Thank you, for the work you did, to research and write something exceptional. This is a very well documented explanation of what is behind the intentional breakdown of our society, I have observed by experience, all of my life. Thank you for connecting it to psychology; most people won’t go there, because they are afraid to knock someone who is just trying to help people. You have clearly demonstrated that it is a strategy of abrogating our power, in our politics, our economy, our patriotism, our military, our police, our churches, our schools, our marriages, our families, basically everywhere. If you understand the reality of what these people are doing, you must be another person who doesn’t sleep at night. The only thing I would encourage you to do is to make your solutions more real and more concrete. It will take a lot of force to stop these people and a lot of effort to undo the damage they have done. I think the best thing is to divide the country.

Keep informing us Linda. Its a step in the right direction. Of course ultimately men will have to do something, either by choice or necessity.

For persons especially interested in the controversies around multiculturalism (and if you have kids in college, you should be…), I recommend Richard Bernstein’s very readable
“Dictatorship of Virtue: How the Battle Over Multiculturalism is Reshaping Our Schools, Our Country, Our Lives.” (1995)

A couple excerpts from the Introduction:

“Out of the burning wish for betterment grew what has now become a kind of bureaucracy of the good, fighting battles that have already been won, demanding ever greater commitments of virtue from a recalcitrant population. … It is an ardently advocated, veritably messianic political program, and, like most political programs that have succumbed to the utopian temptation, it does not take kindly to true difference. …

To put matters bluntly: the multiculturalist rhetoric has the rest of us on the run, unable to respond for fear of being branded unicultural, or racist, or (to get into the trendy academic lingo) complicit in the structures of hegemony imposed by the Eurocentric patriarchy and its strategies of domination. …

In such a way does multiculturalism limit discussion: it makes people afraid to say what they think and feel; it presents dubious and cranky interpretations and analyses as self-evident, indisputable truths. It often operates, not through the usual means of civil discourse and persuasion, but via intimidation and intellectual decree. It rewrites history. It sanctions a cultivation of aggrievement, a constant claim of victimization, an excessive, fussy, self-pitying sort of wariness that induces others to spout pieties.

And that, in turn, covers the public discussion of critical issues with a layer of fear, so that we can no longer speak forthrightly and honestly about such matters as crime, race, poverty, AIDS, the failure of schools, single-parenthood, affirmative action, racial preferences, welfare, college admissions, merit, the breakup of the family, and the disintegration of urban life.”