lumigan tramadol tadalafil

When ‘Plan B’ Becomes Plan A

2006-08-28
By

The FDA recently approved making a drug called “Plan B” available over the counter, with no prescription necessary. A woman who takes it up to three days after intercourse can substantially reduce her chance to become pregnant. Thanks to Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA), who strong-armed the agency by blocking the nominations of Lester Crawford and Andrew von Eschenbach as FDA Commissioner, anyone over 18 can walk into a CVS or Rite-Aid and buy it off the shelf. We all know that age restrictions keep cigarettes and alcohol out of the hands of children, so it’s sure to work for the “morning after” pill, right?

The drug itself is not a bad thing. Unlike the controversial RU-486, it will not stop a pregnancy once it’s begun. The problem is making it available without a prescription, when one is even required for birth control pills. And even the supposed protection of only allowing its sale to those 18 and older is already under assault. A group called The Center for Reproductive Rights (by which is meant Consequence-Free Sex) plans to force the FDA to drop any age restriction whatsoever through lawsuits, and Planned Parenthood has already attacked “the scientifically baseless restriction imposed on teenagers.” If I know Planned Parenthood, they’ll probably set out candy dishes full of Plan B at their clinics, like M&Ms at a never-ending party. Plan B will soon become the primary contraceptive of choice.

Plan B is merely a tool. Like any tool, it can be used for good or ill. The Left will use this one to promote promiscuous, responsibility-free sex among progressively younger children, part of the plan to accelerate the moral decay we already see around us. Those who would have abstained from sex through fear of pregnancy, or not wanting to go through an abortion, will no longer have these excuses. Plan B not only prevents pregnancy, but prevents the user from having to take any responsibility for choosing whether to have sex. Just pop a pill, and stop worrying.

Of course, there are few better ways to drive Liberals into a foaming-mouthed frenzy than speaking about responsibility, self-restraint and discipline — especially concerning sex. For some reason, Liberals believe that the more people act like dogs in the street, rutting whenever, wherever and with whom they happen to be when the urge strikes, the more “enlightened” they are. It’s getting to the point where the dogs will probably begin complaining about the people problem.

Those on the Left tell us that it’s wrong to place moral or legal restrictions on young people having sex — or abortions, or drugs, or anything to let them escape the responsibilities that go along with it — because they’ll just do it anyway. I don’t know why more people don’t use that “argument” to attack laws against murder, theft and tax evasion. After all, if people are going to do these things despite the rules, why have any rules at all? The next time I get a speeding ticket, perhaps I’ll whip out the “people do it anyway” defense.

All too often, the reason given for having unprotected sex is, “it just happened so quickly,” as though feeling an urge is an adequate explanation for lack of restraint. Liberals promote instantaneous gratification as though it were some sort of civil right. More than half of American children have already become sexually active by the time they reach 17, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute. The teen pregnancy rate is significantly higher among Americans than in other developed countries, and nearly 80% of teen pregnancies are unplanned. Obviously, there is a problem here, and making it easier to simply get rid of those pregnancies is not the answer. The question we need to ask is, why is sex so devalued among young people that they see no reason for self-discipline?

The problem lies in the general lack of morals and loose standards that encourage such self-destructive behavior. Uninvolved parents allow the Left to indoctrinate the young into their cult of irresponsibility through schools, television and unsupervised use of the internet. If more parents would work harder at parenting, it would be more difficult for Liberals to spread their corruption. Unfortunately, most kids spend their days bombarded by Left-wing propaganda, and nights and weekends climbing mountains of homework. Even with parents willing to reach out, there isn’t much time for family interaction these days. It’s understandable that parents don’t want to waste what little time they spend with their children on lectures. Still, the only way to reclaim the younger generation is for parents to make the time to instill moral values in their children. Schools are not doing that job, nor is it their job to do.

The only good that is likely to come of Plan B’s widespread use is a reduction in abortions — personally, I’d rather see lives never begun than see them killed before birth. The downside, of course, will be a continued diminution of common morality and an increase in sexual activity among teenagers (and younger children), accompanied by a rise in sexually-transmitted diseases among the young.

As sex becomes the meaningless equivalent of a handshake, don’t be surprised when your first grader comes home with the clap before learning to write in cursive.

Joe Mariani is a computer consultant born and raised in New Jersey. He now lives in Pennsylvania, where the gun laws are less restrictive and taxes are lower. Joe always thought of himself as politically neutral until he saw how far left the left had really gone after 9/11. His essays and links to articles are available at http://www.guardianwatchblog.com/

5 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • tonysprout

    Let’s not forget the morning-after-sex OJ cocktail mixed together by errant men.

  • tonysprout

    Let’s not forget the morning-after-sex OJ cocktail mixed together by errant men.

  • tonysprout

    Let’s not forget the morning-after-sex OJ cocktail mixed together by errant men.

  • http://selfresurrection.blogspot.com/ TheGlimmering

    dontmakehermad,
    Then you’d better tell that to the fertility clinics who inject women with progesterone to improve the likelihood embryos will implant when they place them in the uterus. Progesterone would be the hormone in Plan B. Progesterone works solely by preventing ovulation. If in the 24 hour window that an ova is viable after release, you happen to have sex, then Plan B won’t work for you. Fortunately, since it takes some time for the zygote to reach the uterine wall, the progesterone has already worked its way out of your system so that it’s no longer improving your chance of implantation.

    Furthermore, reason and the medical establishment define pregnancy as beginning at implantation because pregnancy is a state effecting the mother, until implantation her body is unaffected hence why there’s nothing to measure in order to create a pre-implantation pregnancy test. An abortion or miscarriage refers to the ending of a pregnancy and nothing more, hence why preventing implantation is neither. Lastly, the best research indicates that the majority of zygotes, under the best of circumstances, do not implant in the uterus. Conservative estimates are as many as 75% of conceptions do not result in a birth, that’s under the best of circumstances and without interference, the statistic is likely much much higher.

    As for Mariani, rest assured Plan B is hardly candy and no one will be tempted to take it twice considering the extreme queasiness and such of the side effects. (It’s a high dose of hormones, they cause no harm, but neither does menstruation particularly and you don’t see us clamoring for round the clock menstruation to prevent pregnancy.)

    Remind me why we need a carrot and a stick? Wait, forget that, why do we want having a child to be a punishment?? Don’t give me the blather that children weren’t considered an unfortunate side effect of sex prior to contraception, either, we have plenty of first hand accounts from said eras lamenting otherwise. Besides, what’s so moral about a choice you made because otherwise you would suffer some unpleasant consequence? There’s nothing moral about giving to the poor if you believe you’ll be rewarded for it, you’re doing it for your own selfish reasons, for instance.

    At any rate, premarital sex has been with us a long time now and the availability of contraception does not seem to have impacted the prevalence in the least (look at the statistics for rushed weddings in the 50s, the frequency of penalties administered for fornication in Puritan New England, and what little data we have on those moral medievalists). If you equate premarital sex with irresponsibility, than all contraception has done is reduce the number of children born to irresponsible people, and would irresponsible people have abstained if there hadn’t been contraception protecting them? Not if they’re irresponsible, they wouldn’t!

    If you’re waving the carrot and stick on this side as reasons to abstain, I think I’d have to tell you the Left is doing a better job than you are. Reasons the Left supports for abstaining:
    1. You’re not ready.
    2. You don’t want to for whatever reason.
    3. You identify as asexual, meaning you’re not into that sort of thing.
    4. Decided not to to avoid disease.
    5. Religious convictions. (Falls under “don’t want to.”)

    Etc., etc., etc., You might want to check the Leftist credentials of the folks bashing virgins (although the Left heartily mocks anyone who takes too keen an interest in other people remaining virgins, such as purity balls, that’s marginally different). Anyone insulting virgins just for being virgins as opposed to being self-righteous or condescending about it is probably just trying to get in their pants.

  • http://selfresurrection.blogspot.com/ TheGlimmering

    dontmakehermad,
    Then you’d better tell that to the fertility clinics who inject women with progesterone to improve the likelihood embryos will implant when they place them in the uterus. Progesterone would be the hormone in Plan B. Progesterone works solely by preventing ovulation. If in the 24 hour window that an ova is viable after release, you happen to have sex, then Plan B won’t work for you. Fortunately, since it takes some time for the zygote to reach the uterine wall, the progesterone has already worked its way out of your system so that it’s no longer improving your chance of implantation.

    Furthermore, reason and the medical establishment define pregnancy as beginning at implantation because pregnancy is a state effecting the mother, until implantation her body is unaffected hence why there’s nothing to measure in order to create a pre-implantation pregnancy test. An abortion or miscarriage refers to the ending of a pregnancy and nothing more, hence why preventing implantation is neither. Lastly, the best research indicates that the majority of zygotes, under the best of circumstances, do not implant in the uterus. Conservative estimates are as many as 75% of conceptions do not result in a birth, that’s under the best of circumstances and without interference, the statistic is likely much much higher.

    As for Mariani, rest assured Plan B is hardly candy and no one will be tempted to take it twice considering the extreme queasiness and such of the side effects. (It’s a high dose of hormones, they cause no harm, but neither does menstruation particularly and you don’t see us clamoring for round the clock menstruation to prevent pregnancy.)

    Remind me why we need a carrot and a stick? Wait, forget that, why do we want having a child to be a punishment?? Don’t give me the blather that children weren’t considered an unfortunate side effect of sex prior to contraception, either, we have plenty of first hand accounts from said eras lamenting otherwise. Besides, what’s so moral about a choice you made because otherwise you would suffer some unpleasant consequence? There’s nothing moral about giving to the poor if you believe you’ll be rewarded for it, you’re doing it for your own selfish reasons, for instance.

    At any rate, premarital sex has been with us a long time now and the availability of contraception does not seem to have impacted the prevalence in the least (look at the statistics for rushed weddings in the 50s, the frequency of penalties administered for fornication in Puritan New England, and what little data we have on those moral medievalists). If you equate premarital sex with irresponsibility, than all contraception has done is reduce the number of children born to irresponsible people, and would irresponsible people have abstained if there hadn’t been contraception protecting them? Not if they’re irresponsible, they wouldn’t!

    If you’re waving the carrot and stick on this side as reasons to abstain, I think I’d have to tell you the Left is doing a better job than you are. Reasons the Left supports for abstaining:
    1. You’re not ready.
    2. You don’t want to for whatever reason.
    3. You identify as asexual, meaning you’re not into that sort of thing.
    4. Decided not to to avoid disease.
    5. Religious convictions. (Falls under “don’t want to.”)

    Etc., etc., etc., You might want to check the Leftist credentials of the folks bashing virgins (although the Left heartily mocks anyone who takes too keen an interest in other people remaining virgins, such as purity balls, that’s marginally different). Anyone insulting virgins just for being virgins as opposed to being self-righteous or condescending about it is probably just trying to get in their pants.

  • http://selfresurrection.blogspot.com/ TheGlimmering

    dontmakehermad,
    Then you’d better tell that to the fertility clinics who inject women with progesterone to improve the likelihood embryos will implant when they place them in the uterus. Progesterone would be the hormone in Plan B. Progesterone works solely by preventing ovulation. If in the 24 hour window that an ova is viable after release, you happen to have sex, then Plan B won’t work for you. Fortunately, since it takes some time for the zygote to reach the uterine wall, the progesterone has already worked its way out of your system so that it’s no longer improving your chance of implantation.

    Furthermore, reason and the medical establishment define pregnancy as beginning at implantation because pregnancy is a state effecting the mother, until implantation her body is unaffected hence why there’s nothing to measure in order to create a pre-implantation pregnancy test. An abortion or miscarriage refers to the ending of a pregnancy and nothing more, hence why preventing implantation is neither. Lastly, the best research indicates that the majority of zygotes, under the best of circumstances, do not implant in the uterus. Conservative estimates are as many as 75% of conceptions do not result in a birth, that’s under the best of circumstances and without interference, the statistic is likely much much higher.

    As for Mariani, rest assured Plan B is hardly candy and no one will be tempted to take it twice considering the extreme queasiness and such of the side effects. (It’s a high dose of hormones, they cause no harm, but neither does menstruation particularly and you don’t see us clamoring for round the clock menstruation to prevent pregnancy.)

    Remind me why we need a carrot and a stick? Wait, forget that, why do we want having a child to be a punishment?? Don’t give me the blather that children weren’t considered an unfortunate side effect of sex prior to contraception, either, we have plenty of first hand accounts from said eras lamenting otherwise. Besides, what’s so moral about a choice you made because otherwise you would suffer some unpleasant consequence? There’s nothing moral about giving to the poor if you believe you’ll be rewarded for it, you’re doing it for your own selfish reasons, for instance.

    At any rate, premarital sex has been with us a long time now and the availability of contraception does not seem to have impacted the prevalence in the least (look at the statistics for rushed weddings in the 50s, the frequency of penalties administered for fornication in Puritan New England, and what little data we have on those moral medievalists). If you equate premarital sex with irresponsibility, than all contraception has done is reduce the number of children born to irresponsible people, and would irresponsible people have abstained if there hadn’t been contraception protecting them? Not if they’re irresponsible, they wouldn’t!

    If you’re waving the carrot and stick on this side as reasons to abstain, I think I’d have to tell you the Left is doing a better job than you are. Reasons the Left supports for abstaining:
    1. You’re not ready.
    2. You don’t want to for whatever reason.
    3. You identify as asexual, meaning you’re not into that sort of thing.
    4. Decided not to to avoid disease.
    5. Religious convictions. (Falls under “don’t want to.”)

    Etc., etc., etc., You might want to check the Leftist credentials of the folks bashing virgins (although the Left heartily mocks anyone who takes too keen an interest in other people remaining virgins, such as purity balls, that’s marginally different). Anyone insulting virgins just for being virgins as opposed to being self-righteous or condescending about it is probably just trying to get in their pants.

  • Denise Noe

    Joe Mariani says the availability of Plan B means that girls and women who might have abstained out of fear of pregnancy or not wanting to go through an abortion “will no longer have that excuse.” No one needs an “excuse” to abstain from sex! It’s a decision that should not have to be justified. Indeed, that abstinence may be less fear-based may also lead to greater respect for girls and women who abstain — just as we ought to have much respect for boys and men who abstain despite the fact that they can’t get pregnant.

  • Denise Noe

    Joe Mariani says the availability of Plan B means that girls and women who might have abstained out of fear of pregnancy or not wanting to go through an abortion “will no longer have that excuse.” No one needs an “excuse” to abstain from sex! It’s a decision that should not have to be justified. Indeed, that abstinence may be less fear-based may also lead to greater respect for girls and women who abstain — just as we ought to have much respect for boys and men who abstain despite the fact that they can’t get pregnant.

  • Denise Noe

    Joe Mariani says the availability of Plan B means that girls and women who might have abstained out of fear of pregnancy or not wanting to go through an abortion “will no longer have that excuse.” No one needs an “excuse” to abstain from sex! It’s a decision that should not have to be justified. Indeed, that abstinence may be less fear-based may also lead to greater respect for girls and women who abstain — just as we ought to have much respect for boys and men who abstain despite the fact that they can’t get pregnant.

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ dontmakehermad

    Just one clarification. You said “it will not stop a pregnancy once it has begun.” But in fact, it will RARELY stop an existing pregnancy. In some cases, the drug prevents implantation of the fertilized egg into the uterine wall (effectively causing an abortion). Its only saving grace is that its purpose is not to cause an abortion. However, someone who would go to the trouble of taking Plan B to prevent a pregnancy after sex is probably just as likely to cause an abortion if the pregnancy could not have been prevented; in other words, the abortion will become far less frequent, if not quieter (and better yet, unintended).

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ dontmakehermad

    Just one clarification. You said “it will not stop a pregnancy once it has begun.” But in fact, it will RARELY stop an existing pregnancy. In some cases, the drug prevents implantation of the fertilized egg into the uterine wall (effectively causing an abortion). Its only saving grace is that its purpose is not to cause an abortion. However, someone who would go to the trouble of taking Plan B to prevent a pregnancy after sex is probably just as likely to cause an abortion if the pregnancy could not have been prevented; in other words, the abortion will become far less frequent, if not quieter (and better yet, unintended).

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ dontmakehermad

    Just one clarification. You said “it will not stop a pregnancy once it has begun.” But in fact, it will RARELY stop an existing pregnancy. In some cases, the drug prevents implantation of the fertilized egg into the uterine wall (effectively causing an abortion). Its only saving grace is that its purpose is not to cause an abortion. However, someone who would go to the trouble of taking Plan B to prevent a pregnancy after sex is probably just as likely to cause an abortion if the pregnancy could not have been prevented; in other words, the abortion will become far less frequent, if not quieter (and better yet, unintended).







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search