lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Our Risen World: A Reinterpretation of Genesis 3

2006-08-12
By

Burned into the Western consciousness of both Christians and Jews, and even of non-believers, is the notion that ours is a Fallen World. Eve ate of the tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, then gave it to her husband Adam, and, thus, plunged our world into a cataclysmic mess.

Let’s take a closer look at this powerful Biblical story. We consider The Fall to begin with — knowledge. And what is it the knowledge of? The knowledge of Good and Evil. Since before eating the fruit Adam and Eve knew nothing of good and evil, they could not know they were doing evil in disobeying the Lord’s command to abstain from the fruit.

And since the first humans knew neither Good nor Evil prior to the so-called Fall, we must ask: Why should moral knowledge be a curse rather than a blessing?

Perhaps we can understand this myth better if we imagine what our species would have been if Eve had resisted the serpent’s lure. Why, we would not be human! Instead we would genuinely be what Desmond Morris called “The Naked Ape.”

Smart and verbal, we would lack the natural protection of simian body hair yet feel no impulse to clothe ourselves. More naked than most mammals, we would be copulating without concern for the consequences (some say we do this now; but the many institutions and laws designed to restrain the circumstances under which sex occurs would be absent as would the internal controls possessed by many people).

We usually think of Cain’s murder of Abel as following the first “sin” of disobedience and this is right — and wrong. Deliberate killing of one’s own species has been observed in many other animals; however, since other animals lack a moral intelligence, they are not “murderers.” It is responsibility that, along with other factors, can makes a slaying a murder. Thus, if the “Fall” had never occurred, Cain would have killed his brother with no knowledge that what he did was wrong and, therefore, no guilt.

Animals, children, and the insane do not have the knowledge of good and evil. Had the first humans abstained from the Forbidden Fruit, our entire species we would be no better. Thus, Genesis 3 is not the story of The Fall but of our Rise into full humanity.

10 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Bullsheet

    You don’t have to know good or evil, right or wrong to OBEY God. The choice was given them to obey or disobey. They chose to DISOBEY with intent! As scriptures has proven.

    They therefore chose their OWN way to live by the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The world you see today is the FRUITION of that knowledge. Not a godly knowledge, but a purely humanistic one.

    The whole theme of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation is simply to OBEY God! Not to lean left or right but take the straight path!

  • Bullsheet

    You don’t have to know good or evil, right or wrong to OBEY God. The choice was given them to obey or disobey. They chose to DISOBEY with intent! As scriptures has proven.

    They therefore chose their OWN way to live by the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The world you see today is the FRUITION of that knowledge. Not a godly knowledge, but a purely humanistic one.

    The whole theme of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation is simply to OBEY God! Not to lean left or right but take the straight path!

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    So…admin,

    you are saying that God is unjust?

    You and Denise are then stating that God punished Adam and Eve for doing that which they did not even know was wrong?

    God told Adam that to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was forbidden. He told Adam to so inform Eve as he subsequently did. The fact that she then ignored God’s admonishment and chose to listen to the Serpent rather than obey God’s will proves she knew “right from wrong.”

    For something to be forbidden you requires that you have a cognizance of “right and wrong,” otherwise it is meaningless.

    If God punished them unjustly, then he is a false God.

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    So…admin,

    you are saying that God is unjust?

    You and Denise are then stating that God punished Adam and Eve for doing that which they did not even know was wrong?

    God told Adam that to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was forbidden. He told Adam to so inform Eve as he subsequently did. The fact that she then ignored God’s admonishment and chose to listen to the Serpent rather than obey God’s will proves she knew “right from wrong.”

    For something to be forbidden you requires that you have a cognizance of “right and wrong,” otherwise it is meaningless.

    If God punished them unjustly, then he is a false God.

  • Bullsheet

    The writer said: “Thus, Genesis 3 is not the story of The Fall but of our Rise into full humanity.”

    You are absolutely correct! We humans live a life full of sin that culminates in DEATH. I don’t know what gave the writer such a fulgent thought.

  • Bullsheet

    The writer said: “Thus, Genesis 3 is not the story of The Fall but of our Rise into full humanity.”

    You are absolutely correct! We humans live a life full of sin that culminates in DEATH. I don’t know what gave the writer such a fulgent thought.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com admin

    How is it possible to have knowledge of right and wrong, but not good and evil? This seems to me a matter of degree, not of kind.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com admin

    How is it possible to have knowledge of right and wrong, but not good and evil? This seems to me a matter of degree, not of kind.

  • Bullsheet

    Ah yes, but what anyone does was it intentional or unintentional?

  • Bullsheet

    Ah yes, but what anyone does was it intentional or unintentional?

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    Ah yes, but you are conflating “right” and “wrong” with “good” and “evil.” The two dichotomies are not equivalent. One can do “wrong” without doing “Evil” and one can do something “right” without doing something “good.” (and of course, and vice versa)

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    Ah yes, but you are conflating “right” and “wrong” with “good” and “evil.” The two dichotomies are not equivalent. One can do “wrong” without doing “Evil” and one can do something “right” without doing something “good.” (and of course, and vice versa)

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com admin

    “Adam and Eve knew they were doing wrong because they were going against the instructions of God, not because they consumed the fruit of knowledge.”

    I think Denise’s point is that Adam and Eve could not knowingly “do wrong” without first having knowledge of the difference between right and wrong. In other words, their decision could not be interpreted as ‘wrong’ because Adam and Eve had no context for the very concepts of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. These concepts only come into play after the act of eating the apple; therefore the decision itself could not have been ‘wrong’.

    This is an interesting argument.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com admin

    “Adam and Eve knew they were doing wrong because they were going against the instructions of God, not because they consumed the fruit of knowledge.”

    I think Denise’s point is that Adam and Eve could not knowingly “do wrong” without first having knowledge of the difference between right and wrong. In other words, their decision could not be interpreted as ‘wrong’ because Adam and Eve had no context for the very concepts of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. These concepts only come into play after the act of eating the apple; therefore the decision itself could not have been ‘wrong’.

    This is an interesting argument.

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    If one were to follow your argument and the literal tale as told in Genesis, then your argument is that God had no idea what he was creating. That what he created was flawed and hence, that he was imperfect.

    God in the Bible was not pleased with Adam and Eve, he was angered by their action, as he was when Cain slew Abel. The fact is that there would have been no slaying of Abel by Cain had Eve not listened to the Serpent.

    As lovely as your sentiment and intention are, if you are a literalist, you are quite wrong. If God had intended for man to have the knowledge of Good and Evil, he would have provided him such knowledge and not have forbid him from eating the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

    Perhaps we were intended to “copulate without concern for the consequences” as well as the other things you mention. Perhaps it was in God’s plan for mankind, we will never know.

    Your entire premise is flawed if you believe in the God of Abraham, Moses, and Christ. God is perfection as is all he has created.

    What God did do is provide man with free will, the ability to chose his actions. Adam and Eve knew they were doing wrong because they were going against the instructions of God, not because they consumed the fruit of knowledge. They were not hiding because they suddenly knew they had done wrong, they were hiding because they were embarrassed by their nakedness.

    No man rises when he uses his free will and chooses to obey God, not disobey him. Over and over again the Bible teaches us that lesson. Man is only exhalted when he lives in the Will of God. When man lives contrary to God’s Will, then he is fallen.

    No, Eve’s seduction by the Serpent, and Adam’s subsequent disobedience to God’s Will was not a good thing, it was a bad thing. Genesis 3 is an admonishment to follow God’s Will, not disobey it.

  • http://houstonconservative.com Will Malven

    If one were to follow your argument and the literal tale as told in Genesis, then your argument is that God had no idea what he was creating. That what he created was flawed and hence, that he was imperfect.

    God in the Bible was not pleased with Adam and Eve, he was angered by their action, as he was when Cain slew Abel. The fact is that there would have been no slaying of Abel by Cain had Eve not listened to the Serpent.

    As lovely as your sentiment and intention are, if you are a literalist, you are quite wrong. If God had intended for man to have the knowledge of Good and Evil, he would have provided him such knowledge and not have forbid him from eating the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

    Perhaps we were intended to “copulate without concern for the consequences” as well as the other things you mention. Perhaps it was in God’s plan for mankind, we will never know.

    Your entire premise is flawed if you believe in the God of Abraham, Moses, and Christ. God is perfection as is all he has created.

    What God did do is provide man with free will, the ability to chose his actions. Adam and Eve knew they were doing wrong because they were going against the instructions of God, not because they consumed the fruit of knowledge. They were not hiding because they suddenly knew they had done wrong, they were hiding because they were embarrassed by their nakedness.

    No man rises when he uses his free will and chooses to obey God, not disobey him. Over and over again the Bible teaches us that lesson. Man is only exhalted when he lives in the Will of God. When man lives contrary to God’s Will, then he is fallen.

    No, Eve’s seduction by the Serpent, and Adam’s subsequent disobedience to God’s Will was not a good thing, it was a bad thing. Genesis 3 is an admonishment to follow God’s Will, not disobey it.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search