29-year old woman claims she’s Mel Gibson’s lovechild, plans legal action to test his DNA

They should be able to come to some arrangement, just as soon as Mel and his dad get back from that conference in Iran.

They should be able to come to some arrangement, just as soon as Mel and his dad get back from that conference in Iran.

They should be able to come to some arrangement, just as soon as Mel and his dad get back from that conference in Iran.

They should be able to come to some arrangement, just as soon as Mel and his dad get back from that conference in Iran.

Would she be persuing this if Mel was a homeless man, living in a cardboard box under the bridge?

Would she be persuing this if Mel was a homeless man, living in a cardboard box under the bridge?

Would she be persuing this if Mel was a homeless man, living in a cardboard box under the bridge?

Would she be persuing this if Mel was a homeless man, living in a cardboard box under the bridge?

Macartney, take 2.

Macartney, take 2.

Macartney, take 2.

Now, now, now, Mel believes in the holocaust. In fact, he’d like to see round 2….

Now, now, now, Mel believes in the holocaust. In fact, he’d like to see round 2….

Now, now, now, Mel believes in the holocaust. In fact, he’d like to see round 2….

Now, now, now, Mel believes in the holocaust. In fact, he’d like to see round 2….

My guess is that this IS all about the money.

I could see asking for a DNA test if you were concerned about your own health and wanted to learn your genetic history. That would make sense.

But Sloane never makes that argument. She claims instead that she is “only interested in Gibson’s happiness”. Uh huh. Did Gibson ever say that he would be happier knowing Sloane, or knowing his grandson? If so, why wouldn’t he be the one asking for a DNA test? Why did SHE have to take the route of trying to force the DNA test by filing a lawsuit?

No, there is another motive here. Like many other paternity actions, that motive is most probably money.

My guess is that this IS all about the money.

I could see asking for a DNA test if you were concerned about your own health and wanted to learn your genetic history. That would make sense.

But Sloane never makes that argument. She claims instead that she is “only interested in Gibson’s happiness”. Uh huh. Did Gibson ever say that he would be happier knowing Sloane, or knowing his grandson? If so, why wouldn’t he be the one asking for a DNA test? Why did SHE have to take the route of trying to force the DNA test by filing a lawsuit?

No, there is another motive here. Like many other paternity actions, that motive is most probably money.

My guess is that this IS all about the money.

I could see asking for a DNA test if you were concerned about your own health and wanted to learn your genetic history. That would make sense.

But Sloane never makes that argument. She claims instead that she is “only interested in Gibson’s happiness”. Uh huh. Did Gibson ever say that he would be happier knowing Sloane, or knowing his grandson? If so, why wouldn’t he be the one asking for a DNA test? Why did SHE have to take the route of trying to force the DNA test by filing a lawsuit?

No, there is another motive here. Like many other paternity actions, that motive is most probably money.

My guess is that this IS all about the money.

I could see asking for a DNA test if you were concerned about your own health and wanted to learn your genetic history. That would make sense.

But Sloane never makes that argument. She claims instead that she is “only interested in Gibson’s happiness”. Uh huh. Did Gibson ever say that he would be happier knowing Sloane, or knowing his grandson? If so, why wouldn’t he be the one asking for a DNA test? Why did SHE have to take the route of trying to force the DNA test by filing a lawsuit?

No, there is another motive here. Like many other paternity actions, that motive is most probably money.