Comments on: Sen. Barbara Boxer Should Apologize To Condoleezza Rice

By: oneShef

oneShef — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:02:34 +0000

Robert,
Obviously if the members of the “Senate Foreign Relations Committee” were, or had been doing their job as most Americans would initially interpret the title of the committe’s name to imply, then “RELATIONS” would be established to the embarassment of the White House. Unfortunately, to the members of the Senate, this most likely refers implies and suggests something entirely different and something that they appear to do a good job living up to…Having “relations” that are “foreign” to one another…

and that’s the news from Wake Low beGone…where are the Senators are bought and paid for(just like the pages), the electorate is taken for granted and the Constitution is troden upon..

By: Will Malven

Will Malven — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 03:18:30 +0000

Interesting definition of “illegal, immoral, invasion” you Liberals have. Is that anything like the mission in Bosnia? Where, incidently, we still have troops. Interesting definition of “6 months” as well.

As for making Secretary Rice “squirm,” not even close. Condi ate their lunches. She made Chris Dodd look as dumb as he actually is. All you Liberals can do is take cheap shots because you have no answers, even now.

Hateful Harry said as much when he said it wasn’t his job to make policy. If you are going to be critical of the government’s policies, you better be prepared to offer your own. But of course we already know that the Democrats only answer is to cut and run like the cowards they have been for the past 50 years.

“Run away! Run Away!” Democrats always run away from the “vicious killer rabbits.”

Thank God your ilk weren’t around during WWII, we’d have baled the first time Marines his a Pacific Island because we were taking too many casualties.

By: Patriot

Patriot — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:39:54 +0000

TheRanger is right on.

Mr. Reyes has some good things to say in this one, but they are sandwiched between some typical liberal stuff where opinions are cited as fact.

If the clean topic of the title was addressed in this essay I would be clapping.

By: Squiggy

Squiggy — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:33:03 +0000

I did say one nice thing – your title. And if you were able to stay on subject (and for once kept your hatred bottled up) I could have praised the article. But I guess you can’t change your spots.

By: TheRanger

TheRanger — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:29:34 +0000

The problem with Democrats is that they are used to spewing out hate-filled venom at their political opponents (nazi, fascist,racist,islamophobe,homophobe etc,etc, you know Rob because you do the same thing) because the so-called “mainstream” news media i.e. the NYTimes, the WashingtonPost,ABC,NBC,CBS etc give them a free ride constantly. So, Boxers ugliness in not surprising. But, if this had been a Republican and, gasp, a male Republican at that, he would have been crucified by the same media that now stays silent when it’s a female Democrat doing the slimeing.

By: Robert Paul Reyes

Robert Paul Reyes — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:51:17 +0000

I’m sure you can find one good thing to say about my essay, for a change.

Eccles. 6:5. A sweet word multiplieth friends, and appeaseth enemies, and a gracious tongue in a good man aboundeth.

By: Squiggy

Squiggy — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:14:44 +0000

Robert, when I saw the title of your piece, I thought you just might deserve some kudos for once. I opened the page ready to applaud, and the first thing I see is ill-fated, illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. Just because you disagree with something doesn’t make it ill-fated, illegal and immoral. You take a legitimate scolding and turn it into a hate-filled diatribe.

Get over your bitterness, or your heart will explode.