lumigan tramadol tadalafil

India Supreme Court rules on Domestic Violence Act: in-laws not liable to provide ‘shared household’

2006-12-20
By

Under Section 17(1) of the Act, every woman in a domestic relationship shall have the right to reside in the shared household, whether or not she has any right, title or beneficial interest in the same.

37 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • redrajesh

    In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
    Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com

  • redrajesh

    In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
    Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com

  • redrajesh

    In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
    Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com

  • redrajesh

    In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
    Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
    “Stopping False Allegations with Technology”

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
    “Stopping False Allegations with Technology”

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
    “Stopping False Allegations with Technology”

  • http://www.dontmakehermad.com/ John Dias

    I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.

    John Dias
    Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
    “Stopping False Allegations with Technology”







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search

RSS Amy Alkon

RSS Donna Laframboise