<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Realpolitik of Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:06:21 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: taleswapper</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-10840</link>
		<dc:creator>taleswapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/#comment-10840</guid>
		<description>&quot;For those of you who delve into the media-driven and supported cries of â€œracism,â€ enough already. Since when is it racist to enforce oneâ€™s laws? For anyone to engage in calling an American citizen â€œracistâ€ because he or she has genuine concerns over the social and economic impact of mass immigration into the country displays a racism all their own, and that racism is one of anti-Americanism.&quot;

Ahh, yes. By all means trot out this old saw. Anyone who disagrees with you must be racist and unAmerican.

The US was _founded_ by people who thought unjust laws should be fought. To suggest that a law, by virtue only of it&#039;s exsistance, should therefore be supported is to deny the very basis for the American Revolution.

If the law made left-handers illegal tomorrow; the same arguments would apply, and still be wrong. You or I are not &quot;better&quot; in any measurable way by virtue of being born here. Children born to American parents overseas are still Americans.

Our founders were British subjects who saw a goernment trying to make them second-class citizens based on where they were born. We all know the result. Let&#039;s not make the same mistke that King George did.

Only duties are conferred by citizenship. The duty to vote; the duty to serve on juries and in the Armed Forces; the duties of public office. Rights are conferred by God to all men. See the Declaration

&quot;If all those disparate groups and organizations of â€œnon-whitesâ€ have not figured out what ails the American people most in all this, let me explain it to you: assimilation.&quot;

Fine. So when the majority are Hispanics, you too will wave the Mexican flag and learn a new language? Assimilation happens at the end of a helping hand, not the point of a gun. The real problm is that illegals integrate _too_ well; many are as good or better at exploiting the flaws in our social system. Every door or opportunity we want to close to immigrants should be closed to _everyone_.

&quot;And for all my friends over at La Raza, and the â€œSpanish Councilâ€ for this, and the â€œMexican Caucusâ€ for that, an old saying comes to mind here: â€œAmÃ©rica: lo ama o sale de Ã©l.â€

America stands for freedom for ALL people. If you don&#039;t like it; there&#039;s the door. True American won&#039;t make the mistake of Pastor Martin NiemÃ¶ller, and ignore an afront to the liberty of others. After all, it might be us, next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For those of you who delve into the media-driven and supported cries of â€œracism,â€ enough already. Since when is it racist to enforce oneâ€™s laws? For anyone to engage in calling an American citizen â€œracistâ€ because he or she has genuine concerns over the social and economic impact of mass immigration into the country displays a racism all their own, and that racism is one of anti-Americanism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ahh, yes. By all means trot out this old saw. Anyone who disagrees with you must be racist and unAmerican.</p>
<p>The US was _founded_ by people who thought unjust laws should be fought. To suggest that a law, by virtue only of it&#8217;s exsistance, should therefore be supported is to deny the very basis for the American Revolution.</p>
<p>If the law made left-handers illegal tomorrow; the same arguments would apply, and still be wrong. You or I are not &#8220;better&#8221; in any measurable way by virtue of being born here. Children born to American parents overseas are still Americans.</p>
<p>Our founders were British subjects who saw a goernment trying to make them second-class citizens based on where they were born. We all know the result. Let&#8217;s not make the same mistke that King George did.</p>
<p>Only duties are conferred by citizenship. The duty to vote; the duty to serve on juries and in the Armed Forces; the duties of public office. Rights are conferred by God to all men. See the Declaration</p>
<p>&#8220;If all those disparate groups and organizations of â€œnon-whitesâ€ have not figured out what ails the American people most in all this, let me explain it to you: assimilation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fine. So when the majority are Hispanics, you too will wave the Mexican flag and learn a new language? Assimilation happens at the end of a helping hand, not the point of a gun. The real problm is that illegals integrate _too_ well; many are as good or better at exploiting the flaws in our social system. Every door or opportunity we want to close to immigrants should be closed to _everyone_.</p>
<p>&#8220;And for all my friends over at La Raza, and the â€œSpanish Councilâ€ for this, and the â€œMexican Caucusâ€ for that, an old saying comes to mind here: â€œAmÃ©rica: lo ama o sale de Ã©l.â€</p>
<p>America stands for freedom for ALL people. If you don&#8217;t like it; there&#8217;s the door. True American won&#8217;t make the mistake of Pastor Martin NiemÃ¶ller, and ignore an afront to the liberty of others. After all, it might be us, next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MND BlogWonks &#187; Vincent Fiore</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-10790</link>
		<dc:creator>MND BlogWonks &#187; Vincent Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/02/the-realpolitik-of-immigration/#comment-10790</guid>
		<description>[...] The Realpolitik of Immigration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Realpolitik of Immigration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
