Hypocritical nonsense…
Sadly, the House defeated an anti-”same-sex marriage” bill yesterday.
Rep Barney Frank, the homosexual representative from Massachusetts, offered a syrupy comment that homosexuals admire the heterosexual institution of marriage and just want to share it.
There are two things wrong with this statement.
One is the assumption that heterosexuality, which produces children, and homosexuality, which doesn’t, are on a par. I have yet to find a rationale for why people think they are. If the argument that any hierarchy in types of sexuality is discriminatory, and I have heard that wonderfully silly term “heterosexism”, then masturbation, bestiality and polygamy are just as “good” as heterosexuality.
That is nonsense. Society must protect heterosexual marriage because it is the best way to care for children and insure the future of society. Even our current version of the Delphic Oracle, psychlogical studies, affirm that.
Second, Barney Frank is just the respectable “front-man” for the skillful, and well-financed campaign by the homosexual activists to “homosexualize” the sexual life of this country.
This includes substituting the word “partners” for “husband and wife” thereby erasing the obvious need, obvious anyway to anyone who has spent anytime helping to raise children, for a mother and a father, the relentlss portrayal of homosexuals in a positive light possible because of the power of the homosexual community in the media. All male homosexuals are cute and cuddly; all lesbians are cool and hip. The corollary to this is to portray heterosexual men and fathers as boobs, the family as a prison as opposed to the wonderful, exciting world of “careerism”, one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated on the American public since P T Barnum.
The emotional needs of our children are sacrificed on the altar of phoney sexual equality and the penalty for disagrreeing with this position is to be labelled at least “un-cool” or “un-hip” but more probably a “homophobic bigot”.
And if you want a paradigm for the way this whole operation works, consider Marlo Thomas Donahue’s book “Free to Be You and Me”.
The lure was supposed freedom from the rigid world of “sexual sterotypes”; women could become firemen, whoops! sorry!—I should say “firepersons”, and men escape the tyrrany of watching the NFL and become beauticians.
We know where that got us. It was the removal of one set of rules and customs based on nature and the substitution of another set based on ideology and enforced by the type of tyrranny currently running wild in our universities. where young men are told in their orientation programs that they are “potential rapists” and young women become Lesbians Until Graduation and are solicited by the lesbian teachers in the Women’s Studies programs.
Let’s be pellucidly clear about just what the “legitimizing” of homosexuality would mean: Heterosexuality and homosexuality would become competitors not complimentary components.
The degrading of heterosexual relationships by “Vagina Day” tactics would continue. Intergenerational sex would be just around the corner.
Is that wild-eyed hysteria and bigotry?
Not when the ACLU supports NAMBLA, the man-boy love association, and includes in their constitution favoring the lowering of the age of consent for sex. Who does this benefit?
Guess.
Feminism and the homosexual movement have come to represent a ruthless grab for power relying on the guilt felt by people over the treatment of black Americans.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME.
One more time.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME and to try to imply that they are in blatantly dishonest.
“Same-sex marriage” must be stopped dead in its tracks. The argument that this is the denial of a civil right is specious because there is no special right to marriage for homosexuals.
So stow it, Barney.
