Eye Doc
House GOP plans Social Security vote

Since the Senate doesn’t have the guts to work on any kind of an intellegent Social Security reform package, the House Republicans have decided to do it themselves, and hopefully will vote on it sometime this year. The cornerstone of the proposed legislation will be using the existing Social Security surplus to fund private accounts. Even if this goes nowhere, at least the House GOP are coming up with good ideas and trying to act on them, as opposed to their counterparts who have no intellegent ideas on this subject whatsoever. And, it will put the Democrats on record as having voted against a good reform package, which is what the Dems are really afraid of.

House Republican leaders declared Wednesday that they will seek a vote this year on a scaled-back plan to establish Social Security private accounts like those proposed by President Bush.

Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) told reporters after a meeting of House GOP members that the leadership will push a plan to establish private accounts by tapping the Social Security surplus. House GOP Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) said a vote could be held in July or September, when lawmakers return from their summer break.

The GOP leadership’s move marks a significant change in the Social Security debate and, if successful, would lead to the first vote on private accounts in this session of Congress. The decision indicated that the House leadership was ready to press ahead with a vote without assurances of Senate action.

“Politically, people are not as nervous as they used to be,” said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), vice chairman of the House Republican Conference.

Harry Reid resumed his mindless blathering on the issue claiming all sorts of castastrophe should such legislation be passed.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Republicans are “pushing a risky privatization scheme that will weaken Social Security, cut benefits and increase the debt.”

At least he didn’t say “explode the deficit” like Al Gore used to say. I never could quite figure out how you could explode the deficit, but I digress. Now here’s a real rocket scientist for you:

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said, “This plan is going nowhere. To say that they are going to use the surplus to fund private accounts is ridiculous and irresponsible.”

Right Jan, it’s irresponsible, as opposed to say, spending the surplus, which is what the Democrats want to do. How do such dumb, dishonest people actually get elected?

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 12 views | Other posts by Eye Doc

Stumble It!

book mark House GOP plans Social Security vote in del.icio.us | House GOP plans Social Security vote to Slashdot.com | Submit House GOP plans Social Security vote to Digg.com | Submit House GOP plans Social Security vote to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote in Furl | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote in Spurl | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote in Reddit | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote in Tailrank | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote in Newsvine | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote to Yahoo! | Bookmark House GOP plans Social Security vote to Fark

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MND Opinion
Glenn Sacks on men and the world they inhabit Dr. Helen Smith on psychology, family, sex, and metropolis Bernard Chapin: political commentary, men and women Marc H. Rudov on men and women Marty Nemko: men's issues social critic, radio host, columnist Professor Stephen Baskerville on fatherhood and family in America David R. Usher on the gender wars Warner Todd Huston on politics and current events Denise Noe on women, crime, history, and society Carey Roberts on political correctness Jim Kouri: Crime and Security Zvakwana: on Africa and Zimbabwe Dr. Robert Wascher on health and medicine Blogwonks Humorist Doug Powers on society Roger F. Gay on politics and technology, robotics
editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
Site Meter
RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
counter