Daniel McCarthy
Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist

Why the Universe Is the Way It Is
by Hugh Ross, Ph.D.

In the best-selling science book of all time, author Stephen Hawking explains that no human is content until he or she has complete answers to the following questions: “What is the nature of the universe? What is our place in it and where did it and we come from? Why is it the way it is?”1

From a naturalistic perspective, the pain, death, decay, and evil that humans and all life experience serve no real purpose. They simply are the consequence of a random set of cosmic coincidences that permit life to exist.

In countless publications and lectures, naturalists assert that the Christian explanation for the origin, structure, and history of the universe–a biblical creation model–cannot be correct. For a God as powerful, caring, and knowledgeable as Christians claim would have done a much better job of creating. “Your God has other options,” they complain. “He could have built a better universe, one without these things in it.”

God’s Purposes in Creating
The first fallacy I see in this complaint lies in its assumption that God’s sole purpose in creating the universe would (or should) have been to provide a perfectly comfortable environment for life, and especially human life. A second fallacy lies in the assumption that God intended this creation to be it, the one and only permanent home for humanity, that is, paradise or utopia.

From a Christian perspective, God could have innumerable reasons for creating the universe, Earth, and life in the manner that He did. The Bible declares one reason (number 1 below) and infers at least six others:

to manifest and declare the attributes of God, specifically His glory, power, righteousness, wisdom, involvement, and love;
to provide a suitable habitat for a variety of physical life and for human beings in particular;
to provide the physical and historical context for God the Son to take human form and accomplish the reconciliation of man to God;
to provide the necessary resources for the human race to rapidly develop civilization and technology and to achieve global occupation;
to provide humanity with the best possible viewing platform for discovering–even measuring–expressions of God’s glory, power, wisdom, and love;
to provide a theatre for the rapid (in astronomical terms), efficient conquest of evil; and
to provide human beings with the preparation and training they will need to fulfill their purpose and fully enjoy their reward in the new creation.
While these themes offer some insight into God’s purposes in creation–especially that Christ would accomplish redemption–a complete biblical creation model is unattainable, and no one should be surprised that a few puzzling features remain incompletely explained.

The key point, however, is that everyone should stand utterly amazed that God could create a single universe that can accomplish so much–and with such effectiveness and efficiency. The skeptics who claim they could do better would do well to ponder what it takes to design a universe that can simultaneously fulfill even a few of the purposes mentioned. I sometimes challenge them to try.

Second Creation
A critical distinctive of the biblical creation accounts compared to other creation scenarios is the promise of a new creation that will some day replace the present creation. This new creation goes beyond paradise restored. It is a radically and gloriously different creation governed by different laws and framed by different dimensions.2

According to Romans and Revelation, the universe in which we presently reside awaits deliverance from its current limitations, including the presence of sin and its consequences.3 When God’s plan–through Christ–to redeem the full number of fallen humans has been accomplished, this universe will have fulfilled its purposes. At that time, God will remove this universe from existence and introduce us to a far superior creation. To put it another way, the present creation is the perfect creation for God to accomplish His redemptive plan and to conquer evil in the process. The new creation that will follow is the perfect creation in which God can lavish His love upon those humans who have accepted, by His grace, the offer of redemption from sin.

The promise of a new creation to replace the present creation implies that God has purposes for humanity beyond those listed above. Thus, while human beings are equipped to value and enjoy the present creation, in the new creation they will need new and far greater capacities for love and delight.4 In 1 Corinthians 2:9 the apostle Paul reminds us that “as it is written, no eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him.”

References
Stephen W. Hawking, A Brief History of Time (New York: Bantam Books, 1988), 171.
Hugh Ross, Beyond the Cosmos, 2nd ed. (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1999), 217-28.
Romans 8:18-23; Revelation 20:7-21:8, the Holy Bible, New International Version.
For further study about the new creation see Ross, Beyond the Cosmos, 217-28

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 0 views | Other posts by Daniel McCarthy

Possibly Related Posts:

  • In G… — er — Atheists, We Trust
  • ...
  • Athesists
  • ...
  • US congressman Ellison (D-MN) compares Bush to Hitler
  • ...
  • “War is not the answer”
  • ...
  • It’s Time To Do Away With Christ Centric B.C/A.D System
  • ...

    Stumble It!

    book mark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in del.icio.us | Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist to Slashdot.com | Submit Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist to Digg.com | Submit Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist to BoingBoing.net | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in Furl | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in Spurl | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in Reddit | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in Tailrank | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist in Newsvine | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist to Yahoo! | Bookmark Good Answer to Atheists by and Astrophysicist to Fark

    4 Comments »

    1. Steve Farrell said,

      Daniel:

      Thank you for your wonderful and thoughtful post.

      I was just memorizing 1 Corinthians 2:9 this week.

      God bless you in your studies,

      Steve

      March 14, 2006 at 12:14 pm

    2. Daniel McCarthy said,

      Thanks Steve and Dr. Ross is a true blessing. He has turned a number of top scientists to the Fatih including the late Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry, Dr. Richard Smalley.

      I really need to memorize more scripture.

      Dan

      March 14, 2006 at 4:34 pm

    3. Sara said,

      As an atheist scientist, this totally failed to move me. It starts out with the idea that God is something that needs to be disproved - why? What reason should I have to argue against something there’s really no evidence for?

      April 2, 2006 at 3:00 pm

    4. Daniel McCarthy said,

      Thanks for you response Sara, but you need to justify your atheism. The Kalam Cosmological Argument forcefully argues for a Creator. Also, you could not complete any science projects without assuming the uniformity of the laws of nature, the reliability of your senses, the laws of logic and mathematics along with a number of other brute facts which hold to be true. God is one of those brute facts that is properly basic. You have the right to maintain your view as an atheist; but scientists are supposed to work to uncover truth. Therefore, when you look at the brute facts which are necessary for you to perform your valuable work, you must question why Realism is a view that is essential to abductive thinking. Therefore, why are these Brute facts entwined in our Universe? You can choose to ignore this question, but the existence of these brute facts points to a designer who built these facts into the fabric of our universe. You may Also, you are in the small minority of people in the world. Even in the scientific world, which indoctrinates its adherents on the facts of atheism, most believe in some sort of God.

      Best,
      Dan

      April 19, 2006 at 12:46 pm

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Blogwonks: Free Wordpress Blog Hosting
    BLOGWONKS.com is a your online news and blogging partner. Just click here to sign up for your free WordPress blog. You can customize your blog to display the latest RSS postings from your favorite websites. You can keep a diary, upload images and media files, and even register visitors on your site. Sign up now! It's FREE!
    MND Opinion
    editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
    MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2006 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
    Site Meter
    RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY
    counter