lumigan tramadol tadalafil

On John DePetro and Fat Lesbians: The personal is the political for all candidates

2006-11-04
By

The firing of WRKO-AM announcer John DePetro, for calling Massachusetts gubernatorial contender Grace Ross a “fat lesbian”, is a grossly inappropriate response by the station. However, I do agree that DePetro’s point could have been more intelligently stated, and his apology to Mr. Ross should have been sufficient.

DePetro’s comment was not inaccurate (although what critical mass has to do with one’s politics is certainly up for discussion).

The personal has been the political for years (if one happens to be a man). Male candidates are called every name in the book by the media, and for every scurrilous reason. Everything they ever breathed is called out for microscopic inspection or ridicule.

Feminist Carol Hanisch invented the idea that the “personal is the political” in 1970. It was quickly adopted by feminists and perfected into today’s accusatory terrorism of male politicians – most often founded on imagery more than reality. It is only fair that feminists now be held to a similar standard of review – so long as it is accurate.

If we fired every writer and radio announcer who ever made a Coulteresque remark about a politician, the airwaves would have nothing left to play except commercials. (This might well be better than suffering through groveling cootchie-snorter interviews the WRKO management expects).

Those brave enough to cruise Grace Ross’s web site will find a treasure trove of laughable idiocy. Its a Green-Rainbow party (Venusian Arboreal Whoopie!) ticket featuring an inseparable pair of lesbian-activists propelled by iron-age feminist-socialist ideology.

The dynamic duette is “running” on abolishment of poverty and free health care (for single mothers and lesbians at the expense of working men). They promise to “take back the night” (from gangs of mass rapists pillaging the state of Massachusetts, which for political purposes has been temporarily relocated to Sudan). They promise to “respect” illegal immigrants. Their pitch closes with the classic feminist-hippie slogan — “peace and love”. Is this a joke, or is it Memorex?

I cannot imagine any non-lobotomized host being able to conduct a serious interview with Ross. It would take an interviewer carved from solid granite not to die of laughter (which is more permanent than getting fired, but at least you don’t feel the pain).

DePetro is to be commended for not laying down before lesbians who expect to be treated as virgin queens while dicing out every stripe of political insanity and perversion.

Lesbians, at the helm of government, would be a very serious threat to America (even more dangerous than John Kerry). Politicized lesbianism has no use for men in home, family, and society. A reign of pink multiculturalism in Massachusetts (or anywhere else) would be devastating.

There is nothing wrong with ridiculing lesbian politicians, who upon entering the political forum, will find that the personal is, indeed, inseparable from their politics.

Mr. DePetro has a bright career before him. He should have no difficulty finding a radio station looking for the ad revenues that always follow a host capable of telling it like it is. Ask Air America. They know.

————————————————-

David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network, and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition

1 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • DadWithGirls

    David R. Usher is a voice to be listened to, closely and with respect.

    Even when I disagree with his opinions, he educates and advocates for logical politics and rejects the pop soundbite dumbed-down condescension that voters are geting now from both parties of un-democracy.

    “It is a shame that conservatives have been unwilling and/or so uninformed on feminism…”

    Perhaps it is more (less?) than a shame?

    Maybe there is a logical tryst?

  • DadWithGirls

    David R. Usher is a voice to be listened to, closely and with respect.

    Even when I disagree with his opinions, he educates and advocates for logical politics and rejects the pop soundbite dumbed-down condescension that voters are geting now from both parties of un-democracy.

    “It is a shame that conservatives have been unwilling and/or so uninformed on feminism…”

    Perhaps it is more (less?) than a shame?

    Maybe there is a logical tryst?

  • fourthwire

    “Lesbians, at the helm of government, would be a very serious threat to America (even more dangerous than John Kerry). Politicized lesbianism has no use for men in home, family, and society.”

    I could not agree more, Dave Usher. Lesbians are among the most male-hostile, misandric women in American society today.

    It’s a pity that good people can be fired for simply stating the facts, but as you know even better than I, radical feminists use ever dirty tactic in the book to silence even POTENTIAL adversaries.

    Who needs al Qaeda to threaten our society when lesbians politicians and their feminist supporters can undermine it from within?

    Great blog!!!

  • fourthwire

    “Lesbians, at the helm of government, would be a very serious threat to America (even more dangerous than John Kerry). Politicized lesbianism has no use for men in home, family, and society.”

    I could not agree more, Dave Usher. Lesbians are among the most male-hostile, misandric women in American society today.

    It’s a pity that good people can be fired for simply stating the facts, but as you know even better than I, radical feminists use ever dirty tactic in the book to silence even POTENTIAL adversaries.

    Who needs al Qaeda to threaten our society when lesbians politicians and their feminist supporters can undermine it from within?

    Great blog!!!

  • David R. Usher

    It is a shame that conservatives have been unwilling and/or so uninformed on feminism, that they failed to oppose the terrorist side of feminist social policy revisionism with the same gusto they opposed abortion and same-sex marriage. Peter Sprigg (FRC) basically refers to this in pointing out that we would never have broached SSM as a possible issue had conservatives done their homework 40 years ago (as I more clearly point out: to shut down anti-family programs) to protect the institution of marriage from (below-the-waterline) evisceration.

    This tragic error is costing them dearly in these elections. All the major budgetary problems that keep us from resolving health care, medicare, and poverty issues; fighting a robust war on terror and illegal immigration, all rise from the dangerously anti-marriage programs conservatives stupidly voted for.

    Log-cabin Republicans and pink-elephants in the party dragged it into an ideological swamp, and it may well cost them the elections on Tuesday. In the future, Republicans must realize they will always lose when the personal politics of lesbians and feminists cannot be even mentioned, much less vetted and openly criticized on principle and substance.

    There are a few Republicans in high places who understand this. I expect more of the party to pay serious attention to these matters after suffering the losses on Nov 7th that will be caused by voters who unhappily are still bearing the brunt of the destruction of the American family. Republicans promised to fix this in 1994, and instead did things that arguably made things worse.

    But, pro-marriage change cannot occur so long as talk-show hosts are fired for talking about the awful things feminists have done to marriage, and are prevented from ridiculing them for it.

    And, yes, the candidacy of these two nutty lesbians in Massachusetts is the prime-time political comedy of the season. It points to the legal stupidity of the Massachussetts Supreme Court in the Goodridge decision, which effectively made a pink monopoly of marriage and family the law of the land. How anyone could take these two weird women seriously is beyond me.  In fact, I will be more than happy to do a show with him on this when he gets resituated.

  • David R. Usher

    It is a shame that conservatives have been unwilling and/or so uninformed on feminism, that they failed to oppose the terrorist side of feminist social policy revisionism with the same gusto they opposed abortion and same-sex marriage. Peter Sprigg (FRC) basically refers to this in pointing out that we would never have broached SSM as a possible issue had conservatives done their homework 40 years ago (as I more clearly point out: to shut down anti-family programs) to protect the institution of marriage from (below-the-waterline) evisceration.

    This tragic error is costing them dearly in these elections. All the major budgetary problems that keep us from resolving health care, medicare, and poverty issues; fighting a robust war on terror and illegal immigration, all rise from the dangerously anti-marriage programs conservatives stupidly voted for.

    Log-cabin Republicans and pink-elephants in the party dragged it into an ideological swamp, and it may well cost them the elections on Tuesday. In the future, Republicans must realize they will always lose when the personal politics of lesbians and feminists cannot be even mentioned, much less vetted and openly criticized on principle and substance.

    There are a few Republicans in high places who understand this. I expect more of the party to pay serious attention to these matters after suffering the losses on Nov 7th that will be caused by voters who unhappily are still bearing the brunt of the destruction of the American family. Republicans promised to fix this in 1994, and instead did things that arguably made things worse.

    But, pro-marriage change cannot occur so long as talk-show hosts are fired for talking about the awful things feminists have done to marriage, and are prevented from ridiculing them for it.

    And, yes, the candidacy of these two nutty lesbians in Massachusetts is the prime-time political comedy of the season. It points to the legal stupidity of the Massachussetts Supreme Court in the Goodridge decision, which effectively made a pink monopoly of marriage and family the law of the land. How anyone could take these two weird women seriously is beyond me.  In fact, I will be more than happy to do a show with him on this when he gets resituated.

  • DadWithGirls

    David R. Usher is to be feared now.

    He is discovering his comedic persona.

    “Lesbians, at the helm of government, would be a very serious threat to America…”

    That’s really funny!

    What about subservient evangelical conservative fellow-travellers who vote for VAWA 2005 – 2010?

    I’ll do the straight lines David.

    You clearly have the punchlines covered!

  • DadWithGirls

    David R. Usher is to be feared now.

    He is discovering his comedic persona.

    “Lesbians, at the helm of government, would be a very serious threat to America…”

    That’s really funny!

    What about subservient evangelical conservative fellow-travellers who vote for VAWA 2005 – 2010?

    I’ll do the straight lines David.

    You clearly have the punchlines covered!

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Ahh. Diversity. Along with power seekers, the good, the bad, the mediocre, the despots and the crooked, you now look forward to ‘strangly sexual’ legislators. America is catching up. Slick Willy and JFK may have been exceptional, but hey, at least their proclivities were normally directed even if a little unbridled. Britain has long been used to MPs wearing stockings and panties and responding well to party whips. That’s just the male ones. Bridles have been known too.

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Ahh. Diversity. Along with power seekers, the good, the bad, the mediocre, the despots and the crooked, you now look forward to ‘strangly sexual’ legislators. America is catching up. Slick Willy and JFK may have been exceptional, but hey, at least their proclivities were normally directed even if a little unbridled. Britain has long been used to MPs wearing stockings and panties and responding well to party whips. That’s just the male ones. Bridles have been known too.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search