You didn’t think you were going to hear me make a woman
scream, did you?

If you don’t live in the Bay Area (San Francisco/San Jose),
the way to hear the show is through the Website of KIFR
106.9FM (CBS Radio) — http://www.1069FreeFM.com.

Click on “live” at the top of the page. Preregistration required.

The call-in number is 1.888.500.1069

If you think I sound petulant, that’s the way I feel. When blog commenters have something new to say, I will have new responses.

Look at it from my perspective. There are certain men on this site who get pissed every time I say something nice about women. There are others who make the same comments no matter the topic. Still, there are those who fume because I am running a business but think my blog is their free-for-all venting forum.

Righteous indignation is one thing, caustic bitterness another. My message is simple: if men and women treat each other like peers, respect each other, and reciprocate, they will get along famously. If that irritates you, I don’t what to say.

PS — I want and encourage debate from all commenters. I do not care if people disagree with me, if they do so respectfully and intelligently. I will not, however, tolerate gratuitous personal slamming and name-calling — I dislike it equally in a marriage and on my blog.

The only rules required in dating and marriage are no-nonsense rules: men and women are peers, period. Anything other than that will cause resentment and anger. This is what all my books and articles are about. If you don’t believe that, read the angry comments in my blog and in other blogs.

I address your quote, “However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him,” in Under the Clitoral Hood and my articles, “Her Double-D’s Can Bankrupt You,” “Riding the Estrogen Express,” and “How to Lure a Golddigger.”

Unfortunately, some men are such eunuchs, having no game, that they insist on paying for sex. They’re worse than the golddiggers who take their money.

What: Under the Clitoral Hood
Date: Thursday, December 7, 2006
Time: 9:00PM EST/6:00PM PST
Where: WLW 700AM, Cincinnati | XM Satellite: Channel 173

Scott Sloan’s Page
http://www.700wlw.com/pages/onair_scottsloan.html

To Listen:
http://www.700wlw.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html

“Marc Rudov is informative, passionate, and, most of all …
PROVOCATIVE! He’s like a red-hot poker in the side of
dating etiquette. One of those rare guests you’ll be looking
for a reason to rebook.” — Scott Sloan

I hope you can listen,

Marc

I’m going to have to confess to having very little dating experience. However, (prior to kids) anytime I pulled out my wallet, you’d think I cut his penis off and handed it to him.
Social cues are obviously not a strong suit of mine. Perhaps there needs to be a new’rules’ for dating in the 21st century aimed at teen boys.

“But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.”

Appreciation keeps an oven ‘preheated’. My only expectation is to be treated well. “Do unto others….” and all that. I think alot of women think ‘give and take’ means Men give, Women take, you see this all the time. I told the boys that only 1 in every 100 women might be worth their time. Perhaps I was being to generous.
Do you ever wonder what planet people were raised on, i’m a navy brat, I had responsability thumped into my head from very early on. oh well.

Please let me know when you’ve finished reading the book. Many more truisms in store for you.

Sometimes, what makes comedy good are the truisms
lampooned. I think it was “”The Idiot” (Steve Martin’s, not Dosty’s) that produced this gem from Bernadette Peters…”I don’t care about the money, I care about all the stuuuuff!”.

I delight in the fact that your willing to use those $0.25 big triple secret “code” words, known only to us elite conspiritors, and do not follow the MSM lead in dumbing down for for the sake of those that miscomprehend euphonic nuance anyway. It let’s me exercise my brains.
Just sayin’

This will be the last time I comment on any of your articles. As you well know, most of the comments to my articles take great exception to what I write. I respond to most comments, but never have I implied that they don’t have a right to leave a comment.

The comments section is not reserved just for those who agree with you. It’s there for people to comment on your article and the title of your article.

Don’t be so condescending, of course I know the meaning of the word.

Don’t come onto my blog and presume to tell me what to entitle my article. If you don’t understand my title, get a dictionary.

Our culture understands misogyny well, because every man is either a woman-hater or a potential woman-hater, right? Every man who criticizes a woman is called a misogynist.

In fact, our culture worships women and hates men — yet, you did not know the word for hatred of men. Now you know. Welcome to Misandria.

You should use words and phrases that everybody understands.

Have you ever noticed that women who demand dating discounts FROM men never offer divorce discounts TO men?

As one of those women who could not afford to pay for a date, there was an alternative: A home cooked meal. He ended up marrying me. She has to be willing to give to, even if it isn’t financially, and not just sex. Men also like to be pampered and fawned over.

What you seem to be saying is that both sexes tend to enjoy the fruits of another person’s labor. I suppose your husband had a genuine appreciation for yours. Unlike that Marc intoned, I consider your cooking a meal to be labor and effort that you expended, and therefore worth something. In fact, it may even be worth more than a meal served in a restaurant; there’s something to be said for a home cooked meal, made by someone who loves you.

But what Marc always says, and I agree with him, is that no one should tolerate the expectation to another person’s labor, simply because the beneficiary of that labor is the opposite sex. Marc’s emphasis is on women expecting (not just receiving) special treatment and pampering, merely because they are women and they expect to be romanced and paid for by men. When a man pays, he should be appreciated for that. He should not be expected to pay simply because he’s fulfilling the “male role” of paying for everything.

Think back to the time when women were expected to provide that meal you alluded to. Imagine an “Archie Bunker” type, coming home and demanding, “Edith! Get me a beer! Where’s my dinner? You still haven’t made dinner?” How would you like it if the man you had cooked for treated you like that, simply because you’re a woman? If you wouldn’t like it (I didn’t think you would), then you have an inkling of what a man goes through when he’s expected to pay a woman’s way simply because he’s the man.

Sure, men like being pampered just like women. But men are disproportionately expected to do the pampering while women have successfully shrugged off gender roles, like the Edith Bunker housewife. The double standards that remain today are what create the entitlement queens that Marc frequently writes about.

John Dias

For those of you still not clear about how I define nonsense, CLICK HERE.

It is nonsense for a woman to say she cannot “afford” to pay for a date. She gets no female discounts at the bank, the spa, the IRS, the grocery store, the gas station, or the car dealership; she likewise deserves no female discounts on dates. The rule of life: if you want to play, you have to pay.

If you want to read an article about how to spot dangerous women, you might try “Will She Call 911 on You?” by Marc H. Rudov

“Dangerous Behavior Patterns”
Charles E. Corry, Ph.D.
http://www.dvmen.org/dv-125.htm#behavior

This article assumes that a woman is less likely to be volatile when her earlier life was not plagued by various calamities. By extension, those women who were well-balanced and fair-minded are likely to withstand the temptation to become entitlement queens and abusive parasites.