Nope, no evidence of parental alienation here. Everyone go home, nothing to see here.
This bitch and her family need to see the inside of the graybar hotel for awhile.
tonysprout
Nope, no evidence of parental alienation here. Everyone go home, nothing to see here.
This bitch and her family need to see the inside of the graybar hotel for awhile.
DcFather
He ruled that Mr Jones be given care of Jayden, a decision he later described as “as radical an order as a Family Court judge can make”.
Wow, you mean the mother is so bad that a judge allowed a father to take care of his own son! That sure is “radical”. Maybe, just maybe, once in a while, in the really extreme cases, they are actually serious about “the best interests of the child”, and child custody disputes cease to be a female entitlement program.
But that’s New Zealand. If this psycho bitch is also a pedophile, she would be just like my ex-wife. The difference however, is that women like her are revered in the American courts, where fraud, perjury, parental alienation and child abuse are not enough to take such a “radical” step as to actually “rule” based on what is best for children.
DcFather
He ruled that Mr Jones be given care of Jayden, a decision he later described as “as radical an order as a Family Court judge can make”.
Wow, you mean the mother is so bad that a judge allowed a father to take care of his own son! That sure is “radical”. Maybe, just maybe, once in a while, in the really extreme cases, they are actually serious about “the best interests of the child”, and child custody disputes cease to be a female entitlement program.
But that’s New Zealand. If this psycho bitch is also a pedophile, she would be just like my ex-wife. The difference however, is that women like her are revered in the American courts, where fraud, perjury, parental alienation and child abuse are not enough to take such a “radical” step as to actually “rule” based on what is best for children.
thurston861
No fraud, perjury, parental alienation and child abuse are not grounds for taking a child from their mother under any circumstance.
Those are Articles in the Feminist Bill of Rights.
So strange how it is that in Freudian Psychology everything revolves around problems with ones mother, even Pink Floyd’s the Wall was about Mother being the Antagonist, Tears for Fears had a song about Mother’s Talk terrorizing children, then there is the old “Hell hath no fury as a Woman scorned”…yet one goes to court as she is the Virgin Mary all the time.
Clearly innocent until proven guilty at least a dozen times.
thurston861
No fraud, perjury, parental alienation and child abuse are not grounds for taking a child from their mother under any circumstance.
Those are Articles in the Feminist Bill of Rights.
So strange how it is that in Freudian Psychology everything revolves around problems with ones mother, even Pink Floyd’s the Wall was about Mother being the Antagonist, Tears for Fears had a song about Mother’s Talk terrorizing children, then there is the old “Hell hath no fury as a Woman scorned”…yet one goes to court as she is the Virgin Mary all the time.
Clearly innocent until proven guilty at least a dozen times.
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
–Dwight David Eisenhower, “The Chance for Peace,” speech given to the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Apr. 16, 1953.
Latest News Headlines
