Facing 40 years in porn pop-up case
email: editor -@- mensnews daily.com | More from Mike LaSalle
Stumble It!
How to survive the coming food shortage.
4 Responses to “Facing 40 years in porn pop-up case”
Leave a Reply
|
|
Sex & Metropolis
Paul Elam
Dr. Tara J. Palmatier
Pelle Billing
Glenn Sacks
Marc H. Rudov
Roger F. Gay
Carey Roberts
Stephen Baskerville
Gordon E. Finley
Amy Alkon
Dr. Helen Smith
Jerry Fino
Shop Amazon and Support MND
Latest NewsWax
Join Our Mailing List
Recent Comments
- Jacquelyn on Abuse Shelter Watchdogs: See no Evil, Speak no Evil
- Paul Elam on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- TXM on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Punisher on Forever In Prejeans
- Masculist on Do men love women more than women love men?
- Denis on Do men love women more than women love men?
- jon on Do men love women more than women love men?
- julie on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- larry on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Ray on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- TXM on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
- Equality Among Men and Women « Divorced Man Site - Empowering divorced and divorcing men on Do men love women more than women love men?
- Randall Shake on Thoughts from a Disordered Mind
- Lola on Confronting Matriarchy and The False Premise of Feminism
- Ghost on Betrayal Trauma: Do You Have Relationship PTSD from your Wife or Girlfriend?
Search MND
Download PDF Here
Support Our Sponsors!
Please support MND
Subscribe today:
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
SUSTAINER: $5/mo.
CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.
SUPPORTER: $50/mo.
Or Donate Any Amount
January 10th, 2007 at 5:59 am
If she were attractive and actually had sex with the kids, then she could get off with a slap on the wrist and a book deal. Instead, she is being prosecuted and punished just like a male teacher would have been. Sounds to me like the judge and the prosecutor are repulsed by the thought of having sex with this woman, which would explain the stiff penalty normally reserved for male perps.
January 10th, 2007 at 8:04 am
She is being prosecuted by f*ckwits (Or as the Gonzman would say, F*ckweasels; he has such a good vocabulary) not as a man but as a victim of stupidity, censorship, hysteria and f*ckweaselitis. So, simply seeing something is illegal is it. ‘Viewing’ porn. Deliberately or accidentally. I suppose they will be chasing down any surviving soldiers who liberated Belsen next for daring to view naked jews dying of starvation. “Ooooh, they saw NAKED people”!!
40 years is a mockery of just judgement. As someone said, a woman teacher raping a child gets less.
January 10th, 2007 at 10:24 am
She hasn’t been sentenced yet. 40 years is probably reserved for those vile penis-people. Those without a penis are presumed to have been corrupted by those with same.
5 years is too effin long; 1 year is too effin long.
January 10th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
Its time some of the language is reviewed and changed. I’m no more a supporter of porn than the next guy, but “endangering a child” by them seeing a nude photo????
I get so pissed about the moral thumping hypocrits when they talk about porn, especially in the church. Again, I’m no supporter of porn (though by writing this there will be the reactionary moralists who dismiss the words as if they came directly from demons in hell), but amfortas expresses the correct reaction. I’m not even sure the male/female aspect is what irks me most. But when society sits and watched the utter destruction of families and men, then sits in church yelling AMEN about anti gay and anti porn sermons, we gotta enough logs in eyes to start a bon fire.