TIMESONLINE.co.uk

whraglyn,
What is your point, other than repeating yourself?

Oops: my 2nd post is the intended one…

In re Bill C comments:
Is it not a good thing that this technology would cut in 1/2 the use of fetal tissue, cloned or otherwise?

Such being the case, what is your problem with this effort?

Are you arguing that because men may someday have this option, somehow women would be treated ‘unequally’ in development or use of this tech?

Feminists have claimed for decades that the ‘principle’ of ‘our bodies, ourselves’ excludes men from any legal say in decisions regarding their own offspring.
Why does that rule not apply to men in this case?

In any case, women will be no more SOL than men have been for decades, having no legal rights in decisions regarding how their offspring will be treated, in- or ex- utero.
Certainly, women will be no more SOL than the babies who now die during development, and will die from future use, of current directions in stem cell research.

Is it not a good thing that this technology would cut in 1/2 the use of fetal tissue, cloned or otherwise?

Such being the case, what is your problem with this effort?

Feminists have claimed for decades that the ‘principle’ of ‘our bodies, ourselves’ excludes men from any say in decisions regarding their own offspring.
Why does that rule not apply to men herein?
Are you arguing that because men may someday have this option, somehow women would be treated ‘unequally’ in development or use of this tech?

In any cased, women will be no more SOL than men, who currently have no legal rights in decisions regarding how their offspring will be treated, in- or ex- utero.
No more SOL than the babies who now die during development, and will die from future use, of current directions in stem cell research.

Ok, then what about the half of our population that doesn’t have testes? Are they SOL?