lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Seattle, Capital of Misandria

2006-12-01
By

This morning, I appeared as a guest on KBKS (KISS) 106.1FM in Seattle, on Jackie & Bender Mornings. Seattle, if you don’t know, is the left-wing capital of Misandria, the land of man-hating women and vaginized men.

Let me give you a little background about this show. There are four hosts of this program — Jackie, Bender, Sammi, and Jubal — two males and two females. Before I got on the air, Jubal, one of the guys, shaved off some of his pubic hair and placed it on a pizza. Then, one of the females, I don’t know which one (I was too shocked to remember), vomited. OK, now you understand the “class” of these people. By the way, Seattle Magazine apparently voted Jackie & Bender Mornings the best AM radio show of Seattle. Go figure.

This interview, which was prerecorded an hour before it aired, was chopped up, edited, and slanted to make me appear misogynistic, which is untrue and why I generally don’t agree to doing prerecorded interviews. Because of this disingenuous, unprofessional ambush, I have done my last prerecorded interview.

Inherent in KBKS’s ambush was Sammi’s accusation of me lumping all women together as golddiggers. I never said this, do not feel this way, and never felt this way. Truth be told, I believe that most women feel entitled, and I stand by that. Most does not equal all. This is exactly what I told the fab four, but that’s not what they wanted you to hear.

After KBKS played my adulterated interview, when I could not respond, Sammi accused me of being ugly — her alleged reason for my attitudes. In her reprinted screed below, she invited Seattle women to Google me for proof of my ugliness. This fomented her man-haters in the listening audience to insult me. One even sent me hate-mail (also reprinted below).

People who hurl personal, ad-hominem insults during a debate are small. A radio host who purports to know my book without ever reading it is even smaller. You read that correctly: Sammi & Company never read my book. That’s OK — the pusillanimous hosts and callers solidified my case (notice that there were zero male callers — they’re too scared in Seattle to challenge the women), which delights me to no end.

The hot babes I’ve been involved with would argue with Sammi’s defamatory comments about my looks, but they have too much class to lower themselves to contact Sammi. Now, I don’t want to get down to Sammi’s pathetic level, but I have a suggestion for her: lose the donuts and buy a gym membership.

As you know, women generally tend to attack personally when they don’t like the subject matter. This is one of the main reasons men generally don’t respect women. Instead of arguing with logic and reason, why not throw rocks? It’s easier and feels better, right? If more fathers would be tougher parents to their daughters, this wouldn’t be the case.

NoNonsense Bottom Line:

These KISS attackers had their fun, got their ratings, bashed men, bashed me, and ironically validated everything I’ve ever written about entitled women. They unintentionally enhanced the value of www.UnderTheClitoralHood.com, beyond what I could have wanted or expected. I thank them for that.

After you listen to the interview (links immediately following) and read the lovely literary works below, by Sammi and her angry listener, please feel free to contact Sammi to convey your feelings — and please offer your comments below.

===============================================================

Please listen to the interview and then provide your feedback:

Windows Media Player

Everything Else
==============================================================

Here’s What Sammi Wrote on Her Blog After the Show

Marc H. Rudov was on with us today talking about his book. We went into this interview really wanting to talk to him and thinking he’d be fun to talk to and would have some great points. Wrong. Marc has a book out that teaches men to avoid gold diggers. That’s his opinion. I’m all for someone writing a because I know there are some gold digging women out there who do nothing but hook up with rich guys. Marc says it’s all women and will not budge. He’s not willing to listen and consider that not all women are like that.

He’s judging and it’s not a “teaching men” type of book. He says, in the most simple of terms, that men shouldn’t pamper women at all! If you agree, you’d love his book. We didn’t agree with his views (including Bender), so we ripped on him. We talked about everything from him being nuts to the fact that he’s not attractive to our thoughts on why he was divorced (which he wouldn’t talk about). We got an e-mail later thanking for the opportunity to be on but not appreciating how we talked about him. He claims he gets PLENTY of women and that he’s working on a TV deal so he must not be that ugly. You decide.

Google Marc H. Rudov. That’s two guys in two days I’ve had you look up. I promise that yesterday’s man was more of a treat BY FAR!

Enjoy the weekend you are about to have. Can you believe Thanksgiving was only last week? Time is flying by although it seems like the holiday was a month away. Also, Jingle Bell Bash is one week from Sunday. Where did the time go?

Sammi

P.S. Jubal thinks that his head injury is causing him not to be funny. He thinks he’s lost it.

==================================================================

Hate-Mail From An Entitled, Angry Seattle Princess

I heard you on the radio today. You know something, I’m always glad when a guy like you asks me to pay for a date. Because that keeps me from wasting any more time on him! THAT’S why you’re divorced–You’re a skinflint jerk!! AND you are WRONG! Let me explain something to you: Women measure a man by whether or not he is willing to be generous, and not just with money. However, how willing a man is to spend his money on a woman is a very telling indicator of how willing he is to open his heart.

I know men (married to very lucky women) who wouldn’t hesitate to do whatever was necessary to demonstrate their feelings for their mate. That’s the kind of man I want. Sometimes that has to do with money, other times it has to do with whether he will cook me a meal once in a while, be willing to listen to my point of view on issues, my worries and concerns, etc., or take me to an event that is more interesting to me than to him, just for companionship and supportiveness. Would you be willing to do those things? I doubt it.

You wealthy men always act like you’re being asked to donate a kidney when you have to spend money on a date. Let me ask you something: What is your purpose in asking a woman out? A woman doesn’t need a man! So what incentive do you offer for her to spend time with YOU? If all you want is sex, why don’t you just grow some balls and represent that up front? Maybe that’s all the woman wants, too. But the truth is, you’re afraid the woman might not feel the same way and burn you at go. But a date implies you’re interested in something more. DATING is a process by which two individuals get to know one another in order to find out whether they are compatible, interested in one another, share values, etc. I have dated guys with money, and they are usually the biggest jerks and tightwads (like you!) that there are. Look, asshole, even today most women don’t make as much money as their male counterparts in equivalent positions. So if a woman is at an economic disadvantage, why would you expect her to pay for a date she could not afford? Does that make her less appealing as a mate? Does it make her less able to be a loving, devoted, loyal partner in the marriage, a good mother to your children, a staunch supporter in sickness or health, wealth or poverty? You know–the things marriage are supposed to be about. I’m sorry you ended up with a “gold-digger,” but let’s be honest–you get what you give. If you bring low expectations and high demands to the table, what else do you expect?
====================================================================

In closing, I’d like to reinforce my main theme, repeated in everything I write and say: unless men and women treat each other like peers, they never will get along. Women do not deserve any rights or privileges that men cannot have, so men must stop deferring to them. This means that men must cease wining & dining women for sex. They must learn how to attract women without using cash. It’s that simple and the theme of Under the Clitoral Hood. Finally, if radio hosts in the future ever claim that I believe or said anything other than what I just wrote, they are lying.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 30+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper CablesTM (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet EarthTM (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s book, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at http://www.TheNoNonsenseMan.com/.

Copyright © 2006 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.
93 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Pingback: 106 1 kiss fm seattle wa

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    On Saturday night, December 9, 2006, at 11PM PST/2AM EST,
    I will be an in-studio guest with Emily Morse on her radio show,
    ‘Sex with Emily’ — http://www.SexWithEmily.com

    You didn’t think you were going to hear me make a woman
    scream, did you?

    If you don’t live in the Bay Area (San Francisco/San Jose),
    the way to hear the show is through the Website of KIFR
    106.9FM (CBS Radio) — http://www.1069FreeFM.com.

    Click on “live” at the top of the page. Preregistration required.

    The call-in number is 1.888.500.1069

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    On Saturday night, December 9, 2006, at 11PM PST/2AM EST,
    I will be an in-studio guest with Emily Morse on her radio show,
    ‘Sex with Emily’ — http://www.SexWithEmily.com

    You didn’t think you were going to hear me make a woman
    scream, did you?

    If you don’t live in the Bay Area (San Francisco/San Jose),
    the way to hear the show is through the Website of KIFR
    106.9FM (CBS Radio) — http://www.1069FreeFM.com.

    Click on “live” at the top of the page. Preregistration required.

    The call-in number is 1.888.500.1069

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Badger,

    If you think I sound petulant, that’s the way I feel. When blog commenters have something new to say, I will have new responses.

    Look at it from my perspective. There are certain men on this site who get pissed every time I say something nice about women. There are others who make the same comments no matter the topic. Still, there are those who fume because I am running a business but think my blog is their free-for-all venting forum.

    Righteous indignation is one thing, caustic bitterness another. My message is simple: if men and women treat each other like peers, respect each other, and reciprocate, they will get along famously. If that irritates you, I don’t what to say.

    PS — I want and encourage debate from all commenters. I do not care if people disagree with me, if they do so respectfully and intelligently. I will not, however, tolerate gratuitous personal slamming and name-calling — I dislike it equally in a marriage and on my blog.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Badger,

    If you think I sound petulant, that’s the way I feel. When blog commenters have something new to say, I will have new responses.

    Look at it from my perspective. There are certain men on this site who get pissed every time I say something nice about women. There are others who make the same comments no matter the topic. Still, there are those who fume because I am running a business but think my blog is their free-for-all venting forum.

    Righteous indignation is one thing, caustic bitterness another. My message is simple: if men and women treat each other like peers, respect each other, and reciprocate, they will get along famously. If that irritates you, I don’t what to say.

    PS — I want and encourage debate from all commenters. I do not care if people disagree with me, if they do so respectfully and intelligently. I will not, however, tolerate gratuitous personal slamming and name-calling — I dislike it equally in a marriage and on my blog.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Debi912,

    The only rules required in dating and marriage are no-nonsense rules: men and women are peers, period. Anything other than that will cause resentment and anger. This is what all my books and articles are about. If you don’t believe that, read the angry comments in my blog and in other blogs.

    I address your quote, “However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him,” in Under the Clitoral Hood and my articles, “Her Double-D’s Can Bankrupt You,” “Riding the Estrogen Express,” and “How to Lure a Golddigger.”

    Unfortunately, some men are such eunuchs, having no game, that they insist on paying for sex. They’re worse than the golddiggers who take their money.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Debi912,

    The only rules required in dating and marriage are no-nonsense rules: men and women are peers, period. Anything other than that will cause resentment and anger. This is what all my books and articles are about. If you don’t believe that, read the angry comments in my blog and in other blogs.

    I address your quote, “However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him,” in Under the Clitoral Hood and my articles, “Her Double-D’s Can Bankrupt You,” “Riding the Estrogen Express,” and “How to Lure a Golddigger.”

    Unfortunately, some men are such eunuchs, having no game, that they insist on paying for sex. They’re worse than the golddiggers who take their money.

  • badger

    I agree with most of what you have said in the past Marc, but you are starting to sound petulant and seem to be turning alot of people off including myself.

  • badger

    I agree with most of what you have said in the past Marc, but you are starting to sound petulant and seem to be turning alot of people off including myself.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Marc Rudov to Reappear on The Scott Sloan Show
    ==========================================

    What: Under the Clitoral Hood
    Date: Thursday, December 7, 2006
    Time: 9:00PM EST/6:00PM PST
    Where: WLW 700AM, Cincinnati | XM Satellite: Channel 173

    Scott Sloan’s Page
    http://www.700wlw.com/pages/onair_scottsloan.html

    To Listen:
    http://www.700wlw.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html

    “Marc Rudov is informative, passionate, and, most of all …
    PROVOCATIVE! He’s like a red-hot poker in the side of
    dating etiquette. One of those rare guests you’ll be looking
    for a reason to rebook.”
    — Scott Sloan

    I hope you can listen,

    Marc

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Marc Rudov to Reappear on The Scott Sloan Show
    ==========================================

    What: Under the Clitoral Hood
    Date: Thursday, December 7, 2006
    Time: 9:00PM EST/6:00PM PST
    Where: WLW 700AM, Cincinnati | XM Satellite: Channel 173

    Scott Sloan’s Page
    http://www.700wlw.com/pages/onair_scottsloan.html

    To Listen:
    http://www.700wlw.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html

    “Marc Rudov is informative, passionate, and, most of all …
    PROVOCATIVE! He’s like a red-hot poker in the side of
    dating etiquette. One of those rare guests you’ll be looking
    for a reason to rebook.”
    — Scott Sloan

    I hope you can listen,

    Marc

  • debi912

    “It is nonsense for a woman to say she cannot “afford” to pay for a date. She gets no female discounts at the bank, the spa, the IRS, the grocery store, the gas station, or the car dealership; she likewise deserves no female discounts on dates. The rule of life: if you want to play, you have to pay.”

    I’m going to have to confess to having very little dating experience. However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him.
    Social cues are obviously not a strong suit of mine. Perhaps there needs to be a new’rules’ for dating in the 21st century aimed at teen boys.

    “But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.”

    Appreciation keeps an oven ‘preheated’. My only expectation is to be treated well. “Do unto others….” and all that. I think alot of women think ‘give and take’ means Men give, Women take, you see this all the time. I told the boys that only 1 in every 100 women might be worth their time. Perhaps I was being to generous.
    Do you ever wonder what planet people were raised on, i’m a navy brat, I had responsability thumped into my head from very early on. oh well.

  • debi912

    “It is nonsense for a woman to say she cannot “afford” to pay for a date. She gets no female discounts at the bank, the spa, the IRS, the grocery store, the gas station, or the car dealership; she likewise deserves no female discounts on dates. The rule of life: if you want to play, you have to pay.”

    I’m going to have to confess to having very little dating experience. However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him.
    Social cues are obviously not a strong suit of mine. Perhaps there needs to be a new’rules’ for dating in the 21st century aimed at teen boys.

    “But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.”

    Appreciation keeps an oven ‘preheated’. My only expectation is to be treated well. “Do unto others….” and all that. I think alot of women think ‘give and take’ means Men give, Women take, you see this all the time. I told the boys that only 1 in every 100 women might be worth their time. Perhaps I was being to generous.
    Do you ever wonder what planet people were raised on, i’m a navy brat, I had responsability thumped into my head from very early on. oh well.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Hey, CaptDMO, you can pare down that 80% to an even-smaller number by cutting off the largesse. Women do respond to real men — even if they’ve been wined & dined in the past. But, for most of the 80%, it’s waste of time. Something to do when you’re bored.

    Please let me know when you’ve finished reading the book. Many more truisms in store for you.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Hey, CaptDMO, you can pare down that 80% to an even-smaller number by cutting off the largesse. Women do respond to real men — even if they’ve been wined & dined in the past. But, for most of the 80%, it’s waste of time. Something to do when you’re bored.

    Please let me know when you’ve finished reading the book. Many more truisms in store for you.

  • CaptDMO

    Without reading the book yet……
    (money doesn’t arouse women)
    Dude, that “thoughtful” impromptu bouquet of flowers delivered to her work station, for all her
    co-entitlees to admire costs a bunch, and only serves to raise the “me-too” entitlement upmanship. Granted, this applies to the 80% ilk. I hear ya’ on what really get’s that 20% hot to
    make biscuits and gravy for breakfast.

    Sometimes, what makes comedy good are the truisms
    lampooned. I think it was “”The Idiot” (Steve Martin’s, not Dosty’s) that produced this gem from Bernadette Peters…”I don’t care about the money, I care about all the stuuuuff!”.

    I delight in the fact that your willing to use those $0.25 big triple secret “code” words, known only to us elite conspiritors, and do not follow the MSM lead in dumbing down for for the sake of those that miscomprehend euphonic nuance anyway. It let’s me exercise my brains.
    Just sayin’

  • CaptDMO

    Without reading the book yet……
    (money doesn’t arouse women)
    Dude, that “thoughtful” impromptu bouquet of flowers delivered to her work station, for all her
    co-entitlees to admire costs a bunch, and only serves to raise the “me-too” entitlement upmanship. Granted, this applies to the 80% ilk. I hear ya’ on what really get’s that 20% hot to
    make biscuits and gravy for breakfast.

    Sometimes, what makes comedy good are the truisms
    lampooned. I think it was “”The Idiot” (Steve Martin’s, not Dosty’s) that produced this gem from Bernadette Peters…”I don’t care about the money, I care about all the stuuuuff!”.

    I delight in the fact that your willing to use those $0.25 big triple secret “code” words, known only to us elite conspiritors, and do not follow the MSM lead in dumbing down for for the sake of those that miscomprehend euphonic nuance anyway. It let’s me exercise my brains.
    Just sayin’

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Mr Rudov,

    This will be the last time I comment on any of your articles. As you well know, most of the comments to my articles take great exception to what I write. I respond to most comments, but never have I implied that they don’t have a right to leave a comment.

    The comments section is not reserved just for those who agree with you. It’s there for people to comment on your article and the title of your article.

    Don’t be so condescending, of course I know the meaning of the word.

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Mr Rudov,

    This will be the last time I comment on any of your articles. As you well know, most of the comments to my articles take great exception to what I write. I respond to most comments, but never have I implied that they don’t have a right to leave a comment.

    The comments section is not reserved just for those who agree with you. It’s there for people to comment on your article and the title of your article.

    Don’t be so condescending, of course I know the meaning of the word.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Mr. Reyes,

    Don’t come onto my blog and presume to tell me what to entitle my article. If you don’t understand my title, get a dictionary.

    Our culture understands misogyny well, because every man is either a woman-hater or a potential woman-hater, right? Every man who criticizes a woman is called a misogynist.

    In fact, our culture worships women and hates men — yet, you did not know the word for hatred of men. Now you know. Welcome to Misandria.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Mr. Reyes,

    Don’t come onto my blog and presume to tell me what to entitle my article. If you don’t understand my title, get a dictionary.

    Our culture understands misogyny well, because every man is either a woman-hater or a potential woman-hater, right? Every man who criticizes a woman is called a misogynist.

    In fact, our culture worships women and hates men — yet, you did not know the word for hatred of men. Now you know. Welcome to Misandria.

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Using words like “misandry” or “misandria” lends you the aura of a cultist speaking in his own peculiar language.

    You should use words and phrases that everybody understands.

  • Robert Paul Reyes

    Using words like “misandry” or “misandria” lends you the aura of a cultist speaking in his own peculiar language.

    You should use words and phrases that everybody understands.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    John Dias makes great points. I disagree, though, that a home-cooked meal is a permanent substitute for a restaurant meal. Some women, as a matter of principle, would not be caught dead paying in public for a man. In other words, public reciprocation is embarrassing but public consumption is delightful.

    Have you ever noticed that women who demand dating discounts FROM men never offer divorce discounts TO men?

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    John Dias makes great points. I disagree, though, that a home-cooked meal is a permanent substitute for a restaurant meal. Some women, as a matter of principle, would not be caught dead paying in public for a man. In other words, public reciprocation is embarrassing but public consumption is delightful.

    Have you ever noticed that women who demand dating discounts FROM men never offer divorce discounts TO men?

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    debi912 wrote:

    As one of those women who could not afford to pay for a date, there was an alternative: A home cooked meal. He ended up marrying me. She has to be willing to give to, even if it isn’t financially, and not just sex. Men also like to be pampered and fawned over.

    What you seem to be saying is that both sexes tend to enjoy the fruits of another person’s labor. I suppose your husband had a genuine appreciation for yours. Unlike that Marc intoned, I consider your cooking a meal to be labor and effort that you expended, and therefore worth something. In fact, it may even be worth more than a meal served in a restaurant; there’s something to be said for a home cooked meal, made by someone who loves you.

    But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.

    Think back to the time when women were expected to provide that meal you alluded to. Imagine an “Archie Bunker” type, coming home and demanding, “Edith! Get me a beer! Where’s my dinner? You still haven’t made dinner?” How would you like it if the man you had cooked for treated you like that, simply because you’re a woman? If you wouldn’t like it (I didn’t think you would), then you have an inkling of what a man goes through when he’s expected to pay a woman’s way simply because he’s the man.

    Sure, men like being pampered just like women. But men are disproportionately expected to do the pampering while women have successfully shrugged off gender roles, like the Edith Bunker housewife. The double standards that remain today are what create the entitlement queens that Marc frequently writes about.

    John Dias

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    debi912 wrote:

    As one of those women who could not afford to pay for a date, there was an alternative: A home cooked meal. He ended up marrying me. She has to be willing to give to, even if it isn’t financially, and not just sex. Men also like to be pampered and fawned over.

    What you seem to be saying is that both sexes tend to enjoy the fruits of another person’s labor. I suppose your husband had a genuine appreciation for yours. Unlike that Marc intoned, I consider your cooking a meal to be labor and effort that you expended, and therefore worth something. In fact, it may even be worth more than a meal served in a restaurant; there’s something to be said for a home cooked meal, made by someone who loves you.

    But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.

    Think back to the time when women were expected to provide that meal you alluded to. Imagine an “Archie Bunker” type, coming home and demanding, “Edith! Get me a beer! Where’s my dinner? You still haven’t made dinner?” How would you like it if the man you had cooked for treated you like that, simply because you’re a woman? If you wouldn’t like it (I didn’t think you would), then you have an inkling of what a man goes through when he’s expected to pay a woman’s way simply because he’s the man.

    Sure, men like being pampered just like women. But men are disproportionately expected to do the pampering while women have successfully shrugged off gender roles, like the Edith Bunker housewife. The double standards that remain today are what create the entitlement queens that Marc frequently writes about.

    John Dias

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    WHAT IS NONSENSE?

    For those of you still not clear about how I define nonsense, CLICK HERE.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    WHAT IS NONSENSE?

    For those of you still not clear about how I define nonsense, CLICK HERE.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Debi912,

    It is nonsense for a woman to say she cannot “afford” to pay for a date. She gets no female discounts at the bank, the spa, the IRS, the grocery store, the gas station, or the car dealership; she likewise deserves no female discounts on dates. The rule of life: if you want to play, you have to pay.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    Debi912,

    It is nonsense for a woman to say she cannot “afford” to pay for a date. She gets no female discounts at the bank, the spa, the IRS, the grocery store, the gas station, or the car dealership; she likewise deserves no female discounts on dates. The rule of life: if you want to play, you have to pay.

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    To Mr. Harold Zoid,

    If you want to read an article about how to spot dangerous women, you might try “Will She Call 911 on You?” by Marc H. Rudov

  • http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com Marc H. Rudov

    To Mr. Harold Zoid,

    If you want to read an article about how to spot dangerous women, you might try “Will She Call 911 on You?” by Marc H. Rudov

  • debi912

    As one of those women who could not afford to pay for a date, there was an alternative: A home cooked meal. He ended up marrying me. She has to be willing to give to, even if it isn’t financially, and not just sex. Men also like to be pampered and fawned over.

  • debi912

    As one of those women who could not afford to pay for a date, there was an alternative: A home cooked meal. He ended up marrying me. She has to be willing to give to, even if it isn’t financially, and not just sex. Men also like to be pampered and fawned over.

  • HaroldZoid

    Wow, Mr. Dias thanks for the link. Great stuff.

  • HaroldZoid

    Wow, Mr. Dias thanks for the link. Great stuff.

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    Conservativation, to answer your inquiry, if you’re still interested in having a relationship with women beyond just sex, this involves spotting and avoiding the types of women likely to become bitches. There’s an article I really love that can shed some light; here it is:

    “Dangerous Behavior Patterns”
    Charles E. Corry, Ph.D.
    http://www.dvmen.org/dv-125.htm#behavior

    This article assumes that a woman is less likely to be volatile when her earlier life was not plagued by various calamities. By extension, those women who were well-balanced and fair-minded are likely to withstand the temptation to become entitlement queens and abusive parasites.

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    Conservativation, to answer your inquiry, if you’re still interested in having a relationship with women beyond just sex, this involves spotting and avoiding the types of women likely to become bitches. There’s an article I really love that can shed some light; here it is:

    “Dangerous Behavior Patterns”
    Charles E. Corry, Ph.D.
    http://www.dvmen.org/dv-125.htm#behavior

    This article assumes that a woman is less likely to be volatile when her earlier life was not plagued by various calamities. By extension, those women who were well-balanced and fair-minded are likely to withstand the temptation to become entitlement queens and abusive parasites.

  • GladMadSadDad

    I am confused as well? I haven’t seen anything resembling “blasting”? I thought amfortas was supportive with some reservations about Marc attributing women’s entitlement attitudes to men rather than laying the fault on them as adults. I tend to agree with amfortas on this one while still agreeing wtih Marc on his overriding thesis.

    I make a concious effort to raise my daughter to be responsible for her own actions, just as I do with my two sons. I make sure that I do not send any signals that she can “charm” me into being any less stern when she acts badly. I think I’m doing well, but even if I failed miserably and led her to believe that she should expect men to give more than they get, I still feel that when she is an adult, she is responsible for her behaviors and attitudes…not me.

    My ex’s family was as dysfunctional as any you want to meet. The father was a monster, and the mother abandoned them. The whole situation was tragic, and for years I pitied my then wife for what she had to deal with as a child.

    Eventually, as she strived to make my adult life as miserable as her childhood life, I began to understand that she did not warrant my pity. She refused to take any advice or actions recommended by the “professionals” and I was forced to bear the consequences of her inaction.

    There comes a time when we are all responsible for ourselves. For the women who feel entitled, they should be held accountable. Not their fathers or anyone else. I’m with amfortas and I’m not blasting anyone.

  • GladMadSadDad

    I am confused as well? I haven’t seen anything resembling “blasting”? I thought amfortas was supportive with some reservations about Marc attributing women’s entitlement attitudes to men rather than laying the fault on them as adults. I tend to agree with amfortas on this one while still agreeing wtih Marc on his overriding thesis.

    I make a concious effort to raise my daughter to be responsible for her own actions, just as I do with my two sons. I make sure that I do not send any signals that she can “charm” me into being any less stern when she acts badly. I think I’m doing well, but even if I failed miserably and led her to believe that she should expect men to give more than they get, I still feel that when she is an adult, she is responsible for her behaviors and attitudes…not me.

    My ex’s family was as dysfunctional as any you want to meet. The father was a monster, and the mother abandoned them. The whole situation was tragic, and for years I pitied my then wife for what she had to deal with as a child.

    Eventually, as she strived to make my adult life as miserable as her childhood life, I began to understand that she did not warrant my pity. She refused to take any advice or actions recommended by the “professionals” and I was forced to bear the consequences of her inaction.

    There comes a time when we are all responsible for ourselves. For the women who feel entitled, they should be held accountable. Not their fathers or anyone else. I’m with amfortas and I’m not blasting anyone.

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Marc, I have not ‘endlessly’ argued with you (3 out of 26 comments) misunderstood, misquoted, misinterpreted, or blasted you. I am not an attention whore. I am one of your fans, actually. One of your readers. But if this is how you respond to reader feedback, perhaps I should broaden out to other authors.

    Delete away, old son, if that is your pleasure.

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Marc, I have not ‘endlessly’ argued with you (3 out of 26 comments) misunderstood, misquoted, misinterpreted, or blasted you. I am not an attention whore. I am one of your fans, actually. One of your readers. But if this is how you respond to reader feedback, perhaps I should broaden out to other authors.

    Delete away, old son, if that is your pleasure.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search