India Supreme Court rules on Domestic Violence Act: in-laws not liable to provide ’shared household’
email: editor -@- mensnews daily.com | More from Mike LaSalle
Stumble It!
How to survive the coming food shortage.
2 Responses to “India Supreme Court rules on Domestic Violence Act: in-laws not liable to provide ’shared household’”
Leave a Reply
|
|
Sex & Metropolis
Paul Elam
Pelle Billing
Glenn Sacks
Marc H. Rudov
Roger F. Gay
Carey Roberts
Stephen Baskerville
Gordon E. Finley
Amy Alkon
Dr. Helen Smith
Jerry Fino
Shop Amazon and Support MND
Latest NewsWax
Join Our Mailing List
Recent Comments
- Lola on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Andre Lieven on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Lally on Sexual Predator Insanity
- Mike S. on Do men love women more than women love men?
- Robert Stevens on Is There Anything Good About Fathers?
- Berny Belair on Young teen girls who want to get pregnant
- Just the facts on VAWA Facilitated and Funded the Illegal Abduction of Madison Tenn
- Paul Elam on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Mary Duval Rickysmom on Sexual Predator Insanity
- Jay R on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Ray Merk on Political Corruption Equivalent to Religion, according to British Judge
- julie on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Paul Elam on Sexual Predator Insanity
- Jay R on Do men love women more than women love men?
- DonnieH on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
Search MND
Download PDF Here
Support Our Sponsors!
Please support MND
Subscribe today:
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
December 20th, 2006 at 2:47 pm
I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.
John Dias
Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
“Stopping False Allegations with Technology”
December 21st, 2006 at 10:34 am
In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com