Ah, that’s the deep and insightful and layered analysis I always expect from people with halos.

(It’s a trcik of back-lighting, right? A Holywood stunt?)

But the Shrub’s evangelical angels didn’t shine in the election, so sad.

Well, there’s always “The Rapture” to bet on….

Our nation’s position is clear by what the Founders wrote but we have failed to realize that objective and become more human, as execution is not retrebution of society, but the manifestation of the fact that society can do nothing else to save itself from the ravages of the guilty individual’s criminal nature.

In my study of foundational laws with a Rabbi, as the Torah law is the foundation of the Biblical law that the Founders were seeking justification under, the principle of avoiding suffering in the death of the subject was the focus.

The only thing I have seen in my inquiries since my discussion is the Orthodox means of ritual salaughter of animals where the jugular is cut and the blood returned to the ground.

Painless and quick. No nerves severed, no pain. Merciful and not degrading of our own humanity and manifestation of the image of G-D whom each man is to represent.

This begs the question, why kill man if he is claimed to be made in HIS image; how is this justified?

Simply, a man who will not be retrained by true laws of human society is a false image of G-D that cannot be preserved for its warring nature against human kind.

My final though on Saddam is this. How is he guilty of the stated crimes when the government we elected gave him all sorts of weapons and suported his actions to war against Iran, which lead to his unforgiven national debt, becasue we wanted him to fight Iran and not us?

Will former president Mitterand of France now be placed on trial for his support and military support of the genocide in Rwanda?

Was Milosovic guilty of genocide by actively standing against the encroaching Iran backed Sharia-Facists in Yugoslavia?

How can things be done in the name of justice when it is so selective?

Simply, it is not. this is just the law of the jungle.

I agree. I would call you a “political idiot” aka “democrat”, and that is far more dangerous to America.

You are completely devoid of any intellectual arguments. You are nothing but a Democrat parrot. Whatever you read on Dumbocraticunderground you immediately run over here and repeat, mistaking it tripe for prime rib.

You are one of the most unintentionally funny commentators we have visiting us here. To bad you don’t even know how funny you are.

Coward, like most liberals, you lack the courage of your convictions. You quack like a duck, you walk like a duck but you’re carrying a sign that says “I’m a rabbit.”

You claim that “there’s a lot you agree with in the Republican platform” but you declare that “their ideology keeps getting in the way of common sense and decency.” ???? Err…the platform is a statement of their ideology, or did you sleep through that day of class.

I guess you could say that you “agree in principle with the Republican platform” its just the specifics you dislike. Sounds like a Democrat Politician to me.

You are a flaming moonbat Liberal with all the intellectual dishonesty that entails.

Grow up and learn to stand up for what you believe. Stop trying to be both fish and fowl.

Here I am pointing out the empty space between your ears and you’re concerned about TYPO’s………

And would you even recognize “actual data” if it were bounced off your browridge?……..;-)

Guess you missed the 2004 election, roadkill? It was in all the papers and did not involve the Supremes at all–

He still hasn’t answered. I guess he cut and run like all liberals do when confronted with reality.

I bet he would be praising you for your intelligence and insight if you agreed with him.

Nope. I’m just another dumb military veteran.

How about we realease him in a public square instead? Then the will of the majority of Iraqis could be carried out in whatever way they deem fit.

No, actually, I’m far more dangerous than that dismissive term with which you label me.

I actually would like to understand how you think….

But, alas, so far, I’ve seen very little evidence of actual cognition.

I’m sure I’ve overlooked something critically important….

Are you listed on Wikipedia?

You would think they had all served in the military or something because they never get the point.

Can’t wait to watch them squirm November 8th. Everybody go and vote. Not only against the Dems, but against what the terrorists want.

You left out the “s.”

For Sensible.

Your diatribes are rather bereft of actual data.

Though you excel at comic relief.

Coming from a critter who believes that Saddam “was our man on the CIA’s payroll” that’s rather amusing to read.

Do you have the vaguest clue about what ACTUALLY consitutes “a sensible analyis” regarding Saddam Hussein?

Focus, physiological genius: I mentioned your idiotic attempts to include an analogy to Vietnam as possibly being one of your “wet dreams”.

Who told you that “wet dreams” have anything to do with “masturbation”?…;-)

“Though I appreciate their political import, especially in light of all the evangelical leaders in The Shrub’s base of rightwingnut support who have been outted recently.”

And those opinions have exactly WHAT to do with Saddam Hussein, international genius?…;-)

“How many more closet gay chickenhawk neo-cons can America tolerate?”

With your pitiful grasp of history, you probably don’t need to concern yourself about anyone else’s shortcomings, international genius.

Your masturbatory metaphors are indeed disturbing. Though I appreciate their political import, especially in light of all the evangelical leaders in The Shrub’s base of rightwingnut support who have been outted recently.

How many more closet gay chickenhawk neo-cons can America tolerate?

Sadly, your commenatry does not include anything like a sensible analysis of the U.S.’ historical involvement covertly with Saddam.

Ever enjoyed a cartoon by Pogo?

LOL….. another myth, my Middle-Eastern dunce.

To finance his war against Iran, Saddam Hussein borrowed heavily from other Middle Eastern nations, including Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

As the matter of fact, Saddam’s debt to the latter nation was part of the reason for his invasion of Kuwait, setting off the first Gulf War.

Get your facts straight, international genius.

“The most immediate consequences of hanging Saddam will be to watch U.S. soldiers being airlifted off the hotel rooftops in the Green Zone.”

Are you trying to predict the future or simply providing another one of your wet dreams?