The Colbert Press Club Speech: Biting? Yes. Edgy? You Bet. “Ballsy”? Anything But.

2006-05-02
By

All the folks who think President Bush is the worst thing to come along since Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are still rolling on the floor over Stephen Colbert’s speech at the National Press Club Dinner.

Anti-Bushers are praising Colbert for having the courage to sit eight feet from Bush and finally say to him what everybody wants to, and be funny to boot. Some, including Jon Stewart, are calling his performance “ballsy”, courageous, and whatnot. (others disagree)

Anybody who’s familiar with these National Press Club dinners knows what they’re all about. I remember many years ago watching Don Imus viciously, and yes, somewhat hilariously, dismantle Bill Clinton to his face, and the people who are now wetting themselves over Colbert’s words in front of Bush were angered to the point of irritable bowel syndrome over the vitriol of Imus.

Take Press Club speeches for what they are: roasts. The roastee is a sitting duck, and making jokes about a sitting duck doesn’t require any particular amount of guts or balls, no matter how funny the material may or may not be. Especially as it concerns Bush. Dubya is made out by those who don’t like him as an idiot, a simp, a moron, and a buffoon. If that’s the case, Colbert wasn’t performing a roast – he was, in essence, heckling at an inside-the-beltway version of the Special Olympics. Still not ballsy.

Colbert was in character and hiding behind his TV show persona and doofy newsman, blinded by, well, just about everything, and playing it as if siding with the Bush Administration. In Lib-Land, the latter, of course, would mean that Colbert’s portraying an idiot, which then provided the outlet for the anti-Bush comedy disguised as moronic supporter.

Some have written that Colbert had “brass cojones” for doing the speech. “Daily Show” host Jon Stewart called it “Balls-ilicious“, a word usually reserved for movie reviews in The Advocate.

Traditionally, the speaker at these events provides the bat, and the president provides the crotch. Just for showing up, if anybody has the brass cojones, it’s the president.

In addition, true “ballsy” status would have been achieved had Colbert been himself and launched into a first-person monolog and not played the typical Hollywood “Wizard hiding behind the curtain” routine. This is very common, because if the schtick goes bad in some way (inaccurate, distasteful, etc.), you can just blame it on the character.

But it was not to be, because Colbert is wise enough to know that exposing your true self as a liberal is unwise for a fake newsman. Just ask Dan Rather.

These Press Club dinner speeches do make you appreciate this country just a little more, though. In what other nation could you say these things a mere few feet from its leader? Conversely, in what other nation could you get its leader to show up, year after year, for something he knows will probably be a vicious pounding?

Funny how the left is lionizing Colbert as their new hero, but few, if any, of those same people would allow themselves to be put through that like our presidents do year after year. Every president going into a Press Club dinner knows they’re about to be picked on, beat on, insulted and verbally lashed. That’s ballsy.

—–

Note: If you’re seeing only this post, the entire blog is accessible by clicking here.

7,616 views

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/05/02/doug-powers-64/ BlogWonks » Doug Powers

    [...] The Colbert Press Club Speech: Biting? Yes. Edgy? You Bet. “Ballsy”? Anything But. [...]

  • huh?what?

    Colbert was HIRED to do his persona. Do you not remember the introduction? Clearly you can’t listen, so why should anyone listen to you? And that lame response to your misspelling of cohones (sic)…it isn’t the fact that you typoed an average word – everyone does that – it is the fact that you don’t know how to spell the word and didn’t bother to check. Who wants a commentary from someone too lazy to “look it up?”. If you have never left the U.S., then that might explain it.

    Colbert has gigantic balls for doing that. Very VERY ballsy (sp?). I think it was done in fun, and if you didn’t get the jokes (as they were hilarious)…then reread my first paragraph and it will explain a bunch. It does for me. Maybe you need a laughtrack in order to tell you when to laugh, because it was f’in hilarious and not really directed at the president – it was aimed directly at the press.

    I felt a little sorry for the president – not really. But, I LOVED the f’in smackdown to the press. It was like 68% of America giving them their annual job review, and their assessment was “below expectations – needs improvement”. It rocked.

  • huh?what?

    Colbert was HIRED to do his persona. Do you not remember the introduction? Clearly you can’t listen, so why should anyone listen to you? And that lame response to your misspelling of cohones (sic)…it isn’t the fact that you typoed an average word – everyone does that – it is the fact that you don’t know how to spell the word and didn’t bother to check. Who wants a commentary from someone too lazy to “look it up?”. If you have never left the U.S., then that might explain it.

    Colbert has gigantic balls for doing that. Very VERY ballsy (sp?). I think it was done in fun, and if you didn’t get the jokes (as they were hilarious)…then reread my first paragraph and it will explain a bunch. It does for me. Maybe you need a laughtrack in order to tell you when to laugh, because it was f’in hilarious and not really directed at the president – it was aimed directly at the press.

    I felt a little sorry for the president – not really. But, I LOVED the f’in smackdown to the press. It was like 68% of America giving them their annual job review, and their assessment was “below expectations – needs improvement”. It rocked.

  • fourthwire

    “Colbert has gigantic balls for doing that. Very VERY ballsy”

    If you believe that Colbert has “gigantic balls” for roasting a politician OR the press, then you probably ought to wonder just how much courage it takes to enter a burning building to save someone, pursue a violent criminal through a warehouse complex or take point on a foot patrol near Fallujah.

    What the hell do you think Colbert risked by roasting Bush, or the press? He’s a friggin’ entertainer. When is the last time that you read about an entertainer needing “balls” to do their job?

    Here’s a clue, one that you badly seem to need: It doesn’t take “balls” to entertain, so much as talent, a bit of intelligence, and some good material.

    No doubt some degree of courage is necessary to face an audience, or some cameras, but neither audiences nor cameras can injure you or kill you, except perhaps on a Simpsons’ episode.

    The prison guards in America’s maximum security prisons have more “balls” than entertainers do.

    So when nitwits like you glorify entertainers like Colbert for having “balls”, all that I do my best to limit my response to laughter at your ignorance.

    A fair number of Americans have apparently been raised and educated by their Sony Playstations. And you just might be one of them.

    The thought of educating them just doesn’t seem to be worth the effort.

  • fourthwire

    “Colbert has gigantic balls for doing that. Very VERY ballsy”

    If you believe that Colbert has “gigantic balls” for roasting a politician OR the press, then you probably ought to wonder just how much courage it takes to enter a burning building to save someone, pursue a violent criminal through a warehouse complex or take point on a foot patrol near Fallujah.

    What the hell do you think Colbert risked by roasting Bush, or the press? He’s a friggin’ entertainer. When is the last time that you read about an entertainer needing “balls” to do their job?

    Here’s a clue, one that you badly seem to need: It doesn’t take “balls” to entertain, so much as talent, a bit of intelligence, and some good material.

    No doubt some degree of courage is necessary to face an audience, or some cameras, but neither audiences nor cameras can injure you or kill you, except perhaps on a Simpsons’ episode.

    The prison guards in America’s maximum security prisons have more “balls” than entertainers do.

    So when nitwits like you glorify entertainers like Colbert for having “balls”, all that I do my best to limit my response to laughter at your ignorance.

    A fair number of Americans have apparently been raised and educated by their Sony Playstations. And you just might be one of them.

    The thought of educating them just doesn’t seem to be worth the effort.

  • huh?what?

    That was hilarious. So you are relating the job of a firefighter to an entertainer? What, do you have a long list job titles in order from ballsy to non-ballsy? I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to the situation…and in this case it is the press.

    If you haven’t seen the press tiptoeing around the president for the past 5 years, well, I am not sure there is much to say. Being a fairly popular “entertainer”, risking his career, and blasting them in public on their complacency, all the while uncomfortably reminding them that there is a war going on while they sip their champagne – is very ballsy indeed. Why do you think the blogs are full? Because no one has had an opportunity to do that in such a public format.

    But, the smart one (not lGnraNt like me) resorts to name calling…right?

    I love the Sony Playstation remark – never played one. I will let you go, sounds like your hand needs to do some overtime.

    Love,
    The nitwit who can’t figure out the giant list from top to bottom of ballsy things to do and say, but HAS figured out how to relate things based on situations.

  • huh?what?

    That was hilarious. So you are relating the job of a firefighter to an entertainer? What, do you have a long list job titles in order from ballsy to non-ballsy? I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to the situation…and in this case it is the press.

    If you haven’t seen the press tiptoeing around the president for the past 5 years, well, I am not sure there is much to say. Being a fairly popular “entertainer”, risking his career, and blasting them in public on their complacency, all the while uncomfortably reminding them that there is a war going on while they sip their champagne – is very ballsy indeed. Why do you think the blogs are full? Because no one has had an opportunity to do that in such a public format.

    But, the smart one (not lGnraNt like me) resorts to name calling…right?

    I love the Sony Playstation remark – never played one. I will let you go, sounds like your hand needs to do some overtime.

    Love,
    The nitwit who can’t figure out the giant list from top to bottom of ballsy things to do and say, but HAS figured out how to relate things based on situations.

  • huh?what?

    Oh yeah…lame LAME site. Won’t be back!

  • huh?what?

    Oh yeah…lame LAME site. Won’t be back!

  • fourthwire

    “So you are relating the job of a firefighter to an entertainer?”

    No. I was pointing out that entertainers are likely only considered to “require giant balls” by individuals with lukewarm IQ’s or lower.

    Individuals that place their own lives in danger through acts related to simply performing their duties need “balls”.

    Entertainers do nothing of the sort.

    “What, do you have a long list job titles in order from ballsy to non-ballsy?”

    No, I don’t need one….. although with your impressive cognitive capabilities as demonstrated so far, I could see why you might.

    “I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to the situation…and in this case it is the press.”

    And I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to common sense and at least a basic grounding in reality.

    “If you haven’t seen the press tiptoeing around the president for the past 5 years, well, I am not sure there is much to say.”

    Press tiptoeing around the president? The press have been every bit as aggressive around the president during the last five years as the press have been during the previous several decades….

    ….. whether you noticed or not. Which idjit told you that the press has been “tiptoeing” around the president?

    “Being a fairly popular “entertainer”, risking his career, and blasting them in public on their complacency, all the while uncomfortably reminding them that there is a war going on while they sip their champagne – is very ballsy indeed.”

    Risking his career for roasting a political figure at a Press Club luncheon? Are you simple? Do you have any clue how long comedians have been roasting politicians at Press Club luncheons?

    Roasting Bush required very little in the way of “balls”…. and anyone even tenuously grounded in reality ought to understand that point.

    Can you name the last comedian who lost his job for “roasting” a politician at a Press Club luncheon?

    No, I didn’t believe that you could……

    Here’s another clue, and one which you badly seem to need: It is unlikely that Bush, anyone in his administration or Congress, not to mention the vast majority of Americans who can manage to either watch or read the news CAN forget that “there is a war going on”.

    And if you want those luncheons to stop serving champagne, you will have to take that matter up with the caterer.

    Perhaps you feel that Bush, Congress, the press and anyone remotely suspected of politics be forced to eat MRE’s and drink purified water, but such a measure would be neither practical nor acceptable to virtually ALL politicians and the press.

    The caterer probably would be displeased, to boot.

    The vermin detonating IED’s in their attempts to kill American troops and Iraqis don’t give a rat’s ass whether Bush and the press drank champagne at the Press Club luncheon…. only veritable geniuses like yourself would think that it’s any real issue.

    “Why do you think the blogs are full?”

    Because blogs provide a superior means to participate in discussions and exchanges of opinions using technology that has only been made available in recent years comes immediately to mind……

    “But, the smart one (not lGnraNt like me) resorts to name calling…right?”

    Actually, it’s rather difficult to read your post and NOT determine that you are simple.

    “I love the Sony Playstation remark – never played one.”

    I guessed that you were educated by one based on your abject cluelessness, nothing more.

    “Love,
    The nitwit who can’t figure out the giant list from top to bottom of ballsy things to do and say, but HAS figured out how to relate things based on situations.”

    You just continue working on how to “relate” things.

    And don’t worry about being mistaken for intelligent life if you believe that a comedian’s career can be put in danger by roasting a politician during a Press Club luncheon.

  • fourthwire

    “So you are relating the job of a firefighter to an entertainer?”

    No. I was pointing out that entertainers are likely only considered to “require giant balls” by individuals with lukewarm IQ’s or lower.

    Individuals that place their own lives in danger through acts related to simply performing their duties need “balls”.

    Entertainers do nothing of the sort.

    “What, do you have a long list job titles in order from ballsy to non-ballsy?”

    No, I don’t need one….. although with your impressive cognitive capabilities as demonstrated so far, I could see why you might.

    “I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to the situation…and in this case it is the press.”

    And I like to make my judgements IN RELATION to common sense and at least a basic grounding in reality.

    “If you haven’t seen the press tiptoeing around the president for the past 5 years, well, I am not sure there is much to say.”

    Press tiptoeing around the president? The press have been every bit as aggressive around the president during the last five years as the press have been during the previous several decades….

    ….. whether you noticed or not. Which idjit told you that the press has been “tiptoeing” around the president?

    “Being a fairly popular “entertainer”, risking his career, and blasting them in public on their complacency, all the while uncomfortably reminding them that there is a war going on while they sip their champagne – is very ballsy indeed.”

    Risking his career for roasting a political figure at a Press Club luncheon? Are you simple? Do you have any clue how long comedians have been roasting politicians at Press Club luncheons?

    Roasting Bush required very little in the way of “balls”…. and anyone even tenuously grounded in reality ought to understand that point.

    Can you name the last comedian who lost his job for “roasting” a politician at a Press Club luncheon?

    No, I didn’t believe that you could……

    Here’s another clue, and one which you badly seem to need: It is unlikely that Bush, anyone in his administration or Congress, not to mention the vast majority of Americans who can manage to either watch or read the news CAN forget that “there is a war going on”.

    And if you want those luncheons to stop serving champagne, you will have to take that matter up with the caterer.

    Perhaps you feel that Bush, Congress, the press and anyone remotely suspected of politics be forced to eat MRE’s and drink purified water, but such a measure would be neither practical nor acceptable to virtually ALL politicians and the press.

    The caterer probably would be displeased, to boot.

    The vermin detonating IED’s in their attempts to kill American troops and Iraqis don’t give a rat’s ass whether Bush and the press drank champagne at the Press Club luncheon…. only veritable geniuses like yourself would think that it’s any real issue.

    “Why do you think the blogs are full?”

    Because blogs provide a superior means to participate in discussions and exchanges of opinions using technology that has only been made available in recent years comes immediately to mind……

    “But, the smart one (not lGnraNt like me) resorts to name calling…right?”

    Actually, it’s rather difficult to read your post and NOT determine that you are simple.

    “I love the Sony Playstation remark – never played one.”

    I guessed that you were educated by one based on your abject cluelessness, nothing more.

    “Love,
    The nitwit who can’t figure out the giant list from top to bottom of ballsy things to do and say, but HAS figured out how to relate things based on situations.”

    You just continue working on how to “relate” things.

    And don’t worry about being mistaken for intelligent life if you believe that a comedian’s career can be put in danger by roasting a politician during a Press Club luncheon.

  • Jdalla

    From a comletely unbiased standpoint (yes I do have some opinion in the matter; no I’m not going to bring it up), both of the above posters resort to some name calling in their posts. However, as far as the fundementals of logical argument go, huh? what? has made a stronger case. It appears fourth wire is more motivated by beliefs to try to appear like the rational side. Just an outside observation, not meant as an attack or a taking of sides.

  • Jdalla

    From a comletely unbiased standpoint (yes I do have some opinion in the matter; no I’m not going to bring it up), both of the above posters resort to some name calling in their posts. However, as far as the fundementals of logical argument go, huh? what? has made a stronger case. It appears fourth wire is more motivated by beliefs to try to appear like the rational side. Just an outside observation, not meant as an attack or a taking of sides.

  • fourthwire

    jdalla, you are welcome to your opinion. In fact, I resort to “name calling” when someone posts stupidly (as the other individual has done).

    I don’t believe that complete morons should be encouraged to post. They may or may not be embarrassed when they are told that they are complete morons, but at least I have done my part to keep them informed.

    Indeed, I am “motivated by beliefs”. I believe that treating complete morons politely represents errors of judgement.

    If you actually believe that the moron has made “a stronger case”, then you might be able to tell me just how much “balls” it takes to roast a politician at a Press Club dinner.

    For that matter, can you name the last comedian FIRED for doing precisely that?

    No, I don’t believe so.

    Perhaps you’re simply not much brighter than your buddy….;-)

    Just an outside observation – not meant as an attack or taking of sides.

  • fourthwire

    jdalla, you are welcome to your opinion. In fact, I resort to “name calling” when someone posts stupidly (as the other individual has done).

    I don’t believe that complete morons should be encouraged to post. They may or may not be embarrassed when they are told that they are complete morons, but at least I have done my part to keep them informed.

    Indeed, I am “motivated by beliefs”. I believe that treating complete morons politely represents errors of judgement.

    If you actually believe that the moron has made “a stronger case”, then you might be able to tell me just how much “balls” it takes to roast a politician at a Press Club dinner.

    For that matter, can you name the last comedian FIRED for doing precisely that?

    No, I don’t believe so.

    Perhaps you’re simply not much brighter than your buddy….;-)

    Just an outside observation – not meant as an attack or taking of sides.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/05/07/richard-cohen-is-right-oh-the-horror/ BlogWonks » Richard Cohen is Right – Oh the Horror

    [...] I just thought I’d post this for all the miffed people who I’ve heard from concerning my blog commentary that Colbert’s standup routine was anything but “ballsy” or courageous. Yes, some liberals agree. [...]

  • http://www.ibsarticles.com/irritable-bowel-syndrome-solution-to-americas-gas-crisis-found/ Irritable Bowel Syndrome Treatment – Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Solution to America’s Gas Crisis Found

    [...] The Colbert Press Club Speech: Biting? Yes. Edgy? You Bet. …Men’s News Daily, CA - May 3, 2006… his face, and the people who are now wetting themselves over Colbert s words in front of Bush were angered to the point of irritable bowel syndrome over the … [...]






Search