• Log In
• Register
• Find Password

• home
• rss
• submission guidelines
• masthead
• letter from the editor
• mra principles and goals
• mnd lifestyles

How to survive the coming food shortage.

14 Responses to “bloomberg.com”

1. 
   1
   Obtestor Says:
   May 31st, 2006 at 9:57 pm

   You just know the blood-suckers in the racketeering divorce industry were planning this for a long time! As men avoided the vagina ideology terrorist divorce court system by simply not marrying, blood-sucking lawyers were losing their ability to steal.

   It is no longer safe for men to have any relationship at any level with a female in western civilization.

2. 
   2
   Denis Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 6:12 am

   Yup. This is all breeding the conditions for a revolution, perhaps a violent one someday. This is totalitarianism and men will one day rebel as the noose becomes unacceptable.

   Like Shakespeare once said, “kill all the lawyers”…

3. 
   3
   DcFather Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 7:01 am

   First they destroy marriage and family by turning it into a female victimology cult and a huge money grab for sleazy lawyers. Then, as society crumbles in a plethora of new social maladies, and men especially retreat from marriage in an effort to avoid the racketeering shakedown of divorce, rather than honorably retreating from the assault on children and family, the greedy bastards are after those who have wisely escaped their net, all in the name of “innocent” women and THEIR children, of course.

   Next, as the wiser men among us avoid “cohabiting” to avoid yet another trap set for those who seek any semblance of familialal life, eventually they will target “intimate partners”, in other words, any man having sex with any woman, marriage or not, cohabiting or not, will be viewed as somebody whose assets must be seized whenever the woman deems it convenient, along with a hefty fee for those who feed off of the destruction of families, or of anything resembling a family, as the case may now be.

   The only end in sight, short of a societal downfall, is for women to rise above the cult of victimolgy en masse. Since such women with decency are increasingly scarce, that seems unlikely, especially since they are the sort to not demand reform and are more likely to go about daily life and simply not cash in at a nearby gender court of law.

   The best bet for men may be in hopes of development of a new drug, an anti-viagra of sorts, whereby men can enjoy what remains of liberty, without fear of being exploited and destroyed for having any affiliation with any female whatsoever. At that point, the family destruction business will either have to finally retreat and allow normal human relationships to exist without fear of lawyers, or else a tax on being male will be introduced, such as has already been attempted in Sweden.

4. 
   4
   Obtestor Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 7:44 am

   They have perverted the marriage contract, so as men avoid the marriage contract they want to create a legal climate where women are entitled to one man’s productivity (or multiple men) and property absent such a contract. That means any polluted female could just show up at the front door to some unsuspecting male target and then claim the male’s property and productivity under the vagina ideology’s concept of relationship entitlement. We are moving to the point where the arrogance of women has reached such a level of insanity that they believe any interaction between the vagina and men requires men to redistribute their property to the female.

   On a positive note, the marriage boycott by men of the satanic definition of family in the west is obviously working. That is positive. How do we defend against this next round of looting by the vagina ideology terrorists? I think that it all boils down to men not allowing women to use their address. If women can’t send mail to the victimized male’s residence (where the man is potentially a victim immediately after forming any relationship at any level with a western female), it is obviously not her residence. Residency is the key to the next wave of looting by the criminal divorce syndicate. They know that a predatory female that a male victim has never met would have no chance in court to steal from the male absent a residency standard.

   So men need to ensure that no female resides on their property full time. If men allow that, male property becomes female property through the racketeering and corrupt organizations known as the divorce syndicate where you no longer even have to be “legally” married for such looting to take place.

5. 
   5
   rast4406 Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 7:56 am

   the marriage contract

   I think I’ve probably posted this before, but I’ve never understood why, when I commit myself to a woman, I need to ask the government’s permission to do so.

   My commitment is to HER, not some idiotic bureaucrat behind a desk.

   Seeking permission to marry from a government that I do not trust is simply signing a contract that, should she decide she’s had enough of me, she can claim ridiculous sums of cash and prizes when she has me arrested on some trumped-up DV charge.

6. 
   6
   Denis Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 8:28 am

   It’s all part of a strategy of incrementalism. Since feminism has come into American life there has been a steady intrusion into all aspects of the citizenry’s (or are we now subjects?)life. Someday I predict the government will have the authority to decide when someone’s life should come to an end. People won’t live out their natural lives; the government will say you’ve had your time but you must leave now. Sounds crazy but how many predicted or expected today’s Orwellian world?

7. 
   7
   Obtestor Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 8:55 am

   The marriage contract is supposed to give couples that marry special rights in our country and marriage produced children for the state, one of the primary responsibilities of the citizen.

   That very basic legal concept of reward has been perversely inverted into a satanic punishment for men who marry. Feminism is satanism.

   I predict rapid, draconian political change on the horizon. When it comes, head for the hills.

8. 
   8
   roger Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 9:02 am

   Guys,
   Its time to go back to what our parents TRIED to teach us.
   (Remember those earlyl moral teachings?)
   And that is, you shouldnt screw around before marriage.
   As we all know, it leads to problems…and as evidence in the article above, the problems are only getting deeper.

   Everybody knows that sexuality is a natural drive, in both men and women. However, statistically, only men get left with the bill. They are simply starting to formalize, with legislation, that all sex must be paid for.

9. 
   9
   rast4406 Says:
   June 1st, 2006 at 10:47 am

   The marriage contract is supposed to give couples that marry special rights in our country and marriage produced children for the state, one of the primary responsibilities of the citizen.

   Two things:

   1) Why is the government involved AT ALL in an intimate relationship I have with a woman? Why do we naturally assume that we need a governmentally-sponsored event for me to commit myself to a woman?

   2) I don’t buy that my primary responsibility as a citizen is to procreate. That’s ridiculous.

10. 
    10
    Denis Says:
    June 1st, 2006 at 1:08 pm

    I agree. Government today is monstrously large, invasive, and power hungry….every aspect of our lives are regulated and/or taxed….and the huge irony is that we are expending great treasure from the taxpayers as well as the lives of our fighting men to provide an opportunity for freedom to a people that overwhelmingly dislike or hate us outright, while we turn our own people (overwhelmingly males) into slaves…..America is f***ed up in a major way and the only hope is for a political earthquake or a revolution……the government has become our masters, it is out of control, it is dangerously totalitarian…..

11. 
    11
    Obtestor Says:
    June 1st, 2006 at 2:24 pm

    Rast, what else is marriage for in regards to the “state”? To procreate. That is why married people get more tax breaks than single people. Even if single people have kids, they still don’t get the tax breaks that married people do. Why do you think homosexuals are so desperate to marry? They want the perks. That is what government is supposed to do: provide a safe environment for families to take root, produce children to replace populations of the state, and pay taxes for services.

    Since feminist satanism took over America, the family has been redefined as a venue of exploitation of women and must be destroyed. Fathers cannot be trusted by the communist state to care for children, and they really don’t want fathers ‘teaching’ children masculine and moral ideals. American feminist satanism has shifted the ‘family’ into a new definition recognized in legal circles and the ’state’:

    One woman + child or children = family.

    Since men have picked up on this racket, they have boycotted marriage, thus the redefinition of the law to allow any feminist satanist the ability to ‘divorce’ any man she encounters regardless of reason without signing a marriage contract or participating in traditional ceremonies that would hint to the feminist satanist having any responsibility in the marriage itself.

    It wasn’t so long ago that all people had to do to declare they were married was to write their names down together in a family bible. Traditional American families all had bibles like those. Everyone in the community recognized that family bible as the marriage contract for those that could not afford a traditional ceremony or were too far away from getting it done by a church or priest. Government at that time was never involved in marriage and never would have dared get involved.

    Since satanic feminism arrived on the scene in America in 1973 and the vagina ideology’s murder of God shortly thereafter, what we have today is simply the product of an evil ideology. American feminism which is satanism is derived from the former Soviet Union. Family courts are all built using the foundations of the old Soviet. American women who think they are men is also derived from the gender exploitation agenda of the former Soviet as well. It was never American and never will be. The people are deceived right now.

    The only way for men today to be safe from this system of terror is to stay isolated from it and wait for it to self-destruct (lobbing in some parting shots when it happens is optional).

12. 
    12
    rast4406 Says:
    June 1st, 2006 at 6:35 pm

    Well, Ob, we agree on feminism being one of the more evil things we’ve accepted and encouraged along the way.

    Having said that, I still don’t buy into the thought that one of my primary responsibilities as a citizen is to make children. I’ll agree that there are a few teeny tiny perks to having children, but I suspect they are (now) mainly a hook whereby men are rooked into forfeiting the most productive years of their lives to an ex-wife.

    That has little (if anything) to do with marriage.

13. 
    13
    Obtestor Says:
    June 1st, 2006 at 10:58 pm

    Rast, what else would government marriage entitlements desire in return but children, stable society and payment of taxes?

    The modern definition of marriage has become perverse. We are in complete agreement on that point. I have been saying all along that the marriage contract is junk law. That is why I personally have boycotted marriage and children and do my best to try and convince every other man I meet to do the same for their own wellbeing.

    That said, the strength of the original marriage contract was recognized by the state as a husband and wife producing offspring (the obvious biologically proven outcome).

    Today the state conducts replacement population activities using illegal immigrants. Remember how the satanic feminists said that “divorce” and “abortion” would solve all welfare problems in the United States?

    We have been conned on a level unprecedented in human history. We are being replaced with people from the 4th world that have no stake and no loyalty to the United States. That is where our posterity is going. It is being done so that the controlling religion in the United States can celebrate the destruction of the American heterosexual male, and that religion, the only religion with political powwer in the United States, is goddess worship, or in its public name, feminism.

    It is all about vagina worship, the worship of the goddess. That is what Dan Brown’s Da’Vinci Code movie is about too. Instead of worshipping a male icon like Jesus, now the west has to worship Mary Magdalene. It all fits. Everything being thrown at us is all about goddess worship now.

    Someone needs to explain to feminists that they are not gods. They are mortal human beings that will die when they get old and worms will eat their bones when they do. They will all turn ugly long before that, however, because American women love to fill their fat faces down at Taco Bell. Even if men wanted to, how could we ever worship something that ugly?

14. 
    14
    rast4406 Says:
    June 3rd, 2006 at 6:36 am

    Ob –

    I’ve enjoyed your posts for quite a while now, but I’m pretty much over reading/responding to them. Not so very much because we disagree, but rather because you live in a scary, paranoid and beligerant world.

    Where you see nation/worldwide consipiracy and planning, I see simple self-interest run amok.

    Where you find some secret meaning in a book written by some demon-spawn of satan, I read a work whereby the author neatly weaves history with fictions which, all told, add up to a few days of entertainment.

    But let me thank you for reminding me what my marriage was like.

    Living with paranoia is difficult.

    - Rast

Leave a Reply