Parents might think twice about sending their children to Rutgers University. It may well be the most anti-family college in America; a training camp for global feminist terrorism.
Rutgers is home base for the Center for Women’s Global Leadership (CWGL). The CWGL is a major launch-point for global radical feminist initiatives primarily attacking well-off developing countries while virtually ignoring areas where women are truly in dire straits – such as Darfur.
The CWGL just completed the “16 days of activism against gender violence” campaign — one of several extended feminist holidays worshipping government and U.N. programs that entitle women to steal families, assets, and businesses simply by hollering “abuse”. But the theme does not end there: everything else found in the “V-dictionary”, such as abortion, welfare entitlements, HIV/AIDS, GLBT agenda, same sex marriage, poverty, and “human rights” congeal into one inseparable cause-celebre powered by the “abuse” word.
Rutgers is an integral part of the U.N. Feminist Rumor Mill. Virtually all statistics and conclusions feminists make about abuse have been scientifically proven to be fantastical.
In fact, the body of assertions made in the U.N. Secretary Generals Report on Violence Against Women were so outrageous that the U.N. Third Committee voted unanimously to only “note” the report, rather than accept it. In parliamentary language, this is a full rejection — a rare event at the United Nations.
For example, radical activists claimed that “70 percent of married women in India were victims of beatings or rape”. After much research, Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) found this was based on a graphic in a UNPF report that was obviously mislabeled and meaningless. Yet, this claim is the lead item on virtually every feminist website around the world.
In fact, there are so few truly scientific claims made in any of the U.N. or CWGL documents, we can say the expenditure of federal and international monies has been spent, in majority, on social terrorism of foreign countries.
I realize this is a breathtaking statement to make. As always, I back my statements up thoroughly. We will now examine recent events in India, which was recently conquered by the feminist insurgency, and is just starting to realize what happened.
Destruction of Marriage in India
In India, the words “dowry death” or “bride burning” conjure up horrible images that can be misused to fool legislators into passing anything. That is precisely what happened.
India’s new IPC 498a law permits any woman to claim dowry abuse – causing government to swing into action as if Bin Laden just waltzed into the White House. On mere allegation alone, her husband and members of his family will be incarcerated. Bail can be optionally granted only by a judge. Incarceration prior to the initial bail hearing is often several months, depending on how much the woman’s family greases the palms of police and magistrate. Trials take between three and six years to be heard, during which the individuals arrested are subject to constant harassment and blackmail.
India did not stop there. Feminists harassed legislators into passing the most outrageous domestic violence law anywhere in the world.
The new Indian domestic violence law goes far beyond anything in Western law. “Not providing money for maintaining you or your children” and “not paying rent” are now crimes in India. This criminalization of poverty insanely thrusts poor families into more desperate straits than before: two households must be sustained on the same income. Literally any domestic disagreement, no matter how minor, now invokes destruction of the family in India.
The excesses of these new laws are apparent and intuitively predictable. You do not have to take my word for it. Ex-wives are blaming the domestic violence law for making their lives worse. Police say that about 80% of dowry allegations are false. Ajaib Singh, head of the Women and Child Support Unit in Chandigarh, reports that only 20% of dowry claims are genuine.
Shantosh Singh, chairperson of Women Welfare Counselling Cell at Sector 17, reveals the truth: ‘‘People generally make use this law to facilitate a divorce. And often, it’s the lawyers who advise the women to implicate their in-laws under the provisions of this Act,’’
Indian lawyers admit the truth, too. ‘There are only 10 per cent cases based on truth, and people usually come to us and ask specifically to mention the element of dowry in their divorce petitions,’’
The Times of India was inundated with letters to the editor about horrendous legal abuses – classified by the newspaper as “A legal tool to earn quick money”. 498a.org has quite a collection of articles documenting many instances of intentional organized human rights abuses.
India’s Supreme Court quickly recognized the problem. It described the new Dowry law as “legal terrorism”, but surprisingly lacked the mettle to rule the law unconstitutional. As in America, what lines the pockets of lawyers is unlikely to be stopped by courts.
Why is “legal terrorism” endemic in India? It is all about money. The laws entitle a woman to make a false allegation to lock up her spouse and members of his family, and terrorize them for years, so his family has to pay her a very large “reverse dowry” to drop the charges. Once the charges are dropped, she is in full control of the family. He is summarily ejected from society in divorce court, his career possibly ruined. Also, he is used as another number to beef up crime statistics.
Here are the sickening results of the feminist invasion of India. Of 58319 dowry cases in 2004, 134,757 individuals were incarcerated. Of these, 24,127 have been acquitted, and only 5,739 convicted. The rest are still “in limbo” living under the ragged sword of feminism. This suggests that up to 95.8% of dowry cases in India are, in fact, cases of terrorist blackmail.
Even companies are vulnerable. Recently, a wife accused a husband of domestic violence, and filed suit against his employer, WiPro, for “ruining her marriage” due to a “dating allowance” they were allegedly giving her husband. Since the company does not provide “dating allowances”, she dropped the charge, but continues to sue the company for ruining her marriage anyway.
Like Al Qaeda, feminist terrorists will go to any length to seize control of entire countries. An article published on November 30th by CommonDreams.org, as part of Rutgers activism campaign, still pretends that women will experience abuse rates of up to 70% (despite retraction by the Washington Times on November 28th, and full rejection by the U.N. Third Committee on November 22nd).
From a high-level perspective, we see that the purpose of these “laws” is to seize money and establish imperial matriarchy in up-and-coming export-positive developing countries. This is why we do not see feminists marching on Darfur, where there is no money to be taken.
Studying the feminist invasion of India is instructive. It is easier to recognize that the “domestic violence” cabal is, in fact, a terrorist network when we view the treachery inflicted on other countries.
America is a primary source of this form of terrorism. People I met personally in countries such as China, Japan, Singapore, Korea, and India are all too aware of it. America is funding this invasion via federal entitlements, and is substantially responsible for it. We must stop exporting legal terrorism to developing countries in the name of “democracy”. We are losing friends around the world, some of whom will predictably become enemies with bombs on their backs.
History suggests that radical destruction of marriage and family is far more endemic and destructive than any of the human rights issues feminists complain about in their diatribes.
America must stop funding all radical organizations and programs destroying families globally. American domestic violence laws, such as the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) must be fully rewritten to be gender-neutral, require that agencies unequivocally provide full assistance to anyone who requests it, and require solid evidentiary proof before legal artillery is fired.
Mark Twain once said “A lie can travel half-way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes”. After a decade of Violence Against Women Act abuses, the truth now wears Army boots. The lie stops right here, and so does the buck.
————————————————-
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
————————————————-
Rate this post:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Stumble It!
amfortas said,
We were not ready.
We slept. Exhausted.
Battle had taken its toll
But the Family survived.
The children played under her gaze.
Malevolent. Smiling.
She was Ready.
Definite. Ordered.
The Blue Pencil, poised.
Poisoned.
Quietly at first, she rode in.
She changed the land,
The familiar, the family.
Hooves churned mud.
The first was Fair, our childhood’s most cherished friend:
Resolver of squabbles, distributor, sharer,
Fair cared for all:
a string of rubies around her doomed, pale and lovely neck.
It was so sad.
They said it was consumption.
All used up, in tatters, shrouded,
she just faded away.
Next to go was that sturdy, quarrelsome Equality, which surprised us all
as he was so in demand, they said,
by all,
especially some;
aye, and relied upon.
For so many years a staunch friend and fighter.
His burial dressage, a white cheesecloth, yoked neck.
Naked beneath,
his scarred skin a testament.
Parchment.
Burned Beyond Recognition.
Truth tried hard.
Was Tried.
Hard.
Derided, Derrida-ed,
denied existence;
perjured,
Falsely accused,
she struggled
as she was garrotted.
Died hard.
Soon after that, Justice
suicided off a nearby cliff.
Now Lover’s Leap, a place then
from which many a loving couple had gazed out,
seeking the broader vista.
Now has Disabled Access.
Was it in despair?
Perhaps sympathy with the others.
No-one saw her silent fall.
Was she pushed?
Who could gain?
Her handmaids will argue for a time and time,
billing innocence by the hour.
The old, wise man, Honour, lost his marbles, they said.
He languished as the village idiot for a while,
The butt of jokes and calumnies.
Taunted.
His body was found in a ditch one day.
Starvation.
They left it there.
The loss of these good companions all
has been followed now
by Liberty and Freedom,
two noble and leathery old soldiers.
They put on their dress uniforms, immaculate,
faced each other squarely and
blew each other’s brains out.
Such fine shots, both.
They left a note. Signed as written together.
They could no longer support the malignancy of the vile regime,
the note said.
They felt duty-bound to remove themselves
from further abuse,
the note said.
They took Duty with them.
An altar was discovered in the woods
On which the charred bones of hermaphrodite Trust
Were found,
Sacrificed to Narcissus
Who had been elevated to the Pantheon.
Tears flowed down Olympus’ stony sides.
Even God cries.
The book closed.
After, there was Laughter, Music, Whine.
High pitched.
So much fun.
The departed were only words
After all.
Oppressive words.
Now dead.
Like Fathers.
Dead, white males.
What, three were maids?
So? Whatever, said the wenches.
No one noticed Love fall to her knees.
Her calls for help were drowned by song.
Trampled to death under dancing feet.
The last to succumb.
Four.
The Impostor was on the scene quickly.
Ready, Definite.
Re-defined.
By Order. She said.
Scripted.
The Princess of lies rides
over barren lands.
Long hair down her back.
Across her breast,
Over her steed’s flank.
Hooves on skulls.
The children gabble and cry.
No words
describe
their pain.
They were
forbidden.
December 14, 2006 at 1:17 am
swarup1973 said,
Quote:
Stop abuse of elders at the name of IPC Criminal LAWS.Stop blind arrests innocents, without any investigation
Stop encouraging single parenting and family breakup
Strong Legal action against those who implicate innocents or catalyze this abuse.
All family disputes maters to be considered as Civil Matter case only as Criminal Case is not a Joke or order PIZZA.
December 14, 2006 at 3:09 am
swarup1973 said,
David, we are comitted to stop this legal terrorism in India.
Star News Issued the Red Allert .
See the Live and swho to all in your country :
Star News : Red Allert Video - Misuse of 498a
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Js3ortbCrA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJNWMCVSqRk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc6HDlAgR6c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWcBqMRciiw
Please understand,all women does not born in Raja Harish Chandra Family.
But the attempet to establish a “Women’s” Verbal statement is sufficient to punish any X,Y,Z .may we can accept such injustice, but the problem is, when the same calim by another Women like in the form of Mother/sister the same had not considered at all.
Wonder why this double standard!!!!
December 14, 2006 at 3:12 am
kush1973sic said,
If you’re mum does not harass your dad, then why you need 498a and Domestic violence act only for your mum?
If your mum does not do any thing 498A and domestic violence act will not be used in that case at all..very simple, so let make this 498A and domestic violence act applicable for both mum and dad and who ever will ask illegal money/property instead of earning the same by their hard work, will go to jail. This is my view.
Now answer this question, in the road if any one abuse your mum what you will do ?.. every one knows and you do it proudly.
And now in your own mother’s home when a dirty DIL( So called wives) abuse and throw them out of house, refuse to give them the necessary medical care, refuse to give them to talk to your mum, what you will do?
A mum who had completed all the responsibility as a daughter, as a wives, as a mother will be termed as a criminal without any small evidence?
Why 498A and doemstic violence act does not need a small evidence before arresting any TOM, DICK or herry ?
For the need of sex you forget your mother’s milk to blindly support your so called money minded Pimps?
Please remember this is not the fight between dad and mum, if so let remove the word “relative” from the 498A and domestic violence law.. why those pimps are coming in between the fight or love between our dad and mum.
Now if your mum start to beg for a part time dad , for that you have to think what you have to do, your dad have to always beg to see your face irrespective he does the sex or does not do the sex with your mum, but the same is not applicable for your mum, she have all the right to have sex with multiple part time dad and that is not a crime…. if any punishment applicable , in that case also your part time dad will be punished.
If some one can’t think honestly, that is not the kush’s responsibility.”
December 14, 2006 at 3:53 am
monit said,
98% percent misuse means thosands of men/their parents/sisters/ young children go to jail without any investigation.
Its a LEGAL terrorism that our SUPREME COURT has also accepted. POLICE, LWAYERS, WOMEN ORGANIZATIONS have ganged up and provoking females here to just file a case under this LAW.
December 14, 2006 at 3:55 am
swarup1973 said,
For details read :
http://www.indiatalking.com/blog/swarup/1330/
December 14, 2006 at 4:55 am
roger said,
Once the “value” has been removed, and the hideous cost established (as is being seen now)there is no reason to ever participate in it.
December 14, 2006 at 8:11 am
mazza said,
98% percent misuse means thousands of men/their parents/sisters/ young children go to jail without any investigation.”
I’ve heard this in local editorials in Pune. Women are literally waging war on men in India. A large number of Indian men are furious with the US for the import of feminism. Families are falling apart everywhere. India is experiencing a divorce and feminists revolution on fast forward and people are angry. Still, public opinion always excuses the horrors as any criticism is seen as anti-woman.
This is the last thing India needs. AIDS, pollution, Muslims stirring up problems everywhere; now we are facing a cataclysm of family life.
December 14, 2006 at 10:02 am
Denis said,
For 40 years in this country men stood silent. Their rights have been decimated and may never be restored. And many men have been feminised. I find too many of them to be a disgrace.
You do not have to have the same fate as American men.
You must speak out and revolt and you must do this early. Shut down the feminist movement now when there is time to do it relatively easily.
Silence will not get you anything other than a much worse situation than you have today.
December 14, 2006 at 12:46 pm
Roger Knight said,
It was India’s Congress that passed this law.
Blame them! And blame the Indian judges and lawyers for pursuing this monstrosity for their profit like Milo Minderbinders who give not a damn what they are doing to their own nation.
December 14, 2006 at 12:49 pm
mruffolo said,
For the pleasure of seeing a woman dressed sexually, men may have lost control of family, academics, media, and government.
A few years ago I was guilty of the similar behavior.
Men lost their rights because we allowed it. For 10,000 years men were honored and in charge, now we are not.
December 14, 2006 at 1:08 pm
Denis said,
It is the same with America and feminism.
December 14, 2006 at 1:13 pm
conservativation said,
I’ve wondered why our own feminists seem so little concerned for the plight of Muslim women. Then again its not unusual for a feminist, or a liberal to take inconsistent positions on things seemingly having no grasp on linear rational thought.
Dare I say even women in general do that?
December 14, 2006 at 2:20 pm
Roger Knight said,
Otherwise, it would not get a toehold in any society and would be rejected for the utter nonsense it is.
December 14, 2006 at 2:28 pm
Denis said,
December 14, 2006 at 7:04 pm
kangaroox said,
December 14, 2006 at 9:26 pm
kush1973sic said,
Our politicians are doing such crime as a whole sale free lincence and supreme court of India just observing like a dump!!!
Shame to supreme court of India, our politician want to make our judicial system like a fish market and supreme court of India also support that also.. i think,otherwise why they are keeping silence?
-
*Red Alert News: Destrunction of Marriage in India.
Regarding USA , we request Please stop funding the Feminsit to do the Legal Terrorism not only in India , in the rest of the country , we promise , we will stop this legal terrorism in the Next day.
Specially in india , the feminist use that money not only to kill the men , they use that for kill the Innocent women as well as Child also.
Check , maximum child home in India , the child had been abused sexually and those orginasations head enjoying the life at 5 Star hotel by the fund received form USA and other interntional funding.
December 15, 2006 at 12:26 am
monit said,
They want to destroy Marriage institution in India.
December 15, 2006 at 7:23 am
Denis said,
Yes. Everywhere feminism has been established, the birthrates have plummeted. It’s happened in Western Europe, the former communist states of the Soviet Union. It’s happened to the U.S. as well. Whites are not reproducing to replaceable levels.
I believe elites of the world are trying to slow global population growth by destroying marriage. The easiest way to destroy marriage is by empowering one member over the other in the marriage “contract”. Taking away the rights of men is how they are doing this.
December 15, 2006 at 8:23 am
Denis said,
“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.”
Ice And Fire - Andrea Dworkin
“Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.”
Vassar College. Assistant Dean of Students - Catherine Comin
“All men are rapists and that’s all they are.”
Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore’s Presidential Campaign.) - Marilyn French
“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.”
Ms. Magazine Editor. - Robin Morgan
“I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.”
Ms. Magazine Editor. - Robin Morgan
“‘To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.”
Scum Manifesto - Valerie Solanas
“(Rape) is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear”
Against Our Will p.6. - Susan Brownmiller
“We are taught, encouraged, moulded by and lulled into accepting a range of false notions about the family. As a source of some of our most profound experiences, it continues to be such an integral part of our emotional lives that it appears beyond criticism. Yet hiding from the truth of family life leaves women and children vulnerable.”
- Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women
” How will the family unit be destroyed? …[T]he demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare.”
In “Female Liberation” - Roxanne Dunbarr
“Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it “Her”. Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination.”
Pornography: Men Possessing Women - Andrea Dworkin
“The traditional flowers of courtship are the traditional flowers of the grave, delivered to the victim before the kill. The cadaver is dressed up and made up and laid down and ritually violated and consecrated to an eternity of being used.”
- Andrea Dworkin
“Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women’s bodies.”
- Andrea Dworkin
“The cultural institutions which embody and enforce those interlocked aberrations - for instance, law, art, religion, nation-states, the family, tribe, or commune based on father-right - these institutions are real and they must be destroyed.”
- Andrea Dworkin
“My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don’t even need to shrug. I simply don’t care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don’t matter.”
The Woman’s Room - Marilyn French
“The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together…. Whatever its ultimate meaning, the breakup of families now is an objectively revolutionary process…. No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children….”
“Functions of the Family,” WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969 - Linda Gordon
“When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression…”
- Sheila Jeffrys
“I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.”
Former Congresswoman - Barbara Jordan
“You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs.”
(Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.) - Catherine MacKinnon
“All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman.”
- Catherine MacKinnon
“We can’t destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.”
From Sisterhood Is Powerful, (ed), 1970, p. 537 - Robin Morgan
“All men are good for is fucking, and running over with a truck”
Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator, quoted by Richard Dinsmore, who brought a successful civil suit against the University in the amount of $600,000.
December 15, 2006 at 11:53 am
David R. Usher said,
Here is a quick example of a 2006 sociology class syllabus from Rutgers, featuring McKinnon and others:
December 15, 2006 at 1:06 pm
Denis said,
Otherwise they would’nt do it.
How did this market of women who can be reached via male bashing commercials grow so large as to attract the attention of even the advertisers?
By the spread of male hatred by feminists for over 4 decades.
December 15, 2006 at 3:18 pm
roger said,
The men will win. Because it is a rule of stength, power, and force.
This will be a very good thing for the whole world to see. It will prove exactly how feminism erodes security for all.
Nice job ladies. And thanks!
December 15, 2006 at 4:30 pm
kangaroox said,
December 15, 2006 at 6:12 pm
Indian_Crusader said,
Please visit http://mynation.net/blog/index.php?post=125 or http://mynation.net/blog
it shows real statistics of misuse ,Truth behind mens harassment and result.
many victims stories posted here http://498a.wordpress.com and http://victims-of-law.blogspot.com/
Many other recent news also can be found here http://dvact.awardspace.com
December 16, 2006 at 1:30 am
monit said,
They raid on Friday, because then getting maximum money is possible, because the courts will be closed for Saturday and Sunday, so bail can only be achieved on Monday.
For a good reputed family member, spending two days in jail is worst nightmare, and that is what the police and girls side look for. Police and the girl both get good deal in terms o money and saddistic pleasure.
“THANKS GOD IT’S NOT FRIDAY…” for Indian males.
December 16, 2006 at 11:16 am
monit said,
http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/26051/11_2006/devils_renuka1a/act-wont-hit-good-hubbies-renuka.html
December 16, 2006 at 11:35 am
David R. Usher said,
It is clear the DV laws are intended to put women in a position where they can do or say anything they want, while the husband can do or say absolutely nothing. The laws are, inter-alia, a framework for organized abuse of men; the laws are not narrowly tailored to address the issue they claim to address.
December 16, 2006 at 1:11 pm
kangaroox said,
Irish Exceptionalism at an End?
By Joseph A. D’Agostino
Last month, I went on a short speaking tour of the Republic of Ireland (not the northern bit), the first time I had been to that country. I spent a week there giving speeches at three Irish universities and visiting some of the sights of an island about the size of the state of Maine. I went expecting friendly people, a still slightly traditional culture, and beautiful countryside, and my expectations were exceeded.
Ireland is perhaps 20 years behind the times, and given the nature of our times, that is a very good thing.
Although there has been a wave of immigration into Ireland in the last few years, the country’s populace is still largely whole and somewhat cohesive. The shared culture, history, religious background, language, and race has perhaps created a warmer, more trusting nation, with tighter community bonds, when combined with the relative lack of avant garde influences. The Catholic attitude of relationships first, with family and community ranked ahead of money-making or social climbing, is still relatively strong.
Sadly, progressive attitudes are fast transforming Irish life with their emphases on equality and career over family and community, not to mention faith. Of course, these progressive attitudes have their advantages. Ireland’s GDP has almost doubled in the past ten years, and the nation of 4.1 million people is now considered one of the richest on a per capita basis in the European Union. Curiously, EU subsidies and foreign investment poured into historically Catholic Ireland right after she legalized contraception and divorce in the 1990s. It has become common for Irishwomen to travel to Britain for abortions, which are still illegal in their homeland. Ireland sold her soul, and now she is receiving her thirty pieces of silver.
So with greater personal freedom and much greater wealth, the Irish must be becoming happier, right? Let’s see. The experts agree that Ireland’s suicide rate has soared, even after adjusting for the former tendency of Irishmen to call suicides “accidents” because of the stigma of suicide.
In fact, the No. 1 killer of young men in Ireland today is suicide. Is that a sign of a happy society? Drug abuse is up, alcohol abuse is up (which is saying a lot for Ireland), violent crime is rising, the divorce rate has reached 25%, the illegitimacy rate has reached 31%, the abortion rate is over 10%, the birthrate has dropped below replacement level—-are these signs of a vigorous society headed toward greater happiness and fulfillment, or a society headed down the tubes fast?
When the indicators of social decay and unhappiness are all pointing in the wrong direction, and people aren’t having enough kids to keep their society going, it’s perfectly obvious that the society in question is going down to destruction even if GDP growth is up. Obviously, a low birthrate alone is enough to destroy any society. The days of large Irish Catholic families are over, and young people are literally killing themselves off at ever-higher rates. “Twenty years ago an Irish family physician might have seen one patient every three years who would have died by suicide,” says the charity The Ireland Funds. “Now, it is increasingly common for doctors to have two to three patients a year take their own lives.”
As St. Francis of Assisi said, if your possessions do not make you happy, what good are they?
And why has Irish GDP growth been so high recently? The main reason is self-destructive: Female labor force participation in Ireland has skyrocketed. The ideal of woman as wife and mother, creating a beautiful home that serves as refuge and social center, nurturing the next generation instead of leaving it to be raised by strangers, has given way to the woman-as-man model of feminism. With married women now working outside the home, of course per capita GDP growth has soared. What have plummeted are people’s well-being and the birthrate.
So Ireland’s economic growth won’t last. Once female labor force participation is maxed out, GDP growth will slow. And then comes slow death. For a time, Ireland will be rich, as Britain, France, Germany, and Italy are. With few children to support, a greater proportion of the population is economically productive and can keep that production for itself. Yet when all those working-age people retire and there are relatively few young people to take their place, what then?
Ireland’s fertility rate was 3.5 children per woman in 1975, according to the United Nations Population Division. Now it is 1.9, below the replacement rate of 2.1, and headed further down. So today, 11% of the Irish population is 65 or over. By 2050, it will be 26%. Those 80 or over will go from 2.6% today to 7.6% in 2050. At the same time, those between 15 and 24 will fall from 15% to 9.7% in 2050. This is what environmentalists call unsustainable. And Ireland, since the anti-family social revolution came later there than elsewhere in the West, is much better off than Britain and most of the Continent.
My largely student audiences, even their pro-life members, seemed particularly offended when I called feminism “the most socially destructive movement in modern times.” I spoke at the National University of Ireland in Maynooth (near Dublin), Galway, and Cork, and this may have been the most controversial argument. Yet the statement is irrefutable.
Every single society in the world that has adopted feminism is dying out.
They all have below-replacement birthrates, with no exceptions from Ireland to Italy, Sweden to Japan, Spain to the United States (ours is perhaps the least feminist of the feminist nations and hosts many fecund immigrants, yet our birthrate is 2.0). It goes to basic primal truths: When most women in a society no longer view themselves primarily as mothers to provide the next generation, that society dies. Female careerism kills. All the feminist bloviation in the world can’t get around this biological fact. When something increases crime, it is socially destructive. When something encourages able-bodied people to go on welfare, it is socially destructive. Child abuse is socially destructive. Yet what could be more socially destructive than something that literally eliminates that society? That is what feminism is doing to all of Western Civilization.
I pointed out to the young women listening to me that the future of the world is not feminist. Traditional, religious, father-headed families are the ones having the kids, on average, I noted. Since a much large percentage of Muslim families than Christian or Jewish ones are devout and patriarchal, the world becomes more Islamic with every passing moment, especially since Islam is growing rapidly by conversions as well. And the Muslim world is becoming more radical with every passing moment, too.
Secularized people have the lowest birthrates. Thirty-five years ago, the Western world had 30% of the Earth’s population and the Muslim world had 15%. Today, each has about 20%. Can you guess what the figures will be in 20 years?
Barren feminist societies shall not inherit the Earth, due to the simple fact that they are not producing heirs.
The Irish government has no intention of altering its current destructive, EU-mandated course. This supposedly pro-life government has even greatly increased Ireland’s contribution to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which works to kill off via population control the black, brown, and yellow peoples of the world as the white peoples kill themselves off voluntarily. UNFPA also subsidizes Communist China’s long-running official forced abortion and sterilization campaign, yet the Irish government’s contribution to UNFPA has risen from 762,000 euro in 2000 to 3 million euro last year.
I enjoyed my time in Ireland greatly. I love the people, the countryside, and the ruins. I am sad to see a Catholic nation that survived centuries of English Protestant oppression head voluntarily down the path of suicide. The day St. Patrick lit the Christian paschal fire atop the Hill of Slane as a challenge to the pagan Celtic establishment seems as far in the past spiritually as it is chronologically. I pray she will return to her roots before it’s too late.
Joseph A. D’Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the Population Research Institute.
December 16, 2006 at 4:39 pm
monit said,
See the complete coverage, and anybody can understand the TRUE INTENT of inacting DV, Dowry LAWS in India…
Part 1. (David has seen only this part, see the complete video, part 2,3)
http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/26051/11_2006/devils_renuka1a/act-wont-hit-good-hubbies-renuka.html
Part 2
http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/26051/11_2006/devils_renuka1b/radio-destresses-bumpy-rides.html
Part 3
http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/26051/11_2006/devils_renuka2/radio-destresses-bumpy-rides.html
December 16, 2006 at 9:50 pm
Scott Strohm said,
I find that I am still often unable to extricate myself quickly enough from such situations.
I learned an expression (*after* becoming a victim of the divorce industry) that is good advice of the Cassandra kind. (I’ve added liar to idiot–that’s my lesson from experience.)
Never argue with an idiot (or liar, or…); they’ll knock you down to their level and beat you with experience.
December 17, 2006 at 8:37 am
swarup1973 said,
We have missed to record the programe of Star News , India , where a “Hunter wife” , a police constable , misuse the Dowry law (498a) and send her husabnd and husband’s age old mother behind the bar without any investigation.
Subsequently the husabnd recorded the voice of her , where she threatened , that she will make further more false case the way she
had done the dowry case .
This voice recording the husabnds put in fornt of Higher police officer and then the “Specail Vigelence enquiry done” and the whole family got
relife and a enquiry order against her and those who had help her to file the false dowry case had been ordered.
My message to all those still consider that Recording ( use of techonology) is not allowed , take a note.
Firing a Bullot is not allowed , but if the same fired to save your life , is justified .
So let use the techonology to expose them , otherwise no one will belive you.
Use viedo and voice recording.
Go through the Viedo Recording as under :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiIdBtXpN3c
India TV 498A Misuse awareness program.
December 18, 2006 at 2:56 am
swarup1973 said,
One more viedo , it is in english in CNN-IBN.
She the lady host how bitting her lips at the end of programme( it is 3 vs 1 argument) , as all three can’t digest question raised , like why whole sale free lincence to bad women , are they want live in realtionship legal in india.. why this double standard.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDv-e23ueQE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmO9nZtMJpg
CNN-IBN Debate on…
December 18, 2006 at 3:04 am
swarup1973 said,
http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/27446/tortured-hubbies-victims-of-498a.html
December 19, 2006 at 1:09 am
swarup1973 said,
Supreme Court India finds fault with Domestic Violence Act.
More at :
http://indiatalking.com/blog/swarup/4631/
Supreme Court India finds fault with Domestic Violence Act
The court also commented on poor drafting of Section 2(s) of the Act, which defines ’shared household’. Terming the definition of ’shared household’ in Section 2(s) of the Act as “not very happily worded”, the Bench said it “appears to be the result of clumsy drafting, but we have to give it an interpretation which is sensible and does not lead to chaos in society,” it observed.
December 19, 2006 at 11:57 pm
swarup1973 said,
Ex-Congress leader held guilty in ‘lover’s’ murder .
New Delhi: A former Delhi municipal councillor and Congress leader was on Thursday found guilty in the murder of her colleague and alleged lover in August 2002.
Sharda Jain was convicted of getting Congress councillor Atma Ram Gupta, 50, killed allegedly because he was cheating her. Seven other persons, including three UP Police officials, were also found guilty.
December 21, 2006 at 7:17 am