Charles Gibson is either clueless, or lying about gay marriage

2006-06-06
By

Even though the majority of Americans polled support a ban on same sex marriage, and 45 out of 50 states have already banned it, Charles Gibson of ABC World News Tonight claimed on the air that the American public is evenly split on the issue.

A new ABC News poll found that by a 22-point margin — 58 to 36 percent — a solid majority of Americans believe “same-sex marriage should be illegal,” yet, on Monday’s World News Tonight, ABC anchor Charles Gibson declared that “the polls show Americans are fairly evenly split on this issue.” ABCNews.com headlined its story, “Most Oppose Gay Marriage; Fewer Back an Amendment,” and reporter Jake Tapper pointed out how “forty-five of fifty states have passed either constitutional amendments or laws banning same-sex marriage, including in Democratic-leaning states Oregon and California.” Nonetheless, a seemingly befuddled Gibson asked George Stephanopoulos: “Why does the White House think this is a political winner for the President if indeed we’re split?” Stephanopoulos explained that “the number of Americans who are strongly opposed to gay marriage is more than twice the size of the number who are strongly for it, and that group of voters who want to block gay marriage is three times as likely to vote on the issue.”

Either Gibson is spinning in an attempt to make supporters of a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage look like extremists, or he is really out of touch with the American people. In either case, he comes off looking like an idiot.

24 views

  • Sean

    If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?

  • Sean

    If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?

  • Sean

    If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?

  • Sean

    If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?

  • fourthwire

    “If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?”

    Why would a poll concerning skin color and any attendant government actions concerning individuals of different skin color be comparable to a poll concerning sexual preferences and any attendant government actions concerning homosexual individuals?

    Individuals are BORN with various skin colors – they have essentially NO choice in the matter, and should not be discriminated against on that basis alone.

    On the other hand, homosexuality is a BEHAVIORAL CHOICE for a minority of individuals. Don’t expect me to lose any sleep over THEIR “civil rights”.

  • fourthwire

    “If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?”

    Why would a poll concerning skin color and any attendant government actions concerning individuals of different skin color be comparable to a poll concerning sexual preferences and any attendant government actions concerning homosexual individuals?

    Individuals are BORN with various skin colors – they have essentially NO choice in the matter, and should not be discriminated against on that basis alone.

    On the other hand, homosexuality is a BEHAVIORAL CHOICE for a minority of individuals. Don’t expect me to lose any sleep over THEIR “civil rights”.

  • fourthwire

    “If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?”

    Why would a poll concerning skin color and any attendant government actions concerning individuals of different skin color be comparable to a poll concerning sexual preferences and any attendant government actions concerning homosexual individuals?

    Individuals are BORN with various skin colors – they have essentially NO choice in the matter, and should not be discriminated against on that basis alone.

    On the other hand, homosexuality is a BEHAVIORAL CHOICE for a minority of individuals. Don’t expect me to lose any sleep over THEIR “civil rights”.

  • fourthwire

    “If Americans were polled regarding inter-racial marriage, and a majority voted against it, should the government act on their vote, and disallow inter-racial marriage?”

    Why would a poll concerning skin color and any attendant government actions concerning individuals of different skin color be comparable to a poll concerning sexual preferences and any attendant government actions concerning homosexual individuals?

    Individuals are BORN with various skin colors – they have essentially NO choice in the matter, and should not be discriminated against on that basis alone.

    On the other hand, homosexuality is a BEHAVIORAL CHOICE for a minority of individuals. Don’t expect me to lose any sleep over THEIR “civil rights”.

  • Sean

    Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?

  • Sean

    Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?

  • Sean

    Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?

  • Sean

    Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?

  • fourthwire

    Certainly not in my state, it isn’t.

  • fourthwire

    Certainly not in my state, it isn’t.

  • fourthwire

    Certainly not in my state, it isn’t.

  • fourthwire

    Certainly not in my state, it isn’t.

  • Obtestor

    [Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?]

    Sodomy used to be illegal in the United States when America was a moral country. Then two things happened. First, the homosexual lobby began brow-beating the American Medical Association into removing homosexuality from the DSM as a mental deficiency. The AMA caved and gave the homosexuals what they wanted. Second, a pair of homosexuals in Texas got caught in the act of sodomy by police and were arrested. Some say this was intentional to get such a case in court and then run it up the appeals chain to the United States Supreme Court, which is exactly what happened. The USSC ruled on the case and said that sodomy was not illegal.

    This is what created the perversion in law and governance in America that we now see today.

    None of the above has anything to do with “marriage” however. The homosexual lobby wants special rights to become married, but hopefully we can see the Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution enacted before that nation-destroying agenda is realised.

  • Obtestor

    [Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?]

    Sodomy used to be illegal in the United States when America was a moral country. Then two things happened. First, the homosexual lobby began brow-beating the American Medical Association into removing homosexuality from the DSM as a mental deficiency. The AMA caved and gave the homosexuals what they wanted. Second, a pair of homosexuals in Texas got caught in the act of sodomy by police and were arrested. Some say this was intentional to get such a case in court and then run it up the appeals chain to the United States Supreme Court, which is exactly what happened. The USSC ruled on the case and said that sodomy was not illegal.

    This is what created the perversion in law and governance in America that we now see today.

    None of the above has anything to do with “marriage” however. The homosexual lobby wants special rights to become married, but hopefully we can see the Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution enacted before that nation-destroying agenda is realised.

  • Obtestor

    [Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?]

    Sodomy used to be illegal in the United States when America was a moral country. Then two things happened. First, the homosexual lobby began brow-beating the American Medical Association into removing homosexuality from the DSM as a mental deficiency. The AMA caved and gave the homosexuals what they wanted. Second, a pair of homosexuals in Texas got caught in the act of sodomy by police and were arrested. Some say this was intentional to get such a case in court and then run it up the appeals chain to the United States Supreme Court, which is exactly what happened. The USSC ruled on the case and said that sodomy was not illegal.

    This is what created the perversion in law and governance in America that we now see today.

    None of the above has anything to do with “marriage” however. The homosexual lobby wants special rights to become married, but hopefully we can see the Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution enacted before that nation-destroying agenda is realised.

  • Obtestor

    [Is being homosexual a criminal offense in the States?]

    Sodomy used to be illegal in the United States when America was a moral country. Then two things happened. First, the homosexual lobby began brow-beating the American Medical Association into removing homosexuality from the DSM as a mental deficiency. The AMA caved and gave the homosexuals what they wanted. Second, a pair of homosexuals in Texas got caught in the act of sodomy by police and were arrested. Some say this was intentional to get such a case in court and then run it up the appeals chain to the United States Supreme Court, which is exactly what happened. The USSC ruled on the case and said that sodomy was not illegal.

    This is what created the perversion in law and governance in America that we now see today.

    None of the above has anything to do with “marriage” however. The homosexual lobby wants special rights to become married, but hopefully we can see the Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution enacted before that nation-destroying agenda is realised.






Search