<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lincoln, Madeleine Albright, and the Pig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:39:56 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amfortas</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-28628</link>
		<dc:creator>amfortas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 05:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/#comment-28628</guid>
		<description>As usual, Joyanna, you cut to the issues well. But I reckon its alright to have Madeleine haul you out when you are stuck in mud. Better a pig in a poke than you in one. hahahaha.

Yes, America is Imperialistic. Of course. The denials are part of the American character too. But imperialism isn&#039;t a human invention, discovery or even a national fault. It is part of the warp and weft of human nature. Pity America didn&#039;t understand this before they forcibly dismantled the British Empire. The Brits were doing it quite well and taking all the stick for it. But along come the Yanks with their envy and who now have to take their turn in the barrel. Hahahaha. I&#039;m sure that others would make a worse fix of it so carry on and do your best. At least you speak English of sorts. If only the Americans had been honest about it and said &#039;its our turn&#039;. But no, they had to condemn it. The Princess of Lies grinned at that one.

Talking of the Princess. Women and power. I don&#039;t know. I guess women can make as good a mess of things as any man could. I have no great problem with whatever genitals are the fixtures and fittings of this leader or that. The Presidential peeing position is a private matter. (I think Ghengis Khan squatted). Nor their after-rationalisations. Its their character that matters. 

So Maddy wanted to see the world and its people and met one-armed children, hotel porters and had lots of room service instead. So, some guy in a suit, like Henry K, did better? Its a pity Maddy was such an ugly woman, otherwise she could have taken advantage of all that aphrodisiac power. Pig in a poke or poking a pig, being in the barrel, its all the same. 

Maybe Maddy should have run for President. Just think, President Mad Korbelova. That would have had an impact on relations with the Russians. They wouldn&#039;t have known if they won or lost!

Did you know that there have been 21 women who have run for President in America. The first was Victoria Woodhall in 1872. That was well before even most men had the vote. She was a clairvoyant - clearly a murky-eyed one - and taked and played with the spirits of her dead sisters. Now even Billy Clinton sounds good after that! (Just think what clairvoyancy could do for foreign policy decisions).  She made a fortune as a &#039;magnetic healer&#039;, a seemingly attractive career for nutty women in those days, as in these. It certainly pulled the money in. She and her sister (a live one this time) made another fortune when they opened a brokerage firm on Wall Street, the first women to do so. So much for oppression. (maybe clairvoyancy worked for her!)

She wanted free love for everyone, her first of course, and the ability to change her lovers daily at whim - you know, equality with men who we all know do this with impunity all the time - but she didn&#039;t get it through the sort of Congress she wanted approval from.  Maybe she wasn&#039;t sure what congress meant and thought it was a knocking shop. Then again, maybe she was right. 

I don&#039;t know whether the guy -Ulysses Grant? - who won the election had a different gal each day or just wanked his way through life. Odds are he didn&#039;t have nubile interns to pull his chain though back then. At least with her fortune Vicky could buy a warm night or two. She proved &#039;armless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, Joyanna, you cut to the issues well. But I reckon its alright to have Madeleine haul you out when you are stuck in mud. Better a pig in a poke than you in one. hahahaha.</p>
<p>Yes, America is Imperialistic. Of course. The denials are part of the American character too. But imperialism isn&#8217;t a human invention, discovery or even a national fault. It is part of the warp and weft of human nature. Pity America didn&#8217;t understand this before they forcibly dismantled the British Empire. The Brits were doing it quite well and taking all the stick for it. But along come the Yanks with their envy and who now have to take their turn in the barrel. Hahahaha. I&#8217;m sure that others would make a worse fix of it so carry on and do your best. At least you speak English of sorts. If only the Americans had been honest about it and said &#8216;its our turn&#8217;. But no, they had to condemn it. The Princess of Lies grinned at that one.</p>
<p>Talking of the Princess. Women and power. I don&#8217;t know. I guess women can make as good a mess of things as any man could. I have no great problem with whatever genitals are the fixtures and fittings of this leader or that. The Presidential peeing position is a private matter. (I think Ghengis Khan squatted). Nor their after-rationalisations. Its their character that matters. </p>
<p>So Maddy wanted to see the world and its people and met one-armed children, hotel porters and had lots of room service instead. So, some guy in a suit, like Henry K, did better? Its a pity Maddy was such an ugly woman, otherwise she could have taken advantage of all that aphrodisiac power. Pig in a poke or poking a pig, being in the barrel, its all the same. </p>
<p>Maybe Maddy should have run for President. Just think, President Mad Korbelova. That would have had an impact on relations with the Russians. They wouldn&#8217;t have known if they won or lost!</p>
<p>Did you know that there have been 21 women who have run for President in America. The first was Victoria Woodhall in 1872. That was well before even most men had the vote. She was a clairvoyant &#8211; clearly a murky-eyed one &#8211; and taked and played with the spirits of her dead sisters. Now even Billy Clinton sounds good after that! (Just think what clairvoyancy could do for foreign policy decisions).  She made a fortune as a &#8216;magnetic healer&#8217;, a seemingly attractive career for nutty women in those days, as in these. It certainly pulled the money in. She and her sister (a live one this time) made another fortune when they opened a brokerage firm on Wall Street, the first women to do so. So much for oppression. (maybe clairvoyancy worked for her!)</p>
<p>She wanted free love for everyone, her first of course, and the ability to change her lovers daily at whim &#8211; you know, equality with men who we all know do this with impunity all the time &#8211; but she didn&#8217;t get it through the sort of Congress she wanted approval from.  Maybe she wasn&#8217;t sure what congress meant and thought it was a knocking shop. Then again, maybe she was right. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether the guy -Ulysses Grant? &#8211; who won the election had a different gal each day or just wanked his way through life. Odds are he didn&#8217;t have nubile interns to pull his chain though back then. At least with her fortune Vicky could buy a warm night or two. She proved &#8216;armless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyanna Adams</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-28607</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyanna Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/#comment-28607</guid>
		<description>Ha, good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativation</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-28593</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/01/26/lincoln-madeleine-albright-and-the-pig/#comment-28593</guid>
		<description>Im glad, as you mention, Bill Clinton keeps having his orgasmic finale in his speeches. I own dry cleaning business, and blue dresses are $8.99.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im glad, as you mention, Bill Clinton keeps having his orgasmic finale in his speeches. I own dry cleaning business, and blue dresses are $8.99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
