55KRC.com
Stumble It!
|
|
Sex & Metropolis
Paul Elam
Dr. Tara J. Palmatier
Pelle Billing
Glenn Sacks
Marc H. Rudov
Roger F. Gay
Carey Roberts
Stephen Baskerville
Gordon E. Finley
Amy Alkon
Dr. Helen Smith
Jerry Fino
Shop Amazon and Support MND
Latest NewsWax
Join Our Mailing List
Recent Comments
- Denis on Do men love women more than women love men?
- jon on Do men love women more than women love men?
- larry on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Ray on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- TXM on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Equality Among Men and Women « Divorced Man Site - Empowering divorced and divorcing men on Do men love women more than women love men?
- Randall Shake on Thoughts from a Disordered Mind
- Lola on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Ghost on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- OpPTSD_Jason on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Andre Lieven on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Lally on Sexual Predator Insanity
- Mike S. on Do men love women more than women love men?
- Robert Stevens on Is There Anything Good About Fathers?
- Berny Belair on Young teen girls who want to get pregnant
Search MND
Download PDF Here
Support Our Sponsors!
Please support MND
Subscribe today:
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
October 31st, 2005 at 3:38 pm
People get off of rape and murder ‘convictions’ years after the actual event because of DNA results that have recently become available.
Why not child support????
October 31st, 2005 at 7:43 pm
Simple. Follow the money. When an accused rapist or murderer is exonerated by DNA testing, it relieves the penal system of an expense. The only one who cares that he’s released is the prosecutor, whose conviction stats go down. But when an accused father (note the criminal analog in how he’s treated by the system) is shown not to have sired the child, it threatens that all-important federal subsidy the court gets for fleecing him.
Can’t have that, now. It might become a trend, and endanger the court’s budget.
October 31st, 2005 at 7:49 pm
Its getting very obvious these people dont’ give a damn about children and are all about money, money, money.
November 1st, 2005 at 10:02 am
what really gets my goat, is that they dont want mandatory DNA testing, and yet, they are willing to penalize a man if he cant get one in a timely fashion. of course it takes the moms cooperation to do this, and if she doesnt cooperate he is liable to pay for a period in which she may not be able to tag the real dad. the real dad may not be locatable, and so she gets a big blank spot in support if she lets the innocent man go by letting a test be done… Since there is no punishment for doing this and a monetary punishment for not doing this, you can guess what the outcomes will always be. the mothers will always refuse a test for in the absence of a test, and her cooperation, the dad is who she says it is. whats more is that if this is all found out, she doesnt have to give the money back. So, the bottom line is, that is open season on mens wallets (often through their hearts). no matter what she does, she benifits by doing whats wrong, than by doing whats right.