Comments on: Activists Resolve to Expose VAWA’s Inequities http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:53:53 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Eric http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/comment-page-1/#comment-10340 Eric Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:56:12 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/#comment-10340 Why is this silly ad ridiculous, Eric? Simple. The VAWA is bogus and the information to create such an entity is bogus. Why support a bogus entity whether or not men may/can take advantage of it? Why not just support the existing laws that dealt with this stuff from a constitutionally criminally correct posture as opposed to taking it out of criminal law (innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt) to one of civil law that takes what used to be criminal law into the realm of civil law that states one is guilty with the prepoderance of evidence (more that 51%)? It is stupid to support such crap. In fact, I am ashamed of the "signers/supporters" of this crap! If you want to support socialism and communism (where MOST of this crap came from), fine. Just state what you believe and don't hide behind the crap. If you want to support the Republic of the United States of America, don't listen to politicians (not a single one has acknowledged that we are really a Republic and not a deomocracy). Not one has acknowledged that we are a republic in over 50 years or so... We can take back our Republic. Will you? Eric Eric@FIRMncp.com Why is this silly ad ridiculous, Eric?

Simple.

The VAWA is bogus and the information to create such an entity is bogus.

Why support a bogus entity whether or not men may/can take advantage of it?

Why not just support the existing laws that dealt with this stuff from a constitutionally criminally correct posture as opposed to taking it out of criminal law (innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt) to one of civil law that takes what used to be criminal law into the realm of civil law that states one is guilty with the prepoderance of evidence (more that 51%)?

It is stupid to support such crap. In fact, I am ashamed of the “signers/supporters” of this crap!

If you want to support socialism and communism (where MOST of this crap came from), fine. Just state what you believe and don’t hide behind the crap.

If you want to support the Republic of the United States of America, don’t listen to politicians (not a single one has acknowledged that we are really a Republic and not a deomocracy). Not one has acknowledged that we are a republic in over 50 years or so…

We can take back our Republic.

Will you?

Eric

Eric@FIRMncp.com

]]> By: Eric http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/comment-page-1/#comment-10338 Eric Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:38:31 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/#comment-10338 This is a silly and ridiculous "article." Eric This is a silly and ridiculous “article.”

Eric

]]> By: MND BlogWonks » MND NEWSWIRE http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/comment-page-1/#comment-10313 MND BlogWonks » MND NEWSWIRE Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:07:48 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/21/activists-resolve-to-expose-vawas-inequities/#comment-10313 [...] Activists Resolve to Expose VAWA’s Inequities [...] [...] Activists Resolve to Expose VAWA’s Inequities [...]

]]>