Man-Hating DA Nifong Surrenders
Well, the news is in: the man-hating district attorney from Durham, NC — Mike Nifong — has, at last, thrown in the towel on his wrongly pursued rape case against three lacrosse players from Duke University.
Nifong today dropped the rape charges against the three lacrosse players because his star witness, Crystal Gail Mangum — the stripper who goes unnamed in almost all news accounts, even though the names of the accused are constantly displayed — suddenly cannot remember if the alleged perpetrators raped her. Suddenly can’t remember? Are you serious?
Perhaps Mangum’s foggy memory haunts her because, prior to arriving at her Duke stripping gig, Mangum had sex with at least three different men — according to a DNA test, which surfaced last week and which Nifong illegally suppressed. This DNA test exonorates the three wrongly accused Duke students. Worse, Nifong never even interviewed Mangum until a few days ago. Imagine such legal imprudence from a district attorney, especially one prosecuting a world-famous case in which three men could be imprisoned.
In “Juris Contemptus: The Un-American Scourge,” I wrote about DA Nifong’s unethical behavior, in prosecuting his case before TV cameras, thereby violating the American Bar Association’s Rules of Conduct. He did this to win reelection, and he was successful.
I am not, in this piece, going to rehash or expand upon Nifong’s legal transgressions — I’ll leave that to the legal talking heads on cable news programs. Instead, I want to address something deeper and more pernicious: male misandry.
Mike Nifong is an example of a dangerous force in Western cultures: a man in a position of power who hates men, a male man-hater, a man who presumes all men guilty in entanglements with women, a man willing to sacrifice other men — because it is politically acceptable — to further his agenda. This is a serious, anti-family problem in our society. It’s one thing to see man-bashing from angry feminists; it’s quite another to experience it from men.
Let’s face it, the reason men have fewer reproductive (Roe v. Wade) and civil (VAWA) rights than women is that men — who comprise the majority of lawmakers, judges, governors, and presidents — write, interpret, and execute our laws. Why do men hate men so much?
In most homes, children are taught to worship mothers and take fathers for granted. This was true when fathers actually lived with their children. It’s now worse because, in at least 50% of homes, fathers don’t live with their children. What better illustrates the treatment of mothers vs. fathers than telephone calls? In any calendar year, the volume of paid long-distance calls is highest on Mothers’ Day. On the other hand, the volume of collect long-distance calls is highest on Fathers’ Day. What does that tell you?
Men are constantly vilified and portrayed as incompetent losers in TV commercials — especially during the Super Bowl, a man’s venue — and TV sitcoms. My Australian colleague, James Macnamara, based his PhD thesis and subsequent book on this destructive, misandric trend, showing that it exists in his native country as well as in the UK and the USA. Moreover, standup comedians, most of whom are men, routinely refer to men as unfaithful dogs, even though women equally cheat on their boyfriends and husbands.
During this month of Christmas shopping, I’ve seen TV commercial after TV commercial admonishing men to buy jewelry, clothing, and teddy bears for women. Yet, I have not seen ONE appeal to women to purchase anything for men. It’s as if men have but one purpose in life: supporting women.
When a female teacher rapes a male student, many men — including Geraldo Rivera — dismiss such an event as a right of passage. Through a sexual encounter with a female teacher, a young boy — who is a child — could contract an STD, become a father, or be falsely accused of rape. This would permanently destroy the boy’s life.
No matter. In Western cultures, males — whether boys, single men, or fathers — have no value. Men are largely to blame for this because they tolerate it. These eunuchs hail from man-hating homes and enter the world as man-hating, self-loathing adults, dedicated to worshipping and deferring to women. We see it in dating, in marriages, in the workplace, in movies, on TV, in elections, in print media, in family courts, and in criminal courts like DA Nifong’s.
Until men start challenging and overturning this widespread, inhumane misandry, they will be permanently relegated to the emasculating role of sperm donor/ATM — and they will deserve it.
About the Author
Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 30+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper CablesTM (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet EarthTM (ISBN 0974501719).
Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at http://www.TheNoNonsenseMan.com/.
| More from Marc H. Rudov
Stumble It!
December 26th, 2006 at 9:25 am
DaPoet said: “Sorry Marc but real men don’t allow themselves to be manipulated by the women in their life nor do they stab their brothers in the back…But She-Males do…”
You are correct. Why are you apologizing?
December 26th, 2006 at 4:56 am
Sorry Marc but real men don’t allow themselves to be manipulated by the women in their life nor do they stab their brothers in the back…But She-Males do…
December 25th, 2006 at 9:32 pm
Once again, some of you are misunderstanding and misquoting me, and totally ignorant about Female 101. Giving a woman orgasms is not spoiling her — it is pleasing her and making her addicted to you, in a good way. If you think of this as defeat, you have your head up your ass. Making a woman scream in bed is one of man’s greatest joys in life.
To have the attitude that a woman is responsible for her own orgasms is outright stupidity — and self-defeating. If you can’t make her scream, she doesn’t need you. If you give her responsibility for her orgasms, she will cheat on or leave you, as well she should.
Pleasing a woman in bed is not, however, tantamount to the spoiling derived from wining & dining her like a whore. Such moronic, emasculating behavior gives her real power and establishes the expectation that you will be a great provider in divorce court. In this regard, comparing an entitled woman to a spoiled-brat child is apt, and I draw this comparison in Under the Clitoral Hood. If you don’t read it, you’ll never know.
Above, luna said that men have stood by allowing their rights to disappear. He is restating the point of this article. Thank you, luna.
December 25th, 2006 at 1:55 pm
I very much agree with Marc that in our culture (western) we spoil women.
If you spoil a child rotten, that child will grow to hate you as a parent.
Marc is very right, that men need to stop feeling they have to do everything for women. But this is the basis of our mating system. But the key to defeating this is not to give women plenty of orgasms. It is not completely a mans responsibility to give women lots of orgasms..And I will say that doing this, is just another form of spoiling women. Women have their own responsibility to get their own orgasms. And men make a big mistake by trying to feel obligated to give women these orgasms.
That is a major problem among western women, is they have big problems in the sexual department. But its up to that women to get hers. Men working extra hard in the bedroom is not the answer. While it is fun to satisfy your woman, it could also become a task for men. And make him lose focus on many other things in life. This giving women lots of orgasms once again brings the focus to the woman. Heck, that gives the female the upper hand. I am the one that wants lots of orgasms.
But stil men need to learn to make women see that they have responsibility, accountability in every department. Right now women feel they have entitlement. That has to change.
December 25th, 2006 at 1:21 pm
Lets also realize that men do compete for women against one another. I often see many men who want power and control, will use men and exploit men in any way they can to get to the top.
So what we may see often when we see certain men in the media and in high authoritative position capitalize on exploiting and weakening other men, is simply that male taking advantage of an opportunity.
I have seen plenty of men talk a good game when they are struggling to get to the top, but when the finally get to the top, they give opportunities to women. Go to any major company and see how it works. You see offices filled with women, and most of the executive offices filled with men. That when men get to the top, the get a certain perverted chilvaristic sense about them. Now they become the Sen. Biden, or the Mike Nifong. I cant tell ya how many times I have seen this..
Men in authoritative positions fear surrounding themselves with more men that women, becuz as men we are the competitive sex, and its more likely to face replacement with more men under him, than females…
December 25th, 2006 at 1:12 pm
DaPoet said:
“Women have never had the ability to give life because that is the male role…Females are simply incubators who nurture life during pregnancy and after birth…”
Well it may be the wrong choice of words that I used, but I think you would understand what I mean. The fact that women have inside their bodies the ability to give birth, they have simply been able to be capitalize on that. Men need a woman to sustain those babies. And women simply have forced men to do what they want them to based on having that womb. This is the original arguement. This is what the war is all about. This lies at the foundation of the issues that lie between men and women. Women simpl have not been fair about it. But if women fear that if they become baby making machines for men, then they simply lose status.
December 25th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
“Hating men is NOT part of this.”
A wise philosopher once said correctly that the opposite of love is not hate, but indifference.
The fact that Nifong is totally indifferent to what he is doing to innocent men shows that he considers them irrelevant and without value and worth. He would NEVER ever do what he is doing to women. Maybe he IS doing it to WHITE men, but in the end, the fact that they are men is what matters. These are trumped up rape charges.
The fact that men are sent off to die by incompetent politicians who have failed in THEIR jobs, are expected to always give and give to the women (including giving up OUR rights for the benefit of women), are unjustly jailed, deprived of family, property, and possessions, without due process simply for being men, …these all show how little this society values it’s men. And the POS Nifong is a Baby Boomer male product of this culture. It is a culture awash with misandrist ideas and values and these ideas and values marinate the minds of it’s people. It’s been doing this for 40+ years.
December 25th, 2006 at 12:13 pm
Not men Luna but She-Males: which is a male who bows down before the feminine gender by both wearing on their backs the footprints of the female who dominates em. As well as by stabbing their own gender in the back by supporting the passage of laws that intentionally give females more rights and advantages while outright oppressing the male gender…
December 25th, 2006 at 10:52 am
… and men have stood by and allowed all of it, and continue to do so.
December 25th, 2006 at 9:11 am
All this stuff about vaginas and wombs and power is getting into nonesense territory too. Biologically, women have always been vulnerable in child gestation, bearing and nurturing, and needed a male to provide and protect. It is nature’s way. It has been taken advantage of, however, by women’s access to the societal, technological and economic advances created by men. Un-natural advantage. Women have taken advantage of man’s biological drive to provide and protect and give little or nothing in return. They used to ‘earn’ it. Now they demand it. They used to respond with love, respect, acknowledgement. Now it is entitlement and social force. They ‘take’ and when objection looms from men, in any form, even thinking through the issues, its a game of “Let’s you and him fight” and they use the ‘power instruments’ of society.
It is a spiritual ‘Ceasarian Section’.
December 25th, 2006 at 8:51 am
If you believe Nifong did what he did out of man-hating…
You’re In NONSENSE Territory!
Nifong is playing the race card to win political points and it isn’t going as easily as he thought. He doesn’t hate men, he’s a leftist politician. Leftists will do anything to win, even destroy innocent people. Hating men is NOT part of this.
December 25th, 2006 at 7:13 am
Marc…
I agree that the individual members of the feminine gender use their vagina’s to manipulate men yet it is also just as true that they use their wombs to financially enslave men as well…
It seems to me that in this day and age the single greatest mistake a man can make is to become intimate (engage in sexual intercourse)with a female…
Nifong is only acting within the normal parameters of his misandric programing and isn’t even aware that he hates men…Nor is his primary motive driven by hatred of men but by the desire to win a conviction at any cost (a problem that is endemic in the legal profession) in order to keep his job…Had he not pursued a case against the students involved no doubt he would have faced an opponent who would have had no qualms whatsoever campaigning on the promise to pursue the case…Which is being driven by race (black on white racism) just as much if not more so as it is on gender issues…
As the father of a son I would much rather my son to remain single and pursue his own interests rather than a career that would allow him to either marry or bed any female he chooses…For it is upon the altar of lust, marriage and the family court system that the dreams of the average man are being sacrificed in this day and time…
December 25th, 2006 at 5:10 am
Supamike Said:
“People used to worship women due to her ability to give life.”
Women have never had the ability to give life because that is the male role…Females are simply incubators who nurture life during pregnancy and after birth…
December 24th, 2006 at 11:33 pm
You have a Merry Christmas yourself…
December 24th, 2006 at 11:12 pm
Supamike,
You understand nothing about what I am teaching men, and you understand less about women. This becomes ever-more clear with every word you write.
It is futile for me to continue a dialog with you, for I am talking to a wall.
Best of luck to you.
December 24th, 2006 at 10:44 pm
I am gonna be honest with you marc, I have known for many years, that if you turn a woman out, that she will follow you for life, that to me is immature power over women, that eventually can come back to bite ya. Women love sex, and they can desire that alot longer than we men can. I have very little interest in “fun power” for men. My interest lie with empowering men.
You say that men should have equal power to their offspring but right now they have hardly any. Even married men are complaining that they dont have much influence to thec children. I think its childish to teach men to do what you are saying. Every man knows that if he gives his woman the big “o” that he can enslave her. But that is not what men should want to do to women.
What you are teaching is a war in the bedroom, with women. Heck women can give themselves the big “o” without a man these days. With vibrators, dildo, rabbits and such they are geting that orgasm on a regular basis these days. Feminism is teaching women to attach themselves to other women..The whole game being played by you and these feminist is who can make the other cum the hardest…Its purely an immature game.
Men have lost power, because they have simply lost their own self control over themselves. We want loose women, but expect these loose women to have our interest.
Mike Nifong is the result of some mother who teaches who to exploit men to gain power. There are lots of men just like him. Nifong would not exist if his father had of pulled him aside as a boy to teach him how to be a real man. So how do we deal with these men? Or do we just go out on a date and demand that she pay her half? Is that how you suggest I beat Nifong? Or do you suggest calling out the Duke Lacrosse players to stop calling up strippers?