Pat Robertson: Other Religions Are “Demonic Powers”

EJ – If Pat Robertson is materialistic why is he talking about demons? It is easy to criticize Christianity for how bad things are. But the reality is, what calls itself Christian, today in the West, is the apostate carcass, which has been devoured by hippy vultures for all of my lifetime. The high rates of suicide, are the resulting state of despair, left after we have been, intentionally stripped of everything that gave meaning, to our lives. Christians have little power, to force their truth on our free society, because it’s illegal. The hippies knew this, and took advantage of it. Vatican II, was a suicide pact agreed to by Catholic hippies, in the sixties. James Dobson is just another hippy Psychologist, contributing to the apostasy. Attempts to stand for revealed truth, in the middle of apostasy, tends to make people like Pat Robertson, look ridiculous. Whatever he says, to wake up the people, gets reported and ridiculed endlessly. If we are not to be literal, or take the scriptures seriously, than just how much more of the scriptures are you willing to let go, and what will the consequences be? How much longer will it be until you are kicked to death by your own children for no reason?

Pat Robertson and his ilk have a myopic, literal, materialistic viewpoint about a spiritual message and it doesn’t work. James Dobson wrote in his newsletter that born again Christians have the same rate of divorce as people who have no religious affiliation whatsoever. That doesn’t say much for the effectiveness of Robertson’s message or organization. Further, Christian nations have the highest rates of suicide in the world and we in America have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Robertson needs to get his own house in order, but he can’t with his limited understanding of matters spiritual.

Truth is not provable, it is understood. Only information is provable and it is transitory.
Christians spend too much effort trying to prove they are right and too little effort on living the life the message calls for.

Pat Robertson and his ilk have a myopic, literal, materialistic viewpoint about a spiritual message and it doesn’t work. James Dobson wrote in his newsletter that born again Christians have the same rate of divorce as people who have no religious affiliation whatsoever. That doesn’t say much for the effectiveness of Robertson’s message or organization. Further, Christian nations have the highest rates of suicide in the world and we in America have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Robertson needs to get his own house in order, but he can’t with his limited understanding of matters spiritual.

Truth is not provable, it is understood. Only information is provable and it is transitory.
Christians spend too much effort trying to prove they are right and too little effort on living the life the message calls for.

It’s interesting that Pat Robertson is too cowardly to take on a true opponent. I would of welcomed the chance.

I’m sure Pat is just quaking in his boots at the thought of “taking on” a blog troll.

It’s interesting that Pat Robertson is too cowardly to take on a true opponent. I would of welcomed the chance.

I’m sure Pat is just quaking in his boots at the thought of “taking on” a blog troll.

I wrote a snail mail letter to Pat Robertson. I asked how there could be Christianity without the possibility of a Christian marriage? I got no response.

In the Holy Bible, the man is to be in charge – no iffs, ands, or buts about it. But such a marriage, where the authority of the man contiues in the event that the marriage fails – man gets full and complete authority over said children from such a marriage has been outlawed. In the end, it wasn’t any devil that defeated Jesus. Instead it was the Child Support Slavery laws that made Jesus into both a liar and a sinner. That’s why Christianity is simply not taken seriously anymore.

It’s interesting that Pat Robertson is too cowardly to take on a true opponent. I would of welcomed the chance.

I wrote a snail mail letter to Pat Robertson. I asked how there could be Christianity without the possibility of a Christian marriage? I got no response.

In the Holy Bible, the man is to be in charge – no iffs, ands, or buts about it. But such a marriage, where the authority of the man contiues in the event that the marriage fails – man gets full and complete authority over said children from such a marriage has been outlawed. In the end, it wasn’t any devil that defeated Jesus. Instead it was the Child Support Slavery laws that made Jesus into both a liar and a sinner. That’s why Christianity is simply not taken seriously anymore.

It’s interesting that Pat Robertson is too cowardly to take on a true opponent. I would of welcomed the chance.

You were born and raised, in the greatest religion in the world, and the greatest country in the world, and can defend neither.

Mexico? Roberto is an illegal which is why it’s so easy to get his panties in a wad. Not to mention, proof positive why we’ve got to stop the illegal invasion.

Is San Fransico so much different than the rest of America that you really have no idea how hollow your incredulity sounds?

This statement boggles the mind. You obviously have never been there. If the “inhabitants” of Frisco were green and had tentacles it wouldn’t feel any weirder.

You were born and raised, in the greatest religion in the world, and the greatest country in the world, and can defend neither.

Mexico? Roberto is an illegal which is why it’s so easy to get his panties in a wad. Not to mention, proof positive why we’ve got to stop the illegal invasion.

Is San Fransico so much different than the rest of America that you really have no idea how hollow your incredulity sounds?

This statement boggles the mind. You obviously have never been there. If the “inhabitants” of Frisco were green and had tentacles it wouldn’t feel any weirder.

If I felt the urge, for my own amusement, to have an extended debate or discussion, to convince you that PR is right, I would first of all begin, with helping you determine, if this lashing out, is rational or irrational. It is clearly irrational; I have studied all the major religions and I can prove to you that none claim to be able to do the things to which you referred, except Judaism and Christianity. I would go, step by step, through all of your statements, and help you weigh the evidence. I think we would soon discover that you have the depth of understanding, typical of our dumbed down public school education. Because of the pressure for tolerance, to never say one child’s idea is right or better than another’s, you were educated, in public schools, that replaced absolutism with relativism, and replaced objectivism with subjectivism, that instead of saying all people are equal, they said all ideas are equal. This has caused you to be permanently scarred, with this notion that all the religions of the world are equal and no one should judge. This is what you refer to as ecumenical thinking. You probably think all political systems, economic systems, and all cultures are equal and no one should judge. I would also help you, to examine your own personal beliefs, to understand if you have any moral basis, to judge PR or anyone else. Your statements expose you to be a relativist. If that is the case, you have no moral basis, to judge anyone. You were born and raised, in the greatest religion in the world, and the greatest country in the world, and can defend neither. You sound like you gained your patriotism and spiritual enlightenment at Starbucks.

If I felt the urge, for my own amusement, to have an extended debate or discussion, to convince you that PR is right, I would first of all begin, with helping you determine, if this lashing out, is rational or irrational. It is clearly irrational; I have studied all the major religions and I can prove to you that none claim to be able to do the things to which you referred, except Judaism and Christianity. I would go, step by step, through all of your statements, and help you weigh the evidence. I think we would soon discover that you have the depth of understanding, typical of our dumbed down public school education. Because of the pressure for tolerance, to never say one child’s idea is right or better than another’s, you were educated, in public schools, that replaced absolutism with relativism, and replaced objectivism with subjectivism, that instead of saying all people are equal, they said all ideas are equal. This has caused you to be permanently scarred, with this notion that all the religions of the world are equal and no one should judge. This is what you refer to as ecumenical thinking. You probably think all political systems, economic systems, and all cultures are equal and no one should judge. I would also help you, to examine your own personal beliefs, to understand if you have any moral basis, to judge PR or anyone else. Your statements expose you to be a relativist. If that is the case, you have no moral basis, to judge anyone. You were born and raised, in the greatest religion in the world, and the greatest country in the world, and can defend neither. You sound like you gained your patriotism and spiritual enlightenment at Starbucks.

RPR are you serious? I like some of your writing because it is thought provoking and argumentative, but you can’t actually be credible and not know that what Pat Robertson stated is indeed exactly what the G-d of the Tora teaches, it just so happens that Jesus is that very same
G-d. Is San Fransico so much different than the rest of America that you really have no idea how hollow your incredulity sounds?

RPR are you serious? I like some of your writing because it is thought provoking and argumentative, but you can’t actually be credible and not know that what Pat Robertson stated is indeed exactly what the G-d of the Tora teaches, it just so happens that Jesus is that very same
G-d. Is San Fransico so much different than the rest of America that you really have no idea how hollow your incredulity sounds?

Paging Rev. Robertson. Please book into Amfortas’s ‘Recognising Demonic Powers, 101′ program. I am the only accredited Demonic Powers identifyer in the world. All the others are fakes.

Paging Rev. Robertson. Please book into Amfortas’s ‘Recognising Demonic Powers, 101′ program. I am the only accredited Demonic Powers identifyer in the world. All the others are fakes.

RPR, if you accept the validity of the Bible as a descriptor of what Jesus actually said, you must also feel like Jesus is a demon. The Bible quotes Jesus as saying, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father, except through me.” Doesn’t seem consistent with your “can’t we all just get along” sentiments.

John Dias

RPR, if you accept the validity of the Bible as a descriptor of what Jesus actually said, you must also feel like Jesus is a demon. The Bible quotes Jesus as saying, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father, except through me.” Doesn’t seem consistent with your “can’t we all just get along” sentiments.

John Dias

Why should you have any problem with Mr Roberstson? You automatically think if you are disagreed with, the disagreer is wrong. Likely you’re just jealous because you’re a nobody…

Why should you have any problem with Mr Roberstson? You automatically think if you are disagreed with, the disagreer is wrong. Likely you’re just jealous because you’re a nobody…

Mr Reyes,

This passage from your article seems a bit of a stretch:

“I don’t know why Pat Robertson demonizes Muslims, he has a lot in common with bin Laden and other radical Islamists. The leader of al Qaeda sees everyone who is not a Sunni Muslim as an infidel dog who is worthy of death and damnation.”

I do not believe that Pat Robertson or the 700 Club are responsible for any terrorist murders or are funding any terrorist organizations. Mr Robertson is a Fundumentalist Christian who literally believes that Christ is the only way to salvation. He stands firm in his beliefs and I admire him for it even If I don’t agree. I have heard of Mr Robertson prozetlizing and advocating that people accept Christ and Christianity but I have yet to hear him preach forced conversion and the spread of Christianity through force of arms. I have heard Osama Bin Laden preach spread of Islam(IT MEANS SUBMISSION NOT PEACE) through force though.

Mr Reyes,

This passage from your article seems a bit of a stretch:

“I don’t know why Pat Robertson demonizes Muslims, he has a lot in common with bin Laden and other radical Islamists. The leader of al Qaeda sees everyone who is not a Sunni Muslim as an infidel dog who is worthy of death and damnation.”

I do not believe that Pat Robertson or the 700 Club are responsible for any terrorist murders or are funding any terrorist organizations. Mr Robertson is a Fundumentalist Christian who literally believes that Christ is the only way to salvation. He stands firm in his beliefs and I admire him for it even If I don’t agree. I have heard of Mr Robertson prozetlizing and advocating that people accept Christ and Christianity but I have yet to hear him preach forced conversion and the spread of Christianity through force of arms. I have heard Osama Bin Laden preach spread of Islam(IT MEANS SUBMISSION NOT PEACE) through force though.

Religion isn’t like a favorite football team. Pat Robertson truly believes that if you don’t believe as he believes, you’ll spend all eternity in Hell. To Pat Robertson, to “show respect” for other religions would be to condemn someone to an eternity of suffering. You don’t say, “all religions are equally valid” if you think all other religions are wrong.

Pat Robertson replied appropriately according to his beliefs. Shouldn’t you be respectful and tolerant of his diversity?

Religion isn’t like a favorite football team. Pat Robertson truly believes that if you don’t believe as he believes, you’ll spend all eternity in Hell. To Pat Robertson, to “show respect” for other religions would be to condemn someone to an eternity of suffering. You don’t say, “all religions are equally valid” if you think all other religions are wrong.

Pat Robertson replied appropriately according to his beliefs. Shouldn’t you be respectful and tolerant of his diversity?