Should Pat Robertson Be Stoned To Death For Making False Prophecies?

“the great leader Hugo Chavez”? Care to tell us why this clown is “great”? Oh, I forgot, you’re an hispanic supremacist so this guy good crap his pants and you’d think it was “great”.And I bet you’re still not packing your bags to go live in the country of your hero, are you? No, like all leftwing nuts you like to worship from afar while still enjoying the creature comforts that America offers. Gutless

“the great leader Hugo Chavez”? Care to tell us why this clown is “great”? Oh, I forgot, you’re an hispanic supremacist so this guy good crap his pants and you’d think it was “great”.And I bet you’re still not packing your bags to go live in the country of your hero, are you? No, like all leftwing nuts you like to worship from afar while still enjoying the creature comforts that America offers. Gutless

“the great leader Hugo Chavez”? Care to tell us why this clown is “great”? Oh, I forgot, you’re an hispanic supremacist so this guy good crap his pants and you’d think it was “great”.And I bet you’re still not packing your bags to go live in the country of your hero, are you? No, like all leftwing nuts you like to worship from afar while still enjoying the creature comforts that America offers. Gutless

To The Ranger:

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?

To The Ranger:

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?

To The Ranger:

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?

One is hoisted ON a petard, not with it. Basically a petard is – (and I only say because last time I mentioned something almost everyone knows about you insisted I explain for those who don’t)- a plank.

On the plank there would be an explosive charge, usually for breaking through castle walls. One hauled or pushed the plank up the wall by one means or another until it was at the place one wanted the resultant hole. The ‘engineer’ (as the demo guys of the day were called) who placed the charges had to be quick getting off the plank when the time came to get it into position.

I like the stoning idea though RPR. Unfortunately I am not without sin.

Still, who cares. Gimme a stone. This Robertson fellow is a plank.

One is hoisted ON a petard, not with it. Basically a petard is – (and I only say because last time I mentioned something almost everyone knows about you insisted I explain for those who don’t)- a plank.

On the plank there would be an explosive charge, usually for breaking through castle walls. One hauled or pushed the plank up the wall by one means or another until it was at the place one wanted the resultant hole. The ‘engineer’ (as the demo guys of the day were called) who placed the charges had to be quick getting off the plank when the time came to get it into position.

I like the stoning idea though RPR. Unfortunately I am not without sin.

Still, who cares. Gimme a stone. This Robertson fellow is a plank.

One is hoisted ON a petard, not with it. Basically a petard is – (and I only say because last time I mentioned something almost everyone knows about you insisted I explain for those who don’t)- a plank.

On the plank there would be an explosive charge, usually for breaking through castle walls. One hauled or pushed the plank up the wall by one means or another until it was at the place one wanted the resultant hole. The ‘engineer’ (as the demo guys of the day were called) who placed the charges had to be quick getting off the plank when the time came to get it into position.

I like the stoning idea though RPR. Unfortunately I am not without sin.

Still, who cares. Gimme a stone. This Robertson fellow is a plank.

From the quotes you have provided, Pat does not seem to claim to be speaking for god with the exception of the “terrorist attack in 2007″ quote. Since that one has yet to come to pass, it’s a little early to break out the blazing faggots for a preacher roasting party.

If the 2007 quote fails to come to pass, and the quote is accurate, then Pat would indeed be a false prophet. The other predictions seem to me, from reading your article, to be pat speaking in his own voice, not gods.

From the quotes you have provided, Pat does not seem to claim to be speaking for god with the exception of the “terrorist attack in 2007″ quote. Since that one has yet to come to pass, it’s a little early to break out the blazing faggots for a preacher roasting party.

If the 2007 quote fails to come to pass, and the quote is accurate, then Pat would indeed be a false prophet. The other predictions seem to me, from reading your article, to be pat speaking in his own voice, not gods.

From the quotes you have provided, Pat does not seem to claim to be speaking for god with the exception of the “terrorist attack in 2007″ quote. Since that one has yet to come to pass, it’s a little early to break out the blazing faggots for a preacher roasting party.

If the 2007 quote fails to come to pass, and the quote is accurate, then Pat would indeed be a false prophet. The other predictions seem to me, from reading your article, to be pat speaking in his own voice, not gods.

Amfortas, that was a typo on my part. I corrected it to read: hoisted by his OWN petard.

And that is how Wikipedia stats it also:

Hoisted by his own petard

The word remains in modern usage in the phrase to be hoisted by one’s own petard, which means “to be harmed by one’s own plan to harm someone else” or “to fall in one’s own trap”. Shakespeare coined the now proverbial phrase in Hamlet.

In the following passage, the “letters” refer to instructions (written by his uncle Claudius, the King) to be carried sealed to the King of England, by Hamlet, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, the latter being two schoolfellows of Hamlet. The letters, as Hamlet suspects, contain a death warrant against Hamlet, who will later open and modify them to instead request the execution of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Enginer refers to a military engineer.

There’s letters seal’d: and my two schoolfellows,
Whom I will trust as I will adders fang’d,
They bear the mandate; they must sweep my way
And marshal me to knavery. Let it work;
For ’tis the sport to have the enginer
Hoist with his own petar; and ‘t shall go hard
But I will delve one yard below their mines
And blow them at the moon: O, ’tis most sweet,
When in one line two crafts directly meet.

Amfortas, that was a typo on my part. I corrected it to read: hoisted by his OWN petard.

And that is how Wikipedia stats it also:

Hoisted by his own petard

The word remains in modern usage in the phrase to be hoisted by one’s own petard, which means “to be harmed by one’s own plan to harm someone else” or “to fall in one’s own trap”. Shakespeare coined the now proverbial phrase in Hamlet.

In the following passage, the “letters” refer to instructions (written by his uncle Claudius, the King) to be carried sealed to the King of England, by Hamlet, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, the latter being two schoolfellows of Hamlet. The letters, as Hamlet suspects, contain a death warrant against Hamlet, who will later open and modify them to instead request the execution of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Enginer refers to a military engineer.

There’s letters seal’d: and my two schoolfellows,
Whom I will trust as I will adders fang’d,
They bear the mandate; they must sweep my way
And marshal me to knavery. Let it work;
For ’tis the sport to have the enginer
Hoist with his own petar; and ‘t shall go hard
But I will delve one yard below their mines
And blow them at the moon: O, ’tis most sweet,
When in one line two crafts directly meet.

Amfortas, that was a typo on my part. I corrected it to read: hoisted by his OWN petard.

And that is how Wikipedia stats it also:

Hoisted by his own petard

The word remains in modern usage in the phrase to be hoisted by one’s own petard, which means “to be harmed by one’s own plan to harm someone else” or “to fall in one’s own trap”. Shakespeare coined the now proverbial phrase in Hamlet.

In the following passage, the “letters” refer to instructions (written by his uncle Claudius, the King) to be carried sealed to the King of England, by Hamlet, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, the latter being two schoolfellows of Hamlet. The letters, as Hamlet suspects, contain a death warrant against Hamlet, who will later open and modify them to instead request the execution of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Enginer refers to a military engineer.

There’s letters seal’d: and my two schoolfellows,
Whom I will trust as I will adders fang’d,
They bear the mandate; they must sweep my way
And marshal me to knavery. Let it work;
For ’tis the sport to have the enginer
Hoist with his own petar; and ‘t shall go hard
But I will delve one yard below their mines
And blow them at the moon: O, ’tis most sweet,
When in one line two crafts directly meet.

Dr. Damage, indeed Pat Robertson usually claims to hear directly from God when he makes his predictions.

If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones. Because most assuredly Robertson’s prediction will not come true.

Dr. Damage, indeed Pat Robertson usually claims to hear directly from God when he makes his predictions.

If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones. Because most assuredly Robertson’s prediction will not come true.

Dr. Damage, indeed Pat Robertson usually claims to hear directly from God when he makes his predictions.

If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones. Because most assuredly Robertson’s prediction will not come true.

“… usually claims to hear directly from God …”

I’d be curious as to whether he did in the instances that you cite where his predictions have failed.

“If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones

Christians have more than merely the old testament to draw on. When Christ calls on he who is without sin to cast the first stone, he was speaking of an adulterous woman. The old testament also calls for stoning for her offense, yet Christ, who is without sin, refused to cast the first stone also. Admonishing her only to “sin no more”.

Had I an effective soapbox from which to do so, I would follow christs example and call on pat to cease passing himself off as a prophet, assuming:
1. That predictions have failed to come to pass where he claims to speak for god
2. That the 2007 prophecy fails to come to pass.

I’m curious though: why do you assume that the jihadi will not attack the US with a devastating attack during 2007? You’re that confident or purely because Pat said that it would?

“… usually claims to hear directly from God …”

I’d be curious as to whether he did in the instances that you cite where his predictions have failed.

“If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones

Christians have more than merely the old testament to draw on. When Christ calls on he who is without sin to cast the first stone, he was speaking of an adulterous woman. The old testament also calls for stoning for her offense, yet Christ, who is without sin, refused to cast the first stone also. Admonishing her only to “sin no more”.

Had I an effective soapbox from which to do so, I would follow christs example and call on pat to cease passing himself off as a prophet, assuming:
1. That predictions have failed to come to pass where he claims to speak for god
2. That the 2007 prophecy fails to come to pass.

I’m curious though: why do you assume that the jihadi will not attack the US with a devastating attack during 2007? You’re that confident or purely because Pat said that it would?

“… usually claims to hear directly from God …”

I’d be curious as to whether he did in the instances that you cite where his predictions have failed.

“If you believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God, and is to be interepred literally, I hope you are gathering stones

Christians have more than merely the old testament to draw on. When Christ calls on he who is without sin to cast the first stone, he was speaking of an adulterous woman. The old testament also calls for stoning for her offense, yet Christ, who is without sin, refused to cast the first stone also. Admonishing her only to “sin no more”.

Had I an effective soapbox from which to do so, I would follow christs example and call on pat to cease passing himself off as a prophet, assuming:
1. That predictions have failed to come to pass where he claims to speak for god
2. That the 2007 prophecy fails to come to pass.

I’m curious though: why do you assume that the jihadi will not attack the US with a devastating attack during 2007? You’re that confident or purely because Pat said that it would?

Dr. Damage: The Islamists will probably attack us in 2007, but they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Dr. Damage: The Islamists will probably attack us in 2007, but they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Dr. Damage: The Islamists will probably attack us in 2007, but they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Nice quote RPR. I’m sorry you had to scurry off to look him up. The good Bard oft’ play’d with words, dropping letters to fit the line (or mere speed-writing), ‘creatively’ using the incorrect verb tense, using a noun for a verb or omiting words altogether. So the phrase “Hoist with his own petar” in proper syntax would have ‘along’ qualifying the ‘with’ as well as a d at the end of petard and the verb hoisted instead of the noun (a)hoist. But he can get away with it. Being dead lets you off a lot of these minor criticisms.

But…. Not only the OWN omitted, you said hoist BY. One would be hoist’ with (or even ‘by’) a rope or a pole ON the petard or hoist’ ALONG with his own petard. Pedantic bugger I am, godwot!

Nice quote RPR. I’m sorry you had to scurry off to look him up. The good Bard oft’ play’d with words, dropping letters to fit the line (or mere speed-writing), ‘creatively’ using the incorrect verb tense, using a noun for a verb or omiting words altogether. So the phrase “Hoist with his own petar” in proper syntax would have ‘along’ qualifying the ‘with’ as well as a d at the end of petard and the verb hoisted instead of the noun (a)hoist. But he can get away with it. Being dead lets you off a lot of these minor criticisms.

But…. Not only the OWN omitted, you said hoist BY. One would be hoist’ with (or even ‘by’) a rope or a pole ON the petard or hoist’ ALONG with his own petard. Pedantic bugger I am, godwot!

Nice quote RPR. I’m sorry you had to scurry off to look him up. The good Bard oft’ play’d with words, dropping letters to fit the line (or mere speed-writing), ‘creatively’ using the incorrect verb tense, using a noun for a verb or omiting words altogether. So the phrase “Hoist with his own petar” in proper syntax would have ‘along’ qualifying the ‘with’ as well as a d at the end of petard and the verb hoisted instead of the noun (a)hoist. But he can get away with it. Being dead lets you off a lot of these minor criticisms.

But…. Not only the OWN omitted, you said hoist BY. One would be hoist’ with (or even ‘by’) a rope or a pole ON the petard or hoist’ ALONG with his own petard. Pedantic bugger I am, godwot!

“…they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Your article refers to him as predicting “…that a terrorist attack on the United States would result in “mass killing” late in 2007”

Does “mass killing” always translate as “millions” or does he refer to “millions” someplace that you haven’t quoted?

I’d call 9/11 a mass killing, yet the deaths didn’t even approach a single million, let alone multiple millions.

I rather suspect you’d consider Bush jr responsible for mass killings in Iraq, yet it’s only (in comparison to millions) in the hundreds of thousands even by the MSMs worst guestimates.

“…they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Your article refers to him as predicting “…that a terrorist attack on the United States would result in “mass killing” late in 2007”

Does “mass killing” always translate as “millions” or does he refer to “millions” someplace that you haven’t quoted?

I’d call 9/11 a mass killing, yet the deaths didn’t even approach a single million, let alone multiple millions.

I rather suspect you’d consider Bush jr responsible for mass killings in Iraq, yet it’s only (in comparison to millions) in the hundreds of thousands even by the MSMs worst guestimates.

“…they don’t have the capablitiy to cause millions of casualites. Even a dirty bomb will result in relatively few casualties.

Your article refers to him as predicting “…that a terrorist attack on the United States would result in “mass killing” late in 2007”

Does “mass killing” always translate as “millions” or does he refer to “millions” someplace that you haven’t quoted?

I’d call 9/11 a mass killing, yet the deaths didn’t even approach a single million, let alone multiple millions.

I rather suspect you’d consider Bush jr responsible for mass killings in Iraq, yet it’s only (in comparison to millions) in the hundreds of thousands even by the MSMs worst guestimates.

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

http://www.tampabays10.com/news/national/article.aspx?storyid=46528

“Virginia Beach, VA (AP) — Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says God has told him there will be horrific terrorist attacks targeting US cities in the second half of this year.

On Tuesday’s broadcast of “The 700 Club,” Robertson forecast attacks producing mass chaos and possibly killing millions of people. According to Robertson, “The Lord didn’t say `nuclear,’ but I do believe it will be something like that.”

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

http://www.tampabays10.com/news/national/article.aspx?storyid=46528

“Virginia Beach, VA (AP) — Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says God has told him there will be horrific terrorist attacks targeting US cities in the second half of this year.

On Tuesday’s broadcast of “The 700 Club,” Robertson forecast attacks producing mass chaos and possibly killing millions of people. According to Robertson, “The Lord didn’t say `nuclear,’ but I do believe it will be something like that.”

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

http://www.tampabays10.com/news/national/article.aspx?storyid=46528

“Virginia Beach, VA (AP) — Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says God has told him there will be horrific terrorist attacks targeting US cities in the second half of this year.

On Tuesday’s broadcast of “The 700 Club,” Robertson forecast attacks producing mass chaos and possibly killing millions of people. According to Robertson, “The Lord didn’t say `nuclear,’ but I do believe it will be something like that.”

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

Never suggested otherwise. I half suspected as much in fact. However, IMO Pat is still safe from being guest of honor at a post 2007 barbeque provided a late 2007 terror attack achieves at least “mass killings” as the millions component of the “prophecy” (I guess we’ll see wont we) is preceded by the word “possibly”.

Also, a successful bioweapon attack could easily escalate into the millions of casualties. Fortunately, the number of states capable of supplying such weapons to terrorists is slightly smaller than it was a few years ago so they might be less willing to do so considering the greater chances that the transfer might be tracked back to themselves.

It would take balls of steel for any rogue states leader to provide terrorists with bioweapons as theres little doubt that Bush jr would respond in kind (nukes because the US claims not to posses bio or chemical weapons) should he be able to identify the source.

Long story short: you’re correct. millions of casualties are a very low order probability. Which, unfortunately, doesn’t really translate as impossible.

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

Never suggested otherwise. I half suspected as much in fact. However, IMO Pat is still safe from being guest of honor at a post 2007 barbeque provided a late 2007 terror attack achieves at least “mass killings” as the millions component of the “prophecy” (I guess we’ll see wont we) is preceded by the word “possibly”.

Also, a successful bioweapon attack could easily escalate into the millions of casualties. Fortunately, the number of states capable of supplying such weapons to terrorists is slightly smaller than it was a few years ago so they might be less willing to do so considering the greater chances that the transfer might be tracked back to themselves.

It would take balls of steel for any rogue states leader to provide terrorists with bioweapons as theres little doubt that Bush jr would respond in kind (nukes because the US claims not to posses bio or chemical weapons) should he be able to identify the source.

Long story short: you’re correct. millions of casualties are a very low order probability. Which, unfortunately, doesn’t really translate as impossible.

My bad, I didn’t provide the documentation that Robertson predicted casualties in the millions.

I’m not a prophet expected to be infallible; I can get away with saying, “My bad”

Never suggested otherwise. I half suspected as much in fact. However, IMO Pat is still safe from being guest of honor at a post 2007 barbeque provided a late 2007 terror attack achieves at least “mass killings” as the millions component of the “prophecy” (I guess we’ll see wont we) is preceded by the word “possibly”.

Also, a successful bioweapon attack could easily escalate into the millions of casualties. Fortunately, the number of states capable of supplying such weapons to terrorists is slightly smaller than it was a few years ago so they might be less willing to do so considering the greater chances that the transfer might be tracked back to themselves.

It would take balls of steel for any rogue states leader to provide terrorists with bioweapons as theres little doubt that Bush jr would respond in kind (nukes because the US claims not to posses bio or chemical weapons) should he be able to identify the source.

Long story short: you’re correct. millions of casualties are a very low order probability. Which, unfortunately, doesn’t really translate as impossible.

Oh, I thought Robertson already WAS stoned. My bad!

Oh, I thought Robertson already WAS stoned. My bad!

Oh, I thought Robertson already WAS stoned. My bad!

He probably is stoned on that protein drink he hawks on his Web site. “personally recommended for him by God”

He probably is stoned on that protein drink he hawks on his Web site. “personally recommended for him by God”

He probably is stoned on that protein drink he hawks on his Web site. “personally recommended for him by God”

For once I have to admit RPR is right about something; if PR is making a prophesy for God that turns out false he must be stoned to death, if PR is a Jew.

For once I have to admit RPR is right about something; if PR is making a prophesy for God that turns out false he must be stoned to death, if PR is a Jew.

For once I have to admit RPR is right about something; if PR is making a prophesy for God that turns out false he must be stoned to death, if PR is a Jew.

Let’s not discriminate on the basis of religion, Chas. Just stone the bastard. In fact why wait till he gets a prophesy wrong. He’s bound to sometime, anyway. Get ‘im ! hahahahahaha

Let’s not discriminate on the basis of religion, Chas. Just stone the bastard. In fact why wait till he gets a prophesy wrong. He’s bound to sometime, anyway. Get ‘im ! hahahahahaha

Let’s not discriminate on the basis of religion, Chas. Just stone the bastard. In fact why wait till he gets a prophesy wrong. He’s bound to sometime, anyway. Get ‘im ! hahahahahaha

Here ya go reyes,

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070104/ap_on_hi_te/immigrant_entreprenurs

this is why immigration reform is important to the US. these people actually contribute.

bet you don’t write about that though, do ya?

Here ya go reyes,

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070104/ap_on_hi_te/immigrant_entreprenurs

this is why immigration reform is important to the US. these people actually contribute.

bet you don’t write about that though, do ya?

Here ya go reyes,

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070104/ap_on_hi_te/immigrant_entreprenurs

this is why immigration reform is important to the US. these people actually contribute.

bet you don’t write about that though, do ya?

Doug Powers

You are correct, he is stoned, and he lost a few stone w/ the protein shake. I amazes me that many Christians somehow feel the need to never be critical of Robertson and to rationalize the things he says and does w/ platitudes and generalities.

Doug Powers

You are correct, he is stoned, and he lost a few stone w/ the protein shake. I amazes me that many Christians somehow feel the need to never be critical of Robertson and to rationalize the things he says and does w/ platitudes and generalities.

Doug Powers

You are correct, he is stoned, and he lost a few stone w/ the protein shake. I amazes me that many Christians somehow feel the need to never be critical of Robertson and to rationalize the things he says and does w/ platitudes and generalities.

I learned a long time ago in a previous live how to determine when things in the bible apply to us or not. However, sometimes I prefer to allow it to remain uncertain, so that those who intentionally avoid the truth and their obligations, will not gain comfort by my words.

I learned a long time ago in a previous live how to determine when things in the bible apply to us or not. However, sometimes I prefer to allow it to remain uncertain, so that those who intentionally avoid the truth and their obligations, will not gain comfort by my words.

I learned a long time ago in a previous live how to determine when things in the bible apply to us or not. However, sometimes I prefer to allow it to remain uncertain, so that those who intentionally avoid the truth and their obligations, will not gain comfort by my words.

I’m shocked. Mr. Reyes the Hispanic Supremacist condemning a non-Hispanic for stupidity. Meanwhile his illegal alien buddies are killing American citizens and stealing tax payer money.

He praises Hugo and worships Che. Those murderers and illegal aliens don’t have to obey the law because they are Hispanic. He’d rather spend his time trash talking non-Hispanics for acting stupid. Forget about the murderers and thieves. He is the very epitome of racism.

Why is MND promoting and publishing the writings of such a blatant racist and hate mongerer? Perhaps we should ask them?

I’m shocked. Mr. Reyes the Hispanic Supremacist condemning a non-Hispanic for stupidity. Meanwhile his illegal alien buddies are killing American citizens and stealing tax payer money.

He praises Hugo and worships Che. Those murderers and illegal aliens don’t have to obey the law because they are Hispanic. He’d rather spend his time trash talking non-Hispanics for acting stupid. Forget about the murderers and thieves. He is the very epitome of racism.

Why is MND promoting and publishing the writings of such a blatant racist and hate mongerer? Perhaps we should ask them?

I’m shocked. Mr. Reyes the Hispanic Supremacist condemning a non-Hispanic for stupidity. Meanwhile his illegal alien buddies are killing American citizens and stealing tax payer money.

He praises Hugo and worships Che. Those murderers and illegal aliens don’t have to obey the law because they are Hispanic. He’d rather spend his time trash talking non-Hispanics for acting stupid. Forget about the murderers and thieves. He is the very epitome of racism.

Why is MND promoting and publishing the writings of such a blatant racist and hate mongerer? Perhaps we should ask them?

Forget about stoning Pat Robertson. I’ll settle for stoning Nancy Pelosi for making false campaign prophecies about leading a more “bipartisan” Congress.

Forget about stoning Pat Robertson. I’ll settle for stoning Nancy Pelosi for making false campaign prophecies about leading a more “bipartisan” Congress.

Forget about stoning Pat Robertson. I’ll settle for stoning Nancy Pelosi for making false campaign prophecies about leading a more “bipartisan” Congress.

Nah, just take away Pelosi’s Botox and she will shrivel away to nothing.

Nah, just take away Pelosi’s Botox and she will shrivel away to nothing.

MND generally and even reflexively opens its doors to contrarians like Robert Paul Reyes. He writes frequently on current events and he always defends his essays vigorously. To my way of thinking, that makes Mr. Reyes an ideal representative for a society that enjoys open debate and upholds the values of public elocution.

Three cheers for Mr. Reyes, for he is indeed a jolly good fellow.

So say I.

MND generally and even reflexively opens its doors to contrarians like Robert Paul Reyes. He writes frequently on current events and he always defends his essays vigorously. To my way of thinking, that makes Mr. Reyes an ideal representative for a society that enjoys open debate and upholds the values of public elocution.

Three cheers for Mr. Reyes, for he is indeed a jolly good fellow.

So say I.

Well guys I have to go along with Mike on that. RPR is always – well nearly always – engaging and even I, far and away the most sensible and balanced person here, can be provocative at times.

Time for another Britney article RPR. Its been a few days now. Or better still, why not do some research on what the money-grubbing entertainment business is doing to Bindi Irwin, the late Steve Irwin’s little girl. I’d like to see you sink your teeth into them.

Well guys I have to go along with Mike on that. RPR is always – well nearly always – engaging and even I, far and away the most sensible and balanced person here, can be provocative at times.

Time for another Britney article RPR. Its been a few days now. Or better still, why not do some research on what the money-grubbing entertainment business is doing to Bindi Irwin, the late Steve Irwin’s little girl. I’d like to see you sink your teeth into them.

Mike, Amfortas:

Thanks for the kind words.

I don’t enjoy the banalities or vulgarites spewn by some of our readership, but I certainly enjoy reading the articulate comments of gentleman like amfortas.

Mike, Amfortas:

Thanks for the kind words.

I don’t enjoy the banalities or vulgarites spewn by some of our readership, but I certainly enjoy reading the articulate comments of gentleman like amfortas.

Mike, Amfortas:

Thanks for the kind words.

I don’t enjoy the banalities or vulgarites spewn by some of our readership, but I certainly enjoy reading the articulate comments of gentleman like amfortas.

TheRanger said,

“the great leader Hugo Chavez”? Care to tell us why this clown is “great”?

The “clown” Chavez is respected and has tremendous influence in his sphere, Latin America.

Bush, who truly is a clown, has squandered America’s good name.

America as a result of Bush’s misadventure in Iraq has lost its influence in Europe and throughout the world.

Here’s a link that goes into detail about the great accomplishments of Hugo Chavez:

Click Link

TheRanger said,

“the great leader Hugo Chavez”? Care to tell us why this clown is “great”?

The “clown” Chavez is respected and has tremendous influence in his sphere, Latin America.

Bush, who truly is a clown, has squandered America’s good name.

America as a result of Bush’s misadventure in Iraq has lost its influence in Europe and throughout the world.

Here’s a link that goes into detail about the great accomplishments of Hugo Chavez:

Click Link

Yeah anybody who hangs out with Castro and Ahmadinejad has to be a quality guy.

He seizes private businesses and takes them over in the name of “the people” for his own use. He calls our President “Satan” on the U.N. floor. He is allowing Middle East terrorists to travel through and probably train in his country. He has taken over the church in his country.

What a “great” guy. Oh, I’m sorry. He’s Hispanic so that makes him great in your eye. Meanwhile you condemn Britney every ten minutes for not wearing underwear. I guess that is much worse than everything Hugo does.

You never learned to notice the imporant stuff did you Mr. Reyes?

Yeah anybody who hangs out with Castro and Ahmadinejad has to be a quality guy.

He seizes private businesses and takes them over in the name of “the people” for his own use. He calls our President “Satan” on the U.N. floor. He is allowing Middle East terrorists to travel through and probably train in his country. He has taken over the church in his country.

What a “great” guy. Oh, I’m sorry. He’s Hispanic so that makes him great in your eye. Meanwhile you condemn Britney every ten minutes for not wearing underwear. I guess that is much worse than everything Hugo does.

You never learned to notice the imporant stuff did you Mr. Reyes?

It’s interesting that no matter what I write about, some posters find a pretext to bring up immigration. And some of y’all think I’m obsessed with Ms. Spears?

It’s interesting that no matter what I write about, some posters find a pretext to bring up immigration. And some of y’all think I’m obsessed with Ms. Spears?

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?
———
Pat Robertson is a fool and I don’t pay any attention to him and I certainly don’t need to classify him as “great” simply because he is white. Why do you seem to need to classify clowns like Hugo Chavez as “great”? Simply because they are hispanic? What has he done that makes him “great”, call George Bush names? Last time saw this “great” man was shutting down opposition newspapers, groping that smelly crackpot that runs Iran and chumming up to other nutcases running disfunctional countries. As a writer and newspaper man yourself you think someone who shuts down papers because they don’t carry a certain veiwpoint is “great”?

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?
———
Pat Robertson is a fool and I don’t pay any attention to him and I certainly don’t need to classify him as “great” simply because he is white. Why do you seem to need to classify clowns like Hugo Chavez as “great”? Simply because they are hispanic? What has he done that makes him “great”, call George Bush names? Last time saw this “great” man was shutting down opposition newspapers, groping that smelly crackpot that runs Iran and chumming up to other nutcases running disfunctional countries. As a writer and newspaper man yourself you think someone who shuts down papers because they don’t carry a certain veiwpoint is “great”?

The Hugo remark about him being a great leader is irrelevant to the message of my essay. Care to comment on my point that Pat Robertson is a hypocrite and a failure as a prophet? And that he should be hoisted by his own petard?
———
Pat Robertson is a fool and I don’t pay any attention to him and I certainly don’t need to classify him as “great” simply because he is white. Why do you seem to need to classify clowns like Hugo Chavez as “great”? Simply because they are hispanic? What has he done that makes him “great”, call George Bush names? Last time saw this “great” man was shutting down opposition newspapers, groping that smelly crackpot that runs Iran and chumming up to other nutcases running disfunctional countries. As a writer and newspaper man yourself you think someone who shuts down papers because they don’t carry a certain veiwpoint is “great”?

RPR, I checked out your link on the “great” things your hero Hugo is doing to his country. Please, this is written by another commie stooge. This is the same crap we always here about Cuba written by useful idiots who go down to visit, sing the praises of the dictator but always hop back on the plane and come back to “evil, capitalist America” to enjoy the freedoms and creature comforts capitalism provides. Blah, blah Cuba has a top notch education system the useful idiots always tell us. Well, that will go along way in the cigar factory you will be working at after you graduate from that fabulous education system communism has provided. I see the same kinds of “worker paradise” nonsense in this fawning sychophants writings toward Hugo Chavez.

RPR, I checked out your link on the “great” things your hero Hugo is doing to his country. Please, this is written by another commie stooge. This is the same crap we always here about Cuba written by useful idiots who go down to visit, sing the praises of the dictator but always hop back on the plane and come back to “evil, capitalist America” to enjoy the freedoms and creature comforts capitalism provides. Blah, blah Cuba has a top notch education system the useful idiots always tell us. Well, that will go along way in the cigar factory you will be working at after you graduate from that fabulous education system communism has provided. I see the same kinds of “worker paradise” nonsense in this fawning sychophants writings toward Hugo Chavez.

RPR, I checked out your link on the “great” things your hero Hugo is doing to his country. Please, this is written by another commie stooge. This is the same crap we always here about Cuba written by useful idiots who go down to visit, sing the praises of the dictator but always hop back on the plane and come back to “evil, capitalist America” to enjoy the freedoms and creature comforts capitalism provides. Blah, blah Cuba has a top notch education system the useful idiots always tell us. Well, that will go along way in the cigar factory you will be working at after you graduate from that fabulous education system communism has provided. I see the same kinds of “worker paradise” nonsense in this fawning sychophants writings toward Hugo Chavez.

Here is a short bio of Michael Parenti, the author of the article I mentioned:

Michael Parenti received his Ph.D. in political science from Yale University. He has taught at a number of colleges and universities, in the United States and abroad. Some of his writings have been translated into Arabic, Bangla, Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish.

During his earlier teaching career he received grants or fellowships from the Louis Rabinowitz Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Brown University, Yale University, State University of New York, and the University of Illinois. For several years he was an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C

*********************

I seriously doubt that such prestigious organizations like Yale University, State University of New York and the Ford Foundation would hire or support a “commie stooge”.

Here is a short bio of Michael Parenti, the author of the article I mentioned:

Michael Parenti received his Ph.D. in political science from Yale University. He has taught at a number of colleges and universities, in the United States and abroad. Some of his writings have been translated into Arabic, Bangla, Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish.

During his earlier teaching career he received grants or fellowships from the Louis Rabinowitz Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Brown University, Yale University, State University of New York, and the University of Illinois. For several years he was an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C

*********************

I seriously doubt that such prestigious organizations like Yale University, State University of New York and the Ford Foundation would hire or support a “commie stooge”.

Here is a short bio of Michael Parenti, the author of the article I mentioned:

Michael Parenti received his Ph.D. in political science from Yale University. He has taught at a number of colleges and universities, in the United States and abroad. Some of his writings have been translated into Arabic, Bangla, Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish.

During his earlier teaching career he received grants or fellowships from the Louis Rabinowitz Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Brown University, Yale University, State University of New York, and the University of Illinois. For several years he was an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C

*********************

I seriously doubt that such prestigious organizations like Yale University, State University of New York and the Ford Foundation would hire or support a “commie stooge”.

Who cares about the author. The peopel you and he praise are tyrants and killers.

Still haven’t managed that prioritization thing yet huh?

Who cares about the author. The peopel you and he praise are tyrants and killers.

Still haven’t managed that prioritization thing yet huh?

Who cares about the author. The peopel you and he praise are tyrants and killers.

Still haven’t managed that prioritization thing yet huh?

Robert,

Like most things that are given from the Creator, no one individual can or should be critical for obvious reasons of sheer self preservation. You know, fire from the sky and hail stones, etc…

It has also been pointed out that 2008 might have been a better time to write this thread had his claims not panned out…you’re still a bit premature with your writing, again!

Have a great weekend..

Robert,

Like most things that are given from the Creator, no one individual can or should be critical for obvious reasons of sheer self preservation. You know, fire from the sky and hail stones, etc…

It has also been pointed out that 2008 might have been a better time to write this thread had his claims not panned out…you’re still a bit premature with your writing, again!

Have a great weekend..

Robert,

Like most things that are given from the Creator, no one individual can or should be critical for obvious reasons of sheer self preservation. You know, fire from the sky and hail stones, etc…

It has also been pointed out that 2008 might have been a better time to write this thread had his claims not panned out…you’re still a bit premature with your writing, again!

Have a great weekend..