<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Single Mothers the &#8216;New American Family?&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:37:06 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stevens</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-19008</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-19008</guid>
		<description>Can you say &quot; failed social engineering experiment&quot; because that is what it is! I &#039;ve seen way too many &quot;single women&quot; try and yes I do say &quot;try&quot; to raise children by themselves.  It does not work and in time the &quot; failed social engineering experiment&quot; will .... well FAIL!
Like communism and other man created atempted to go his own way and not obey the commandments of God, it will be a disaster.. No correction,it already is a disaster, you just have not heard it on the  six o&#039;clock news.
Time will correct the problem, people will come to their senses and realize it is time to put an end the &quot; Feminist Rebellion&quot; and go back to something that has stood the test of time and that is God&#039;s creation,&quot;THE FAMILY&quot;.
IE Man, Woman and Children.  The man is the head, the woman is the heart and the children are the outgrowth of that arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say &#8221; failed social engineering experiment&#8221; because that is what it is! I &#8216;ve seen way too many &#8220;single women&#8221; try and yes I do say &#8220;try&#8221; to raise children by themselves.  It does not work and in time the &#8221; failed social engineering experiment&#8221; will &#8230;. well FAIL!<br />
Like communism and other man created atempted to go his own way and not obey the commandments of God, it will be a disaster.. No correction,it already is a disaster, you just have not heard it on the  six o&#8217;clock news.<br />
Time will correct the problem, people will come to their senses and realize it is time to put an end the &#8221; Feminist Rebellion&#8221; and go back to something that has stood the test of time and that is God&#8217;s creation,&#8221;THE FAMILY&#8221;.<br />
IE Man, Woman and Children.  The man is the head, the woman is the heart and the children are the outgrowth of that arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mruffolo</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18998</link>
		<dc:creator>mruffolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18998</guid>
		<description>It is only a little safer for a man to give his vows privately to a non-American woman. Later when she does not want to keep these vows, he could only lose his children, 20% of income for 18 years, and liberty from a possible order of protection.

Without a marriage a license from our government, the husband keeps all his real and personal property and saves on other support (day care, insurance, mortgage, car payments, alimony).

It is a myth to &quot;pick the right one,&quot; as our government approves, runs, and enforces her getting the kids, income, and property.

There are reasons why women initiate divorce at twice the rate of men. It pays well and it&#039;s fashionable.

She may not know the benefits of divorce at &quot;I do&quot;, but she learns quickly afterward. After a hint of trouble from you, she speaks to her divorced mom, divorced girlfriends, priest, and or  divorce lawyer. Last week a divorced mom shared with me that her priest approved her suggestion to divorce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is only a little safer for a man to give his vows privately to a non-American woman. Later when she does not want to keep these vows, he could only lose his children, 20% of income for 18 years, and liberty from a possible order of protection.</p>
<p>Without a marriage a license from our government, the husband keeps all his real and personal property and saves on other support (day care, insurance, mortgage, car payments, alimony).</p>
<p>It is a myth to &#8220;pick the right one,&#8221; as our government approves, runs, and enforces her getting the kids, income, and property.</p>
<p>There are reasons why women initiate divorce at twice the rate of men. It pays well and it&#8217;s fashionable.</p>
<p>She may not know the benefits of divorce at &#8220;I do&#8221;, but she learns quickly afterward. After a hint of trouble from you, she speaks to her divorced mom, divorced girlfriends, priest, and or  divorce lawyer. Last week a divorced mom shared with me that her priest approved her suggestion to divorce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Knight</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18932</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18932</guid>
		<description>Except that the easiest way for a foreign woman to avoid being deported from the &quot;miles on road signs land&quot; is to claim to be a victim of domestic violence.
So I hereby offer a service to those foreign ladies who love feet and inches so much as to want to come and live here:
I will be your American citizen boyfriend.  You can petition for a protection order against me alleging domestic violence.  I will even help you with the paperwrok, as I work in a law office as a paralegal!  I will appear at the hearing and put up a typical stumbling defense claiming that I never ever threatened you or hit you or anything.  You turn on the waterworks and say I did and the judge will sign the one year restraining order.  (Of course, I will deny ever suborning perjury on your part!)
And with that, you get to stay in Uncle Sam land, whatever other reasons the Dept of Homeland Security might have to send you packing back to the old country.
Of course, I have my living expenses, child support even, I cannot afford to do anything for free. As long as your check for $100,000 clears, I will be happy to be your abusive American boyfriend.
If you want me to actually hit you so as to make it &quot;look good&quot;, well, that will cost extra.  A lot extra.
Of course you are right, children are better raised by both father and mother and even in divorce, no custodial parent should prevent the noncostodial from seeing the children regularly unless there are serious problems with the noncustodial that can be PROVEN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that the easiest way for a foreign woman to avoid being deported from the &#8220;miles on road signs land&#8221; is to claim to be a victim of domestic violence.<br />
So I hereby offer a service to those foreign ladies who love feet and inches so much as to want to come and live here:<br />
I will be your American citizen boyfriend.  You can petition for a protection order against me alleging domestic violence.  I will even help you with the paperwrok, as I work in a law office as a paralegal!  I will appear at the hearing and put up a typical stumbling defense claiming that I never ever threatened you or hit you or anything.  You turn on the waterworks and say I did and the judge will sign the one year restraining order.  (Of course, I will deny ever suborning perjury on your part!)<br />
And with that, you get to stay in Uncle Sam land, whatever other reasons the Dept of Homeland Security might have to send you packing back to the old country.<br />
Of course, I have my living expenses, child support even, I cannot afford to do anything for free. As long as your check for $100,000 clears, I will be happy to be your abusive American boyfriend.<br />
If you want me to actually hit you so as to make it &#8220;look good&#8221;, well, that will cost extra.  A lot extra.<br />
Of course you are right, children are better raised by both father and mother and even in divorce, no custodial parent should prevent the noncostodial from seeing the children regularly unless there are serious problems with the noncustodial that can be PROVEN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galacticlove</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18922</link>
		<dc:creator>galacticlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18922</guid>
		<description>A Man&#039;s Responsibility..

The main point that everyone seems to be missing is the fact that we Men NEED TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT WOMAN to start our families with.  

Admittedly this is becoming a increasingly harder proposition to do in the US and Western Countries..  But in other countries there are women who still believe in a traditional role and a tradtional home.. 

This is EXACTLY why I promote Russian Women as a better alternative to what Men are facing now.

Check out this link to learn more..

http://russianwomen.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/what-is-a-genuine-russian-woman/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Man&#8217;s Responsibility..</p>
<p>The main point that everyone seems to be missing is the fact that we Men NEED TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT WOMAN to start our families with.  </p>
<p>Admittedly this is becoming a increasingly harder proposition to do in the US and Western Countries..  But in other countries there are women who still believe in a traditional role and a tradtional home.. </p>
<p>This is EXACTLY why I promote Russian Women as a better alternative to what Men are facing now.</p>
<p>Check out this link to learn more..</p>
<p><a href="http://russianwomen.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/what-is-a-genuine-russian-woman/" rel="nofollow">http://russianwomen.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/what-is-a-genuine-russian-woman/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DadWithGirls</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18903</link>
		<dc:creator>DadWithGirls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18903</guid>
		<description>The 79 reviews of this book on amazon.com offer a real polarized slugfest between rad-fems and normal people. There are dozens of 1-star reviews, and a bunch of 5-star reviews, giving the book a 4-star average!

The 5-star reviewersâ€™ profiles show that most have only ever reviewed one book â€“ Drexlerâ€™s! (Obviously a set up by the authorâ€™s lesbian-mom circle.)

Just like Drexler&#039;s book which includes few interviews with boys, amazon.com apparently deleted some negative reader reviews from men who were raised in lesbian &quot;families.&quot;

My biased bullet list of excerpted comments follows -- the dyke&#039;s comments can be located quite easily by searching reader reviews by &quot;highest rated.&quot;

--- 

â€¢This is the most blatant propaganda I have seen in a while.
â€¢Another &quot;feel-good&quot; book directed at lesbians who insist fathers aren&#039;t necessary in the raising of boys. They are SO WRONG. Unfortunately, their guinea pigs are the children. The author limits her samples to white, upper class lesbians and single mothers. To say her sample is skewed is an understatement.
â€¢A more apt title would be &quot;How Lesbians and Feminists can Brainwash Children into Thinking Fathers are not Important&quot;.
â€¢Curiously,the author contradicts herself by suggesting that sons need some male contact(grandfathers,uncles,etc.)just not dad.
â€¢There are plenty of situations where one parent or the other does not do a good job of raising the children, but there is nothing in the scientific world that shows any boy is better off being raised without a father.
â€¢This toxic mind trash should be avoided at all costs.
â€¢Despite Drexler&#039;s credentials, Raising Boys without Men is just about the most sloppily researched book ever thrown together.
â€¢Why didn&#039;t anyone notice that her research sample was made up of self-selected mothers in higher-income households whose childbearing was much more carefully planned than most? How did it escape everyone&#039;s notice that most of these boys are still in their preteens and teens, and there&#039;s been no opportunity yet to follow them into adulthood?
â€¢The alleged &quot;Drexler-solicited&quot; reviews are easy to spot - they almost all mention the author&#039;s &quot;research&quot;, they have 5 stars, and are typically the only book that person has ever reviewed on Amazon. 
â€¢After reading this trash I feel ashamed to be a woman. Women who take this battle to this level must have clearly had problem childhoods and no clue as to the importance of men to them or their children - both girls and boys.
â€¢After raising three children as a custodial father, I would never claim something so absurd as that mothers are not important in the raising of girls. Are we to say that one or the other parent is dispensable?
â€¢There&#039;s no need to read this book except to educate yourself on more of society&#039;s attempt to minimize men&#039;s value to families and their children.
â€¢Yes, Ms. Drexler is helping to advance our society by debunking the old two-parent myth of the past. We will anxiously await her new volume on &quot;Men Raising Girls without Women.&quot;
â€¢(From the rad-fem club) -- Imagine how lucky our daughters will be when these young men grow up and are eager to treat them in the most wonderful way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 79 reviews of this book on amazon.com offer a real polarized slugfest between rad-fems and normal people. There are dozens of 1-star reviews, and a bunch of 5-star reviews, giving the book a 4-star average!</p>
<p>The 5-star reviewersâ€™ profiles show that most have only ever reviewed one book â€“ Drexlerâ€™s! (Obviously a set up by the authorâ€™s lesbian-mom circle.)</p>
<p>Just like Drexler&#8217;s book which includes few interviews with boys, amazon.com apparently deleted some negative reader reviews from men who were raised in lesbian &#8220;families.&#8221;</p>
<p>My biased bullet list of excerpted comments follows &#8212; the dyke&#8217;s comments can be located quite easily by searching reader reviews by &#8220;highest rated.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212; </p>
<p>â€¢This is the most blatant propaganda I have seen in a while.<br />
â€¢Another &#8220;feel-good&#8221; book directed at lesbians who insist fathers aren&#8217;t necessary in the raising of boys. They are SO WRONG. Unfortunately, their guinea pigs are the children. The author limits her samples to white, upper class lesbians and single mothers. To say her sample is skewed is an understatement.<br />
â€¢A more apt title would be &#8220;How Lesbians and Feminists can Brainwash Children into Thinking Fathers are not Important&#8221;.<br />
â€¢Curiously,the author contradicts herself by suggesting that sons need some male contact(grandfathers,uncles,etc.)just not dad.<br />
â€¢There are plenty of situations where one parent or the other does not do a good job of raising the children, but there is nothing in the scientific world that shows any boy is better off being raised without a father.<br />
â€¢This toxic mind trash should be avoided at all costs.<br />
â€¢Despite Drexler&#8217;s credentials, Raising Boys without Men is just about the most sloppily researched book ever thrown together.<br />
â€¢Why didn&#8217;t anyone notice that her research sample was made up of self-selected mothers in higher-income households whose childbearing was much more carefully planned than most? How did it escape everyone&#8217;s notice that most of these boys are still in their preteens and teens, and there&#8217;s been no opportunity yet to follow them into adulthood?<br />
â€¢The alleged &#8220;Drexler-solicited&#8221; reviews are easy to spot &#8211; they almost all mention the author&#8217;s &#8220;research&#8221;, they have 5 stars, and are typically the only book that person has ever reviewed on Amazon.<br />
â€¢After reading this trash I feel ashamed to be a woman. Women who take this battle to this level must have clearly had problem childhoods and no clue as to the importance of men to them or their children &#8211; both girls and boys.<br />
â€¢After raising three children as a custodial father, I would never claim something so absurd as that mothers are not important in the raising of girls. Are we to say that one or the other parent is dispensable?<br />
â€¢There&#8217;s no need to read this book except to educate yourself on more of society&#8217;s attempt to minimize men&#8217;s value to families and their children.<br />
â€¢Yes, Ms. Drexler is helping to advance our society by debunking the old two-parent myth of the past. We will anxiously await her new volume on &#8220;Men Raising Girls without Women.&#8221;<br />
â€¢(From the rad-fem club) &#8212; Imagine how lucky our daughters will be when these young men grow up and are eager to treat them in the most wonderful way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snootfish</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18899</link>
		<dc:creator>snootfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18899</guid>
		<description>The first time I picked up the children after the divorce I was arrested. I pulled into the driveway and I was arrested. I still don&#039;t know why to this day. The police officer gave me nothing but incoherent explanations.

I was out in less than two hours. I called and I was told &quot;it was to late you should of come sooner.&quot; Of course, I had come sooner, but I was arrested. I called the police who went out there with me (different officers). 

With lights flashing all around from the police cars, my kids came out of the house. They had their bags packed and had huge grins.  I knew it was worth it, and I knew how important it was.

That kind of thing to an extent continued for several years and now seems to have stopped. All the trouble is more than worth it. My daughter called just a few minutes ago to make sure that I am going to pick her up this evening.

These women who say fathers are not necessary don&#039;t have a clue about life. Fathers provide things that mothers don&#039;t. The converse is also true. These poeple if they really think about it must realize this but they deny it not really caring about the children -- they only care about their agenda. Their agenda is not good for anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I picked up the children after the divorce I was arrested. I pulled into the driveway and I was arrested. I still don&#8217;t know why to this day. The police officer gave me nothing but incoherent explanations.</p>
<p>I was out in less than two hours. I called and I was told &#8220;it was to late you should of come sooner.&#8221; Of course, I had come sooner, but I was arrested. I called the police who went out there with me (different officers). </p>
<p>With lights flashing all around from the police cars, my kids came out of the house. They had their bags packed and had huge grins.  I knew it was worth it, and I knew how important it was.</p>
<p>That kind of thing to an extent continued for several years and now seems to have stopped. All the trouble is more than worth it. My daughter called just a few minutes ago to make sure that I am going to pick her up this evening.</p>
<p>These women who say fathers are not necessary don&#8217;t have a clue about life. Fathers provide things that mothers don&#8217;t. The converse is also true. These poeple if they really think about it must realize this but they deny it not really caring about the children &#8212; they only care about their agenda. Their agenda is not good for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mruffolo</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/comment-page-1/#comment-18893</link>
		<dc:creator>mruffolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/10/04/are-single-mothers-the-new-american-family/#comment-18893</guid>
		<description>My six year old son frequently expresses an interest that my ex-wife and I be together.

My ex-wife said that it is the best interest of the child that we remain separate. I suppose that she believes that a strange man will make a better father, yet the strange man probably struggles to parent his own children, as I do.

I hate divorce. Feminism is selfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My six year old son frequently expresses an interest that my ex-wife and I be together.</p>
<p>My ex-wife said that it is the best interest of the child that we remain separate. I suppose that she believes that a strange man will make a better father, yet the strange man probably struggles to parent his own children, as I do.</p>
<p>I hate divorce. Feminism is selfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
