Comments on: Outside The Box: Unconventional Attacks Using Nuclear Weapons http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:53:53 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Global Geopolitics News » Global Security News - Nuclear weapons safeguarding improved in Russia http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17643 Global Geopolitics News » Global Security News - Nuclear weapons safeguarding improved in Russia Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:46:15 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17643 [...] Outside The Box: Unconventional Attacks Using Nuclear Weapons Men’s News Daily, CA - Sep 5, 2006 As a great many people remain in denial over the coming of nuclear weapons to totalitarian states, it is with the unspoken and ill-considered proviso that a [...] [...] Outside The Box: Unconventional Attacks Using Nuclear Weapons Men’s News Daily, CA – Sep 5, 2006 As a great many people remain in denial over the coming of nuclear weapons to totalitarian states, it is with the unspoken and ill-considered proviso that a [...]

]]> By: ceres http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17399 ceres Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:47:23 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17399 Terrifyingly informative. And, as always, I thank God for your genius, Tom, and you for sharing it. This article belongs on the front page of every rag across America. Surely, even the liberal lickers of the enemy's hand can't deny FDR's genius in his 1st inaugural speech: "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." If we Americans can't shake our paralyzing fear of the enemy, which seems to manifest itself in this idiotic pursuit of appeasement and "making nice", we are absolutely doomed. Terrifyingly informative. And, as always, I thank God for your genius, Tom, and you for sharing it. This article belongs on the front page of every rag across America. Surely, even the liberal lickers of the enemy’s hand can’t deny FDR’s genius in his 1st inaugural speech: “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.” If we Americans can’t shake our paralyzing fear of the enemy, which seems to manifest itself in this idiotic pursuit of appeasement and “making nice”, we are absolutely doomed.

]]> By: Global Geopolitics News » Global Security News - Did Liberals Lie About Weapons of Mass Destruction? http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17379 Global Geopolitics News » Global Security News - Did Liberals Lie About Weapons of Mass Destruction? Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:45:24 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17379 [...] Outside The Box: Unconventional Attacks Using Nuclear Weapons Men’s News Daily, CA - Sep 5, 2006 As a great many people remain in denial over the coming of nuclear weapons to totalitarian states, it is with the unspoken and ill-considered proviso that a [...] [...] Outside The Box: Unconventional Attacks Using Nuclear Weapons Men’s News Daily, CA – Sep 5, 2006 As a great many people remain in denial over the coming of nuclear weapons to totalitarian states, it is with the unspoken and ill-considered proviso that a [...]

]]> By: Aquiline Observer http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17356 Aquiline Observer Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:48:26 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17356 Nice article, Tom. You identify our economy as the target, which has often been ignored. You also advance the methodology of nuke delivery, which is key. There is more for rogue states to consider and it involves little, keychain, radiation detectors that suposedly no one has. Wrong! Port security is much better than blabbering, leftist senators want to admit. The EMP scenario would require missile guidance capability for precision, high altitude bursts. Currently thes capabilities are beyond terrorists and N. Korea, but not China, nor Russia. Allow me to submit one opinion as to what constitutes decisive action rather than Clinton covering up of threats. Although President Bush and I are both opposed to nuclear first-strike, much of our problem today comes from years of appearing to be an easy conquest (Clinton did not effectively retaliate, so invited more attacks). Answer: a large parking lot in Tehran would go a long way towards correcting the false notion of the U.S. as a pushover target now harbored by our avowed enemies. Nice article, Tom. You identify our economy as the target, which has often been ignored. You also advance the methodology of nuke delivery, which is key.

There is more for rogue states to consider and it involves little, keychain, radiation detectors that suposedly no one has. Wrong! Port security is much better than blabbering, leftist senators want to admit.

The EMP scenario would require missile guidance capability for precision, high altitude bursts. Currently thes capabilities are beyond terrorists and N. Korea, but not China, nor Russia.

Allow me to submit one opinion as to what constitutes decisive action rather than Clinton covering up of threats. Although President Bush and I are both opposed to nuclear first-strike, much of our problem today comes from years of appearing to be an easy conquest (Clinton did not effectively retaliate, so invited more attacks).

Answer: a large parking lot in Tehran would go a long way towards correcting the false notion of the U.S. as a pushover target now harbored by our avowed enemies.

]]> By: DadWithGirls http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17338 DadWithGirls Wed, 06 Sep 2006 02:11:53 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17338 With respect Tom M. -- "The issue presented suggests the need for action..." You did not answer my question. What specific ACTION(S) do you indirectly propose? Analysis if as expert as yours typically leads to recommendations, yes? What are they? With respect Tom M. — “The issue presented suggests the need for action…”

You did not answer my question.

What specific ACTION(S) do you indirectly propose?

Analysis if as expert as yours typically leads to recommendations, yes?

What are they?

]]> By: whraglyn http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17306 whraglyn Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:38:28 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17306 Right on the nail head about the above comment, Tom. Right also on the analysis in your essay. While your conclusion definitely does not call for pre-emptive strikes, it does not exclude from the call for discussion the possibility of such action, does it? If not, imo, such an action should not only be on the table, it should be the first option under consideration, in order to determine the viability of such an action, and the possible repercussions among our 'allies'. We know how the enemy will respond: With the same sort of cowardice and brutality they have ever displayed. If we don't stand firm and strong against such evil, perhaps DWG will remember that when his daughters are forced into burkas after the Islamic EMP destruction of our ability to defend ourselves. Right on the nail head about the above comment, Tom.

Right also on the analysis in your essay.

While your conclusion definitely does not call for pre-emptive strikes, it does not exclude from the call for discussion the possibility of such action, does it?

If not, imo, such an action should not only be on the table, it should be the first option under consideration, in order to determine the viability of such an action, and the possible repercussions among our ‘allies’.

We know how the enemy will respond:
With the same sort of cowardice and brutality they have ever displayed.

If we don’t stand firm and strong against such evil, perhaps DWG will remember that when his daughters are forced into burkas after the Islamic EMP destruction of our ability to defend ourselves.

]]> By: Tom Marzullo http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17295 Tom Marzullo Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:53:20 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17295 RE: "Is that just an indirect way of advocating pre-emptive tactical nuclear war by the U.S.?" This comment is substantially equivalent to an unethical lawyer using a classic approach to slime a person giving testimony by asking "When did you stop beating your wife?" The issue presented suggests the need for action, while the reader's comment proposes that only one form of rather extreme action is suggested, though unstated... One of the most useful behavioral rules of thumb I have been ever been taught is that when a person immediately attributes inappropriate patterns of thought or behavior to another person, that they have no knowledge of, actually indicates what that person's own morals dictate. RE: “Is that just an indirect way of advocating pre-emptive tactical nuclear war by the U.S.?”

This comment is substantially equivalent to an unethical lawyer using a classic approach to slime a person giving testimony by asking “When did you stop beating your wife?”

The issue presented suggests the need for action, while the reader’s comment proposes that only one form of rather extreme action is suggested, though unstated… One of the most useful behavioral rules of thumb I have been ever been taught is that when a person immediately attributes inappropriate patterns of thought or behavior to another person, that they have no knowledge of, actually indicates what that person’s own morals dictate.

]]> By: DadWithGirls http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-17289 DadWithGirls Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:33:52 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/09/05/outside-the-box-unconventional-attacks-using-nuclear-weapons/#comment-17289 Following a credible analysis of the threat of terrorist's using nuclear/EMP strike potential, the author concludes -- "This makes dealing decisively, rather than just talking with Iran and North Korea an undeniable priority in terms of both global stability and survival." Is that just an indirect way of advocating pre-emptive tactical nuclear war by the U.S.? Following a credible analysis of the threat of terrorist’s using nuclear/EMP strike potential, the author concludes — “This makes dealing decisively, rather than just talking with Iran and North Korea an undeniable priority in terms of both global stability and survival.”

Is that just an indirect way of advocating pre-emptive tactical nuclear war by the U.S.?

]]>