She Asked for It or The Strange Case of the Woman in White Mittens

2007-01-27
By

Published in The Stake and Epitaph

Hunting close to a new subdivision in Maine on Nov. 15, 1988, Donald Rogerson believed he saw a deer through his rifle sight and fired. Then he saw “the white flags” (buttocks of the aptly named white tailed deer) and fired a second time. When he ran over to examine his kill he discovered the dying body of Karen Wood.

As a licensed hunter, Rogerson was obligated to be absolutely certain he had a deer in his scope when he shot. Investigators found no evidence of a deer in the area — no deer hair, footprints, droppings, etc. Karen Wood was in her own wooded backyard and five feet within her own property when she was killed.

Nevertheless, opinion in Maine was heavily divided as to who was most at fault in the accident. To many, Karen Wood’s death symbolized a clash between rural traditions cherished by Maine natives and suburban newcomers — like the Wood family — unwilling to properly familiarize themselves with local practices.

Some of these “Old Mainers” criticized the victim for contributing to her own death, saying, “Karen Wood would be alive today if she hadn’t been dressed like she was.” What was wrong with Ms. Wood’s clothing? Her apparel lacked anything orange, the color that has traditionally alerted hunters to humans. She was also wearing white mittens, which Rogerson apparently mistook for a deer’s backside.

These comments uncannily echo the classic apology for rape, i.e. “She asked for it. What was she doing in a bar wearing a see-through blouse and miniskirt?”

But instead of entering a drinking place in a Scarlet Woman’s outfit, Karen Wood brazenly sauntered into the backyard of her own home attired in a daring blue sweater and provocative white mittens.

It is only fair to state that Donald Rogerson is by all accounts a very nice man and has said many times that he is terribly sorry for the accident. But he has never admitted fault — a distinction that is important.

The legal disposition of the case is quite interesting. One grand jury refused to indict Mr. Rogerson; a second returned an indictment for manslaughter. Under Maine law, manslaughter is the reckless or criminally negligent killing of a human being. A jury deliberated for nine hours before acquitting Mr. Rogerson.

The jury’s verdict appeared to confirm the arguments of those who thought blame was shared between the shooter and the shot. Together with those arguments, it would also seem to suggest new laws to protect the state’s citizens from such tragedies in the future.

Perhaps all Mainers who venture out-of-doors during hunting season should be legally required to hang an orange sign around their necks with the legend: “Warning! I am not a deer!” In addition, the sale, import, or possession of white gloves should be outlawed within the state so its residents will not be tempted to impersonate deer butts.

13 views

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Oh Deer, Denise. Likeing the arguements to a rape excuse is way out of order. Absolutely no need at all in discussing a tragedy like this.

    For the record, IMHO a woman has every right to wear whatever she wants in her own house and garden. And a skilled hunter has no business mistaking mittens on a human’s hands as a deer’s arse. Is he thick as a brick?

    What she wears at home has nothing to do with what she wears in public. No-one has any entitlement to comment upon or be affected by what she wears at home. In public we are all, men as well as women, affecting others by our deportment and appearance. To pretend otherwise is childish. And no one accidentally rapes.

    So he hasn’t admitted fault. Morally reprehensible and no doubt ordered not to by his insurance company and lawyer. Indictment failed then indictment for manslaughter. Clearly it wasn’t murder. Clearly it was manslaughter. Criminal? Probably not. Reckless? Probably not. Culpably negligent? Probably. What did the Coroner suggest?

    Tragic? Yes.

    I would not want him around me with his gun. But the issue of rape arguement that YOU raise is specious and provocative. Provocative as a mini-skirt and no knickers in the mall. But I am not inclined to use that as an excuse to shoot you.

  • http://lovability.org amfortas

    Oh Deer, Denise. Likeing the arguements to a rape excuse is way out of order. Absolutely no need at all in discussing a tragedy like this.

    For the record, IMHO a woman has every right to wear whatever she wants in her own house and garden. And a skilled hunter has no business mistaking mittens on a human’s hands as a deer’s arse. Is he thick as a brick?

    What she wears at home has nothing to do with what she wears in public. No-one has any entitlement to comment upon or be affected by what she wears at home. In public we are all, men as well as women, affecting others by our deportment and appearance. To pretend otherwise is childish. And no one accidentally rapes.

    So he hasn’t admitted fault. Morally reprehensible and no doubt ordered not to by his insurance company and lawyer. Indictment failed then indictment for manslaughter. Clearly it wasn’t murder. Clearly it was manslaughter. Criminal? Probably not. Reckless? Probably not. Culpably negligent? Probably. What did the Coroner suggest?

    Tragic? Yes.

    I would not want him around me with his gun. But the issue of rape arguement that YOU raise is specious and provocative. Provocative as a mini-skirt and no knickers in the mall. But I am not inclined to use that as an excuse to shoot you.

  • bigpapa

    As a hunter myself,, I put all blame and fault on Rogerson. end of story..
    There is no excuse for him to have taken this shot, he is liable, especially if you was using a scoped rifle.
    He’s the kind of person that gives the rest of us hunters a bad name, like those that drink and hunt or take “sound” shots or take more than the limit..

  • bigpapa

    As a hunter myself,, I put all blame and fault on Rogerson. end of story..
    There is no excuse for him to have taken this shot, he is liable, especially if you was using a scoped rifle.
    He’s the kind of person that gives the rest of us hunters a bad name, like those that drink and hunt or take “sound” shots or take more than the limit..

  • bombbombbombbomb

    “Some of these “Old Mainers” criticized the victim for contributing to her own death, saying, “Karen Wood would be alive today if she hadn’t been dressed like she was.”

    “She asked for it.”

    An observation concerning dress does not equate to saying that the person asked for it. So when a jogger gets run over at night for not wearing reflective clothing – then anyone commenting on it would be assumed that they thought to jogger asked for it?

    People make mistakes, some more culpable than others. It never hurts to minimize the chances that you will be harmed by other people’s mistakes and negligence. So – it is wise to wear bright colors if outside during hunting season, to wear reflective clothing if you walk on roads at night and to have your head lights on while driving during the day. All part of what you can do to protect yourself in an imperfect world.

  • bombbombbombbomb

    “Some of these “Old Mainers” criticized the victim for contributing to her own death, saying, “Karen Wood would be alive today if she hadn’t been dressed like she was.”

    “She asked for it.”

    An observation concerning dress does not equate to saying that the person asked for it. So when a jogger gets run over at night for not wearing reflective clothing – then anyone commenting on it would be assumed that they thought to jogger asked for it?

    People make mistakes, some more culpable than others. It never hurts to minimize the chances that you will be harmed by other people’s mistakes and negligence. So – it is wise to wear bright colors if outside during hunting season, to wear reflective clothing if you walk on roads at night and to have your head lights on while driving during the day. All part of what you can do to protect yourself in an imperfect world.






Search