Comments on: Massachusetts Family Court Judge Banned Book Critical of Her http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:54:36 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Denis http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/comment-page-1/#comment-14768 Denis Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:22:25 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/#comment-14768 Family Courts give men three options: 1.) live with an impossible situation. 2.) commit suicide 3.) go ballistic due to diminished capacity trying to live with an impossible situation. If the system does not allow for the political process to work then violence is not only an expected outcome but a necessity. Our Founding Fathers understood this. Banning a book? In New Zealand the following is occuring: Government Moves Against Men's Rights Site & Priority News Exchange Member -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Government Moves Against Men’s Rights Site with “Extreme Prejudice” (Stand Up and Fight or You May Be Next) The next stage of the conflict with the feminist lead legal & government oligarchy has started in New Zealand. In an effort to suppress men’s rights the government has chosen to enforce “with extreme prejudice” its law prohibiting any criticism of court decisions. This has lead to even the UN making moves to not endorse at least one court case in New Zealand. This is the same Prime Minister Helen lead government that has not allowed a qualified lawyer applicant from receiving his license simply because he is a men’s rights activist. (go to: http://forum.mathews.me.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=1342) Now that women have some power they are changing the system and the way it works by suppressing any criticism against them. They are being totalitarian. Try and follow where this will lead. Unless the system corrects itself, unless dissent is allowed, unless the political process works freely, not only will there be more violence, but the men who carry it out will be morally justified. Family Courts give men three options:

1.) live with an impossible situation.
2.) commit suicide
3.) go ballistic due to diminished capacity trying to live with an impossible situation.

If the system does not allow for the political process to work then violence is not only an expected outcome but a necessity. Our Founding Fathers understood this.

Banning a book?

In New Zealand the following is occuring:

Government Moves Against Men’s Rights Site & Priority News Exchange Member

——————————————————————————–

Government Moves Against Men’s Rights Site with “Extreme Prejudice”
(Stand Up and Fight or You May Be Next)

The next stage of the conflict with the feminist lead legal & government oligarchy has started in New Zealand. In an effort to suppress men’s rights the government has chosen to enforce “with extreme prejudice” its law prohibiting any criticism of court decisions. This has lead to even the UN making moves to not endorse at least one court case in New Zealand. This is the same Prime Minister Helen lead government that has not allowed a qualified lawyer applicant from receiving his license simply because he is a men’s rights activist.

(go to: http://forum.mathews.me.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=1342)

Now that women have some power they are changing the system and the way it works by suppressing any criticism against them. They are being totalitarian.

Try and follow where this will lead. Unless the system corrects itself, unless dissent is allowed, unless the political process works freely, not only will there be more violence, but the men who carry it out will be morally justified.

]]> By: Roger Knight http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/comment-page-1/#comment-14738 Roger Knight Thu, 13 Jul 2006 04:45:32 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/#comment-14738 They violate every other Amendment, why not the First? I have yet to have a court ban the Antipeonage Act website. We will keep our fingers crossed. They violate every other Amendment, why not the First? I have yet to have a court ban the Antipeonage Act website. We will keep our fingers crossed.

]]> By: jsriolo http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/comment-page-1/#comment-14710 jsriolo Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:21:10 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/#comment-14710 I can understand why someone would want to seek revenge when a judge treats them in the manner that family courts treat men, but I cannot condone the way that Darren Mack did it. That being said, anyone who opperates with a blatant disreguard for the rights of others deserves none themselves. This should be especially true for judges and they should be held accountable. I can understand why someone would want to seek revenge when a judge treats them in the manner that family courts treat men, but I cannot condone the way that Darren Mack did it. That being said, anyone who opperates with a blatant disreguard for the rights of others deserves none themselves. This should be especially true for judges and they should be held accountable.

]]> By: Denis http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/comment-page-1/#comment-14706 Denis Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:54:25 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/#comment-14706 It is not hard for me to understand why a man, who is expecting fairness and justice by the state is instead financially and emotionally raped by a judge, and perhaps his lived ruined by this judge, (and done so in a humiliating manner) would want to react by killing that same judge. This makes the Darren Mack's of the world understandable to me. It is not hard for me to understand why a man, who is expecting fairness and justice by the state is instead financially and emotionally raped by a judge, and perhaps his lived ruined by this judge, (and done so in a humiliating manner) would want to react by killing that same judge. This makes the Darren Mack’s of the world understandable to me.

]]> By: And Rightly So! » More Judicial Antics http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/comment-page-1/#comment-14698 And Rightly So! » More Judicial Antics Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:56:05 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/07/11/candidate-for-massachusetts-governor%e2%80%99s-council-calls-into-question-family-court-judge%e2%80%99s-ethics-that-bans-book-critical-of-her/#comment-14698 [...] Ah yes, once again, our friends from the south have a different approach to integrity than my long time neighbors do. The criticism seriously questions Judge Manzi’s ethics, making claims that a tape-recording was edited, and that a Lawrence attorney could substantiate the statements were missing from the tape. In a bit of an irony, Kevin Thompson complains in his book, Judge Mainz should have recused herself for having personal bias. Despite the book containing lengthy and scathing criticisms of the Judge Manzi, reliable statements made Mr. Thompson and Fathers and Families indicate that Judge Manzi ruled on whether to ban the book and, in fact, actually banned it. Notes Attorney Del Gallo, “The law is quite clear. Judges cannot rule on cases where there is a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. What we have here is a conflict of interest on an acid trip. While completely trampling on the free speech rights of Mr. Thompson, a judge has banned a book that is scathingly critical of her. Apart from accepting an actual bribe or ruling on a case where a judge plainly has a financial interest in the outcome of a case, it is hard to imagine a more manifest conflict of interest.” [...] [...] Ah yes, once again, our friends from the south have a different approach to integrity than my long time neighbors do. The criticism seriously questions Judge Manzi’s ethics, making claims that a tape-recording was edited, and that a Lawrence attorney could substantiate the statements were missing from the tape. In a bit of an irony, Kevin Thompson complains in his book, Judge Mainz should have recused herself for having personal bias. Despite the book containing lengthy and scathing criticisms of the Judge Manzi, reliable statements made Mr. Thompson and Fathers and Families indicate that Judge Manzi ruled on whether to ban the book and, in fact, actually banned it. Notes Attorney Del Gallo, “The law is quite clear. Judges cannot rule on cases where there is a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. What we have here is a conflict of interest on an acid trip. While completely trampling on the free speech rights of Mr. Thompson, a judge has banned a book that is scathingly critical of her. Apart from accepting an actual bribe or ruling on a case where a judge plainly has a financial interest in the outcome of a case, it is hard to imagine a more manifest conflict of interest.” [...]

]]>