lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Down to the Wire in North Dakota

The biggest shared parenting story of the year has entered its final week in North Dakota. The bar associations and their allies have begun their media blitz to defeat the Shared Parenting Initiative.

Mitch Sanderson and the North Dakota Coalition for Families and Children are fighting a David and Goliath battle that has already sent shock waves throughout the divorce industry. Not surprisingly, divorce operatives are now pulling out all the stops during the final week to defeat the Initiative.

The only opponents of this Initiative are those who profit from family breakup and fatherless children: lawyers, judges, social workers and other bureaucrats, child support enforcement agents, domestic violence lobbies, and feminist groups. Because they have no substantive arguments to wield against the measure, they resort to insulting personal attacks against the citizens who have collected thousands of signatures to place the measure on the ballot.

Here is what Mitch and the NDCFC are up against:

  • The wealthy bar associations have begun an all-out media campaign to protect the profits they acquire by destroying families and encouraging fatherless homes.
  • The state’s Division of Human Services has again been caught using taxpayers’ money to lobby against the Initiative. DHS director Carol Olson has already admitted such practices when she directed DHS employees to stop using government, taxpayer-financed time for political purposes, in violation of North Dakota law and standard ethical principles.
  • The federal government has also been caught using taxpayer-funded government resources to lobby against the citizen Initiative. This is a flagrant violation of federal law, the constitutional division between federal and state government, and standard ethics. HHS Deputy Secretary Dr. Wade Horn has likewise corrected misinformation propagated by his region administrator, but much of the damage has been done.

The big guns of bar associations and state and federal bureaucrats are being trained on this Initiative. The stakes are even bigger than shared parenting and the American family, important as those are. They have upped the ante to the point where the issue is now American democracy itself and the power of an out-of-control federal tax-and-patronage apparatus to thwart democracy, suppress lawful citizen initiative, and destroy the republican institutions and participatory democracy for which this nation has long been a shining beacon.

Yet the response from family defenders across the country and even in neighboring states has been less than overwhelming. If you cannot go in person to help, what Mitch and his allies need more than anything during this last week is money. The financial power of the bar associations is massive. As a political scientist, I can attest that referenda are usually won by the side that has the most money to saturate the media, and no law requires that they tell the truth. Measures that begin with huge popular support are often defeated by well-funded special interests.

In this case, the bar associations are using precisely the same tactics politically that they use in the courtroom: Plant doubt in the public’s minds. Spread misinformation which, however inaccurate, nevertheless creates fear. Slander the opposition and innocent people. And if all else fails – if you are a state or federal bureaucrat – break the law.

To contribute to the North Dakota Shared Parenting Initiative, go to http://www.ndspi.org. You can contact Mitch Sanderson and the North Dakota Coalition for Families and Children at their website: info@ndspi.org.

Stephen Baskerville is President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children (www.acfc.org). His latest major article, “Politics and Same-Sex Marriage,” is published in the November-December issue of Society, a journal of the social sciences.

16 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • FamilyLawyer

    Shared Parenting might stand a chance of someday passing of the supporters of that concept will stop blaming everyone else for it not being the norm.

    You people all share at least 50% of the blame for not not having your kids an equal – or close to equal – amount of time.

    You find it easier to blame everyone else for your post divorce problems than to change your own behavior.

  • FamilyLawyer

    Shared Parenting might stand a chance of someday passing of the supporters of that concept will stop blaming everyone else for it not being the norm.

    You people all share at least 50% of the blame for not not having your kids an equal – or close to equal – amount of time.

    You find it easier to blame everyone else for your post divorce problems than to change your own behavior.

  • mruffolo

    Analyzing a divorce is like analyzing a robbery.

    After the study, the robber will still have your stuff.

    One way to avoid a robber is to stay out of their path.

    However in divorce, the robber is supported by a government who is organized, secret, and well funded, and a culture that refuses public dialog.

    The consequences of divorce is the white elephant in the room. It’s there…everyone sees it, yet few are willing to mention it.

    It’s a easier conversation in a feminist’s world to say the father/husband was emotionally abusive. American culture hates fathers.

    Fighting each other will divide us. This keeps us from building into one another, to grow stronger, tp share knowledge or successes, to organize against the real enemy.

    Be cool to one another.

  • mruffolo

    Analyzing a divorce is like analyzing a robbery.

    After the study, the robber will still have your stuff.

    One way to avoid a robber is to stay out of their path.

    However in divorce, the robber is supported by a government who is organized, secret, and well funded, and a culture that refuses public dialog.

    The consequences of divorce is the white elephant in the room. It’s there…everyone sees it, yet few are willing to mention it.

    It’s a easier conversation in a feminist’s world to say the father/husband was emotionally abusive. American culture hates fathers.

    Fighting each other will divide us. This keeps us from building into one another, to grow stronger, tp share knowledge or successes, to organize against the real enemy.

    Be cool to one another.

  • mruffolo

    Analyzing a divorce is like analyzing a robbery.

    After the study, the robber will still have your stuff.

    One way to avoid a robber is to stay out of their path.

    However in divorce, the robber is supported by a government who is organized, secret, and well funded, and a culture that refuses public dialog.

    The consequences of divorce is the white elephant in the room. It’s there…everyone sees it, yet few are willing to mention it.

    It’s a easier conversation in a feminist’s world to say the father/husband was emotionally abusive. American culture hates fathers.

    Fighting each other will divide us. This keeps us from building into one another, to grow stronger, tp share knowledge or successes, to organize against the real enemy.

    Be cool to one another.

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    wls,

    You are an idiot.

    You sit there and complain without a plan except to “analyze” the problem.

    And, that is the problem… Idiots like you that think analyzing what I and others that have actually got off their butts to do something have already done.

    Go ahead… Keep trying to re-invent the wheel… I’ll be dead and gone in the next 50 years and the problem(s) will still be here as you “analyze” the problem..

    It’s your ilk that begets more stupidity and more arm chair generals that want to tell others how to do it by repeating the failures in the past because you are too stupid to look at history, realize the apathy and do something radical that will work, such as just not playing their game anymore…

    It’s what all the great leaders have done when others will participate.

    I get so impatient with stupidity, apathy, name calling by people like you that can’t tell a hole in the ground from their own asshole…

    Eric

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    wls,

    You are an idiot.

    You sit there and complain without a plan except to “analyze” the problem.

    And, that is the problem… Idiots like you that think analyzing what I and others that have actually got off their butts to do something have already done.

    Go ahead… Keep trying to re-invent the wheel… I’ll be dead and gone in the next 50 years and the problem(s) will still be here as you “analyze” the problem..

    It’s your ilk that begets more stupidity and more arm chair generals that want to tell others how to do it by repeating the failures in the past because you are too stupid to look at history, realize the apathy and do something radical that will work, such as just not playing their game anymore…

    It’s what all the great leaders have done when others will participate.

    I get so impatient with stupidity, apathy, name calling by people like you that can’t tell a hole in the ground from their own asshole…

    Eric

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    wls,

    You are an idiot.

    You sit there and complain without a plan except to “analyze” the problem.

    And, that is the problem… Idiots like you that think analyzing what I and others that have actually got off their butts to do something have already done.

    Go ahead… Keep trying to re-invent the wheel… I’ll be dead and gone in the next 50 years and the problem(s) will still be here as you “analyze” the problem..

    It’s your ilk that begets more stupidity and more arm chair generals that want to tell others how to do it by repeating the failures in the past because you are too stupid to look at history, realize the apathy and do something radical that will work, such as just not playing their game anymore…

    It’s what all the great leaders have done when others will participate.

    I get so impatient with stupidity, apathy, name calling by people like you that can’t tell a hole in the ground from their own asshole…

    Eric

  • wls

    See: just as I said; Eric is an example of exactly the kind of crackpot that I was talking about.

    I don’t know the Illinois law mruffolo refers to, but `equitable’ in a legal context usually denotes the procedures of the old Courts of Equity, which were distinct from common law courts. I don’t think his remark makes sense.

    It’s time to wise up: analyse the problem honestly and know what we are talking about: while fashionable, this head-in-ass approach isn’t working.

  • wls

    See: just as I said; Eric is an example of exactly the kind of crackpot that I was talking about.

    I don’t know the Illinois law mruffolo refers to, but `equitable’ in a legal context usually denotes the procedures of the old Courts of Equity, which were distinct from common law courts. I don’t think his remark makes sense.

    It’s time to wise up: analyse the problem honestly and know what we are talking about: while fashionable, this head-in-ass approach isn’t working.

  • wls

    See: just as I said; Eric is an example of exactly the kind of crackpot that I was talking about.

    I don’t know the Illinois law mruffolo refers to, but `equitable’ in a legal context usually denotes the procedures of the old Courts of Equity, which were distinct from common law courts. I don’t think his remark makes sense.

    It’s time to wise up: analyse the problem honestly and know what we are talking about: while fashionable, this head-in-ass approach isn’t working.

  • mruffolo

    In Illinois State law reads “equitable” treatment, but “local rules” and case law is where the rubber meets the road.

    However at the end of the day, it’s about jobs for people in the divorce industry. I observe that for simple matters they drag it out at the expense of the man, both money and reputation.

    Divorce is easier than marriage. For marriage you need two people to agree, however, in a divorce you need only one.

    It’s no wonder ex-husbands have been running and hiding for the last fifty years, Most are not running from their family but are being chased out by feminist moms and our government.

    About 80% of woman initiate because there is no shame, instead woman are rewarded with children, 18 years of income, and property. All approved and enforced by the worlds most powerful government.

    If you have not read any of Baskerville’s articles, then I would encourage you.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net

  • mruffolo

    In Illinois State law reads “equitable” treatment, but “local rules” and case law is where the rubber meets the road.

    However at the end of the day, it’s about jobs for people in the divorce industry. I observe that for simple matters they drag it out at the expense of the man, both money and reputation.

    Divorce is easier than marriage. For marriage you need two people to agree, however, in a divorce you need only one.

    It’s no wonder ex-husbands have been running and hiding for the last fifty years, Most are not running from their family but are being chased out by feminist moms and our government.

    About 80% of woman initiate because there is no shame, instead woman are rewarded with children, 18 years of income, and property. All approved and enforced by the worlds most powerful government.

    If you have not read any of Baskerville’s articles, then I would encourage you.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net

  • mruffolo

    In Illinois State law reads “equitable” treatment, but “local rules” and case law is where the rubber meets the road.

    However at the end of the day, it’s about jobs for people in the divorce industry. I observe that for simple matters they drag it out at the expense of the man, both money and reputation.

    Divorce is easier than marriage. For marriage you need two people to agree, however, in a divorce you need only one.

    It’s no wonder ex-husbands have been running and hiding for the last fifty years, Most are not running from their family but are being chased out by feminist moms and our government.

    About 80% of woman initiate because there is no shame, instead woman are rewarded with children, 18 years of income, and property. All approved and enforced by the worlds most powerful government.

    If you have not read any of Baskerville’s articles, then I would encourage you.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    “This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.”

    How true, John…

    And, that is why it will lose in ND or any other state. People and especially men, I have found, are all talk and no action particularily when it comes to their rights being trampled upon by a run-a-way system supported by black robed activists with their own personal agendas perpetuating the existing atrocities for their own financial gain-damn the children and while you are at it, toss the men out on the streets with just the clothes on their back-damn their so called Constitutional rights. This way, they, the feminazis and one world governmentalists such as Hillary Clinton, can place the more maleable females that want a socialist government overall, to head the family to make each generation weaker and weaker to governmental intervention.

    I wish it was different, but it is not. All we have to do is look at the men reinventing the wheel as they bang their heads upon that proverbial wall for the last 50 plus years, when all it would take to solve this dilemma would be to stop playing their game for 3 months. Just 3 months is all it would take to turn the system on its’ heels and make equality the law of the land instead of making women “more equal” than men and children.

    I pray that I am wrong, but I know better…

    Eric

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    “This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.”

    How true, John…

    And, that is why it will lose in ND or any other state. People and especially men, I have found, are all talk and no action particularily when it comes to their rights being trampled upon by a run-a-way system supported by black robed activists with their own personal agendas perpetuating the existing atrocities for their own financial gain-damn the children and while you are at it, toss the men out on the streets with just the clothes on their back-damn their so called Constitutional rights. This way, they, the feminazis and one world governmentalists such as Hillary Clinton, can place the more maleable females that want a socialist government overall, to head the family to make each generation weaker and weaker to governmental intervention.

    I wish it was different, but it is not. All we have to do is look at the men reinventing the wheel as they bang their heads upon that proverbial wall for the last 50 plus years, when all it would take to solve this dilemma would be to stop playing their game for 3 months. Just 3 months is all it would take to turn the system on its’ heels and make equality the law of the land instead of making women “more equal” than men and children.

    I pray that I am wrong, but I know better…

    Eric

  • http://www.FIRMncp.com Eric

    “This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.”

    How true, John…

    And, that is why it will lose in ND or any other state. People and especially men, I have found, are all talk and no action particularily when it comes to their rights being trampled upon by a run-a-way system supported by black robed activists with their own personal agendas perpetuating the existing atrocities for their own financial gain-damn the children and while you are at it, toss the men out on the streets with just the clothes on their back-damn their so called Constitutional rights. This way, they, the feminazis and one world governmentalists such as Hillary Clinton, can place the more maleable females that want a socialist government overall, to head the family to make each generation weaker and weaker to governmental intervention.

    I wish it was different, but it is not. All we have to do is look at the men reinventing the wheel as they bang their heads upon that proverbial wall for the last 50 plus years, when all it would take to solve this dilemma would be to stop playing their game for 3 months. Just 3 months is all it would take to turn the system on its’ heels and make equality the law of the land instead of making women “more equal” than men and children.

    I pray that I am wrong, but I know better…

    Eric

  • wls

    The sad truth is that the response from `family defenders’ on the internet—the blogs, e-groups, some websites—has been overwhelmingly derogatory: the Initiative and everyone who defends it has been derided, ridiculed, condemned, or, at best, stiffed.

    Some say family law is already OK and the problem is just that the judges don’t follow it, behavior which will continue even if you reform it. We should instead be enforcing the law against the treason they commit when they violate their oaths of office, they wail.

    Others are saying the North Dakota welfare director’s allegation that the state will lose IV-D funding is entirely correct, and illustrative of the truth that child support must be abolished absolutely, first, before equal parenting legislation can be contemplated.

    All take considerable pride in their non-engagement and the distance they keep from politics: they wouldn’t be caught dead near a hearing or public discussion, or probably at a polls. The movement they draw their inspiration from and most admire is that which contends the income tax is invalid—a fraud—and no one can actually be sanctioned or jailed for failing to pay and file a return.

  • wls

    The sad truth is that the response from `family defenders’ on the internet—the blogs, e-groups, some websites—has been overwhelmingly derogatory: the Initiative and everyone who defends it has been derided, ridiculed, condemned, or, at best, stiffed.

    Some say family law is already OK and the problem is just that the judges don’t follow it, behavior which will continue even if you reform it. We should instead be enforcing the law against the treason they commit when they violate their oaths of office, they wail.

    Others are saying the North Dakota welfare director’s allegation that the state will lose IV-D funding is entirely correct, and illustrative of the truth that child support must be abolished absolutely, first, before equal parenting legislation can be contemplated.

    All take considerable pride in their non-engagement and the distance they keep from politics: they wouldn’t be caught dead near a hearing or public discussion, or probably at a polls. The movement they draw their inspiration from and most admire is that which contends the income tax is invalid—a fraud—and no one can actually be sanctioned or jailed for failing to pay and file a return.

  • wls

    The sad truth is that the response from `family defenders’ on the internet—the blogs, e-groups, some websites—has been overwhelmingly derogatory: the Initiative and everyone who defends it has been derided, ridiculed, condemned, or, at best, stiffed.

    Some say family law is already OK and the problem is just that the judges don’t follow it, behavior which will continue even if you reform it. We should instead be enforcing the law against the treason they commit when they violate their oaths of office, they wail.

    Others are saying the North Dakota welfare director’s allegation that the state will lose IV-D funding is entirely correct, and illustrative of the truth that child support must be abolished absolutely, first, before equal parenting legislation can be contemplated.

    All take considerable pride in their non-engagement and the distance they keep from politics: they wouldn’t be caught dead near a hearing or public discussion, or probably at a polls. The movement they draw their inspiration from and most admire is that which contends the income tax is invalid—a fraud—and no one can actually be sanctioned or jailed for failing to pay and file a return.

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I haven’t been much help because I live outside of North Dakota. But I made a donation today. I hope everyone who reads this will also make a donation:
    http://www.ndspi.org

    This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I haven’t been much help because I live outside of North Dakota. But I made a donation today. I hope everyone who reads this will also make a donation:
    http://www.ndspi.org

    This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I haven’t been much help because I live outside of North Dakota. But I made a donation today. I hope everyone who reads this will also make a donation:
    http://www.ndspi.org

    This is one of those “put up or shut up” moments. Let’s make sure the Shared Parenting campaign is well-funded in the final stretch.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com

  • mruffolo

    Thanks for the update.

    Good Luck ND.

  • mruffolo

    Thanks for the update.

    Good Luck ND.

  • mruffolo

    Thanks for the update.

    Good Luck ND.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    By all means, vote for the shared parenting initiative.
    If I have not been of much help it is because I am 24/7 busy all the time!
    And while you are at it, North Dakotans, feel free to scream for the enforcement of the Peonage Law.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    By all means, vote for the shared parenting initiative.
    If I have not been of much help it is because I am 24/7 busy all the time!
    And while you are at it, North Dakotans, feel free to scream for the enforcement of the Peonage Law.

  • http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com Roger Knight

    By all means, vote for the shared parenting initiative.
    If I have not been of much help it is because I am 24/7 busy all the time!
    And while you are at it, North Dakotans, feel free to scream for the enforcement of the Peonage Law.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search