Goldwater, McCain, and Indentured Servitude

2006-07-09
By

Don Goldwater raised the ire of Republican candidate John McCain last week by suggesting that illegal immigrants should be imprisoned and have to help build a wall to stop Mexico from mass exportation of its poor and criminal citizens.

Goldwater is champing for a term as Governor of Arizona. He correctly asserts that foreigners who intentionally go out of their way to violate immigration laws have committed crimes, should be incarcerated for a period of time, and have to work to pay the costs of their incarceration.

Goldwater cites “tried and tested, effective and accepted practices” dealing with convicted non-violent felons in the penal system.

McCain, a leading Republicrat who confidently expects a presidential nomination from whatever party would have him, feels it is “deeply offensive” to do this to criminals, but only if they are from Mexico.
McCain is a decade too late opposing this notion. He supported forced labor camps when he voted for passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Act of 1996. We have been doing this since 1996 to divorced fathers, who for no reason of their own fall behind on child support, and find their way into permanent peonage working for state prison labor camps.

Prisoners make license plates, handle airline reservations, make military tents and garb, and just about anything else the state can think of at the bargain wage of only 25-cents per hour, under the auspices of Correctional Systems, Inc (CSI), which is America’s largest private prison contractor.

If one is really a criminal, this is a good idea as long as government isn’t competing unfairly with private businesses (which it does). But, if one happens to be a divorced father who is merely unable to earn what some bureaucrat imagines he should, PROWA is an unconstitutional form of eternal slavery.

As if supporting slavery is not bad enough, McCain co-sponsored S.1227 in 1999, in an attempt to amend PROWA to give free Medicaid and SCHIP to illegal immigrant women and children. McCain’s net idea: lock up thousands of innocent divorced men, who labor for 25-cents per hour, to pay for free medical care for illegal immigrants. How dare we do this to good American citizens who have done nothing wrong and committed no crime!

Courts in most states hold that child support cannot be lowered simply because a man’s income has decreased. In most states, a man must be permanently and seriously disabled before courts will consider lowering child support orders. A 1999 study by the American Coalition for Fathers and Children found that less the 5% of those who filed for a downward modification of support in the State of California were able to get a modification. The rest were ordered to pull money out of thin air or go to prison.

Once a divorced man who falls behind on support enters the prison system, he is caught in a permanent trap. Courts consistently rule that imprisonment is not cause for lowering child support. There is no way that a man can pay off any child support order when being paid only twenty-five cents per hour.

Both Mr. McCain and Mr. Goldwater have some serious thinking to do about their political futures. Feminist politics supporting the predatory “see no evil” welfare state are falling apart. Political candidates supporting Leninist-style labor camps full of divorced men who have committed no crime will lose many disaffected voters who know exactly what is going on.

In-balance, there is nothing wrong with expecting real criminals to work to cover the costs of their incarceration – especially where this would clearly stop illegal immigration.

But balance cannot exist until federal legislation is reformed to require that state child support orders match actual monthly income. We cannot permit federal funds to continue being misused by states to create profitable penury in the name of radical feminism.

Anti-family politics of the 1990’s is dead. Pro-marriage reforms are what both leading Republican pundits and all but the most ignorant voters demand and expect from candidates in the 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

————————————————-

David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition

1 views

  • conservativation

    I did ministry in the prison system, met many men who commited terrible crimes 20 plus years ago, and are now middle aged and sitting in prison. Granted, my classes were the cream of the crop, but I listened as these (now decent…I submit) men told about family law scenarios that occured alongside the criminal stuff and it made my head spin. It is a wierd kind of cold comfort, but at least these men I know are not in prison specifically due to a family law matter…the hopelessness and helplessness that must accompany that scenario is profound.

  • conservativation

    I did ministry in the prison system, met many men who commited terrible crimes 20 plus years ago, and are now middle aged and sitting in prison. Granted, my classes were the cream of the crop, but I listened as these (now decent…I submit) men told about family law scenarios that occured alongside the criminal stuff and it made my head spin. It is a wierd kind of cold comfort, but at least these men I know are not in prison specifically due to a family law matter…the hopelessness and helplessness that must accompany that scenario is profound.

  • conservativation

    I did ministry in the prison system, met many men who commited terrible crimes 20 plus years ago, and are now middle aged and sitting in prison. Granted, my classes were the cream of the crop, but I listened as these (now decent…I submit) men told about family law scenarios that occured alongside the criminal stuff and it made my head spin. It is a wierd kind of cold comfort, but at least these men I know are not in prison specifically due to a family law matter…the hopelessness and helplessness that must accompany that scenario is profound.

  • conservativation

    I did ministry in the prison system, met many men who commited terrible crimes 20 plus years ago, and are now middle aged and sitting in prison. Granted, my classes were the cream of the crop, but I listened as these (now decent…I submit) men told about family law scenarios that occured alongside the criminal stuff and it made my head spin. It is a wierd kind of cold comfort, but at least these men I know are not in prison specifically due to a family law matter…the hopelessness and helplessness that must accompany that scenario is profound.

  • http://www.americaairlinecheap.com/?p=120 America Airline » America Airline – Drunk? Co-pilot is jailed in SL

    [...] Goldwater, McCain, and Indentured ServitudeMen’s News Daily, CA - 2 hours ago… Prisoners make license plates, handle airline reservations, make military tents and … auspices of Correctional Systems, Inc (CSI), which is America s largest … [...]

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    David! Congratulations, you actually used the word peonage!
    Now why don’t you simply explain to your good readers that inposing and enforcing child support orders with mechanisms to extort employment to force payment is the crime defined by 18 U.S.C. §1581 and that such orders are declared null and void by 42 U.S.C. §1994.
    I know you will still say that the courts will not enforce the Peonage Law in the context of family law.
    But I fail to see how that is an excuse to not tell your good readers all about it.
    The family courts behave like the Star Chamber. While in the United States the files are usually public record and not sealed, if no one with the ears of the nation reports on it, including the challenges made to it as peonage, then the files might as well be sealed from the public.
    And the family courts will continue to behave as the Star Chamber.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    David! Congratulations, you actually used the word peonage!
    Now why don’t you simply explain to your good readers that inposing and enforcing child support orders with mechanisms to extort employment to force payment is the crime defined by 18 U.S.C. §1581 and that such orders are declared null and void by 42 U.S.C. §1994.
    I know you will still say that the courts will not enforce the Peonage Law in the context of family law.
    But I fail to see how that is an excuse to not tell your good readers all about it.
    The family courts behave like the Star Chamber. While in the United States the files are usually public record and not sealed, if no one with the ears of the nation reports on it, including the challenges made to it as peonage, then the files might as well be sealed from the public.
    And the family courts will continue to behave as the Star Chamber.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    David! Congratulations, you actually used the word peonage!
    Now why don’t you simply explain to your good readers that inposing and enforcing child support orders with mechanisms to extort employment to force payment is the crime defined by 18 U.S.C. §1581 and that such orders are declared null and void by 42 U.S.C. §1994.
    I know you will still say that the courts will not enforce the Peonage Law in the context of family law.
    But I fail to see how that is an excuse to not tell your good readers all about it.
    The family courts behave like the Star Chamber. While in the United States the files are usually public record and not sealed, if no one with the ears of the nation reports on it, including the challenges made to it as peonage, then the files might as well be sealed from the public.
    And the family courts will continue to behave as the Star Chamber.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    David! Congratulations, you actually used the word peonage!
    Now why don’t you simply explain to your good readers that inposing and enforcing child support orders with mechanisms to extort employment to force payment is the crime defined by 18 U.S.C. §1581 and that such orders are declared null and void by 42 U.S.C. §1994.
    I know you will still say that the courts will not enforce the Peonage Law in the context of family law.
    But I fail to see how that is an excuse to not tell your good readers all about it.
    The family courts behave like the Star Chamber. While in the United States the files are usually public record and not sealed, if no one with the ears of the nation reports on it, including the challenges made to it as peonage, then the files might as well be sealed from the public.
    And the family courts will continue to behave as the Star Chamber.

  • mruffolo

    William J Christopher has been jailed for 5.5 years for being accused of domestic violence. He is a veteran.

    http://www.onsecondthought.tv/christopher.html

    Not only can you be imprisoned for child support issues, but also you risk jail time arguing with your wife.

    A new divorce lawyer shared this support story.

    The father withheld a month of day care because the wife, who had sole custody, did not tell him where his son was attending a new day care service.

    The wife with her attorney dragged the father to court for the late payment. Being an honest man, the father told the truth that he refused to pay his wife that month’s day care because he was leveraging it for information on the location of his child.

    The judged ruled against the father contempt of an order. The father was now ordered to pay the missing months day care, plus pay both attorneys fees of about $3k, and spend a week in jail.

    The father lost his job when his employer discovered he was imprisoned. He also did not learn where his son was attending day care.

    A happy feminst family story – dad bad, mom good.

    This occurred about winter of 2004 at Kane County Family Court with Judge Robert Spence.

    http://www.cic.co.kane.il.us/assignedjudges.htm

  • mruffolo

    William J Christopher has been jailed for 5.5 years for being accused of domestic violence. He is a veteran.

    http://www.onsecondthought.tv/christopher.html

    Not only can you be imprisoned for child support issues, but also you risk jail time arguing with your wife.

    A new divorce lawyer shared this support story.

    The father withheld a month of day care because the wife, who had sole custody, did not tell him where his son was attending a new day care service.

    The wife with her attorney dragged the father to court for the late payment. Being an honest man, the father told the truth that he refused to pay his wife that month’s day care because he was leveraging it for information on the location of his child.

    The judged ruled against the father contempt of an order. The father was now ordered to pay the missing months day care, plus pay both attorneys fees of about $3k, and spend a week in jail.

    The father lost his job when his employer discovered he was imprisoned. He also did not learn where his son was attending day care.

    A happy feminst family story – dad bad, mom good.

    This occurred about winter of 2004 at Kane County Family Court with Judge Robert Spence.

    http://www.cic.co.kane.il.us/assignedjudges.htm

  • mruffolo

    William J Christopher has been jailed for 5.5 years for being accused of domestic violence. He is a veteran.

    http://www.onsecondthought.tv/christopher.html

    Not only can you be imprisoned for child support issues, but also you risk jail time arguing with your wife.

    A new divorce lawyer shared this support story.

    The father withheld a month of day care because the wife, who had sole custody, did not tell him where his son was attending a new day care service.

    The wife with her attorney dragged the father to court for the late payment. Being an honest man, the father told the truth that he refused to pay his wife that month’s day care because he was leveraging it for information on the location of his child.

    The judged ruled against the father contempt of an order. The father was now ordered to pay the missing months day care, plus pay both attorneys fees of about $3k, and spend a week in jail.

    The father lost his job when his employer discovered he was imprisoned. He also did not learn where his son was attending day care.

    A happy feminst family story – dad bad, mom good.

    This occurred about winter of 2004 at Kane County Family Court with Judge Robert Spence.

    http://www.cic.co.kane.il.us/assignedjudges.htm

  • mruffolo

    William J Christopher has been jailed for 5.5 years for being accused of domestic violence. He is a veteran.

    http://www.onsecondthought.tv/christopher.html

    Not only can you be imprisoned for child support issues, but also you risk jail time arguing with your wife.

    A new divorce lawyer shared this support story.

    The father withheld a month of day care because the wife, who had sole custody, did not tell him where his son was attending a new day care service.

    The wife with her attorney dragged the father to court for the late payment. Being an honest man, the father told the truth that he refused to pay his wife that month’s day care because he was leveraging it for information on the location of his child.

    The judged ruled against the father contempt of an order. The father was now ordered to pay the missing months day care, plus pay both attorneys fees of about $3k, and spend a week in jail.

    The father lost his job when his employer discovered he was imprisoned. He also did not learn where his son was attending day care.

    A happy feminst family story – dad bad, mom good.

    This occurred about winter of 2004 at Kane County Family Court with Judge Robert Spence.

    http://www.cic.co.kane.il.us/assignedjudges.htm

  • mruffolo

    When I share the above story with a friend or family member and I add that I am remain committed to staying out of divorce court by remaining single. Some then call me “bitter” from my divorce.

    I am grateful for this reply as it flags them as a feminist. Managing the relationship with a feminist becomes easier when they are identified – I avoid sharing personal information, and I no longer take them seriously.

  • mruffolo

    When I share the above story with a friend or family member and I add that I am remain committed to staying out of divorce court by remaining single. Some then call me “bitter” from my divorce.

    I am grateful for this reply as it flags them as a feminist. Managing the relationship with a feminist becomes easier when they are identified – I avoid sharing personal information, and I no longer take them seriously.

  • mruffolo

    When I share the above story with a friend or family member and I add that I am remain committed to staying out of divorce court by remaining single. Some then call me “bitter” from my divorce.

    I am grateful for this reply as it flags them as a feminist. Managing the relationship with a feminist becomes easier when they are identified – I avoid sharing personal information, and I no longer take them seriously.

  • mruffolo

    When I share the above story with a friend or family member and I add that I am remain committed to staying out of divorce court by remaining single. Some then call me “bitter” from my divorce.

    I am grateful for this reply as it flags them as a feminist. Managing the relationship with a feminist becomes easier when they are identified – I avoid sharing personal information, and I no longer take them seriously.






Search