Comments on: Gay panties in a twist over anchor’s comments

By: AlMartin

AlMartin — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:59:00 +0000

You are free to say whatever you want in this state….as long as it’s the same as what I say.

Pathetic.

By: roger

roger — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:01:45 +0000

As Oriana Fallaci said:
“Political Correctness is cowardice”

The announcer should be applauded for telling the truth.

And we are seeing this more and more – people are starting to take a stand against the lunacy.

By: mruffolo

mruffolo — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:28:50 +0000

After men take centuries to turn America into a prosperous nation from hard work and innovation, we no focus on training up our a future generation of leaders in divorce and gayness is little thanks.

I expect our government will keep itself in business providing social services for the social problems that they help create.

I read an article from Baskerville about the divorce industry and other government agencies that generate business each each other. It’s a referral service that keeps its citizens dependent on the process.

By: dontmakehermad

dontmakehermad — Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:09:55 +0000

By what I can discern from this article, the self-described “politically incorrect” radio host is under attack because he criticized the situation of a baby being created outside the bonds of a romantic relationship. The parents aren’t married, nor are they romantically involved. So this radio host is claiming that this is a travesty because of the effect the arrangement will have on the child as she grows up.

Perhaps the girl will miss out on the subtle (but important) expressions of affection that teach her how to be gentle and affectionate later on in life. That is a valid point for which the radio broadcaster needs not to apologize.

I do think it’s ridiculous that the local politician is so self-absorbed that he can’t take a little criticism of his life choices without marshalling all of his political soldiers in a demand for a public apology. Just who does he think he is, Benito Mussolini? What right does he have to use his office to demogogue perfectly legitimate dissent that disagrees with his lifestyle? For that matter, what right does he even have to try to squash “illegitimate” views? None. He’s just a man, behaving like a little girl who — in a tantrum — is stomping the floor because she didn’t get her way.

Typical of San Francisco liberals — demand compliance in the name of open-mindedness. What’s next?

John Dias
Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com