Psychosis hits 1 in 1,000 new moms, study says
email: editor -@- mensnews daily.com | More from Mike LaSalle
Stumble It!
8 Responses to “Psychosis hits 1 in 1,000 new moms, study says”
Leave a Reply
|
|
Sex & Metropolis
Join Our Mailing List
Letters from the editor
Paul Elam
Pelle Billing
Glenn Sacks
Marc H. Rudov
Roger F. Gay
Carey Roberts
Stephen Baskerville
Gordon E. Finley
Amy Alkon
Dr. Helen Smith
Jerry Fino
Shop Amazon and Support MND
Recent Comments
- poiuyt on Do PC Feminists Really Think Women are Too Weak…or Just Too Special?
- Who are River Smith and Heidi Raynor and What Kind of Cult are They Running? | MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory on Allaboutcounseling.com is All About Hating Men and Exploiting Women
- Paul Elam on Who are River Smith and Heidi Raynor and What Kind of Cult are They Running?
- DcFather on Do PC Feminists Really Think Women are Too Weak…or Just Too Special?
- Rick on Cleaning This Gun and the Protective/Threatening Father
- julie on The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- julie on The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- Denis on Do PC Feminists Really Think Women are Too Weak…or Just Too Special?
- Trust on Sanctity of Criminals’ Lives
- jjtaup on Death Penalty For Cop Killers?
- shatteredmen on Death Penalty For Cop Killers?
- shatteredmen on Death Penalty For Cop Killers?
- Mike on The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- LR on The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- LR on The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
Search MND
Download PDF Here
Support Our Sponsors!
Please support MND
Subscribe today:
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
December 7th, 2006 at 5:20 am
Holy mackeral, isn’t there enough prozac in the streams and waterways already without creating the need for more.
Are they now creating the victim’s victim ?
December 7th, 2006 at 8:44 am
Enough with the excuse making for women already, as if men who do terrible things have absolutley nothing wrong with them. We already have too much legislation designed to paint women as victims and men as perpetrators regardless of facts. The last thing we need is “a new bill” to solve alleged problems for women. Notice the common theme: women are suffering and they don’t even know it, or so says one “researcher” in another country. But that doesn’t stop some goofball with a “D” beside his name from introducing new legislation. Excuse me, but what about the thousands of studies that show the real plight of boys and men and fathers. They don’t need a Danish “researcher” to tell them it’s real.
December 7th, 2006 at 10:25 am
A few days ago a woman up here in Canada murdered her son and killed herself by jumping off a freeway overpass. In perusing various websites here. The link to the story was on the front page and right underneath it was a link to this Danish research and then a third link about domestic violence. It has been learned over the past few days that the father (earlier painted as the possible reason) was touted as loving and compassinate by her family. As much as the media tried to infer but not actully coming out and saying it they wanted the man to be at fault. Sickening.
December 7th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Right. Here we go again. The ads on these pages for the Godzilla form of PMS were not enough, now we know that child birth is a debilitating medical condition for a woman. Maybe we could just up it to 40,000 words per day that they speak and that would be a sufficient vent.
December 7th, 2006 at 1:05 pm
Looks like the prividge princesses can’t handle real responsibilty. Like taking care of a child and putting themselves second. Sigh…why do the have children if they can’t do that? Oh, I forgot that they can’t handle working either and the think that child support is the easy way out of working. Sorry PP’s it doesn’t work that way.
Maybe they should be looking at a way to get men to pay non-child support, that is, if a man doesn’t make them pregnant, they are entitled to payment because of that. OMG, I just gave them another way to be PP’s!
Fortunately, most of them are to lazy to read…
December 8th, 2006 at 8:00 am
They are talking of 1 in a 1000. That is statistically insignificant. 0.001. Ok, it translates into quite a few people but it still means that 999 out of a 1000 cope quite well with this natural process. As psychoses of this or that sort affect 4 – 5% of people anyway, it hardly makes a blip. Just think of the number of males and females who die each year. Now that would be a large enough %age to cause a worry in comparison.
December 9th, 2006 at 9:28 am
NationalVoice said:
“Sigh…why do the have children if they can’t do that? Oh, I forgot that they can’t handle working either and the think that child support is the easy way out of working.”
Sorry pal. You get an “F”. The real reason is because it is THEIR RIGHT! GESH! Turn in your Patriarchy (TM) card at the door!
TMOTS
December 11th, 2006 at 6:52 am
These women are a danger to their children! We need more laws to protect those that can’t protect themselves. I propose legislation that will require all mothers with newborns to pass a psych test before the hospital can release the baby. Any female diagnosed with post-partum blues will just have to wait to bond with their babies. It’s for the good of the children, best interests and all that, doncha know.