OTTAWA (CP)
| More from MNDwire
This entry was posted on Monday, July 31st, 2006 at 6:40 pm and is filed under Sex & Metropolis. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. | 1 views | Trackback | Print this page |
| More from MNDwire
How to survive the coming food shortage.
|
|

MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!
Stumble It!
August 1st, 2006 at 5:33 am
Um, excuse me Canada, but that’s called Communism and it has been proven to be a failure. Its simple really, when you get to keep the same amount no matter how much you earn, the incentive is do to do nothing but the absolute minimum. Sure it would be nice if human nature fit the Marxist utopia formula, but it doesn’t, and history has proven that any attempt to force it on the people will result in the deaths of millions, then it will collapse.
For Canadian men, I suggest avoiding fatherhood altogether if possible, because for now at least that goes a long way in keeping the feminazi police off your back.
But we here in America are no better, of course. I also oppose and despise the Marxist feminists ruining America too, but it would be nice if there were a free country nearby.
August 1st, 2006 at 11:41 am
Just another reason to add to “The List of Reasons for Not Marrying”.
August 3rd, 2006 at 4:23 pm
the fact of the matter is, in a normal family, the father spends exactly WHAT HE WANTS TO SPEND on his kids. Nothing more, nothing less.
To have the State step in and CONTROL how much a father spends on his children (or go to jail) – is totalitarianism.
I would just ask the government: if a man must pay an increase to his children for every extra cent he may make, WHO THEN is going to save for his retirement? OR…is the government going to step forward and help with that? Not likely these days.