I’m thinking that it’s because men are made to feel guilty of gender social roles prior to the 1970s.

Well speaking from a generation where girls weren’t denied anything, while boys had to endure boy-bashing as a means to gain girls more self respect, I hope my generation will recognize feminist hypocrisy in selectively using issues in marketing all women as “victims” and all men as “villains” to gain billions in tax dollars in federal and state funds to be used for only female interest and women’s issues, and while many men and boys suffer from many of these concerns, the needs of anyone male is ignored.

We can’t continue to let “gender issues” be represented by “feminist” for they have strayed far from the noble goals of equality and mutual respect in becoming a manipulative sexist organization who promote women as underdogs who are morally superior and that all men who are privileged and morally corrupt.

I hope this Duke Rape Case is a wake up call for all fair-minded people in realizing that individuals don’t represent an entire gender.

Crystal Gail Mangum’s story is as flawed as her integrity and character. It has nothing to do with her being a stripper, a female, black, a convict, etc… It’s because it apparently seems that she lied.

Feminism as an ideology defines men as both oppressors and as prey.

This alone is worthy of a Ph.D. thesis on gender-based psychosis. (Suggested title — “All Them Crazy Bitches: The Social Construction of a Whacked-Out Ideology.”)

That was a really cute sleight-of-hand that the 1970’s fems got away with —- using Marxist class warfare language and imposing it on female-male relational politics.

Now our global culture is contaminated with “victim power….” and becoming a victim is the surest route to fame and fortune.

I’ve taken a womenz’ studies class or two, and no feminist professor I’ve met ever liked her mother.