Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Mike LaSalle
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Wellesley Women’s Review shuts down ...Well. Isn’t that speeeeeeecial! ...The Nigger Test ...The Feminists Are Right This Time ...Feminut Play gets reviewed by Feminut ...
Stumble It!
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ...
Permalink |
Print This Post
|
3 views |
Other posts by Mike LaSalle
Possibly Related Posts:
Stumble It!
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
13 Comments »
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
mruffolo said,
When my eyes were opened about our feminist centered culture a few years ago, I supposed that feminist were mostly female.
A long-time friend, a black guy, ex-Marine, and body builder, of mine is a feminist, but I was unaware of it until I shared with him my experience in divorce court. My friend holds similar views as Dr. Phil.
October 31, 2006 at 1:18 pm
christianj said,
Phil is just another variation of cowards, that feminism produces.
October 31, 2006 at 1:50 pm
fourthwire said,
As such he deserves nothing but contempt.
October 31, 2006 at 2:33 pm
BobH said,
What do you expect from a shrink who made his name on Oprah?
October 31, 2006 at 2:58 pm
mruffolo said,
October 31, 2006 at 3:20 pm
PolishKnight said,
“The hand that rocks the cradle…”
Many cultures have rituals of manhood where a young boy rejects boyhood, and care from his mother, and accepts manhood along with the responsibilites and status.
In a mangina feminized culture, men are treated as second class citizens who can only differentiate themselves from boys through income generation. In a cute scene in Seinfeld, Elaine educates a Jewish boy at his Bar Mitzvah: “Before you can become a man, you need to have several good jobs, a nice home…”
So consequently, in western cultures many men view themselves as little boys that have to continually earn and even beg for manhood and this includes being apologetic and groveling (which only lowers their self esteem and respect from women that much more.) When women want to diss a man, they refer to him as a “little boy” which reveals what they think is the worst thing about men. (Men insult women by calling them ugly.)
The good news (depending upon how you look at it) is that the manginas get treated worse than the most sexist construction worker. Montel has been dragged through the mud in his divorces. Women tell me they DESPISE wimps EVEN and perhaps ESPECIALLY if they say they want to be treated as equals. Poor jerks.
October 31, 2006 at 4:08 pm
Roger Knight said,
Just because you made a baby with a man, you have NO RIGHT to make him your slave. NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER.
It is a crime that is allowed only because of the incredible bias in the judicial system due to all of the money to be stolen off of breadwinning fathers, men with normal sex drives, and taxpayers who cannot see they are being ripped off and WHO is responsible for the ripping off.
Even though it is all in plain sight.
Several sources of the imbalance:
One: with the right to abortion nad the privilege of abandoning her new born infant at firestations, women get to make the SECOND decision, men cannot. It is like a football game where one team gets to replay each down if it does not like the results, but the other team must play by the old rules.
Or a better analogy, a chess game where one player gets to make two moves each turn and other only one.
Two: No fault divorce was sold as a way of allowing a couple who MUTUALLY agree to a divorce can have their separation without either party having to prove wrongdoing or other “grounds” for divorce. While that is allowed, what actually happens is that either party can UNILATERALLY impose the divorce, and need not prove the respondent to such divorce EVER DID ANYTHING WRONG to obtain an order for property division, spousal support or alimony, and child support.
That is dispensing with the due process of law and going straight to the deprivation of property.
Not what James Madison had in mind with the Constitutional requirement for due process of law.
Of course, 70 to 90% of all divorces are female initiated. And 99.99% of all paternity filings (by themselves or through the state).
Of course, for the destruction of the good will by which we begin support orders, there is the fact that the way the current system is designed, most men who make less than $60,000 per year will be hit with support orders that leave them with little live on.
Thus the high probability that they will not be able to or willing to comply with them.
And yet a woman who initiated the divorce, or the entitlement princess who had a baby so she can get all the goodies, will find out that she is responsible for her child regardless of any support moneys she receives.
That is when they get mad and demand violations of state constitutions that prohibit imprisonment for debt and the whole gamut of nonsense we call the Child Support Crusade.
Ladies, you are being manipulated into being unAmerican in the worst ways.
What is driving this?
Not honest belief in feminist ideology or in taking down the patriarchy. The judges and lawyers I have been able to speak to, under circumstances where they felt like being honest with me, tell me it is all about the money. They don’t believe the feminazi crap. Family practice is the easiest way for a lawyer to make a living. Having to prove wrongdoing or preventing such proof, in either civil or criminal cases, is hard work and risky. Enforcing the judgments or coercing settlements has always been where the money is for lawyers and other agents in this business. Most judges actually have profited off the divorce and family industry themselves, or they do not wish to be a threat to those who do.
That is why we have this insane system instead of rational family and marriage policies.
It is all about the money that can be fleeced off the men and the taxpayers.
October 31, 2006 at 5:16 pm
Denis said,
He is worse than a feminist.
October 31, 2006 at 11:32 pm
amfortas said,
November 1, 2006 at 5:10 am
DcFather said,
A similar show as “Dr Phil” for men would go something like this:
“You get home from drunk from the bar and she doesn’t have dinner on the table in five minutes, then she deserves a good berating and beating, and if she is such a louse that she wants to know why, tell her she has no right to know why, and beat her some more. If she still doesn’t learn, I’ll help you take your children away from her, and force her to cook and clean for you even after you no longer give her the time of day. Remember, you deserve it.”
But there aren’t enough men that are so selfish and ignorant, and the reverse situation isn’t PC, so he has to sell this crap to women who are so caught up in misandry and full of themselves they actually buy it.
November 1, 2006 at 6:49 am
mruffolo said,
It was reported last week that nationally, combined average daily circulation of all 770 newspapers reporting was 43.7 million, a drop of 2.8 percent.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15891496.ht
Peruse the front pages of these newspapers today, Wednesday, November 1, 2006, to see the focus is women, children, blacks as good, while white men as mostly bad.
http://www.newseum.org/todaysfrontpages
Honoring men is not a national pass time.
I expect many of these readers to come to web sites like mensnewsdaily.com.
But maybe feminism marketing and programming lost it’s profitability.
NBC Universal makes $750M in cuts by reducing staff, scripted shows, news budget.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/na/cp_X101902AU.xml.html
Another feminist media company losing money is the NY Times Co. 3Q Profit Plunges 39%
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003285206
I expect the feminists in media that get fired could find work in academics or government, a place where profit is not measured.
November 1, 2006 at 9:44 am
roger said,
http://drphil.com/slideshows/slideshow/2931/?id=2931&slide=1%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&null=null
paste into your browser.
November 1, 2006 at 1:36 pm
tonysprout said,
November 2, 2006 at 4:00 pm