lumigan tramadol tadalafil

The Great Libertarian Majority

2006-12-19
By

In a recent Human Events article, David Boaz and David Kirby, analyze the Republicans’ loss of Libertarian votes. In a 2006 Zogby poll commissioned by Boaz and Kirby, 59% of voters identified themselves as fiscally conservative and socially liberal. One may take issue with their definition, but it does describe an ideology that shares significant common ground with Libertarianism. Moreover, 44% continued to identify with this label when it was specifically described as Libertarianism.

Additionally, their analysis of polling data including the Zogby poll indicated that Libertarians accounted for 15% of the votes in the 2002, 2004 and 2006 elections. Boaz and Kirby make the point that Republicans must find a way to regain Libertarian votes lost to Democrats.

However, there is another story in these statistics. This story is not about gaining influence in a two party system, but of a strong independent Libertarian party ready to emerge on the political scene. Let’s review.

15% of voters are Libertarians.
44% of voters are not opposed to the label Libertarian.
59% of voters hold at least some Libertarian views.

If these numbers are to be believed, a majority of American voters likely share the core Libertarian values of smaller government, lower taxes and greater personal freedom. A large minority of voters share these values and identify with Libertarianism. A smaller minority are outright Libertarian.

The only remaining question is how to mobilize these folks to affect positive change in government. These answers are in forthcoming articles but here is a hint: What is being done today in not working.

Discuss smaller government, lower taxes and personal freedom at a path less traveled .

13 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Denis

    The problem with Libertarians (of which I am one-but with a small “l”) is that they preach a set of values but do not preach an effective means to implement these values. It is important to identify sources of what is wrong (and not only the “wrong” itself)). And too many of them want to spend endless hours arguing about who is the “purer libertarian”. Wherever feminism (the “source”)has taken hold it has resulted in (what is “wrong”): 1.) bigger government, 2.) higher taxes, 3.) less freedom. I would think you Libertarians could see the real threat out there (e.g., feminism), speak out loudly about this threat (such as by exposing it to the masses), and proposing an alternate reality that resonates with the public. It is afterall, among the greatest of sources for the loss of freedom, growth of government, and growth of taxes.

    Bigger government necessitates higher taxes. When government became The Big Mommy, or usually, when it replaces fathers in families: The Big Daddy, it took over roles and responsibilities left to the individual/family. Everyone ends up paying for someone else’s Big Mommy or Big Daddy. The government grabs more power, extracts more taxes and consequently takes more and more freedom. The politicians see the advantages in doing this (for themselves that is) and are forever finding new ways to grow government and extract taxes. I am not suggesting to you that it ALL boils down to feminism-I’ll agree there are other areas where government power has grown, taxes have gone up-and not in response to feminism. But I will propose that feminism is among the greatest of sources of the government’s increase in size, increase in intruding on private matters, increase in taxation, and the taking of individual rights/ freedoms (primarily men’s)over the past 40 years.

  • Denis

    The problem with Libertarians (of which I am one-but with a small “l”) is that they preach a set of values but do not preach an effective means to implement these values. It is important to identify sources of what is wrong (and not only the “wrong” itself)). And too many of them want to spend endless hours arguing about who is the “purer libertarian”. Wherever feminism (the “source”)has taken hold it has resulted in (what is “wrong”): 1.) bigger government, 2.) higher taxes, 3.) less freedom. I would think you Libertarians could see the real threat out there (e.g., feminism), speak out loudly about this threat (such as by exposing it to the masses), and proposing an alternate reality that resonates with the public. It is afterall, among the greatest of sources for the loss of freedom, growth of government, and growth of taxes.

    Bigger government necessitates higher taxes. When government became The Big Mommy, or usually, when it replaces fathers in families: The Big Daddy, it took over roles and responsibilities left to the individual/family. Everyone ends up paying for someone else’s Big Mommy or Big Daddy. The government grabs more power, extracts more taxes and consequently takes more and more freedom. The politicians see the advantages in doing this (for themselves that is) and are forever finding new ways to grow government and extract taxes. I am not suggesting to you that it ALL boils down to feminism-I’ll agree there are other areas where government power has grown, taxes have gone up-and not in response to feminism. But I will propose that feminism is among the greatest of sources of the government’s increase in size, increase in intruding on private matters, increase in taxation, and the taking of individual rights/ freedoms (primarily men’s)over the past 40 years.

  • Denis

    The problem with Libertarians (of which I am one-but with a small “l”) is that they preach a set of values but do not preach an effective means to implement these values. It is important to identify sources of what is wrong (and not only the “wrong” itself)). And too many of them want to spend endless hours arguing about who is the “purer libertarian”. Wherever feminism (the “source”)has taken hold it has resulted in (what is “wrong”): 1.) bigger government, 2.) higher taxes, 3.) less freedom. I would think you Libertarians could see the real threat out there (e.g., feminism), speak out loudly about this threat (such as by exposing it to the masses), and proposing an alternate reality that resonates with the public. It is afterall, among the greatest of sources for the loss of freedom, growth of government, and growth of taxes.

    Bigger government necessitates higher taxes. When government became The Big Mommy, or usually, when it replaces fathers in families: The Big Daddy, it took over roles and responsibilities left to the individual/family. Everyone ends up paying for someone else’s Big Mommy or Big Daddy. The government grabs more power, extracts more taxes and consequently takes more and more freedom. The politicians see the advantages in doing this (for themselves that is) and are forever finding new ways to grow government and extract taxes. I am not suggesting to you that it ALL boils down to feminism-I’ll agree there are other areas where government power has grown, taxes have gone up-and not in response to feminism. But I will propose that feminism is among the greatest of sources of the government’s increase in size, increase in intruding on private matters, increase in taxation, and the taking of individual rights/ freedoms (primarily men’s)over the past 40 years.

  • Denis

    The problem with Libertarians (of which I am one-but with a small “l”) is that they preach a set of values but do not preach an effective means to implement these values. It is important to identify sources of what is wrong (and not only the “wrong” itself)). And too many of them want to spend endless hours arguing about who is the “purer libertarian”. Wherever feminism (the “source”)has taken hold it has resulted in (what is “wrong”): 1.) bigger government, 2.) higher taxes, 3.) less freedom. I would think you Libertarians could see the real threat out there (e.g., feminism), speak out loudly about this threat (such as by exposing it to the masses), and proposing an alternate reality that resonates with the public. It is afterall, among the greatest of sources for the loss of freedom, growth of government, and growth of taxes.

    Bigger government necessitates higher taxes. When government became The Big Mommy, or usually, when it replaces fathers in families: The Big Daddy, it took over roles and responsibilities left to the individual/family. Everyone ends up paying for someone else’s Big Mommy or Big Daddy. The government grabs more power, extracts more taxes and consequently takes more and more freedom. The politicians see the advantages in doing this (for themselves that is) and are forever finding new ways to grow government and extract taxes. I am not suggesting to you that it ALL boils down to feminism-I’ll agree there are other areas where government power has grown, taxes have gone up-and not in response to feminism. But I will propose that feminism is among the greatest of sources of the government’s increase in size, increase in intruding on private matters, increase in taxation, and the taking of individual rights/ freedoms (primarily men’s)over the past 40 years.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    **** I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones. ****

    1) There is no inherent right to make bad choices.
    2) Some are forced to live with the bad choices made by others. So those some have no “real freedom”. Libertarianism is about the enslavement of non-libertarians for the benefit of libertarian.

    ***** To legislate morality in our country *****

    Congratulations! You’ve just defined what “law” is. Criminalizing thievery is a legislation of morality. And law is obviously something that you’re allergic to, though thievery may not be.

    *****is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell *****

    Don’t toy with me.

    ***** With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one? *****

    With thousands of political parties in the world, why should anyone believe that Libertarians represent the correct one?

    ***** You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?*****

    Libertarians, as I have mentioned before, have done a pretty good job of corrupting the morals of several generations without the advantage of formal political power.

    But as for a formal auto-de-fe involving the enshrinement of the Libertarian Party as the ruling party, that will happen on the day that Liechtenstein invades China.

    ***** Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity. *****

    Yeah, and those are the two choices that you’re left with. An odd attitude coming from someone who expects to be anointed king at the end of the next cycle.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    **** I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones. ****

    1) There is no inherent right to make bad choices.
    2) Some are forced to live with the bad choices made by others. So those some have no “real freedom”. Libertarianism is about the enslavement of non-libertarians for the benefit of libertarian.

    ***** To legislate morality in our country *****

    Congratulations! You’ve just defined what “law” is. Criminalizing thievery is a legislation of morality. And law is obviously something that you’re allergic to, though thievery may not be.

    *****is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell *****

    Don’t toy with me.

    ***** With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one? *****

    With thousands of political parties in the world, why should anyone believe that Libertarians represent the correct one?

    ***** You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?*****

    Libertarians, as I have mentioned before, have done a pretty good job of corrupting the morals of several generations without the advantage of formal political power.

    But as for a formal auto-de-fe involving the enshrinement of the Libertarian Party as the ruling party, that will happen on the day that Liechtenstein invades China.

    ***** Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity. *****

    Yeah, and those are the two choices that you’re left with. An odd attitude coming from someone who expects to be anointed king at the end of the next cycle.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    **** I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones. ****

    1) There is no inherent right to make bad choices.
    2) Some are forced to live with the bad choices made by others. So those some have no “real freedom”. Libertarianism is about the enslavement of non-libertarians for the benefit of libertarian.

    ***** To legislate morality in our country *****

    Congratulations! You’ve just defined what “law” is. Criminalizing thievery is a legislation of morality. And law is obviously something that you’re allergic to, though thievery may not be.

    *****is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell *****

    Don’t toy with me.

    ***** With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one? *****

    With thousands of political parties in the world, why should anyone believe that Libertarians represent the correct one?

    ***** You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?*****

    Libertarians, as I have mentioned before, have done a pretty good job of corrupting the morals of several generations without the advantage of formal political power.

    But as for a formal auto-de-fe involving the enshrinement of the Libertarian Party as the ruling party, that will happen on the day that Liechtenstein invades China.

    ***** Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity. *****

    Yeah, and those are the two choices that you’re left with. An odd attitude coming from someone who expects to be anointed king at the end of the next cycle.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    **** I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones. ****

    1) There is no inherent right to make bad choices.
    2) Some are forced to live with the bad choices made by others. So those some have no “real freedom”. Libertarianism is about the enslavement of non-libertarians for the benefit of libertarian.

    ***** To legislate morality in our country *****

    Congratulations! You’ve just defined what “law” is. Criminalizing thievery is a legislation of morality. And law is obviously something that you’re allergic to, though thievery may not be.

    *****is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell *****

    Don’t toy with me.

    ***** With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one? *****

    With thousands of political parties in the world, why should anyone believe that Libertarians represent the correct one?

    ***** You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?*****

    Libertarians, as I have mentioned before, have done a pretty good job of corrupting the morals of several generations without the advantage of formal political power.

    But as for a formal auto-de-fe involving the enshrinement of the Libertarian Party as the ruling party, that will happen on the day that Liechtenstein invades China.

    ***** Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity. *****

    Yeah, and those are the two choices that you’re left with. An odd attitude coming from someone who expects to be anointed king at the end of the next cycle.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    *****This is the difference between Libertarians and the others. Any act of Liberty is allowed, even prostitution, ESPECIALLY when we ourselves don’t favor these acts. It’s called LIBERTY. Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    Do you or do you not favor legalized prostitution? Yes or no? In one breath, you say that “we” allow it and “we” don’t favor it.

    Is a Libertarian society one in which prostitution is allowed to take place? Do you favor its legalization? Yes or no? Stop running from the question! Obviously, Libertarians do not have even the saving grace of integrity and answer questions like any politician would.

    ***** Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    There is no such animal. That is Yippie Party barnyard residue. A society in which citizens are FREE to engage in prostitution is a society in which other citizens are victimized by the prevalence of prostitution in their neighborhoods.

    Libertarianism is moral socialism, benefitting the morally unfit at the expense of the morally fit.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    *****This is the difference between Libertarians and the others. Any act of Liberty is allowed, even prostitution, ESPECIALLY when we ourselves don’t favor these acts. It’s called LIBERTY. Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    Do you or do you not favor legalized prostitution? Yes or no? In one breath, you say that “we” allow it and “we” don’t favor it.

    Is a Libertarian society one in which prostitution is allowed to take place? Do you favor its legalization? Yes or no? Stop running from the question! Obviously, Libertarians do not have even the saving grace of integrity and answer questions like any politician would.

    ***** Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    There is no such animal. That is Yippie Party barnyard residue. A society in which citizens are FREE to engage in prostitution is a society in which other citizens are victimized by the prevalence of prostitution in their neighborhoods.

    Libertarianism is moral socialism, benefitting the morally unfit at the expense of the morally fit.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    *****This is the difference between Libertarians and the others. Any act of Liberty is allowed, even prostitution, ESPECIALLY when we ourselves don’t favor these acts. It’s called LIBERTY. Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    Do you or do you not favor legalized prostitution? Yes or no? In one breath, you say that “we” allow it and “we” don’t favor it.

    Is a Libertarian society one in which prostitution is allowed to take place? Do you favor its legalization? Yes or no? Stop running from the question! Obviously, Libertarians do not have even the saving grace of integrity and answer questions like any politician would.

    ***** Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    There is no such animal. That is Yippie Party barnyard residue. A society in which citizens are FREE to engage in prostitution is a society in which other citizens are victimized by the prevalence of prostitution in their neighborhoods.

    Libertarianism is moral socialism, benefitting the morally unfit at the expense of the morally fit.

  • grizzlieantagonist

    *****This is the difference between Libertarians and the others. Any act of Liberty is allowed, even prostitution, ESPECIALLY when we ourselves don’t favor these acts. It’s called LIBERTY. Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    Do you or do you not favor legalized prostitution? Yes or no? In one breath, you say that “we” allow it and “we” don’t favor it.

    Is a Libertarian society one in which prostitution is allowed to take place? Do you favor its legalization? Yes or no? Stop running from the question! Obviously, Libertarians do not have even the saving grace of integrity and answer questions like any politician would.

    ***** Liberty for everyone is accomplished when all citizens are FREE to do as they please as long as the Rights of other citizens ar not violated.*****

    There is no such animal. That is Yippie Party barnyard residue. A society in which citizens are FREE to engage in prostitution is a society in which other citizens are victimized by the prevalence of prostitution in their neighborhoods.

    Libertarianism is moral socialism, benefitting the morally unfit at the expense of the morally fit.

  • red pill

    All power to the Pipples!
    The peasants are revolting.
    D’uh!

  • red pill

    All power to the Pipples!
    The peasants are revolting.
    D’uh!

  • red pill

    All power to the Pipples!
    The peasants are revolting.
    D’uh!

  • red pill

    All power to the Pipples!
    The peasants are revolting.
    D’uh!

  • NationalVoice

    I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones.

    To legislate morality in our country is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell than have someone else decide what is right and wrong for me based on their personal beliefs. With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one?

    I’ve never seen the Repusicans and Democrats so scared.

    You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?

    Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity.

    We want people to know that we exist and that they do have other choices besides the Gay Old Pedophile party and the Demoncrats.

    And, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Hopefully, these two corrupt parties will end up in the dustbin of history and We the People will once again be free.

    Let the Sunshine in!

  • NationalVoice

    I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones.

    To legislate morality in our country is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell than have someone else decide what is right and wrong for me based on their personal beliefs. With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one?

    I’ve never seen the Repusicans and Democrats so scared.

    You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?

    Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity.

    We want people to know that we exist and that they do have other choices besides the Gay Old Pedophile party and the Demoncrats.

    And, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Hopefully, these two corrupt parties will end up in the dustbin of history and We the People will once again be free.

    Let the Sunshine in!

  • NationalVoice

    I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones.

    To legislate morality in our country is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell than have someone else decide what is right and wrong for me based on their personal beliefs. With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one?

    I’ve never seen the Repusicans and Democrats so scared.

    You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?

    Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity.

    We want people to know that we exist and that they do have other choices besides the Gay Old Pedophile party and the Demoncrats.

    And, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Hopefully, these two corrupt parties will end up in the dustbin of history and We the People will once again be free.

    Let the Sunshine in!

  • NationalVoice

    I find it interesting that there are those on the list that are really vehement when it comes to libertarians. You seize on the fact that real freedom does allow people to make choices, even bad ones.

    To legislate morality in our country is no different than Islam. I’d rather go to hell than have someone else decide what is right and wrong for me based on their personal beliefs. With over 900 religions in the world, why should I believe that they have somehow seized on the correct one?

    I’ve never seen the Repusicans and Democrats so scared.

    You’re afraid that your power over We the People is going to be broken in the next election aren’t you?

    Please, bad mouth us all you want, even bad publicity is better than no publicity.

    We want people to know that we exist and that they do have other choices besides the Gay Old Pedophile party and the Demoncrats.

    And, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Hopefully, these two corrupt parties will end up in the dustbin of history and We the People will once again be free.

    Let the Sunshine in!







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search