Opinion Matters Bernard Chapin's Siege Engine
Robert Paul Reyes
Britney Spears Flashes Her Genitals At The Paparazzi

Days after Britney Spears announced her divorce from K-Fed, she was already hitting the clubs with a new boy toy in tow.

Britney quickly shed the pounds she gained during her pregnancy, and just as quickly she donned micro miniskirts and blouses with plunging neck lines to show off her svelte figure.

But the buzz word of today is “extreme”, and photos of the pop diva wearing a short dress don’t generate enough attention.

Britney, hungry for attention, displayed her private parts to the paparazzi. The desperate slut was photographed getting out of a car in a hiked-up miniskirt sans underwear. This was not a demure peek at her privates, it was a display fit for a gynecologist.

For those of you who think this was an innocent accident, I have an ocean front property in Tennessee you might be interested in.

I’m not going to post a link to a pic of Britney showing off her goods, if you want to see the skank without her drawers — Google her yourself.

Britney now joins a growing number of bimbos who have flashed their nether regions: Paris Hilton, Mariah Carey, Lil’ Kim and Lindsay Lohan, to name just a few.

Britney is involved in nasty custody battle with her ex, and flashing her genitals is guaranteed not to gain favor with the judge. But the pop star cares more about her career than her children.

When a man wants to dismiss a woman he refers to her by the C-word. In effect, he is saying that the female in question doesn’t have a brain or a personality and her only asset is her vagina.

By flashing her C-word Britney is saying the same thing: Here is the most interesting thing about me boys — make sure you get a good shot.

Britney, if these X-rated photos don’t generate enough publicity, are you going to surreptitiously release a sex tape of you and K-Fed or one of your other lovers?

Stumble It!

Rate this post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

| Print This Post Print This Post | 525 views | Other posts by Robert Paul Reyes

Possibly Related Posts:

  • Four paparazzi members arrested after chasing Britney Spears’ car
  • Four paparazzi members arrested after chasing Britney Spears' car
  • Britney Spears Explains Her Vagina-Flashing Binge
  • Uproar over Britney Spears’ exposure underlines resilient importance of modesty
  • Uproar over Britney Spears' exposure underlines resilient importance of modesty
  • Celebrity Skank, Britney Spears, Offered Role In Doctor Who
  • Of Anna Nicole Smith And Britney Spears
  • Britney Spears Officially Divorced
  • Britney Spears Cancels Post-Rehab Concert
  • Avril Lavigne Shows No Sympathy for Spears
  • 6 Comments »

    1. amfortas said,

      Not going to impress a judge? The Judge that dares to go there and criticise would lose his position. He would be villified for daring to criticise a woman, denying her her ‘right’ to do whatsoever she wants with her body. He would be called a controlling oppressor. A pervert. She would claim she was simply allowing air to get to her parts for health reasons and any man who looked was a pervert who should be locked up. Its men’s fault! So there!!! As for the photographer - well, he’s a man. Its his fault.

      Now if it was a man who had shown his privates in public, dogs would have howled, old ladies would have fainted, small girls would have been trumatised for life - even just hearing about it, each would need 400 years of therapy at taxpayer’s expense - and of course every woman in the world would have been grievously offended and oppressed. The penis is a thing of horror. The sight of a dick can cause riots. A penis induces more fear than a buzz-saw in the hands of Freddie Kruger. But a hairy clam? No way.

      November 28, 2006 at 10:55 pm

    2. Robert Paul Reyes said,

      amfortas wrote:

      “A penis induces more fear than a buzz-saw in the hands of Freddie Kruger. But a hairy clam? No way.”

      Her clam has a bikini wax finish.

      Unfortunately, you are right. Britney can drive with her infant bouncing on her lap, expose her genitals, drop her infant and she will still end up with custody of the children. Even if K-Fed were a gentleman and a scholar instead of a no-good fool, she would still be granted custody of the children.

      November 28, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    3. tsaltman said,

      Get the F**k outta here w/that BS! She needs to air out her crotch for health reasons??? That’s why they make COTTON panties. So you s**t can air out through out the day. And if you’re that nasty down there then maybe you should walk around your house naked or sleep naked. LMAO Is that YOUR excuse when you get out of your car sans MODISTY w/your skirt/dress hiked up, legs WIDE open for the world to see? Get real. She did that s**t on purpose because she wants attention. She’s always been an attention whore and is attempting to get back into the game since she’s been out of the scene while she was married to that retarded ass gold digger she was stupid enough to marry and get knocked up TWICE by.

      November 29, 2006 at 8:57 pm

    4. stands2p said,

      If Pat Robertson was having a really slow day; had nothing better to do than check up on what 4th tier celebrities were up to; he might have expressed similar sentiments in response to Britney’s gash-flashing.
      Robert your essays rarely reflect any original thought or insight, they parrot the fashionable sentiments of the poorly informed but loudly opinionated liberal/socialist. Your opinions are all over the map because your core values twitch as a weather vane. We should withhold our collective forgiveness from a “Seinfeld” actor who hasn’t crossed anyone’s mind in years until the call for his scalp becomes to shrill and then we should all get over it.
      You seem to write mainly to provoke a reaction. Such a motive is not inherently wrong but neither is it something to be proud of. No one really cares about Britney’s crotch or some has-been’s temper tantrum; it’s just something to gab about at the virtual water cooler. But when you write about substantive events, your past writings diminish your authority to comment effectively. There are an inifite number of internet trolls, aim higher or tell your story walkin’.

      November 30, 2006 at 9:28 am

    5. kzarz said,

      I’m so inundated with sexual photos from the media that I don’t care anymore. All cunts look alike and her is no different. I haven’t seen the photos but take my word for it, they all look the same … and probably smell the same too.

      December 1, 2006 at 9:35 am

    6. » Celebrity press, blogs make fun of Britney Spear’s vaginaPinOy SPY! PaPaRaZzI! - PiNaY CeLeBrItY, Sports Babes, Filipina Models, PiCs, Videos, Celebs sCaNDaLs, wEbCaMs, FrEe DoWnLoAdS, GaMeS, Mp3, rAdiO » Blog Archive said,

      [...] A very blunt headline: Britney Spears Flashes Her Genitals At The Paparazzi [...]

      December 5, 2006 at 9:39 pm

    Leave a Comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    MND Opinion
    editor's bio | article rss | comments rss | itunes podcast | tos | privacy policy
    MensNEWSdaily®, mndnet.com, BlogWonks.com™, BlogWonk.com™, NewsWax.com™, YakVox.com™, DorkWatch.org™, CounterPulse.com™, JavaKing.com™ © 2001 - 2009 Java King, Inc.. Opinions found on this website are expressly those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this publication, its editorial staff or contributors. Words, graphics, audio, video, and all other content published on this domain must adhere to our Terms of Service . JAVA KING, INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AFFILIATES, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS HEREIN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
    Site Meter
    RETURN TO MENS NEWS DAILY