Comments on: India Supreme Court rules on Domestic Violence Act: in-laws not liable to provide ’shared household’ http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/20/india-supreme-court-rules-on-domestic-violence-act-in-laws-not-liable-to-provide-shared-household/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:36:56 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: redrajesh http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/20/india-supreme-court-rules-on-domestic-violence-act-in-laws-not-liable-to-provide-shared-household/comment-page-1/#comment-25287 redrajesh Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:34:34 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/20/india-supreme-court-rules-on-domestic-violence-act-in-laws-not-liable-to-provide-shared-household/#comment-25287 In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman. Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com In the scenario, it is best not to marry an Indian woman. They can as well work their ass and earn money for themselves to get what they need(or rather want). Pre nups are also not useful in India as they are not enforceable in a court of law. Indian men have just one option to prevent themselves from being tortured by an Indian woman.
Read about it at http://noemptyspace.blogspot.com

]]> By: John Dias http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/20/india-supreme-court-rules-on-domestic-violence-act-in-laws-not-liable-to-provide-shared-household/comment-page-1/#comment-25218 John Dias Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:47:58 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/20/india-supreme-court-rules-on-domestic-violence-act-in-laws-not-liable-to-provide-shared-household/#comment-25218 I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, <b>married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan</b> and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn't this the <i>de facto</i> situation now? If she gets on a power trip and "kicks him out," she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment. John Dias Founder, <a href="http://www.dontmakehermad.com/" rel="nofollow">DontMakeHerMad.com</a> <i>"Stopping False Allegations with Technology"</i> I think that in the current environment, when a woman can use a restraining order to kick a man out of his home and obligate him to continue paying for it, married men should let their wives be the only signatories on the loan and on the title. Sure, this makes such men guests in their own homes, but isn’t this the de facto situation now? If she gets on a power trip and “kicks him out,” she will then be stuck paying for the mortgage. This would be an incredible check on female power, if the man had been paying it all along up until that moment.

John Dias
Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
“Stopping False Allegations with Technology”

]]>