CHICAGO SUN-TIMES

She knew exaclty what she was doing when she invited him over on his birthday. She should be charged with premetated unwanted conception.

The boy is obviously not Chinese however the mother now calls him “Cha Ching”.

Reportedly, instead of the $500 per month upon which the boy has lived more lavishly than 99% of children in the world, the mother plans to improve his lifestyle even further, spending a total of $600 per month on the boy. The increase will primarily go to baby-sitters, anybody but the father, while mom goes to the spa, Europe, the Carribean, Monaco, and makes frequent trips to see her Beverly Hills plastic surgeon.

Yup, she is a noble saint, and you have to admire her persistence at using a child to cash in on the superior rights bestowed upon her by judges who have no such authority simply for having a vagina.

The boy is obviously not Chinese however the mother now calls him “Cha Ching”.

Reportedly, instead of the $500 per month upon which the boy has lived more lavishly than 99% of children in the world, the mother plans to improve his lifestyle even further, spending a total of $600 per month on the boy. The increase will primarily go to baby-sitters, anybody but the father, while mom goes to the spa, Europe, the Carribean, Monaco, and makes frequent trips to see her Beverly Hills plastic surgeon.

Yup, she is a noble saint, and you have to admire her persistence at using a child to cash in on the superior rights bestowed upon her by judges who have no such authority simply for having a vagina.

Wait a second here. He met her in her 40′s when she was already divorced with a daughter. Though he gave $500 a month and some “gifts” she wanted $11,000 per month. Now she is 50, REMARRIED and a stay at home mom?
I’ll bet the current husband’s nuts have receded back into his body and he is walking on eggshells. What a fool.
She really knows how to work the system AND how she can make the system work for her.

I wonder if the man thinks differently about his country now that he has been scammed out of $381,373. I mean, he may think it is America in name only.

I wonder if the man thinks differently about his country now that he has been scammed out of $381,373. I mean, he may think it is America in name only.

Based on the data the judge should mark his bill “paid in full and then sum”

“For 2004, the newest data available, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that families making $70,200 a year or more will spend a whopping $269,520 to raise a child from birth through age 17. Higher-income families in urban areas in the West spend the most, $284,460.”

Notice how when he was giving her money it was a “gift” to her, even though the money was meant for the child. It just goes to show you how twisted some people get when they get into an adversaral view of parenthood. What a joke our current system is, I think that 100 years from now people are going to look at how we treated each other, over a piece of paper and call us “barbarians”

Notice how when he was giving her money it was a “gift” to her, even though the money was meant for the child. It just goes to show you how twisted some people get when they get into an adversaral view of parenthood. What a joke our current system is, I think that 100 years from now people are going to look at how we treated each other, over a piece of paper and call us “barbarians”

Examples of these financial rapes should be required reading in our nation’s junior high schools………

…… together with similarly predatory vaginamony rulings for those young men, so they are fully aware of the consequences of having sex without birth control, or marriage to an American woman.