lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Sen. George Allen: Mr. Macaca Just Can’t Follow The Rules

2006-10-18
By
Virginia Sen. George Allen expected his reelection campaign to be a cakewalk, but along the way he stepped on some Macaca quicksand and he has been unable to extricate himself. 

The latest polls show the Virginia Senate race is a virtual tie. Allen, who is a leading member of the Republican “culture of corruption”, has resorted to dirty tricks.

According to Foxnews.com :

“The League of Women Voters of Virginia demanded Tuesday that Republican U.S. Sen. George Allen to pull a campaign ad in which the league says he improperly used footage from an Oct. televised debate.”

Both Allen’s campaign and that of Democratic opponent Jim Webb agreed not to use clips from the debate in their campaign ads – something the league insists on so candidates feel free to speak openly and to protect the league’s status as a nonpartisan entity, said Anne Kanter, the league’s voter development director.”

Political advertisements are 100 per cent spin, debates allow us to see the candidates unplugged and unfiltered. By breaking the rules and airing footage of a debate, Allen’s campaign is undermining the democratic process.

I am not surprised by this horrendous breach of protocol, after all this is the same George Allen who for the past five years has failed to tell Congress about stock options he got for his work as a director of a high-tech company.

The clip in question features Democratic opponent Jim Webb saying:  ”We kid ourselves if we don’t say that we need more revenues.”

“Revenues” is not a synonym for taxes, Webb was referring to his commitment to close glaring corporate loopholes.

Sen. George Allen should be ashamed of himself, but if he is not embarrassed about his racist tendencies, why should he express regret for his brazen duplicity?

 

6 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • oneShef

    Disclosure is not an ommission, most cetainly when it is not done for five years! Avoidence is at its root seeking not to be detected. Call it like it is, quit defending thieves! Using misleading adds only corroborates the deceit displayed by attempting to avoid reporting income! Again, call it like it is! This is an issue of character…not one of the left or right.

  • oneShef

    Disclosure is not an ommission, most cetainly when it is not done for five years! Avoidence is at its root seeking not to be detected. Call it like it is, quit defending thieves! Using misleading adds only corroborates the deceit displayed by attempting to avoid reporting income! Again, call it like it is! This is an issue of character…not one of the left or right.

  • Squiggy

    “Revenues” is not a synonym for taxes, Webb was referring to his commitment to close glaring corporate loopholes.

    Your liberal ignorance is showing. Closing any loophole (aka legal deduction) is raising taxes.

    I don’t think all libs are stupid, but the only other explanation involves malicious intentions. Which is the lesser of the two evils?

  • Squiggy

    “Revenues” is not a synonym for taxes, Webb was referring to his commitment to close glaring corporate loopholes.

    Your liberal ignorance is showing. Closing any loophole (aka legal deduction) is raising taxes.

    I don’t think all libs are stupid, but the only other explanation involves malicious intentions. Which is the lesser of the two evils?

  • whraglyn

    RPR, oops, Robert, From Comment #4 above:
    ‘“The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.’

    So:
    The Allen campaign decision to not present every detail of the debate from which the Webb quote is taken is ‘brazen duplicity’ and ‘dirty tricks’ used to mislead voters,
    BUT, when you leave out ‘the rest of the story’, that is simply because that info ‘wasn’t worth mentioning’ to your readers, right?

    Whew, thanks for demonstrating so clearly the equitable fairness inherent in all things Democrat.

  • whraglyn

    RPR, oops, Robert, From Comment #4 above:
    ‘“The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.’

    So:
    The Allen campaign decision to not present every detail of the debate from which the Webb quote is taken is ‘brazen duplicity’ and ‘dirty tricks’ used to mislead voters,
    BUT, when you leave out ‘the rest of the story’, that is simply because that info ‘wasn’t worth mentioning’ to your readers, right?

    Whew, thanks for demonstrating so clearly the equitable fairness inherent in all things Democrat.

  • whraglyn

    waldo1:
    ‘Talk about culture of corruption. And as with Emperor Clinton and his new clothes…. you just cant see.’

    RPR, um, Robert, does see it; he even admits it.

    RPR, oops, Robert, From Comment #4 above:
    ‘“The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.’

    He sees it alright, waldo1.

    If he doesn’t tell all he sees, it’s just not worth repeating, that’s all.

    Anyone who can’t see that should keep reading until they do see which things are, and are not, worth mentioning.

  • whraglyn

    waldo1:
    ‘Talk about culture of corruption. And as with Emperor Clinton and his new clothes…. you just cant see.’

    RPR, um, Robert, does see it; he even admits it.

    RPR, oops, Robert, From Comment #4 above:
    ‘“The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.’

    He sees it alright, waldo1.

    If he doesn’t tell all he sees, it’s just not worth repeating, that’s all.

    Anyone who can’t see that should keep reading until they do see which things are, and are not, worth mentioning.

  • whraglyn

    ‘Webb did not break the agreement with the league of voters, Allen clearly did. That’s why the league only rebuked Allen.’

    Yah, and the non-partisan integrity of the League of Women Voters is as unassailable as the factual integrity of your work, RPR, oops, Robert.

  • whraglyn

    ‘Webb did not break the agreement with the league of voters, Allen clearly did. That’s why the league only rebuked Allen.’

    Yah, and the non-partisan integrity of the League of Women Voters is as unassailable as the factual integrity of your work, RPR, oops, Robert.

  • waldo1

    Speaking of dirty tricks, how clean would you be if someone followed you around 24/7 with a camera? Would you ever say something that could be blown out of proportion? I suspect you would not be near as clean as you pretend, and where is your outrage at the clearly corrupt actions of Sen. Reid? How about Sen. Clintons Cattle futures, Pelosi’s kickbacks or the oh so uncorrupt congressman Jefferson and his cold hard cash pile. We shouldn’t mention Mr. err Ms. Barney Franks and the brothel being run out of his/her basement… Talk about culture of corruption. And as with Emperor Clinton and his new clothes…. you just cant see

  • waldo1

    Speaking of dirty tricks, how clean would you be if someone followed you around 24/7 with a camera? Would you ever say something that could be blown out of proportion? I suspect you would not be near as clean as you pretend, and where is your outrage at the clearly corrupt actions of Sen. Reid? How about Sen. Clintons Cattle futures, Pelosi’s kickbacks or the oh so uncorrupt congressman Jefferson and his cold hard cash pile. We shouldn’t mention Mr. err Ms. Barney Franks and the brothel being run out of his/her basement… Talk about culture of corruption. And as with Emperor Clinton and his new clothes…. you just cant see

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Webb never posted any debate footage on his site.

    The footage of the entire debate was posted on the Raising Kane blog, an independent Web site. Not an excerpt taken out of context, but the entire debate.

    Webb did not break the agreement with the league of voters, Allen clearly did. That’s why the league only rebuked Allen.

    “The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Webb never posted any debate footage on his site.

    The footage of the entire debate was posted on the Raising Kane blog, an independent Web site. Not an excerpt taken out of context, but the entire debate.

    Webb did not break the agreement with the league of voters, Allen clearly did. That’s why the league only rebuked Allen.

    “The rest of the story” wasn’t worth mentioning.

  • whraglyn

    Hey, nationwish:
    Here’s George!

    *whew*
    Thought for a minute there RPR, …oops, Robert, was going to have to look for real work before, not after, Allen wins again!

  • whraglyn

    Hey, nationwish:
    Here’s George!

    *whew*
    Thought for a minute there RPR, …oops, Robert, was going to have to look for real work before, not after, Allen wins again!

  • Patriot

    What a surprise. Roberto gives yet another slanted and incomplete commentary. That’s so unlike him.

  • Patriot

    What a surprise. Roberto gives yet another slanted and incomplete commentary. That’s so unlike him.

  • stands2p

    Just for the fun of it, here’s the rest of the story:
    Allen campaign spokesman Dick Wadhams said the Webb campaign broke the agreement first because the liberal Raising Kaine blog, which receives funding from the Webb campaign, was providing links to debate footage. He said the ad will not be pulled.

    Kanter(Anne Kanter, the league’s voter development director.) said the blog linked to a youtube.com video that showed the entire debate, rather than clips that could be used out of context. Although Kanter said it was not clear that the blog link violated the agreement, the Webb campaign removed the link out of an abundance of caution.

    “It’s drastically different,” Denny Todd (Webb spokesman Kristian Denny Todd) said of the blog’s link and the Allen campaigns television ads.
    From http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221858,00.html

    Politics is an adversarial endeavor. Socialists like to draw first blood in any issue and then introduce a miniscule point by which they claim their own transgression is somehow different and above reproach. The practice recalls the schoolyard tactic of shoving a classmate and then running to hide behind the teacher’s skirts.

    Supply the whole story Robert.

  • stands2p

    Just for the fun of it, here’s the rest of the story:
    Allen campaign spokesman Dick Wadhams said the Webb campaign broke the agreement first because the liberal Raising Kaine blog, which receives funding from the Webb campaign, was providing links to debate footage. He said the ad will not be pulled.

    Kanter(Anne Kanter, the league’s voter development director.) said the blog linked to a youtube.com video that showed the entire debate, rather than clips that could be used out of context. Although Kanter said it was not clear that the blog link violated the agreement, the Webb campaign removed the link out of an abundance of caution.

    “It’s drastically different,” Denny Todd (Webb spokesman Kristian Denny Todd) said of the blog’s link and the Allen campaigns television ads.
    From http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,221858,00.html

    Politics is an adversarial endeavor. Socialists like to draw first blood in any issue and then introduce a miniscule point by which they claim their own transgression is somehow different and above reproach. The practice recalls the schoolyard tactic of shoving a classmate and then running to hide behind the teacher’s skirts.

    Supply the whole story Robert.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search