lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Question of the hour: Why isn’t Syria being bombed?

2006-08-08
By

Call me a warmongering, neocon armchair general if you like, but why in the name of heaven isn’t Israel bombing Syria at least back into the Bronze Age, if not an even earlier epoch?  Syria (along with Iran, of course) is one of the primary reasons there is a war going on in the Middle East right now due to its support of the Hezbollah terrorist outfit.

Does it make any sense at all that Lebanon and Israel have to suffer all the damage while Syria, which is guilty as sin, gets off scot free?  But Israel has issued repeated pledges not to attack Syria.  The question of the hour, of the day, of our time is: Why?

The standard explanation is that Israel doesn’t want to risk a wider war.  The problem is, rockets are raining down over much of Israel and when this is all over, if Syria skates, it has absolutely no disincentive to do its part in fomenting another proxy war against Israel whenever it feels like it (or whenever Iran calls on it to help in that regard).

Bombing Syria is something that everybody in the world who isn’t actually part of the Axis of Evil should want, including poor, hapless, long-suffering Lebanon.  After all, Hezbollah, with the support of Syria, is the reason Lebanon is getting wrecked.

The brainwashed and the brain-dead will bloviate that Hezbollah is the only deterrent against Israeli occupation, but every thinking person on earth knows that without the presence of Hezbollah, or some similar terrorist group, Israel would never set foot on Lebanese soil probably for as long as the universe continues to exist.

Hezbollah, which is entrenched in Lebanon, is waging a terror war against Israel.  Israel has no choice but to respond by doing grievous damage to Lebanon.  Syria supports Hezbollah and serves as a conduit for weapons coming from Iran.  Therefore, Syria should be bombed.  (Should Iran be bombed as well?  We’ll get to that in a moment.)

There’s little chance of Syria putting up much of a fight given that it has a dilapidated military that could be largely decimated in an afternoon.  Combine that with a little shock and awe over Damascus and Bashar Assad, the bumbling and rather deranged-looking dictator, would probably come to his senses rather quickly.  He might even call it quits with his country’s sugar daddy, Iran.  Talk about a toxic relationship.  As columnist Mark Steyn said, Syria is basically Iran’s Sunni Arab prison bitch.  Not much good can ultimately come from that relationship for Syria, unless it just likes getting slapped around by the Iranian Bubba.

If Israel really is concerned about a wider war, then its primary concern would be with Iran, since Iran has pledged to come to the aid of Syria should she be attacked.  But does that mean it would put an army in the field to protect the Syrian hussy?  Doubtful, since defeating Muslim armies has always been one of Israel’s specialties.

And doing so might also bring the U.S. into the fight, and Iraq or no Iraq, America still has the capability of bombing Iran back into . . .  Well, at the very least, the pre-atomic age.  In other words, despite whatever trash talk Iran would issue about fighting the Great Satan, the last thing they would want is a war with the U.S. because they could kiss their nuclear ambitions goodbye.  Any bombing campaign against Iran would include every known or suspected piece of its dispersed nuclear program.

Would Iran then unleash an army of terrorists against America and Israel?  Maybe, but if they were to overplay their hand, they would risk being completely overthrown and their dreams of Middle Eastern hegemony could go up in smoke.  If they instead just sit back and play it cool and continue to play the West for fools in their nuclear “negotiations,” they eventually become a nuclear power and they’re in the driver’s seat.

Hey, it’s not exactly the last word in geopolitical/war strategizing, but bombing Syria seems like a no-brainer, not to mention exactly what it deserves.

Greg Strange provides conservative commentary with plenty of acerbic wit on the people, politics, events and absurdities of our time. See more at his website: http://www.greg-strange.com/

0 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Hal

    Joyanna, you are right. Negotiating with the terrorists is more properly known as surrender. They hate us (us includes Israel), they want us dead, and paradoxically, any diplomacy makes them hate us more. They understand blood, nothing else.

  • Hal

    Joyanna, you are right. Negotiating with the terrorists is more properly known as surrender. They hate us (us includes Israel), they want us dead, and paradoxically, any diplomacy makes them hate us more. They understand blood, nothing else.

  • Hal

    Joyanna, you are right. Negotiating with the terrorists is more properly known as surrender. They hate us (us includes Israel), they want us dead, and paradoxically, any diplomacy makes them hate us more. They understand blood, nothing else.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/category/blogettes/nobodysopinion/ Joyanna Adams

    You’re right, I’m sure Israel has thought out this whole game. They will make their move when the time is right.

    Let’s just hope they are not listening to Carter and Clinton, or anyone else who tells them to “negotiate.”

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/category/blogettes/nobodysopinion/ Joyanna Adams

    You’re right, I’m sure Israel has thought out this whole game. They will make their move when the time is right.

    Let’s just hope they are not listening to Carter and Clinton, or anyone else who tells them to “negotiate.”

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/category/blogettes/nobodysopinion/ Joyanna Adams

    You’re right, I’m sure Israel has thought out this whole game. They will make their move when the time is right.

    Let’s just hope they are not listening to Carter and Clinton, or anyone else who tells them to “negotiate.”

  • randyf

    Thanks Greg, for giving that information. Ggreen67 may have just noy known the information. And unfortunately, this stuff doesn’t make headlines, like Abu whatever-it-was.

    Cynicism is needed these days, but proof and logic should prevail.

    The problem comes when proof is ignored, usually for ideological reasons.

  • randyf

    Thanks Greg, for giving that information. Ggreen67 may have just noy known the information. And unfortunately, this stuff doesn’t make headlines, like Abu whatever-it-was.

    Cynicism is needed these days, but proof and logic should prevail.

    The problem comes when proof is ignored, usually for ideological reasons.

  • randyf

    Thanks Greg, for giving that information. Ggreen67 may have just noy known the information. And unfortunately, this stuff doesn’t make headlines, like Abu whatever-it-was.

    Cynicism is needed these days, but proof and logic should prevail.

    The problem comes when proof is ignored, usually for ideological reasons.

  • Greg Strange

    ggreen67,

    Can you possibly be this clueless or are you simply a Syrian/Hezbollah/terrorist apologist? You may be the last person on planet earth that needs proof. Okay, here you are:

    The 2001 edition of the State Department’s annual report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported; “Syria granted a variety of terrorist groups—including Hamas, the PFLP-GC, and the PIJ—basing privileges or refuge in areas of Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley under Syrian control … Syria did not act to stop Hizballah and Palestinian projectionist groups from carrying out anti-Israeli attacks. Damascus also served as the primary transit point for terrorist operatives traveling to Lebanon and for the resupply of weapons to Hizballah.”

    The 2002 edition of Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported: “Syria also continued to permit Iranian resupply, via Damascus, of Hizballah in Lebanon. The report notes that Hezbollah operates in the southern suburbs of Beirut, the Bekaa Valley, and southern Lebanon—i.e., Syrian-occupied territory— and “receives financial, training, weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic, and organizational aid from Iran and diplomatic, political, and logistic support from Syria.”

    Even if Syria hasn’t lifted a finger to help Hezbollah since the current war began (which is ridiculously improbable), it is responsible, along with Iran, for having helped Hezbollah to build up the arsenal of rockets and missiles now being used against Israel. Israel is as guilty as sin and only a total fool could believe otherwise.

  • Greg Strange

    ggreen67,

    Can you possibly be this clueless or are you simply a Syrian/Hezbollah/terrorist apologist? You may be the last person on planet earth that needs proof. Okay, here you are:

    The 2001 edition of the State Department’s annual report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported; “Syria granted a variety of terrorist groups—including Hamas, the PFLP-GC, and the PIJ—basing privileges or refuge in areas of Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley under Syrian control … Syria did not act to stop Hizballah and Palestinian projectionist groups from carrying out anti-Israeli attacks. Damascus also served as the primary transit point for terrorist operatives traveling to Lebanon and for the resupply of weapons to Hizballah.”

    The 2002 edition of Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported: “Syria also continued to permit Iranian resupply, via Damascus, of Hizballah in Lebanon. The report notes that Hezbollah operates in the southern suburbs of Beirut, the Bekaa Valley, and southern Lebanon—i.e., Syrian-occupied territory— and “receives financial, training, weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic, and organizational aid from Iran and diplomatic, political, and logistic support from Syria.”

    Even if Syria hasn’t lifted a finger to help Hezbollah since the current war began (which is ridiculously improbable), it is responsible, along with Iran, for having helped Hezbollah to build up the arsenal of rockets and missiles now being used against Israel. Israel is as guilty as sin and only a total fool could believe otherwise.

  • Greg Strange

    ggreen67,

    Can you possibly be this clueless or are you simply a Syrian/Hezbollah/terrorist apologist? You may be the last person on planet earth that needs proof. Okay, here you are:

    The 2001 edition of the State Department’s annual report, Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported; “Syria granted a variety of terrorist groups—including Hamas, the PFLP-GC, and the PIJ—basing privileges or refuge in areas of Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley under Syrian control … Syria did not act to stop Hizballah and Palestinian projectionist groups from carrying out anti-Israeli attacks. Damascus also served as the primary transit point for terrorist operatives traveling to Lebanon and for the resupply of weapons to Hizballah.”

    The 2002 edition of Patterns of Global Terrorism, reported: “Syria also continued to permit Iranian resupply, via Damascus, of Hizballah in Lebanon. The report notes that Hezbollah operates in the southern suburbs of Beirut, the Bekaa Valley, and southern Lebanon—i.e., Syrian-occupied territory— and “receives financial, training, weapons, explosives, political, diplomatic, and organizational aid from Iran and diplomatic, political, and logistic support from Syria.”

    Even if Syria hasn’t lifted a finger to help Hezbollah since the current war began (which is ridiculously improbable), it is responsible, along with Iran, for having helped Hezbollah to build up the arsenal of rockets and missiles now being used against Israel. Israel is as guilty as sin and only a total fool could believe otherwise.

  • ggreen67

    Mr. Strange

    I don’t like taking the devil’s advocate approach, but please point me to one shred of proof that Syria has any involvement in the current happenings with Isreal and Lebanon.

    Its easy to get yourself fired-up listening to talking-heads spewing there, very likely, “personal” opinions, but I havent seen anyone come forth with proof-in-hand.

  • ggreen67

    Mr. Strange

    I don’t like taking the devil’s advocate approach, but please point me to one shred of proof that Syria has any involvement in the current happenings with Isreal and Lebanon.

    Its easy to get yourself fired-up listening to talking-heads spewing there, very likely, “personal” opinions, but I havent seen anyone come forth with proof-in-hand.

  • ggreen67

    Mr. Strange

    I don’t like taking the devil’s advocate approach, but please point me to one shred of proof that Syria has any involvement in the current happenings with Isreal and Lebanon.

    Its easy to get yourself fired-up listening to talking-heads spewing there, very likely, “personal” opinions, but I havent seen anyone come forth with proof-in-hand.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search