Senator Joseph Biden: America's Most Dangerous Global Bully
If you believe that Jews caused the holocaust, then Senator Joe Biden is your prophet on the issue of domestic violence. America’s most dangerous bully is out to destroy every man in America on the vitriolic feminist notion that domestic violence is caused only by men; and secondly, to export America’s insanity to the rest of the world.
Biden’s plan is to create a “legal brigade†— an army in excess of 100,000 lawyers trained (and some federally endowed) to act as clones of the infamous Duke prosecutor Mike Nifong.
Biden would also spend millions of federal dollars on I-VAWA, exporting radical feminism to many foreign countries via the World Health Organization and various U.N. feminist NGO’s. I-VAWA is admittedly just another scheme by the Women’s Edge Coalition to create global-feminist socialism: “A major goal of the campaign is to educate the U.S. public and policymakers about the inextricable link between violence against women and the biggest global development and human rights challenges of our time: poverty, war and conflict, HIV/AIDS, and public healthâ€.
Are we so stupid as to let feminist globallists abuse the “A†word to take over the world?
America: where self-proclaimed victims power predatory government
Senator Biden likes to compare the federal government to a lawnmower — in his vision an army of over 100,000 entitled lawnmowers — chopping down men with billions of federal entitlements, on nothing more than an allegation that domestic violence by men is globally endemic. Entitling violence by women in the name of building a safer world has been the screed of the fascist insurgency in Congress and state legislatures for many years.
If America had not personally witnessed a large number of men being publicly bullied and tortured by predatory feminist pimps, if our brains were turned to sludge and hearts hued from flamed granite, if men were not created equal and the Constitution was interred in the National Cemetery in an unmarked grave, and if all of science were reduced to feminist ideations; we still could not believe Mr. Biden.
Dorothy Rabinowitz, who spent years debunking the false child abuse industry, essentially agrees with my long-held view that false domestic violence charges became the feminist favorite because they do not require the programming of a child. In the Wall Street Journal she writes, “there is little that is new or strange about Mr. Nifong. We have seen the likes of this district attorney, uninterested in proofs of innocence, willing to suppress any he found, many times in the busy army of prosecutors claiming to have found evidence of rampant child abuse in nursery schools and other child-care centers around the country in the 1980s and throughout most of the ’90s.â€
The structural parallels between the false child-abuse allegation industry, and VAWA — which is powered by any allegation of violence made by women, are striking. Both programs are structured to endlessly research and elicit allegations of abuse from a special class of pre-assigned victims, to act as the “validator†of abuse, to entitle hyper-aggressive prosecution and treatment of it, to seize large amounts of money from the alleged perpetrator, and to absolve anyone who abuses the system. We should not be surprised at the soporific efficacy of this arrangement: what dog won’t bark if you offer it a bone, or eventually bite to get what it wants?
Duke prosecutor Mike Nifong taught America invaluable lessons in the Duke Scandal. Women do lie – repetitively — for money and power. Police, prosecutors, the Bar Association, psychologists, and testing agencies do lie for them – because it is thought to be politically correct, is an entitled activity, and conveniently profitable.
- New Jersey Nets player Jason Kidd had to file for divorce to avoid continuing entitled violence at the hands of his wife.
- David Letterman was dragged through an outrageous and expensive false allegation of stalking.
- Tawana Brawley orchestrated a hideous false rape case against six innocent men.
- Actor Phil Hartman was shot to death by his drug-infested wife. Hartman had been walking on eggshells around her violence for some time.
- After a brief marriage to Heather Mills, Beatle Paul McCartney discovered that his wife was a former call-girl, a violent wife, gold-digger, and a professional at making false abuse accusations. We are to believe that Paul somehow became a monster after having a long and wonderful marriage to his first wife, Linda, who passed away from cancer. Paul was not the only person Heather physically attacked. She is currently demanding $50-million from Sir Paul, her latest and greatest trick.
- There are thousands of innocent men who spent much of their lives in prison, who since the advent of DNA evidence, are being acquitted of their crimes. There are countless others for which DNA evidence is not available, or who were too poor to fight the system — convicted purely on the feminist-instilled assumption that men are guilty even if they can prove themselves innocent. I have hundreds of gut-wrenching letters from good men, sitting in prison, for this very reason. Their truths will never be seen on CNN or a feminist U.N. Report.
Exporting the Scourge of Radical Feminism
Unfortunately for Mr. Biden, the WHO study is integrally cross-referenced to Kofi Annan’s Report on Violence Against Women, which was unanimously rejected by the U.N. Third Committee this past November after an international brouhaha revealed that intentional sex bias and tremendous methodological errors rendered the report little more than an exercise in brute sexism.
The WHO report his legislation is built on contains the same preceptual, methodogical and scientific errors as the Secretary General’s report. It starts with a monumental feminist lie “the perpetrators of violence are almost exclusively menâ€. The questioning methodology was similar to that of the Conflict Tactical Scales (CTS), asking forthright questions such as “whether a current or former spouse has ever (fill in the blank). Unlike the CTS, which questioned both men and women, the W.H.O. study carefully avoids asking what feminists do not wish to report (just like Mike Nifong). Only women pre-selected by feminist-operated NGO’s and operatives were interviewed.
Perhaps Mr. Biden would do better spending hundreds of millions of our tax dollars asking Democrats meaningful questions like “has a Republican ever voted against one of your bills?â€
The bottom line: Exporting radical feminist terrorism is a very dangerous thing. The vast majority of Muslims know exactly what radical feminism is, and they are not about to let America ram it down their throats under the guise of “Democracyâ€. As we found out: some are willing to strap a bomb on their back to prove their point.
If Senator Biden wants to stop terrorism, which he claims to desire, he can start by shelving this horrid piece of legislation. He should follow through by undertaking what he forcefully quashed last year: reform of the Violence Against Women Act to become a truly gender-neutral Family Violence Act. When we stop terrorizing America and globalizing radical feminism, we will be well on the way to ending the global war on terror.
————————————————-
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality Network and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition
————————————————-
| More from David R. Usher
Stumble It!
January 14th, 2007 at 12:54 am
Radical feminism is just one of many fronts in the elite conspiracy to promote global Marxism around the world. Women are being used and manipulated as pawns by the world’s elite to achieve this end, with sexual liberalism as the bait. The domestic violence issue is just one of several standard divide and conquer tools to have everyone, including women, at the mercy of a totalitarian world government. Unfortunately, many politicians, like Senator Biden, as well as, industrialists like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, have become so ideologically driven in their pursuit of global Communism whatever the cost that they are psychopaths in the vein of Lenin, Hitler, and Stalin. To support that theory, I would now like to offer a few quotes by Nancy Levant, author of the book, “The Cultural Devastation of American Women,” from her most recent column.
“The one-world government scenario is dialectically based upon economics, environment, and equity – known as the Three E’s. These Three E’s involve global control of the common man’s labor and money, “sustainable†nature, and forcing all commoners into financial sameness.
The feminist movement was crafted by the one-world political initiative and invented to create and sustain global depopulation goals. That is and remains the primary mission of the feminist movement.
Women’s “rights†are disallowed definition by culture, religion, personal opinion, or any other social definition minus the feminist movement. In today’s world, we have no choices as women, whatsoever, but to agree to the think tank morality written and coded by this global movement. The feminist movement is no different than the global environmental movement, the global healthcare movement, the global education movement, or the global economy movement. All are social re-engineering tactics used to forward the take over of all world governments, economies, and cultures, and to force all commoners into the custom-made livelihoods and service of corporate-based governors. According to this government, we have no choices but to accept them all.
The “governors†are the world’s wealthiest industrialists and bankers. Their one-world government hands all power and control of people, land, water, food, human health, children and education, employment, militaries, and economic potential directly to themselves and their personal fortunes. Over and over and over again, when you tie corporate wealth and power to governing agencies, you have Fascism. However, the long-term goal of a one-world government has always been to bring Communism to fruition on a global scale. So, today, we see a hybrid Fascist-Communist system by Three E design, and it is bitterly obvious in every nation on the planet. Almost all global economies are crashing by design, and particularly America’s economy. Note that America’s elite pulled their investments out of the U.S. years ago.
The feminist piece of the global puzzle deals specifically with depopulation through women’s “healthcare,†big pharma, and the “mental health†industrial complex. Women’s rights are now defined by the right to abort, the right to be drafted, and the right to take drugs that will render women and children incapable of bearing children. And just as many women worldwide earned the right to own property, that right has now fallen to other plans, which state that no “individual†may own private property.
Also, one must note that the industrial and banking powers that be are mostly men – the men whose dynastic families created their one-world government of choice. And these same men also created the feminist movement in order to curb the tendencies of commoners to breed and out-number them billions to one. The feminist movement is based upon political lies and the control of reproduction. “Sustainable†nature is also based upon enforcing a remarkable decline in birth rates.
Today’s “liberated†women are still raising children – many of which are raising children alone – and they are working one or two jobs to make end’s meet. Today’s “liberated†women are obsessed with weight, beauty, divorce, money, spending money, and careers to make money. They are far less concerned with their children, who are now raised in state-controlled (government) daycare centers, federally controlled (government) public schools, and state controlled (government) universities. In other words, the government is raising our children in ways that the government sees fit – the government of the world’s industrialists and world bankers. Your children are being raised by and into the new world order, while you are working to support the new world order rather than your children. Truth hurts, doesn’t it?
Let me give the women of the West a clue –“liberation†means that you are free – free to think as you choose and free to create your life according to your efforts and your beliefs. I suggest to you that the “liberation†you have achieved through the misguidance of the feminist movement is false. I suggest that Westernized women are often miserable, overworked, and suffering due to separation from their children. Think of it this way – the feminist movement actually believed they could change the fundamental meaning and purpose of womanhood, biological and instinctual gendering, and that they could culturally remove children from mothers, and call it “liberation.†You are equally liberated to destroy any children that you don’t want. Wow. I guess that means that you have a great deal of power. Congratulations. It is far greater to be a drugged laborer than a mother. Let us thank the feminist movement for making this clear to us dim-witted females.
And to the world’s feminists – I say this: You are the dumbest women who have ever walked the face of the Earth. Week by week, day by day, you are losing every right you thought you invented. You fell hook, line, and sinker into the dialectic, and you are nothing but dictator pawns to the larger mission of total control over people and freedom. What a shame when arrogance literally beats brains useless. What a crime and a shame when you brutally victimize the very people you claim to represent – much like all other destroyers of human freedom. The day will come when you and your brothers in crime will be fully understood for your true missions. The day will come when YOU finally comprehend what you actually stood for – the total denial of rights and freedom for all.”
Are we, as a society, ready to do whatever it takes, including junking our sexually liberated lifestyles as well as applying the necessary political pressure to restore the family as the basic unit of society or do we just sit back and become serfs and slaves to the totalitarian state?
January 14th, 2007 at 1:03 am
Domestic violence law as it has been legislated under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is a hate movement, pure and simple.
January 14th, 2007 at 1:45 am
Let us be frank.
It is terrorism which drove me from my children plain and simple.
It was terrorism when she called the police on a 911 hang up, which I successfully avoided the cavity search by holding my crying son who was told that Mom was trying to send me to jail.
It was terrorism when she tried to strangle me.
It was terrorism when she tried to accuse me of child molestation.
It was terrorism when she filed for a PRA agaisnt me when I had not been in the state for over 2 years and was over 8 miles away and never threatened for me or anyone under my control to take any violent action against her.
VAWA is the the Big Brother of Al Queida in America. It does more damage to America than anything to date, just as the reactionary Patriot Act did more to destroy america by destroying the Constitution thant he attacks themselves.
Simple stuff to see folks. The Cure provided by government is worse than the disease, and that is no accident.
We know who are the terrorists, and as with all forms of terrorism, the source of the power is in the reaction fo the victims. The victims hold the power of the terrorist.
Let us call this what it is, and always will be, and Mr. Usher knows and has written of these laws violating the Peonage Act.
It is unconstitutional Acts of Terrorism against the people and the society of the United States of America.
Let us clean out this American Al Quieda, and it black robed supporters who can strike laws as unconstitutional, and thus eliminate the terrorists.
January 14th, 2007 at 1:46 am
Terrorism is like charity…it begins at home, thus the war must start here.
January 14th, 2007 at 4:06 am
A page where I publish commentary and examples of this usurpation of due process of law:
http://www.antipeonage.0catch.com/gourley.htm
January 14th, 2007 at 10:36 am
Another fine post from Mr. Usher, but I wonder if we might be overlooking an opportunity here. Okay, it’s just a fantasy, but what if we were able to export this I-VAWA brigade to the Middle East? No where else on the planet, just there.
If the feminist meddlecrats could do in Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc., what they do here, we might be able to win this thing. Of course, in the Middle East Biden’s brigade of losers would be given the treatment they deserve (details I leave to the reader’s imagination). But a man can dream. I’d much rather export feminism (and the feminists of both genders) to the Middle East than democracy. Let them deal with it.
January 14th, 2007 at 9:05 pm
KangarooX,
Could you please explain why it is totally unacceptable that women should suffer separation
from THEIR children by going out to work but it is NOT a problem that men must be asked to for the same? This mentality that one parent (the mother) is more important than the other (the father) is the reason why no one cares that fathers are routinely ripped put of their children’s lives at the behest of the crypto-fascist family courts.
January 14th, 2007 at 9:14 pm
I was at one of the original hearings held by Joseph “McCarthy” Biden in 1991 when he was trying to build up the political momentum to get the first VAWA bill through congress.
At this hearing, Joseph “McCarthy” Biden openly admitted that his big sister hit him in the arm so hard (when he was a boy) that she broke his arm. He bought this story up to make the point that his sister hitting him was no where near as serious as him hitting his sister. If he had hit his (much larger) sister, Biden believed that this would constitute “real” violence. However,
if his sister deliberately and viscously hit him [breaking his arm] this was only a trvial act which he should learn to take like a man.
Is it any wonder that a sicko like Joseph “McCathy Biden doesn’t care about womne’s violnec against men?
January 14th, 2007 at 10:40 pm
Biden won’t let his big sister break America’s arm. He’s doing it for her. She is just standing there, arms folded, scowling, whilst little Joey does her dirty work. She says ‘Lets you and him fight’, and he, the cowardly shite that he is, does her biden.
January 15th, 2007 at 11:59 am
ninderthana
That is interesting. I have heard that story before but not from someone actually present at a VAWA hearing where it was told.
You witnessed history. This Sicko needs to lay on a couch and get some treatment not creating policy for this Country between the sexes.
I believe he and his VAWA has done far more damage to this country than any number of historic calamities such as 911, Pearl Harbor, etc. The damage is more spread out geographically and otherwise. It is less obvious, but it is much more long lasting and destructive.
January 15th, 2007 at 12:38 pm
Dear David,
What are you doing about Senator Biden and his ilk? What are you sugesting that anyone does?
January 15th, 2007 at 7:17 pm
Jon Ryan and I attended the first two Senate hearings in 1990(1?) that were chaired by Senator Biden that were specifically held to address the issue of violence against women.
These hearings were a precursor to the ones that eventually led to the WAVA legislation later in the 1990’s. We were there on behalf of the National Coalition of Free Men (NCFM).
Our job was to try and hand out leaflets to the media who were attending these hearings showing them that, contrary to what they were being Senator Biden, there was not an epidemic of violence against women and, in fact, men were the victims of about 2/3 of all violent crime.
The whole hearing process was like one big show trial with Senator Biden making sure that ONLY those witnesses who support his views on the victims of violence were given a chance to speak.
Jon Ryan actually asked to make a submission to the hearing on behalf of NCFM presenting evidence that men were the main victims of violent crime. Needless to say, our submission was rejected out of hand.
During the first Senate hearing, we managed to successfully leave a set of leaflets on the much levels of violence against men on a special desk set up for the media inside the Senate hearing room. This had the “negative effect” that some of the publicity generated from these hearings (on NPR to be specific and see the Washington Times article below as well) actually mentioned that a “zany group call Freeing Men” claimed that men were also significant victims of violent crime. Of course in the anti-male hysteria of the times this claim was dismissed as the ravings of some lunatic fringe.
Next time we tried to hand out leaflets in the Senate hearing room (I was with a teenage daughter of one of our members since Jon could not attend this second hearing) we were apprehended by the Senate security and told that it was illegal to hand out political leaflets within the senate. Obviously, we had had enough impact that Senator Biden decided to set the dogs upon us. We were ejected from the Senate hearing so that we could not communicate with the Press Gallery. I remember being so annoyed that I wandered around to the Senate building to find out were the press lived. I found that they had a collection of (small) desks located in one of the out-of-the-way corridors and so the young lady and I proceeded to leave our pamphlets on the desks of the reporters. We actually spoke to one of the reporters but he seemed almost oblivious to the issue, although he was polite.
Anyway, I suspect that Senator Biden actually made the statement about him being hit by his sister (and her breaking his arm or at least hitting him so hard that he thought it was broken) in the first Senate hearing. I am not sure of the exact date but I think that the second hearing occurred in Oct 1990(1?), so it must have been before then. He addressed the full hearing and he said that he was adamant that if he had committed exactly the same act on his sister then this would be much more serious than what had happened to him.
I do not know if there are transcripts of these hearings but if there are it should be in the transcripts. Unless, of course they have been “edited” for later “public consumption”.
I think that the only newspaper to take up our material was the Washington Times – so it may pay to look at the paper archives to see the single article that made it into the press that question the feminist steam-rolling being driven by Senator Joseph “McCarthy” Biden.
Wouldn’t it be ironic if these comments came back to haunt Senator Biden in his bid to be the Democratic candidate for President.
Article 1636 of 2102{FOUNDITEMS:-0}, Article ID: G0014837 Published on June 29, 1990, The Washington Times{PUBLICATION2} Unequal protection under the law
Now comes Sen. Joseph Biden’s bill to establish a special category for crimes of violence against women. This legislation would make “gender-related violence” a civil-rights violation, entitling the victim to sue for punitive damages. Women would have a civil right to be secure against violence that men would lack. Why not allow all victims of violence to sue for punitive damages?
We already have a new law that make racially motivated violence more of a
Complete Article, 186 words ( )
January 15th, 2007 at 9:32 pm
How to win the votes of women.
Step 1: Stoke up their fears by lying and exaggerating.
Step 2: Claim that you will protect them.
And during every election cycle Sen. Biden will continue to follow this strategy, as he has in the past. This means that each election cycle that results in Sen. Biden’s re-election will result in the vice getting tighter and tighter for men. This will only end when men see to it that Sen. Biden loses re-election and never comes back.
January 16th, 2007 at 12:03 am
An article in todays Timesonline.co.uk by former groupie Dawn Eden titled “Casual sex is a con: women just aren’t like women” is a study in contrasts.
Miss Eden States that Helen Gurley Brown of Cosmo and feminist icon Germaine Greer sold women on the virtues of not having any! An interesting first person narative of sorts, it’s interesting in the reflections of a lost and searching soul, very similar to what the womens movement of today still is looking and longing for. I’ll leave it for you to read and recommend to your friends and sisters. I’m sure my sister will be calling me post haste after checking her email while being couped up the next day or three with our icey winter wonderland here in Austin…a short drive from the Best wlittle Score House in Texas…
January 17th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
[...] My last article, Senator Joseph Biden: America’s Most Dangerous Global Bully, discusses the policy reasons why Senator Biden is wrong to expand the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and to export VAWA globally via federal funding, before substantive reforms are made to guarantee equal domestic violence services to both men and women. [...]
August 11th, 2008 at 6:37 am
[...] legal and social equality of women. International feminism is an offshoot of a movement to create a worldwide socialist paradise, and to eradicate “Patriarchy” in all its forms. It goes without saying that, in some places in the [...]