lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Keeping your Lawyer on a Short Leash

2006-07-09
By

To all who read this I give you one very important piece of advice:  The lawyer you watch closest is the one who works for you.  You are a mealticket- you are revenue.  Keep them on a tight leash or they will screw you and convince themselves they’re doing it in your best interests.


Italics are my inserted comments… enjoy… 

Attorney Smith, 

I’m not angry or emotional, but determined.  Very determined. 

I have the advantage and if this is played correctly, I can pin her in a corner permanently.  Not for me, not for some sick sense of gratification or revenge or ego, but for my kids; it has to be done for them. 

Attorney Jones is trying to get some bargaining chip he can take back to his client to show he was worth what she is going to end up paying him; he’ll get nothing from me.  Nothing. I can not leave her with any confidence of any kind that fighting me, ever, is in her interest. My biggest concern right now is that you and Attorney Jones are too familiar with one another and that can be very bad for a client.  No, I’m not worried about ‘collusion.’ (Well… actually I am) I’m worried about the ‘professional courtesy’ that exists between lawyers. You guys hate attacking one another because lets face it; clients come and go, but you always have to work with these lawyers and the judges- standing up and playing hardball for one client can cause problems for your career later on.  I know this and I have seen it. 

Finally, you’ve been asking me, pressing me to make ‘concessions’ and that is the one thing I will not do, so don’t ask. It sets the wrong precedent. She gets no reward for abusing my kids. Are we clear on this? 

If you can play hardball, that would be great.  If you can’t then I must find new counsel… and that would really be a disappointment, because you are good. 

Sincerely, 

Eric  

 
And the response:
First of all, Eric, do not threaten me!  I have managed results for you that none of your attorneys have been able to obtain. (Now that is true)
 
Secondly, I resent this accusation of familiarity with Eric Attorney Jones. (Is this a joke? Everyone knows lawyers ‘play nice’ with each other) I have an ethical code I must follow to maintain my license.  No client is worth risking that.  That includes you. (WHERE DID THIS COME FROM???)
 
Furthermore, from day one, you have vacillated with how you wished to approach this matter.  I waited for you to make up your mind.  I filed the motion that YOU requested I file. (Uh… it isn’t ‘vacillation.  It’s called consulting with competent legal advice.  Once the motion was filed, THAT was the direction we were going… were…) You stated all along that you wanted Marie to attempt to have a relationship with Ron and  to mend fences. Later, you would seek placement of the other children.  Now, she is not fighting with you after consulting an attorney.  She is asking for the bare minimum of placement that any court will even grant an addict or convicted felon.  Now, that is even too much for you. (Why the hell do I want to give up any time with my other kids so this witch can torment my oldest son?)  There is no child abuse restraining order here. (There is a police report from a municipal police department.  How much does it take?) How much credibility do you really think you are going to have with a judge to fight over one day or a half day per month?  You are going to come across petty.  The court is going to perceive you as merely attempting to punish Marie as opposed to looking out for Ron’s best interests.  I save every email I send you and every one you send me.  I do not appreciate your twisting my words against me.(Someone needs to increase their Prozac…) I have been practicing in this area for a long time and know what the courts are going to do.  I did not send any proposals to Attorney Jones without your authority.  I sent the proposal out after speaking with you and emailing you. (But why were we proposing anything? We filed a motion… let them counter it.  I don’t need my lawyer generating lots of unwanted paperwork at $200 per hour… or am I getting churned here?)
 
If you wish to retain alternative counsel, go right ahead.  I consulted both of my partners in the firm regarding this.  Don’t try to argue breach of confidentiality because in a partnership, confidentiality extends to the entire firm. (More defensiveness?  Besides I knew this… Now it is getting weird…)    They agree with my take on this case.  I have done everything in my power to be honest and represent your interests competently. I have kept your emails stating that you are pleased with my representation.   This change of attitude leads me to believe that you merely wish to battle against Marie.(No… stick with the original motion. THAT is what I wanted.)  I am not a hired gun. (Uh… yes, you are. I’m paying the bills; you do it my way.  I have to live with the results, so I call the shots… Mmmm-kay?) I advise my clients accordingly to the law.  If you want an attorney who will change tactics in midstream and against her professional judgment, be my guest. (I want the ORIGINAL tactics… duh!) I am not that desperate for business.(Oh… I know… I get a return phone call about three days later usually)  I can have my legal assistant draft a stipulation and order for substitution forthwith. (Sounds great…)
 
I would have filed another motion on your behalf for all the children if you had requested. (That was ‘Phase Two’ Dearheart…)   The tone of this email shows me that there is a breakdown in the attorney client relationship. (Oh Really!?!? I hadn’t noticed… You churn me, jack up the billable hours, offer to cave to the opposition… and you don’t think I would be upset?!?!?)

8 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • mruffolo

    Divorce lawyers are beholden to:

    1) Judges and their staff
    2) Lawyers
    3) Client

    All divorce lawyers are small business owners. Their clients will be around for only a few months. If the lawyer is unlucky to defend a father/husband, he will be unhappy with legal services, because the family judge will make it so.

    There is little repeat business for divorce lawyers. They are like hunters constantly looking for new revenue by a broken marriage. Add on revenue is created by more conflict. The richest divorce lawyers learn to create conflict between a husband and wife.

    Lawyers are not paid by results or advice, but by documented billable hours: accepting and reading documents, conversations on the telephone, and time for court appearances.
    Because there is no due process and no evidence, law is not practiced most of the time in family court.

    At $350 per hour, my divorce attorneys were not honest to me about how biased the courts are. Additionally all six divorce books I bought and Barnes and Noble were not factual (what publisher or distributor will offer a pro-male, anti-woman, anti-judge book).

    On December 27, 2004, my apple cart was tipped over by a few articles written by Dr. Stephan Baskerville, a London Business School educated Brit, who married, and later, divorced, an American woman.

    http://www.opinionet.com/archive.php?author=Stephen%20Baskerville,%20PhD

    This guy’s writings put it all in the correct prospective so that all the confusion and frustration and pain of family court were explained. First it was a relief to know that I was not alone and that I was not misreading the situation.

    To get to the truth quickly on family justice, sit yourself in a local family courthouse on a Monday through Wednesday between 9 and 11PM. It’s free and reservations are not required. (No Divorce Court on television does not count).

  • mruffolo

    Divorce lawyers are beholden to:

    1) Judges and their staff
    2) Lawyers
    3) Client

    All divorce lawyers are small business owners. Their clients will be around for only a few months. If the lawyer is unlucky to defend a father/husband, he will be unhappy with legal services, because the family judge will make it so.

    There is little repeat business for divorce lawyers. They are like hunters constantly looking for new revenue by a broken marriage. Add on revenue is created by more conflict. The richest divorce lawyers learn to create conflict between a husband and wife.

    Lawyers are not paid by results or advice, but by documented billable hours: accepting and reading documents, conversations on the telephone, and time for court appearances.
    Because there is no due process and no evidence, law is not practiced most of the time in family court.

    At $350 per hour, my divorce attorneys were not honest to me about how biased the courts are. Additionally all six divorce books I bought and Barnes and Noble were not factual (what publisher or distributor will offer a pro-male, anti-woman, anti-judge book).

    On December 27, 2004, my apple cart was tipped over by a few articles written by Dr. Stephan Baskerville, a London Business School educated Brit, who married, and later, divorced, an American woman.

    http://www.opinionet.com/archive.php?author=Stephen%20Baskerville,%20PhD

    This guy’s writings put it all in the correct prospective so that all the confusion and frustration and pain of family court were explained. First it was a relief to know that I was not alone and that I was not misreading the situation.

    To get to the truth quickly on family justice, sit yourself in a local family courthouse on a Monday through Wednesday between 9 and 11PM. It’s free and reservations are not required. (No Divorce Court on television does not count).

  • mruffolo

    Divorce lawyers are beholden to:

    1) Judges and their staff
    2) Lawyers
    3) Client

    All divorce lawyers are small business owners. Their clients will be around for only a few months. If the lawyer is unlucky to defend a father/husband, he will be unhappy with legal services, because the family judge will make it so.

    There is little repeat business for divorce lawyers. They are like hunters constantly looking for new revenue by a broken marriage. Add on revenue is created by more conflict. The richest divorce lawyers learn to create conflict between a husband and wife.

    Lawyers are not paid by results or advice, but by documented billable hours: accepting and reading documents, conversations on the telephone, and time for court appearances.
    Because there is no due process and no evidence, law is not practiced most of the time in family court.

    At $350 per hour, my divorce attorneys were not honest to me about how biased the courts are. Additionally all six divorce books I bought and Barnes and Noble were not factual (what publisher or distributor will offer a pro-male, anti-woman, anti-judge book).

    On December 27, 2004, my apple cart was tipped over by a few articles written by Dr. Stephan Baskerville, a London Business School educated Brit, who married, and later, divorced, an American woman.

    http://www.opinionet.com/archive.php?author=Stephen%20Baskerville,%20PhD

    This guy’s writings put it all in the correct prospective so that all the confusion and frustration and pain of family court were explained. First it was a relief to know that I was not alone and that I was not misreading the situation.

    To get to the truth quickly on family justice, sit yourself in a local family courthouse on a Monday through Wednesday between 9 and 11PM. It’s free and reservations are not required. (No Divorce Court on television does not count).

  • mruffolo

    Divorce lawyers are beholden to:

    1) Judges and their staff
    2) Lawyers
    3) Client

    All divorce lawyers are small business owners. Their clients will be around for only a few months. If the lawyer is unlucky to defend a father/husband, he will be unhappy with legal services, because the family judge will make it so.

    There is little repeat business for divorce lawyers. They are like hunters constantly looking for new revenue by a broken marriage. Add on revenue is created by more conflict. The richest divorce lawyers learn to create conflict between a husband and wife.

    Lawyers are not paid by results or advice, but by documented billable hours: accepting and reading documents, conversations on the telephone, and time for court appearances.
    Because there is no due process and no evidence, law is not practiced most of the time in family court.

    At $350 per hour, my divorce attorneys were not honest to me about how biased the courts are. Additionally all six divorce books I bought and Barnes and Noble were not factual (what publisher or distributor will offer a pro-male, anti-woman, anti-judge book).

    On December 27, 2004, my apple cart was tipped over by a few articles written by Dr. Stephan Baskerville, a London Business School educated Brit, who married, and later, divorced, an American woman.

    http://www.opinionet.com/archive.php?author=Stephen%20Baskerville,%20PhD

    This guy’s writings put it all in the correct prospective so that all the confusion and frustration and pain of family court were explained. First it was a relief to know that I was not alone and that I was not misreading the situation.

    To get to the truth quickly on family justice, sit yourself in a local family courthouse on a Monday through Wednesday between 9 and 11PM. It’s free and reservations are not required. (No Divorce Court on television does not count).

  • conservativation

    Reading these lines caused me to recall the communication I had with mine when I had a near miss with divorce. Though I always got on just fine with him, and the relationship never became antagonistic, it was the case that my lawyer and her lawyer indded were old buddys. And her lawyers husband was a freaking judge! I never got to the endgame so I cannot complain about results, but I can say the familiarity between the lawyers was a detriment. Also, in my experience, I see very little law being practiced in family law. Rather, I see a series of meetings where lawyers act as babysitters trying to keep the more hysterical of the two parties in line. Having sat through countless legal matters in business etc., the legal part of family law is extremely vague and nebulous, which is what makes it dangerous.
    It is difficult to get an answer from any attorney w/out qualifiers, but family lawyers are the worst. What is bad is, when you pay hunderds per hours, you are hiring the expertise AND the experience, and you never get to tap the experience. Even Drs. will say you have X months to live, but ask a family lawyer if he thinks you will get a 60/40 property split and see if you get anything close to an answer.
    Your primary complaint is so correct. You are paying…period, and you know the psycology of the adversary better then anyone. You should, within the limits of ethics etc., absolutely control what happens, under the considered advice of your lawyer. This letter from yours would really tick me off.

  • conservativation

    Reading these lines caused me to recall the communication I had with mine when I had a near miss with divorce. Though I always got on just fine with him, and the relationship never became antagonistic, it was the case that my lawyer and her lawyer indded were old buddys. And her lawyers husband was a freaking judge! I never got to the endgame so I cannot complain about results, but I can say the familiarity between the lawyers was a detriment. Also, in my experience, I see very little law being practiced in family law. Rather, I see a series of meetings where lawyers act as babysitters trying to keep the more hysterical of the two parties in line. Having sat through countless legal matters in business etc., the legal part of family law is extremely vague and nebulous, which is what makes it dangerous.
    It is difficult to get an answer from any attorney w/out qualifiers, but family lawyers are the worst. What is bad is, when you pay hunderds per hours, you are hiring the expertise AND the experience, and you never get to tap the experience. Even Drs. will say you have X months to live, but ask a family lawyer if he thinks you will get a 60/40 property split and see if you get anything close to an answer.
    Your primary complaint is so correct. You are paying…period, and you know the psycology of the adversary better then anyone. You should, within the limits of ethics etc., absolutely control what happens, under the considered advice of your lawyer. This letter from yours would really tick me off.

  • conservativation

    Reading these lines caused me to recall the communication I had with mine when I had a near miss with divorce. Though I always got on just fine with him, and the relationship never became antagonistic, it was the case that my lawyer and her lawyer indded were old buddys. And her lawyers husband was a freaking judge! I never got to the endgame so I cannot complain about results, but I can say the familiarity between the lawyers was a detriment. Also, in my experience, I see very little law being practiced in family law. Rather, I see a series of meetings where lawyers act as babysitters trying to keep the more hysterical of the two parties in line. Having sat through countless legal matters in business etc., the legal part of family law is extremely vague and nebulous, which is what makes it dangerous.
    It is difficult to get an answer from any attorney w/out qualifiers, but family lawyers are the worst. What is bad is, when you pay hunderds per hours, you are hiring the expertise AND the experience, and you never get to tap the experience. Even Drs. will say you have X months to live, but ask a family lawyer if he thinks you will get a 60/40 property split and see if you get anything close to an answer.
    Your primary complaint is so correct. You are paying…period, and you know the psycology of the adversary better then anyone. You should, within the limits of ethics etc., absolutely control what happens, under the considered advice of your lawyer. This letter from yours would really tick me off.

  • conservativation

    Reading these lines caused me to recall the communication I had with mine when I had a near miss with divorce. Though I always got on just fine with him, and the relationship never became antagonistic, it was the case that my lawyer and her lawyer indded were old buddys. And her lawyers husband was a freaking judge! I never got to the endgame so I cannot complain about results, but I can say the familiarity between the lawyers was a detriment. Also, in my experience, I see very little law being practiced in family law. Rather, I see a series of meetings where lawyers act as babysitters trying to keep the more hysterical of the two parties in line. Having sat through countless legal matters in business etc., the legal part of family law is extremely vague and nebulous, which is what makes it dangerous.
    It is difficult to get an answer from any attorney w/out qualifiers, but family lawyers are the worst. What is bad is, when you pay hunderds per hours, you are hiring the expertise AND the experience, and you never get to tap the experience. Even Drs. will say you have X months to live, but ask a family lawyer if he thinks you will get a 60/40 property split and see if you get anything close to an answer.
    Your primary complaint is so correct. You are paying…period, and you know the psycology of the adversary better then anyone. You should, within the limits of ethics etc., absolutely control what happens, under the considered advice of your lawyer. This letter from yours would really tick me off.

  • David R. Usher

    All,

    This is the inside-view of the typical outcome of the average divorce case. All legislators need to see that the divorce process is stacked heavily against men, how this drives irresponsible divorce, and creates a list of social, fiscal, and public safety issues that reaches from here to Madison County, Il.

    Most attorneys do what they can given the feminization of the judge and how much dirty pool the wife’s attorney plays. It is within this limited range of options, most of which go towards “cutting the losses”, that most men and their attorneys operate. Of course, there are some attorneys who are pallbearers, who do nothing but hand the case over. They are fairly easy to spot.

    The practice of law is an art: you play your best hand and realize it is all you can do. The system is indeed corrupt: lots of cases are decided in hallways outside of courtrooms. Court papers are tinkered with, evidence is misplaced or destroyed, and the thrid-party actors such as GAL’s and psychologists are geared towards issuing findings that blame all the family problems on the husband.

    However, many attorneys are not forthright about the prospects for a just outcome. They don’t want a freaky client on their hands, so the case starts out looking like everything is going to turn out decently. If the client isn’t freaking, he usually helps put on a better case. However, when the false abuse allegations land, and around the time of the PDL and just before the final hearing, reality comes to the forefront. Then the client freaks. Sometimes cases go through hearing looking good, but in the end the feminized judge lays down a ruling with no findings of fact or conclusions of law, and hands the mother the family, while the father gets all sorts of debts that are intentionally not disposed of in the Order.

    Men MUST NOT work their individual cases in public. The judge has the power to destroy you and he will. Men MUST work with a men’s group, which goes after judges and those inside the system who need to be removed. There is safety in numbers. Let others go after your judge.

    Men must know that attorneys cannot say nasty things about other attorneys or judges either in public or a courtroom setting. This is cause for immediate disbarment. An attorney can call a false affivadit “ridiculous” in chambers, but not in the courtroom. There, he can only go after the merits. Its a rotten system that has caused many good family law attorneys to quit because they can’t stand watching good men get raped.

    The answer: All men and equalitarian women must get into the marriage movement and play hardball pro-family politics. What courts do happens only because laws and funding are set up to make it permissable. This includes all liberal, conservative, Libertarian, and even apolitical men. Things will not change until we see pro-marriage issues on the presidential slate. This will not take place until equalitarianists raise enough steam make these issues both magnetic and unavoidable to candidates running for federal office.

    Attorneys who do want to make a difference must support men’s advocacy groups and help them in every way possible, but keep a safe distance from them so they don’t end up being punished in court. This is necessary to effect change and to make sure that a support group is in place so attorneys don’t have to spend lots of hours providing therapy to horrified men at $200/hour.

  • David R. Usher

    All,

    This is the inside-view of the typical outcome of the average divorce case. All legislators need to see that the divorce process is stacked heavily against men, how this drives irresponsible divorce, and creates a list of social, fiscal, and public safety issues that reaches from here to Madison County, Il.

    Most attorneys do what they can given the feminization of the judge and how much dirty pool the wife’s attorney plays. It is within this limited range of options, most of which go towards “cutting the losses”, that most men and their attorneys operate. Of course, there are some attorneys who are pallbearers, who do nothing but hand the case over. They are fairly easy to spot.

    The practice of law is an art: you play your best hand and realize it is all you can do. The system is indeed corrupt: lots of cases are decided in hallways outside of courtrooms. Court papers are tinkered with, evidence is misplaced or destroyed, and the thrid-party actors such as GAL’s and psychologists are geared towards issuing findings that blame all the family problems on the husband.

    However, many attorneys are not forthright about the prospects for a just outcome. They don’t want a freaky client on their hands, so the case starts out looking like everything is going to turn out decently. If the client isn’t freaking, he usually helps put on a better case. However, when the false abuse allegations land, and around the time of the PDL and just before the final hearing, reality comes to the forefront. Then the client freaks. Sometimes cases go through hearing looking good, but in the end the feminized judge lays down a ruling with no findings of fact or conclusions of law, and hands the mother the family, while the father gets all sorts of debts that are intentionally not disposed of in the Order.

    Men MUST NOT work their individual cases in public. The judge has the power to destroy you and he will. Men MUST work with a men’s group, which goes after judges and those inside the system who need to be removed. There is safety in numbers. Let others go after your judge.

    Men must know that attorneys cannot say nasty things about other attorneys or judges either in public or a courtroom setting. This is cause for immediate disbarment. An attorney can call a false affivadit “ridiculous” in chambers, but not in the courtroom. There, he can only go after the merits. Its a rotten system that has caused many good family law attorneys to quit because they can’t stand watching good men get raped.

    The answer: All men and equalitarian women must get into the marriage movement and play hardball pro-family politics. What courts do happens only because laws and funding are set up to make it permissable. This includes all liberal, conservative, Libertarian, and even apolitical men. Things will not change until we see pro-marriage issues on the presidential slate. This will not take place until equalitarianists raise enough steam make these issues both magnetic and unavoidable to candidates running for federal office.

    Attorneys who do want to make a difference must support men’s advocacy groups and help them in every way possible, but keep a safe distance from them so they don’t end up being punished in court. This is necessary to effect change and to make sure that a support group is in place so attorneys don’t have to spend lots of hours providing therapy to horrified men at $200/hour.

  • David R. Usher

    All,

    This is the inside-view of the typical outcome of the average divorce case. All legislators need to see that the divorce process is stacked heavily against men, how this drives irresponsible divorce, and creates a list of social, fiscal, and public safety issues that reaches from here to Madison County, Il.

    Most attorneys do what they can given the feminization of the judge and how much dirty pool the wife’s attorney plays. It is within this limited range of options, most of which go towards “cutting the losses”, that most men and their attorneys operate. Of course, there are some attorneys who are pallbearers, who do nothing but hand the case over. They are fairly easy to spot.

    The practice of law is an art: you play your best hand and realize it is all you can do. The system is indeed corrupt: lots of cases are decided in hallways outside of courtrooms. Court papers are tinkered with, evidence is misplaced or destroyed, and the thrid-party actors such as GAL’s and psychologists are geared towards issuing findings that blame all the family problems on the husband.

    However, many attorneys are not forthright about the prospects for a just outcome. They don’t want a freaky client on their hands, so the case starts out looking like everything is going to turn out decently. If the client isn’t freaking, he usually helps put on a better case. However, when the false abuse allegations land, and around the time of the PDL and just before the final hearing, reality comes to the forefront. Then the client freaks. Sometimes cases go through hearing looking good, but in the end the feminized judge lays down a ruling with no findings of fact or conclusions of law, and hands the mother the family, while the father gets all sorts of debts that are intentionally not disposed of in the Order.

    Men MUST NOT work their individual cases in public. The judge has the power to destroy you and he will. Men MUST work with a men’s group, which goes after judges and those inside the system who need to be removed. There is safety in numbers. Let others go after your judge.

    Men must know that attorneys cannot say nasty things about other attorneys or judges either in public or a courtroom setting. This is cause for immediate disbarment. An attorney can call a false affivadit “ridiculous” in chambers, but not in the courtroom. There, he can only go after the merits. Its a rotten system that has caused many good family law attorneys to quit because they can’t stand watching good men get raped.

    The answer: All men and equalitarian women must get into the marriage movement and play hardball pro-family politics. What courts do happens only because laws and funding are set up to make it permissable. This includes all liberal, conservative, Libertarian, and even apolitical men. Things will not change until we see pro-marriage issues on the presidential slate. This will not take place until equalitarianists raise enough steam make these issues both magnetic and unavoidable to candidates running for federal office.

    Attorneys who do want to make a difference must support men’s advocacy groups and help them in every way possible, but keep a safe distance from them so they don’t end up being punished in court. This is necessary to effect change and to make sure that a support group is in place so attorneys don’t have to spend lots of hours providing therapy to horrified men at $200/hour.

  • David R. Usher

    All,

    This is the inside-view of the typical outcome of the average divorce case. All legislators need to see that the divorce process is stacked heavily against men, how this drives irresponsible divorce, and creates a list of social, fiscal, and public safety issues that reaches from here to Madison County, Il.

    Most attorneys do what they can given the feminization of the judge and how much dirty pool the wife’s attorney plays. It is within this limited range of options, most of which go towards “cutting the losses”, that most men and their attorneys operate. Of course, there are some attorneys who are pallbearers, who do nothing but hand the case over. They are fairly easy to spot.

    The practice of law is an art: you play your best hand and realize it is all you can do. The system is indeed corrupt: lots of cases are decided in hallways outside of courtrooms. Court papers are tinkered with, evidence is misplaced or destroyed, and the thrid-party actors such as GAL’s and psychologists are geared towards issuing findings that blame all the family problems on the husband.

    However, many attorneys are not forthright about the prospects for a just outcome. They don’t want a freaky client on their hands, so the case starts out looking like everything is going to turn out decently. If the client isn’t freaking, he usually helps put on a better case. However, when the false abuse allegations land, and around the time of the PDL and just before the final hearing, reality comes to the forefront. Then the client freaks. Sometimes cases go through hearing looking good, but in the end the feminized judge lays down a ruling with no findings of fact or conclusions of law, and hands the mother the family, while the father gets all sorts of debts that are intentionally not disposed of in the Order.

    Men MUST NOT work their individual cases in public. The judge has the power to destroy you and he will. Men MUST work with a men’s group, which goes after judges and those inside the system who need to be removed. There is safety in numbers. Let others go after your judge.

    Men must know that attorneys cannot say nasty things about other attorneys or judges either in public or a courtroom setting. This is cause for immediate disbarment. An attorney can call a false affivadit “ridiculous” in chambers, but not in the courtroom. There, he can only go after the merits. Its a rotten system that has caused many good family law attorneys to quit because they can’t stand watching good men get raped.

    The answer: All men and equalitarian women must get into the marriage movement and play hardball pro-family politics. What courts do happens only because laws and funding are set up to make it permissable. This includes all liberal, conservative, Libertarian, and even apolitical men. Things will not change until we see pro-marriage issues on the presidential slate. This will not take place until equalitarianists raise enough steam make these issues both magnetic and unavoidable to candidates running for federal office.

    Attorneys who do want to make a difference must support men’s advocacy groups and help them in every way possible, but keep a safe distance from them so they don’t end up being punished in court. This is necessary to effect change and to make sure that a support group is in place so attorneys don’t have to spend lots of hours providing therapy to horrified men at $200/hour.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search

RSS Amy Alkon

RSS Donna Laframboise