Comments on: ap http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:12:59 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: SAM http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/comment-page-1/#comment-13606 SAM Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:29:04 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/#comment-13606 The family court judge is the criminal. The law is an abomination against men. Let the judge try walking a mile in my shoes and see how far he gets before he cops an attitude. The family court judge is the criminal. The law is an abomination against men. Let the judge try walking a mile in my shoes and see how far he gets before he cops an attitude.

]]> By: DcFather http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/comment-page-1/#comment-13499 DcFather Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:25:15 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/#comment-13499 <i>"I don't know how many judges and staff members have to be murdered before we as a society acknowledge this is dangerous work," Berry said.</i> What person with any sense at all would believe that taking children from fathers who have done nothing wrong, then using that as an excuse to take his money would not be <i>"dangerous work"</i>? Frankly, I don't know how many judges <i>"have to be murdered before we as a society"</i> force them to stop destroying families as an excuse to seize the money they want so badly. “I don’t know how many judges and staff members have to be murdered before we as a society acknowledge this is dangerous work,” Berry said.

What person with any sense at all would believe that taking children from fathers who have done nothing wrong, then using that as an excuse to take his money would not be “dangerous work”?

Frankly, I don’t know how many judges “have to be murdered before we as a society” force them to stop destroying families as an excuse to seize the money they want so badly.

]]> By: DcFather http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/comment-page-1/#comment-13498 DcFather Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:06:41 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/#comment-13498 <i>"The ability of the judiciary to determine the rule of law without fear or favor is an indispensable prerequisite to our democratic society," Specter said when the bill was introduced.</i> Well then Senator, drop the <b>favor</b> and there will be nothing to <b>fear</b>. I know, I know, the return on investment is greater to increase security rather than to dispense justice fairly and equally. “The ability of the judiciary to determine the rule of law without fear or favor is an indispensable prerequisite to our democratic society,” Specter said when the bill was introduced.

Well then Senator, drop the favor and there will be nothing to fear. I know, I know, the return on investment is greater to increase security rather than to dispense justice fairly and equally.

]]> By: roger http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/comment-page-1/#comment-13460 roger Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:31:07 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/06/15/ap-478/#comment-13460 "The ability of the judiciary to determine the rule of law without fear or favor is an indispensable prerequisite to our democratic society," However, when the rule of law blatantly discriminates against one group - as is statistically evident in custody cases - the people have an obligation to 'send a message'. Unfortunately - when the messages that are being sent are not being listened to (shared parenting, for example) then the people need to draw attention, one way or another, to the completely bogus and dangerous family court system in this country. Yes - it is dangerous work - particularly when men are overtly discriminated against, as is obvious by even the weakest statistical analysis. EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW?? Now THAT is a crock if there ever was one. “The ability of the judiciary to determine the rule of law without fear or favor is an indispensable prerequisite to our democratic society,”

However, when the rule of law blatantly discriminates against one group – as is statistically evident in custody cases – the people have an obligation to ’send a message’. Unfortunately – when the messages that are being sent are not being listened to (shared parenting, for example) then the people need to draw attention, one way or another, to the completely bogus and dangerous family court system in this country.

Yes – it is dangerous work – particularly when men are overtly discriminated against, as is obvious by even the weakest statistical analysis.

EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW??
Now THAT is a crock if there ever was one.

]]>