TMOTS

There is substantial evidence that VAWA funds are being mis-spent. In 2005, the GAO was charged with providing a full report to Congress on how VAWA is working. This report was never done.

The few GAO reports that have been made admit that a substantial number of grants are not being monitored, no reports have been filed, and accounting reports have not been filed by women’s abuse centers.

It appears that a lot of this money is being used to buy Congress, and to finance a feminist cultural invasion of India.

See:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02641t.pdf
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0225.pdf
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02309.pdf

steven deluca’s link to the AMA report doesnt work. Go to the site and search for the report. It is yet another validation that feminists are promoting lies and propoganda. The AMA states clearly “There is considerable debate over the relative rates of male-on-female versus female-on-male intimate partner violence. Notwithstanding
the findings of the NVAWS and the NCVS, a number of earlier surveys suggest
nearly equal participation rates for men and women in intimate partner violence.
Best known is the NFVS, which reports that female-on-male rates of aggression
are as high or higher than male-on-female rates,9 and Straus16 notes that his
review of some 30 studies using non-self-selected samples yielded the same
conclusion. According to Straus16p211 the “near equality in assault rates cannot
be attributed to a gender bias in reporting.”

See: http://desicritics.org/2006/11/11/135402.php

Below is a fascinating unedited clip from her email, which eloquently describes how life really is in India, and why Indian women do not want western-style feminism rammed down their throats:

“In Western nations, women are not supported by husband or anyone. It goes by give and take policy in marriage. In 2005 as per USA census it is said Marriage is getting extinct in USA.

do you think any man on the land of india will accept someone he is feeding can control him meaninglessly? by criminal terror fear. Marriage will 100% destroy in a year or 10 yrs, But certainly it will. I guess, outsiders of india is involved for this.

Those women, who are not thinking and running fastly behind feminist organisations are not thinking in a dimension calmly whether it really helps preserve our culture and soul.

These laws will be used sprucely by manipulative women largely. If any sita using it, her mind will be slowly spoiled by other bad women to misuse it and “umbrella of control” starts in her family. Marriage closes shortly.

How can a luv/trust/attachment relationship runs with police, using economic/emotional abuse without physical abuse?

In otherwords, we are getting pulled by western nations for their form of life style. no one is thinking about this.

un married women age grows and they will be more burdened like western women to manage herself or her father less(if) family. No man will come forward to marry her or to live with her in fear of 498a or DV act. what will be the fate of the country?

If you see urban women look healthy and ready for beauty contest, but even higher position men or a bureacrat look dry face, peechy personality or dull/pale structure. Am I wrong in not making this research properly? though we call india, male-dominated, it is never. These men are attached and running their families blindly with no expectation. Such highly position kinda men never take care of their women such way in any part of western life. This happens only in India. Now these men start thinking seriously. These men learn theri sons to stay away from urban women for marriages.

Laws when designed in bias to women should have been designed bias towards education and literacy as well. Govt must had designed DVact or
498a differently for educated women after 10th or intermediate atleast, so that misuse gets stopped and country would have flourished infrastructurally. Urban educated ill-women is as cruel as a urban educated ill-men. dont you agree? In that case, how do you agree to keep such laws in the hands of such women? dont you think such women crime increases in society and go unnoticed as there is no law for bad married women to get arrested.

I came to know about this after looking life in the west for several years. Western nations are male dominated but not India.

Infrastructure of India will further deteriorate because all significant thinkers loose balance of their mind to perfectly. 5% intellectuals responsible for 70% growth of the country, anyone thought about this. and this 5% disturbed for 5 to 20 yrs due to 498a or dv act!! what happens? present fate of country happened.

Because of blackmail, by-controll, implicit marital conflicts and years together fight inside courts JUST for finance distribution among couple. Bureacrats and intellectuals mind this way gets ruptured and can’t contribute well or time for the infrastructure better for the country. Intellectuals continue to leave the country.

This is what you wanted DV or 498a in current form. if any innocent women is learnt about such laws, and one bad individual is enough to change their minds to control their husbands. That starts destruction of marriage and take a lot of time and resources of individuals.

Today india infrastrcutre is affected, I believe, strong reason is 498a. Many officials participate in corruption as they became imbalanced, selfish not thinking properly for the development of the country, just because their minds are affected for 5 to 15 yrs period in controlled, blackmailed marriage. you can’t imagine what happens to brain or physiology of human when stressed for years together. That outcome is the present physic structure of men in India.

In future, just like in the west, women be it mother, sister will be fed by only brothers or fathers only. Concept of husband will die. If they get husbands, they get poor husbands, who are economically not well otherwise not. Just western life pervades all walks of life in India. Marriage will not happen (bcoz, boys parents learn boys not to, I learn my son to..i need his physical health and mental helath rather marriage life).

Many intellecutals(70% 498a cases) masters, phds, engineers, doctors are around courts for 5 yrs to 8 yrs to just become innocent after trials. Is this the way country using intellectual resources/proeprty for the country? is this what we wanted India to be?

There is chance for India only when dedicated, sacrifice women role is required. India doesn’t afford feminism. It affords active role of BEST women for the development of the nation. Women who are in wonderful marriage and at the same time helping hands for the country flourish and not feminists.

I end up saying only one thing before western feminism takes its troll completely -

Good women ROLE is must for Indias growth and to preserve marriage value system and spiritual india. Pls. think calmly for a day or 2 and read western life and indian life difference, where it comes. I want my daughter to be part of this marriage system and not living outside marriage with multiple parterns in the name of liberation.

Once majority of Indian men are learnt not to provide/protect/feed his wife for no reciprocation/expectation from herside, that is westernization.

Do you think, a man who simply becomes a pet dog with economic/emotional violence usage by a urban controlling any women. I dont think so. Marriage will 100% break. BUT if the man is intelligent enough to become a beggar, what happens to the fate of that women in the current indian critcal/difficult economy, has any
one thought about it. She will be forced to enter into mal-profession for survival. Bad elements use her more and more. Is this feminism?

Such cases grow exponentially from year after year. Men stop marrying if not now, after 5 yrs. parents will no longer marry their boys. they learn them how to stay away and take care of themselves.

I disclaim all liabilities, these are my opinions & thoughts and experience for the help to other mankind preserving spiritual india.

NCRB shows 45% men and 25% women suicide after marriage in India
(http://ncrb.nic.in/ADSI-03.pdf)

Nagaraj research study (reliable stats : 498a.org/contents/general/
frontline_suicide.pdf) states men vs women suicide rates change after
marriage (before marriage 1:0.9) to 3.4 times (age 35-40).

This means

a) suicide rates till marriage Women vs. men: 1: 0.9

b) suicide rates after marriage (nagaraj study): 1: 3.4

c) suicide rates overall : 25%: 46% (http://ncrb.nic.in/ADSI-03.pdf)

d) dowry dispute deaths by police FIR stats (shown at National crime stats
bureau, you can get a copy using RTI) in 2004: 98%: 2% (2585 women in#s: 53 men
in #s suicided in 2004). THIS IS WHAT WOMEN ORGS SHOWING TO THE WORLD.

This 2% men are from women (daughter-in-law) side. Men suiciding in marriage
is not shown here. This figure is terrorizing to rule women orgs, NCW in
amending dangerous laws like 498a and DV/DP act into cultural society.

CORRECTIONS:
Now my question is what happened to 3.4 times maried men?? where they
are?? I mean

That means 10000 suicides in 2004 Nagarajan study (”b”)
states –2270 women suicide and 7730 men suicide BUT above “d” states 53 men
only (which is men died from daughter-in-laws family)

Balance 7677 (53 subtracted from 7730) -what happened??. Where are these men
deaths?? That means 7677 men died JUST LIKE THAT. They died due to NO family
problems. Reliable stats already states main reason for suicide is family
problems/issues in India.

So empirical analysis from above research shows that “d” (i.e, 98%
vs. 2%), which is FIRs at police station AND FOOLING COMMAN PPL AND MEDIA
BRINGING DANGEROUS LAWS LIKE 498A, DV ACT.

Conclusions:
In year 2004, approx 2585 women suicided/killed and 7730 (or close) men
suicided/killed after marriage. Dowry burning deaths, so far no reliable source is available
anywhere in my research but women orgs(sponsored/funded by western interests) are using this weapon a lot in last 15+yrs to raise funds. This needs serious independent (100% un related to women orgs or feminist orgs) research whether selfish interests are involved to westernize India breaking family system or reality further.”

My disappointment is that an issue that affected three main players plus peripherals (OJ slaughtering two innocents -for those freshly out from under a rock) garnered more attention than an issue that negatively affects many millions (and that a law-abiding judge of the court was shot!! Oh, my!).

“And of course, Darren is not the only one with a motive!” RK
Hell, I could be a viable suspect in that case. Scary.

It’s been years since I heard that sexist speech and I am glad to see that the head of the APA, Dr Gerald P. Koocher, now challenges feminist views of domestic violence. Brave man. Hopefully the APA will make the studies avaible and the therapist of tomorrow will be more careful about sterotyping men when it comes to sex, violence, and the abuse of the other gender.

The AMA (American Medical Association) 3/22/03 had an article online (Report 9) of the Council on Scientific Affairs (1-94) http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/article/2036-2559.html challenging the biased views spread by feminists the last few years about D.V.

Why is it that with two such powerful groups – the AMA and the APA, clearly saying that DV is not about “a war against women” while showing that both genders are deeply impacted by the other gender, that so many groups still are unchallenged, yearly, when they have programs teaching our children and young adults that men are perps and women victims, almost always.

Oh, now I remember, girls don’t do as well in science and they are better than boys with “intuition” and “feelings” … so why look at scientific studies – so many details, so boring? When you can bring man-hating lesbians in the class room (ya, it’s a sterotype) discussing sexual harassment, rape, DV, showing photos of women with black eyes, sharing stories about savage beatings and rapes. Our sons and daughters will not forget the stories and their fathers are not “standing up” for men, mothers are not protecting their sons. Both genders are hurt when lies are told about the other.

Paul Craig Roberts in his article “Feelings in First Place” The Washington Times 10/22/01 wrote: “When confronted with their false reporting, feminists say that they trust their feelings about men more than ‘gender based’ statistics. Like others, they are not interested in information that gets in the way of an agenda.”

SD

Hmmm…. What ever happened to THAT case? That case should be broadcast on Court TV with as much fanfare as the OJ case. It would be a good venue to expose the problems with the current family law debacle in America. Or should this trial be held in secrecy to protect the “best interests” of the judge and his ilk?

I agree with amfortas – copy this to file and send as appropriate.

TMOTS

Oh look at the pretty pink elephant in the corner of the room!

TMOTS