• Log In
• Register
• Find Password

• home
• rss
• submission guidelines
• masthead
• letter from the editor
• mra principles and goals
• mnd lifestyles

How to survive the coming food shortage.

10 Responses to “Lesbian woman ordered to pay child support, denied visitation”

1. 
   1
   thurston861 Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 11:39 am

   Hooorray!

   Both can give all of their money to lawyers like men do!

   Hooray! One can go to jail for failure to pay support because she is not seeing the child, the other can go to jail for violating the visitation order, and the case can go to Federal Court because the Commonwealth of VA does not recognize the non genetically linked Lesbo to the child even by unnatural legal marriage!

   (gee, could this be a reason for natural law? Shame it doies not apply anymore.)

   Hooray the chld of lesbo’s becomes a ward of the state in foster care!

   And people asked why not same sex marriage?

   DUH!

   The solution to this would have come down to natural law. (You know that thing that makes a mother hold the head of her child and cry on the side of the road after a drunk driver has disintigrated the rest of the body.)

   But, since natural law does not apply to Fathers who have emotional, socetal and genetic connectivity, the VT Lesbo can join us Men in our fate.

   thurstonbell861@yahoo.com

2. 
   2
   thurston861 Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 11:42 am

   Hooray! Femmenist Marxism is no different from Socialism!

   Hooray Femenist Marxism making great progress to Equal Distribution of Misery to all!!!!

3. 
   3
   JD Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 1:17 pm

   Schadenfreude is never pretty.

4. 
   4
   The Gonzman Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 2:47 pm

   Well, at least one woman knows what it is like to be designated the “man” in a relationship. Bet she used to cheer it on before it happened to her.

   Keep pushing for that “gay marriage,” though.

5. 
   5
   Roger Knight Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 7:14 pm

   Peonage is still a crime, even when performed against a lesbian.
   Still, it could not happen to a nicer lady.
   Lesbians who speak out against gender bias in the family courts and against the Child Support Crusade are as common as Muslims who speak out against the Jihad and assert that the life of an Infidel child is as precious as the life of a Muslim child.

6. 
   6
   amfortas Says:
   January 15th, 2007 at 7:51 pm

   Someone said in another post on another blog ” You have to trust a mother’s judgement. She knows what’s best for the child”. What a mantra that saves having to think.

   Judgement?? Here is a mother who enters an unatural relationship by whim, has a baby, artificially, to satisfy her whim, breaks the relationship by whim, ‘reverts’ to a different sexual mode at whim, and she gets PAID for it. Judgement hasn’t had a look in. There is nothing f*cking whimsical about forking out money to another person for the next 18 years. What a judgement. What a taker.

7. 
   7
   DcFather Says:
   January 16th, 2007 at 9:15 am

   It’s nice to see a pretend-father facing the same discrimination as a real father, even if it’s not really her child, i.e. pay money or go to prison and you don’t even get to “visit”, even if the amount probably should have another zero at the end and they wouldn’t really put her in prison for it. Now all we need is a false allegation of DV and we’ll be getting close to coming full circle.

   This is surely a challenge for the man-hating lesbians at NOW to explain why this is unfair (without admitting superior rights for females as their agenda) when it’s exactly what they’ve been promoting and getting for real fathers for decades.

8. 
   8
   S Baker Says:
   January 17th, 2007 at 8:28 am

   Sexual deviants should not be allowed to have kids without supervision. Deviants include homosexuals, pedophiles (of which most male homosexuals are members), beastophiles, the genitally mutilated (aka transgenders), and the incestuous. The courts seem to be generating a great deal of social entertainment for themselves at the expense of defenseless kids.

9. 
   9
   circeod Says:
   October 29th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

   I have a comment for S Baker. You basically said that homosexuals should not have kids right? If so I don’t like that you have said that. Any family no matter what your sexuality, as long as you are good parent and don’t treat your kid wrong then it should not matter. I am a proud lesbian and I have a step son that I love with all my heart and her loves me just as much as he loves his mother. I am not trying to make anyone mad, but that comment made me mad. It should not make a difference if you like guys or if you like girls we are all human.

10. 
    10
    Robert Stevens Says:
    October 30th, 2008 at 7:42 am

    Well folks, as much as I hate to say it ” wrong is wrong, no matter who it is done to. Doing this, even to a feminazi is still wrong. It is not about gender, although, it is men that are discriminated against most of the time. It is about creating a system that truly does put the best interest of children first, and the system we got, does not do that.
    As much women deserve the same evil rotten treatment men have always had to suffer from, it has to stop somewhere, even if that means someone with an “unnatural arrangement” get her rights protected. In a way, this sort of thing helps fathers rights advance, because we can say ” Hey, it’s not just men that this happens too and it is wrong, no matter who it is done to. This makes the father right groups look like the good guys and the feminazi, liberal, man haters look like the bad guys. And folks image is everything!
    As far as this PEE ON thing is concerned, the courts, corrupt as they are, have shot it down. My advise, learn the law, most specifically a little thing called Subject Matter Jurisdiction. If you can strip them of that little thing , you would be surprised what you can force the out of control bastard to do. Hell , they can even be made to act reasonable.

Leave a Reply