Lingerie Company Offers Free Panties To Britney Spears

2006-11-30
By

It is now a fashion must for hot young starlets to be photographed exiting limousines in short skirts while wearing no underwear. There are scores of photographs online of the private (non-private?) parts of Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton and too many other infamous sluts to mention.

Britney Spears is the latest skank to join this trend; the shameless hussy has exposed her nether regions to photographers four times in the last few days. Millions of people are now more familiar with Britney’s vagina than her gynecologist and more acquainted with her rectum than her proctologist.  Yes, the images are that explicit.

The Blume lingerie company is offering to make Britney underwear emblazoned with her initials. I think that’s an excellent idea, Blume should present Britney with some underwear with the initials “B” and “S”, for Brazen Skank.

There is a double standard at work here, if Snoop Dog repeatedly had a zipper malfunction and exposed his penis in a public place, before he could say, “Where’s my weed”, the rap star would be facing charges for public indecency.

Why haven’t charges been filed against Britney Spears?

112 views

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    RPR asks, “Why haven’t charges been filed against Britney Spears?” Because women don’t demand it. The Matriarchy allows women to be disgraceful. Its’ called ‘Empowerment’. If a policeman or prosecutor tried to file charges, his career would be ruined. Sure as all hell a woman policeperson or a woman prosecutorperson won’t have the balls to oppose the women’s lobby for fear of queering their own privilege.

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    RPR asks, “Why haven’t charges been filed against Britney Spears?” Because women don’t demand it. The Matriarchy allows women to be disgraceful. Its’ called ‘Empowerment’. If a policeman or prosecutor tried to file charges, his career would be ruined. Sure as all hell a woman policeperson or a woman prosecutorperson won’t have the balls to oppose the women’s lobby for fear of queering their own privilege.

  • stands2p

    Where was this moral outrage when you were acting as a shill for Jim pedophile-prose Webb?

    You should keep in mind that the entertainment industry is the foundation and the cash cow of the Liberal/Socialist movement for whom you so earnestly tote water. They won’t overlook articles like this the next time you want to lend your efforts to their cause.

  • stands2p

    Where was this moral outrage when you were acting as a shill for Jim pedophile-prose Webb?

    You should keep in mind that the entertainment industry is the foundation and the cash cow of the Liberal/Socialist movement for whom you so earnestly tote water. They won’t overlook articles like this the next time you want to lend your efforts to their cause.

  • DrDamage

    Not that I disagree with RPR about the double standard here, but seriously, what’s the big deal about nudity? Isn’t it time to get over the whole nudity taboo psychosis our society has developed?

    Here’s a thought: if someone doesn’t want to see nudity… don’t look!

    And if you don’t want people looking… cover it up!

    Revolutionary I know.

  • DrDamage

    Not that I disagree with RPR about the double standard here, but seriously, what’s the big deal about nudity? Isn’t it time to get over the whole nudity taboo psychosis our society has developed?

    Here’s a thought: if someone doesn’t want to see nudity… don’t look!

    And if you don’t want people looking… cover it up!

    Revolutionary I know.






Search

RSS Amy Alkon

RSS Donna Laframboise